Score:   1
Docket Number:   SD-CA  3:19-cr-01787
Case Name:   USA v. Hernandez et al.
  Press Releases:
Assistant U.S. Attorneys Matthew J. Sutton (619) 546-8941 and Ryan A. Sausedo (619) 546-9689

NEWS RELEASE SUMMARY – May 21, 2019

SAN DIEGO – Indictments were unsealed today in San Diego federal court charging 43 members of a methamphetamine distribution network tied to the Sinaloa Cartel with federal drug trafficking and money laundering offenses.

During the coordinated takedown that began early this morning, investigators executed over a dozen search warrants and seized approximately 80 pounds of methamphetamine, four firearms, and more than $100,000 in U.S. currency. As of today at 5 p.m., 33 of the forty-three defendants are either in federal or state custody. Authorities are continuing to search for 10 defendants. Many of the defendants are scheduled to be arraigned before U.S. Magistrate Judge Linda Lopez at 10:30 a.m. tomorrow.

According to the indictments and other publicly filed court documents, this San Diego based network supplied multi-kilogram quantities of methamphetamine and gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB) to dozens of subdistributors located throughout the United States and the world, including California, Arizona, Oregon, Wyoming, Texas, Arkansas, Florida, Virginia, Washington, D.C., New Jersey, New York and the United Arab Emirates. In return, tens of thousands of dollars in narcotics proceeds were returned to the network’s leaders via shipments of bulk cash, structured cash deposits into bank accounts, and online money transfer systems like PayPal, Zelle, Venmo, and Cash App.

The defendants operated the drug-trafficking scheme by arranging for the shipment of large quantities of methamphetamine from San Diego to various locations in the United States and internationally, through FedEx and the United States Postal Service (USPS). The drug shipments were mailed weekly to various hotels, residences, and Airbnb locations. As part of the scheme, the defendants also created multiple fraudulent FedEx accounts. These fraudulent FedEx accounts were billed to and paid for by large corporations, in hopes that the large businesses would not notice the illicit packages.

Despite their sophisticated efforts, law enforcement penetrated this network with a variety of investigative techniques, including physical surveillance, obtaining phone records, financial documents tracking warrants on telephones and vehicles and undercover agents. Over the course of the investigation, agents obtained dozens of search warrants and a six-month-long federal wiretap to track the communications and the location of the defendants. In conjunction with the wiretaps, agents ultimately seized approximately 78 pounds of methamphetamine and four firearms tied to the network.

In addition to the indictments announced today, more than a dozen defendants who worked with this network have been charged in connection with this investigation in multiple jurisdictions across the United States, including by the U.S. Attorney’s Offices for the District of New Jersey, the Eastern District of Virginia, the Western District of Texas, and Eastern District of Arkansas, as well as the Florida Office of the Attorney General and the Yuma, Arizona County Attorney’s Office.

“Today we have completely dismantled this San Diego-based international drug trafficking network with ties to the Sinaloa Cartel,” said U.S. Attorney Robert Brewer. “I want to congratulate the outstanding federal, state, and local law enforcement cooperation that resulted in this highly successful investigation. Replicating this kind of aggressive law enforcement takedown is critical to breaking the backs of these criminal networks and continuing our efforts against the Sinaloa Cartel.”

“The Sinaloa Cartel relies on members of our communities to distribute their drugs.  Because they manipulate our commercial distribution routes to make a buck, our streets are flooded with high purity and low cost methamphetamine,” said DEA Special Agent in Charge Karen Flowers.  “Without their distribution networks, such as the one dismantled today, cartels would not be able to operate drug businesses that rival Fortune 500 companies and dangerous drugs, like methamphetamine, would be scarce, expensive and of low purity.  The operation today will ultimately disrupt the supply chain, diminish profits and make it harder for the Sinaloa Cartel to do business in the United States.  Just as important, today’s operation sends a message: If you’re profiting from drug addiction, you will be pursued relentlessly by DEA, regardless of your role in the distribution network.”

“As alleged, the defendants ran a sophisticated network of drug trafficking and money laundering,” said Johnathan Smith, IRS Assistant Special Agent in Charge of the Los Angeles Field Office.   “This case demonstrates our ability to identify and trace even the most sophisticated drug trafficking and money laundering organizations.  IRS – Criminal Investigation, in conjunction with our law enforcement partners, will remain committed to disrupting the flow of illicit drug proceeds and dismantling the most sophisticated drug and money laundering organizations.”

“There is no place for illegal drugs in our communities,” said Undersheriff Michael Barnett. “Drugs ruin the life of the user and destroy families. Those who push drugs into our neighborhoods and homes must be held accountable. This massive operation was uncovered because of a Sheriff's Detective and DEA Special Agent who followed up on information. Working together, the Sheriff's Department will continue to target those responsible for distributing and selling illegal drugs in our communities.”

U.S. Attorney Brewer also praised federal, state, and local law enforcement for the coordinated team effort in the culmination of this investigation. This case was led by the Drug Enforcement Administration’s Narcotics Task Force (NTF) and the Internal Revenue Service. The NTF is a DEA-led task force comprised of federal and local law enforcement from the DEA, San Diego County Sheriff’s Department (SDSD), the San Diego Police Department (SDPD), the Escondido Police Department (EPD), United States Border Patrol (USBP), and the San Diego County Probation Office. Agents and officers from the United States Marshals Service, the United States Postal Inspection Service, and the Federal Bureau of Prisons, also provided vital assistance for the investigation. Attorneys from the Department of Justice, Office of Enforcement Operations, Electronic Surveillance Unit, likewise provided critical work as part of the investigative team. He also thanked our vital foreign law enforcement partners in the United Arab Emirates – the Abu Dhabi Police.

This case is the result of the ongoing efforts by the Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Force (OCDETF) a partnership that brings together the combined expertise and unique abilities of federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies. The principal mission of the OCDETF program is to identify, disrupt, dismantle and prosecute high level members of drug trafficking, weapons trafficking and money laundering organizations and enterprises.

The United States is represented in court by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Matthew J. Sutton and Ryan A. Sausedo.

The public is reminded that an indictment is not evidence of guilt. The defendants are presumed innocent and entitled to a fair trial at which the government has the burden of proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. 

Defendant Information

 

Defendants                                                                                     Criminal Case No: 19-cr-1787-BAS



Defendant Number





Name





Age





Hometown





1





Ramon Anthony Hernandez





30





San Diego, CA





2





Tomas Teters





54





San Diego, CA





3





Natalya Soheli





27





San Diego, CA





4





Giorgio Jabsi





27





San Diego, CA





5





William Whitenack





45





Palm Springs, CA





6





Derrick Davidson





41





San Diego, CA





7





Chase Michael Berkman





33





San Diego, CA





8





Jose Rodriguez





40





Chula Vista, CA





9





Heath Sean Silvercloud





42





San Diego, CA





10





Keith Acker





29





San Diego, CA





11





*





41





San Diego, CA





12





*





47





Huntington Beach, CA





13





Christopher Halton





33





Palm Springs, CA





14





*Nicholas Ramirez





41





San Diego, CA





15





Jose Luis Magdaleno





28





San Diego, CA





16





*Corinna Vasquez





48





Oceanside, CA





17





Randall Bialek





57





San Diego, CA





18





*





47





San Diego, CA





19





Daniel Godoy





37





Cathedral City, CA





20





Paul Matthew Calzetta





50





Orlando, FL





21





Destin Banks





40





Orlando, FL





22





*Billie Jo Reynolds





40





Gillette, WY





23





Sean O’Brien





53





San Diego, CA





24





Mark Seymour





36





San Diego, CA





25





Christopher Groves





48





Miami, FL





26





*





45





Moreno Valley, CA





27





Javier Rivera





41





Chula Vista, CA





28





Carlos Velasco





42





Imperial Beach, CA





29





Christian Raggio





26





Imperial Beach, CA





30





Cody Parker





28





San Diego, CA





31





Ivan Torres





31





San Diego, CA





32





Arturo Julian Galvin





36





Columbus, OH





33





John Mark Tomsick





53





San Diego, CA





34





Maresha Morrow





32





San Diego, CA





35





Rene Reynoso





45





San Diego, CA





36





*





59





Escondido, CA





37





Kory Strohauer





33





San Diego, CA





38





*





47





San Diego, CA





39





Daniel Hensley





41





Spring Valley, CA





40





Ubaldo Perez





28





San Diego, CA





41





Peter Mohrmann





53





San Diego, CA





42





Robert Montell





57





San Diego, CA



*Fugitives

Summary of Charges

Conspiracy to Distribute Methamphetamine (21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846)

Conspiracy to Launder Monetary Instruments (18 U.S.C. §§ 1956(a)(1) and (h))

Distribution of Methamphetamine (21 U.S.C., § 841(a)(1))

Possession with Intent to Distribute Methamphetamine (21 U.S.C., § 841(a)(1))

Maximum Penalties: For the drug charges, term of custody including a mandatory minimum 10 years and up to life imprisonment, $10,000,000 fine and a lifetime of supervised release. For money laundering charges, term of custody up to 20 years’ imprisonment, a fine of $500,000 or twice the value of the monetary instrument or funds involved, and 3 years of supervised release.

Defendant                                                                                        Criminal Case No: 19-cr-1788-BAS



Defendant Number





Name





Age





Hometown





1





*





36





Vista, CA



Summary of Charges

Distribution of Methamphetamine (21 U.S.C., § 841(a)(1))

Maximum Penalties: A term of custody including a mandatory minimum 10 years and up to life imprisonment, a $10,000,000 fine and a lifetime of supervised release.

AGENCIES

Drug Enforcement Administration, Narcotics Task Force

Internal Revenue Service - Criminal Investigation

San Diego County Sheriff’s Department

United States Marshals Service

United States Postal Inspection Service

United States Border Patrol

Federal Bureau of Prisons

San Diego Police Department

Escondido Police Department

National City Police Department

San Diego County Probation Office

San Diego County District Attorney’s Office

Riverside County Sheriff's Department

Austin, Texas Police Department

Seminole County, Florida Sheriff’s Department

Department of Justice, Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Forces

Department of Justice, Office of Enforcement Operations

U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of New Jersey

U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Virginia

U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Western District of Texas

U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Arkansas

U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Central District of California

U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Middle District of Florida

U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida

U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Arizona

Florida Office of the Attorney General

Yuma, Arizona County Attorney’s Office

Abu Dhabi Police

CourtListener:
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15653428/united-states-v-hernandez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15653429/united-states-v-hernandez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15653430/united-states-v-hernandez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15653431/united-states-v-hernandez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15653432/united-states-v-hernandez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15653433/united-states-v-hernandez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15653434/united-states-v-hernandez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15653435/united-states-v-hernandez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15653436/united-states-v-hernandez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15653437/united-states-v-hernandez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15653438/united-states-v-hernandez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15653439/united-states-v-hernandez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15653440/united-states-v-hernandez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15653441/united-states-v-hernandez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15653442/united-states-v-hernandez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15653443/united-states-v-hernandez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15653444/united-states-v-hernandez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15653445/united-states-v-hernandez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15653446/united-states-v-hernandez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15653447/united-states-v-hernandez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15653448/united-states-v-hernandez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15653449/united-states-v-hernandez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15653450/united-states-v-hernandez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15653451/united-states-v-hernandez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15653452/united-states-v-hernandez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15653453/united-states-v-hernandez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15653454/united-states-v-hernandez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15653455/united-states-v-hernandez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15653456/united-states-v-hernandez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15653457/united-states-v-hernandez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15653458/united-states-v-hernandez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15653459/united-states-v-hernandez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15653460/united-states-v-hernandez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15653461/united-states-v-hernandez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15653462/united-states-v-hernandez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15653463/united-states-v-hernandez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15653464/united-states-v-hernandez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15653465/united-states-v-hernandez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15653466/united-states-v-hernandez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15653467/united-states-v-hernandez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15653468/united-states-v-hernandez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15653469/united-states-v-hernandez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15653428/united-states-v-hernandez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15653429/united-states-v-hernandez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15653430/united-states-v-hernandez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15653431/united-states-v-hernandez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15653432/united-states-v-hernandez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15653433/united-states-v-hernandez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15653434/united-states-v-hernandez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15653435/united-states-v-hernandez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15653436/united-states-v-hernandez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15653437/united-states-v-hernandez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15653438/united-states-v-hernandez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15653439/united-states-v-hernandez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15653440/united-states-v-hernandez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15653441/united-states-v-hernandez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15653442/united-states-v-hernandez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15653443/united-states-v-hernandez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15653444/united-states-v-hernandez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15653445/united-states-v-hernandez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15653446/united-states-v-hernandez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15653447/united-states-v-hernandez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15653448/united-states-v-hernandez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15653449/united-states-v-hernandez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15653450/united-states-v-hernandez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15653451/united-states-v-hernandez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15653452/united-states-v-hernandez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15653453/united-states-v-hernandez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15653454/united-states-v-hernandez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15653455/united-states-v-hernandez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15653456/united-states-v-hernandez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15653457/united-states-v-hernandez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15653458/united-states-v-hernandez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15653459/united-states-v-hernandez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15653460/united-states-v-hernandez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15653461/united-states-v-hernandez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15653462/united-states-v-hernandez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15653463/united-states-v-hernandez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15653464/united-states-v-hernandez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15653465/united-states-v-hernandez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15653466/united-states-v-hernandez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15653467/united-states-v-hernandez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15653468/united-states-v-hernandez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15653469/united-states-v-hernandez/
Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1khaNDbCrDPuXd9irbXklKyT75ISKM_v367xmS2b7XYs/edit#gid=0
  Last Updated: 2019-12-02 06:08:37 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the second highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE2
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE2
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the third highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE3
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE3
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
F U C K I N G P E D O S R E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E