Score:   1
Docket Number:   SD-CA  3:18-cr-03575
Case Name:   USA v. Enriquez
  Press Releases:
NEWS RELEASE SUMMARY – June 27, 2019

SAN DIEGO – Michael Enriquez was sentenced in federal court today for lying to the Federal Bureau of Investigation by falsely implicating a federal bankruptcy judge in prostitution, and further obstructing justice by fabricating emails and an electronic telephone contact to corroborate his lies.

U.S. District Judge Cynthia Bashant sentenced Enriquez to 27 months in prison, payment of a $50,000 fine and a $200 special assessment, and three years of supervised release, during which he must perform 250 hours of community service.  In sentencing Enriquez, Judge Bashant noted that his conduct “was a lot more sophisticated than someone who just told a lie” and was the type of obstruction scheme that “threatens the whole judicial system.”

“Attempts to extort a federal judge with malicious lies are a direct attack on the Rule of Law, and today’s sentence reflects that such depraved criminal activity will be punished harshly,” commented Robert S. Brewer, United States Attorney for the Southern District of California. 

Paul D. Delacourt, Assistant Director in Charge of the FBI’s Los Angeles Field Office, said, "Mr. Enriquez provided the FBI with false information about a sitting federal bankruptcy judge but, following a thorough investigation, the FBI determined the judge had not engaged in the alleged activity and that Mr. Enriquez had knowingly lied to the FBI on numerous occasions and obstructed justice.  The FBI will not tolerate those who attempt to undermine our judicial process for their own personal benefit.  In this case, the FBI's fact finding resulted in the exoneration of a wrongly accused judge and the prosecution of Mr. Enriquez."

As detailed in the public record, Enriquez concocted these lies in an effort to assist DB, a litigant/debtor in an involuntary bankruptcy proceeding involving corporate entities connected to filmmaking.  Apparently believing that the presiding bankruptcy judge favored his creditors, on multiple occasions, DB expressed to Enriquez a desire to disqualify the bankruptcy judge from the case.  To help DB turn the tide of the bankruptcy proceeding, Enriquez falsely told DB that he had personal knowledge that the bankruptcy judge had engaged in prostitution. To corroborate this account, Enriquez created fake email records of the bankruptcy judge requesting escort services from an online escort service.  Defendant also input the judge’s name and chamber’s telephone number into his phone contacts in an effort to corroborate that the judge was, in fact, a client of such services.  After creating this bogus paper trail, Enriquez forwarded the emails to DB, knowing that the false accusations and fake emails would likely be used to extort the bankruptcy judge or otherwise influence the bankruptcy proceedings.

In or about early 2013, the relationship between Enriquez and DB soured.  In an effort to seize some advantage from his duplicity, Enriquez identified DB’s creditors in the bankruptcy proceeding and arranged to meet two creditors, DM and PP, in New York City in February 2013.  Unbeknownst to DB, at this meeting, Enriquez told DM and PP that DB had obtained information that the bankruptcy judge had frequented prostitutes, and that DB intended to use that information to influence the outcome of the bankruptcy proceedings.  Enriquez did not tell DM and PP that he was the source of the information, that the information was bogus, or that he had fabricated the corroborating documents.

When PP suggested that he could help DM and PP by relaying his allegations to the FBI, Enriquez negotiated a $100,000 payment, which ultimately never materialized.  Thereafter, on or about April 25, 2013, May 17, 2013, and on multiple occasions until in or about July 2016, defendant knowingly and willfully made material false and fraudulent statements to the FBI falsely implicating the bankruptcy judge in prostitution, and provided the FBI with emails and an electronic telephone contact that he had fabricated to corroborate his story.

A multi-year investigation by the FBI ensued, focusing initially on the allegations of bribery, extortion, and the conduct of the bankruptcy judge.  Eventually, through painstaking effort, agents unearthed the truth:  For no discernible reason at all, through malicious lies and fabricated documents, Enriquez attacked the reputation of a respected federal bankruptcy judge.  U.S. Attorney Brewer commended the FBI agents for rigorously unraveling defendant’s lies and deception, and ultimately vindicating our judicial system.

DEFENDANT                                                Case Number 18CR3575-BAS                                

Michael Enriquez                                           Age: 55           San Antonio, TX

SUMMARY OF CHARGE

False Statements -- Title 18, U.S.C., Sec. 1001

Obstruction of Justice -- Title 18, U.S.C., Sec. 1519

AGENCY

Federal Bureau of Investigation

Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1-GhfJIqTd1IuCWEIE25g5rDbskHWntfrkek4BlX5kgc
  Last Updated: 2024-04-09 05:20:19 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the second highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE2
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE2
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
F U C K I N G P E D O S R E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E