Score:   1
Docket Number:   SD-FL  0:18-cr-60278
Case Name:   USA v. Peterson et al
  Press Releases:
On March 1, 2019, two individuals, including a City of Fort Lauderdale Parks and Recreation Department employee, were sentenced by U.S. District Judge Beth Bloom in Miami.

Ariana Fajardo Orshan, United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, George L. Piro, Special Agent in Charge, Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Miami Field Office, and Rick Maglione, Chief, Fort Lauderdale Police Department (FLPD), made the announcement.

Phillip Richard Peterson, 42, of Coral Springs, Florida, pled guilty on December 19, 2018, to five counts of theft from a program receiving federal funds and conspiracy to commit wire fraud, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 666, 1343 and 1349.  Each theft count covers a single year, beginning in 2013 and running through 2017.  Peterson was sentenced to 15 months’ imprisonment on each count, to be served concurrently, and three years of supervised release after the termination of his prison term.  Peterson was also ordered to pay $119,982.69 in restitution to the City of Fort Lauderdale.  Gino Joseph Ferraro, age 49, of Fort Lauderdale, Florida, also pled guilty on December 19, 2018, to one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud.  He was sentenced to five years of probation, a $2,000 fine, and ordered to complete 200 hours of community service.  Ferraro was also ordered to pay $24,337 in restitution to the City of Fort Lauderdale.    

According to the court record, including the defendants’ admissions as part of their pleas, Peterson had been issued a credit card by the City of Fort Lauderdale in connection with his employment to allow him to make job related purchases, on behalf of the Department of Parks and Recreation.  Peterson admitted he would purchase items using his City of Fort Lauderdale credit card, and then sell the items to a local pawn store.  Each year, between 2013 and 2017, Peterson sold more than $5,000 worth of merchandise in this manner.   

Peterson and Ferraro were both sentenced on one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud. Both Peterson and Ferraro unjustly enriched themselves by charging the City of Fort Lauderdale Parks and Recreation Department for volleyball court repairs and other items that were not completed or provided.   Ferraro admitted that Peterson had paid him using his City issued credit card, and he would give Peterson approximately half of the amount that had been charged. 

U.S. Attorney Fajardo Orshan commended the investigative efforts of the FBI and FLPD in this matter.  This case was prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Cynthia R. Wood. 

Related court documents and information may be found on the website of the District Court for the Southern District of Florida at www.flsd.uscourts.gov or at http://pacer.flsd.uscourts.gov.

Two individuals, including a City of Fort Lauderdale Parks and Recreation Department employee, pled guilty yesterday before U.S. District Judge Beth Bloom in Miami.

Ariana Fajardo Orshan, U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, George L. Piro, Special Agent in Charge, Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Miami Field Office, and Rick Maglione, Chief, Fort Lauderdale Police Department (FLPD) made the announcement.

Phillip Richard Peterson, 42, of Coral Springs, Florida, pled guilty to six counts of an indictment, charging him with theft from a program receiving federal funds and conspiracy to commit wire fraud, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 666, 1343 and 1349 (18-CR-60278).  Each theft count of conviction covers a single year, beginning in 2013 and running through 2017.  Peterson faces a maximum statutory sentence of ten years in prison, for each theft count.  In addition, he faces a fine of up to $250,000. 

Co-defendant Gino Joseph Ferraro, age 49, of Fort Lauderdale, Florida, also pled guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud.    Both defendants face a maximum statutory sentence of twenty years in prison and a potential fine of up to $250,000, for the conspiracy conviction.

According to the court docket, including an agreed upon factual proffer, Peterson had been issued a credit card by the City of Fort Lauderdale in connection with his employment to allow him to make job related purchases, on behalf of the Department of Parks and Recreation.  Peterson purchased items using his City of Fort Lauderdale credit card, and then sold the items to a local pawn store.  Each year, between 2013 and 2017, Peterson sold more than $5,000 worth of merchandise in this manner. 

The court docket also indicates that Peterson and Ferraro unjustly enriched themselves by charging the City of Fort Lauderdale Parks and Recreation Department for volleyball court repairs and other items that were not completed or provided.   Ferraro admitted that Peterson had paid him using his City issued credit card, and he would give Peterson approximately half of the amount that had been charged. 

The defendants are scheduled to be sentenced by Judge Bloom on March 1, 2019.

U.S. Attorney Fajardo Orshan commended the investigative efforts of the FBI and FLPD in this matter.  This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Cynthia R. Wood. 

Related court documents and information may be found on the website of the District Court for the Southern District of Florida at www.flsd.uscourts.gov or at http://pacer.flsd.uscourts.gov.

Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1EQeml2E512P_AhqnthLCF3yqS5ASZmHAnr_elzb0Jho
  Last Updated: 2024-04-09 11:17:55 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the second highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE2
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE2
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the third highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE3
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE3
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the fourth highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE4
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE4
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
F U C K I N G P E D O S R E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E