Score:   1
Docket Number:   SD-CA  3:18-cr-01005
Case Name:   USA v. Delgado
  Press Releases:
Assistant U. S. Attorney Michael J. Heyman    

NEWS RELEASE SUMMARY – March 5, 2018

SAN DIEGO – U.S. Border Patrol Agent Ramon Delgado was indicted by a federal grand jury for making false statements during a pre-employment interview and in his application about his associations with known members of a drug trafficking organization.

According to the indictment unsealed today, federal officials began investigating allegations that Delgado associated with and aided a drug trafficking organization that smuggled methamphetamine, heroin and cocaine into the United States.  That drug trafficking organization included United States citizens and Mexican nationals, including two Mexican nationals with whom Delgado maintained a close and extensive relationship. The indictment alleges that Delgado lied about his relationships to these individuals in both his background investigation for federal employment and during an interview with federal agents.

Delgado made his first appearance in federal court today before U.S. Magistrate Judge Nita L. Stormes, who ordered Delgado to appear for a detention hearing on March 8, 2018.

“Any connections to drug traffickers is an obvious red flag, and concealing that connection is even more troubling,” said U.S. Attorney Adam Braverman. “U.S. Border Patrol Agents are trusted guardians of public safety and national security. We will go after any who fall short of this high standard, rare though it may be.”

“I was very disappointed to learn about these allegations when they surfaced,” said Chief Patrol Agent Rodney S. Scott.  “As with any allegation of misconduct, U.S. Border Patrol has supported the investigators throughout the investigative process and will continue to do so as this case now moves into the prosecution phase.  Integrity is a core value of all U.S. Border Patrol agents.  You simply cannot be an agent without it.  It is imperative to point out that while this is extremely disappointing, it is an anomaly.  The vast majority of U.S. Border Patrol agents carry out their duties every single day with integrity, vigilance, and honor.”

FBI Special Agent in Charge John A. Brown commented, “Keeping our border safe is a serious and complex task.  As part of this mission, the San Diego FBI Border Corruption Task Force, along with the Department of Homeland Security – Office of Inspector General, are determined to uphold the public’s confidence in our border security by ensuring the highest standard of those employees charged with protecting the American people at our nation's borders.”

According to the indictment, on October 23, 2015, Delgado submitted his responses to the standard background investigation questions required for federal agents.  One of those questions asked whether, in the prior seven years, Delgado had a close and continuing contact with any foreign nationals with whom he was bound by affection, influence, common interests and obligation.  Delgado stated that he had no such relationships when, in truth, he had a close and continuing relationship with two Mexican nationals who were members of a drug trafficking organization.

The indictment also alleges that on July 27, 2016, federal agents asked Delgado during an interview whether he knew the members of the drug trafficking organization and Delgado falsely claimed that he did not.

DEFENDANT                                               Case Number 18CR1005-LAB                               

Ramon Delgado                                              Age: 44                                   San Diego, CA

SUMMARY OF CHARGES

False Statements – 18 U.S.C. § 1001

Penalty:  5 years’ maximum imprisonment per count

AGENCIES

Federal Bureau of Investigation

Department of Homeland Security, Office of Inspector General

*The charges and allegations contained in an indictment are merely accusations, and the defendants are considered innocent unless and until proven guilty.

Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1J8dADgy53n0Kk-5MWth06ZbkweA3-ddQ-w9vpdFNoNI
  Last Updated: 2024-03-27 04:25:15 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the second highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE2
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE2
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
F U C K I N G P E D O S R E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E