Score:   1
Docket Number:   SD-CA  3:19-cr-02318
Case Name:   USA v. White
  Press Releases:
 Assistant U. S. Attorney Mark W. Pletcher (619) 546-9714

NEWS RELEASE SUMMARY – July 23, 2019

SAN DIEGO – Former U.S. Marine Bradley White pleaded guilty in federal court today to fraud charges, admitting that he participated in a scheme that bilked the military health care program known as TRICARE out of more than $65 million.

White, the sixth of eight defendants to plead guilty in the case so far, admitted as part of his guilty plea that he fraudulently recruited patients in return for a percentage of the amount TRICARE reimbursed for compounded medications that his sham patients ordered.  

White was charged on June 20, 2019, and entered his guilty plea to conspiracy to commit health care fraud before U.S. Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal. Sentencing is set for October 18, 2019 before U.S. District Judge Janis L. Sammartino. 

Compounded medications are specialty medications mixed by a pharmacist to meet the specific medical needs of an individual patient. Although compounded drugs are not approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), they are properly prescribed when a physician determines that an FDA-approved medication does not meet the health needs of a particular patient, such as if a patient requires a particular dosage or application or is allergic to a dye or other ingredient.

According to the guilty plea, a team of individuals, including White, worked to recruit and pay Marines, primarily from the San Diego area, and their dependents – all TRICARE beneficiaries – to obtain compounded medications that would be paid for by TRICARE.  This information was sent to Choice MD, the Tennessee medical clinic that employed Drs. Carl Lindblad and Suzy Vergot.  Drs. Lindblad and Vergot then wrote prescriptions for the TRICARE beneficiaries, despite never examining the patients in person. Once signed by the doctors, these prescriptions were not given to the beneficiaries, but sent directly to particular pharmacies controlled by co-conspirators, which filled the prescriptions and billed TRICARE at exorbitant prices. TRICARE then reimbursed the pharmacy, and which in turn paid kickbacks – as a percentage of the TRICARE reimbursement -- to the pyramid scheme of recruiters.

Both Dr. Lindblad and Dr. Vergot as well as Candace Craven, a nurse practitioner at Choice MD, have pleaded guilty for their roles in the conspiracy to commit health care fraud.  CFK, Inc., the corporate owner of one of the pharmacies, has also pleaded guilty as part of this investigation.   

Josh Morgan, another former Marine from San Diego, also pleaded guilty in March 2018 for his role in recruiting TRICARE beneficiaries to fraudulently receive these prescriptions.

According to court documents, between December 2014 and May 9, 2015 – the day that TRICARE stopped reimbursing for compounded medications – Drs. Lindblad and Vergot authorized 4,442 total prescriptions.  Over this time, their co-conspirators billed TRICARE $65,679,512 for these prescriptions. For his part, White admitted that he recruited patients who billed TRICARE over $7.6 million, for which he was paid over $195,000.

White was the eighth defendant charged in relation to this fraud scheme and the sixth to plead guilty. The two remaining defendants are Jimmy and Ashley Collins, owners of Choice MD. That case, 18CR0432-JLS, is still pending.

DEFENDANT                                               Case Number 19-CR-2318-JLS                                          

Bradley White                                                 Age: 31                       Oakley, CA

SUMMARY OF CHARGES

Conspiracy to Commit Health Care Fraud – Title 18, U.S.C § 1349

Maximum penalty: Ten years in prison and $250,000 fine or double loss amount

AGENCIES

Defense Criminal Investigative Service

Naval Criminal Investigative Service

IRS Criminal Investigation Division, Gulfport, MS

Federal Bureau of Investigation - Jackson, MS Field Office

Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1PtD_yoxu9DKJa6Mg_1ZSO0edQJ4txM01l9t3yezQ-XM
  Last Updated: 2024-04-12 23:57:19 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
F U C K I N G P E D O S R E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E