Score:   1
Docket Number:   ND-OK  4:20-cr-00032
Case Name:   USA v. West
  Press Releases:
A Claremore man was sentenced today in federal court for distribution and receipt of child pornography and for possession of child pornography, announced U.S. Attorney Trent Shores.

U.S. District Judge Gregory K. Frizzell sentenced Daniel Nathan West, 48, to 78 months in federal prison, where he will receive sex offender treatment. Judge Frizzell further ordered West to pay $12,000 in restitution to victims depicted in the videos and identified by the  National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC). Following his prison sentence, West will spend seven years on supervised release and be required to register as a sex offender.

“The sexual exploitation of children is both despicable and criminal. Victims of child pornography are exploited time and again when explicit images of them are produced, shared, and viewed on the internet. This is why the work of investigators, prosecutors and the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children is so critical,” said U.S. Attorney Trent Shores. “We will never stop our duty to identify and recover victims of sexual abuse. And we will never stop pursuing criminals like Daniel West who exploit our children. We will bring them to justice for their heinous crimes.”

In his written plea agreement, West admitted that from May 17 through Dec. 17, 2019, he knowingly possessed, received and distributed child pornography using computer devices, social media applications and the internet. The files contained images of at least one prepubescent minor and a minor who had not attained 12 years of age. On his cell phone, investigators discovered 100 video files of child sexual abuse, including the rape of infants and bestiality.

West was remanded into the custody of the U.S. Marshals Service until transfer to a U.S. Bureau of Prisons facility.

The Tulsa Police Department and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s Homeland Security Investigations conducted the investigation. Assistant U.S. Attorneys Christopher Nassar and Ryan Heatherman prosecuted the case.

United States Attorney Trent Shores announced today the results of the February Federal Grand Jury A.

The following individuals have been charged with violations of United States law in indictments returned by the Grand Jury. The return of an indictment is a method of informing a defendant of alleged violations of federal law, which must be proven in a court of law beyond a reasonable doubt to overcome a defendant’s presumption of innocence.

Jennifer Louise Bruce. Theft of Mail by United States Postal Service Employee. Bruce, 43, of Jennings, is charged with theft of mail by a U.S. Postal Service employee. In her position as a sales and services associate in Bristow and Jennings, Bruce allegedly stole hydrocodone tablets from packages by VA Medical Centers and Outpatient Clinics on five different occasions. She is also alleged to have stolen $20 cash from a letter. The Office of the Inspector General of the U.S. Postal Service is the investigative agency.

Kevin Dewayne Burris. Failure to Register as a Sex Offender. Burris, 54, of Tulsa, is charged with failing to register as a sex offender. The U.S. Marshals Service and Tulsa Police Department are the investigative agencies.

Leslie Michelle Clark. Bank Fraud (Counts 1-29); Aggravated Identity Theft (Counts 30-58). Clark, 52, of Tulsa, is alleged to have knowingly executed a scheme to defraud a financial institution, and to obtain funds under the custody and control of the financial institution by means of false and fraudulent pretenses, that is, by causing checks to be paid from a company’s customer account to Alliance Consulting, a fictitious consulting firm, for fabricated services never rendered, Clark is further charged with 29 counts of aggravated identity theft for allegedly using another individual’s name and signature on the checks which were paid over to Alliance Consulting. The FBI is the investigative agency.

Pablo Gino Hernandez. Possession of Heroin With Intent to Distribute. Hernandez, 27, is charged with knowingly possessing with intent to distribute more than 100 grams or more of heroin. The Drug Enforcement Administration, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s Homeland Security Investigations and the Tulsa Police Department are the investigative agencies.

Calvin Johnson. Wire Fraud (Counts 1 and 2). Johnson, aka “Lakeshia Johnson” and “Keyshia Johnson”, 36, of Tulsa, is charged with two counts of wire fraud. Starting on approximately February 18, 2018, Johnson was employed in the Northern District of Oklahoma by a call center outsourcing company.  Through her employment with the company, Johnson allegedly performed call center services for a financial institution, answering calls from customers concerning suspicious activity on their accounts. During the calls, Johnson gained access to the customers’ account information, including account and routing numbers. Johnson, without the knowledge or consent of the financial institution or its customers, allegedly caused monies to be transferred from customer accounts to various business and financial institutions, such as Best Buy, Verizon Wireless, and several banks. It was part of the Scheme that Johnson used the nearly $20,000 in stolen monies for her own personal expenses. The wire communications were between servers located in the Northern District of Oklahoma and account servers in Fort Washington, Pennsylvania; Little Rock, Arkansas; and other financial institutions. The FBI is the investigative agency.

Victor Manuel Martinez-Luna. Possession of Methamphetamine With Intent to Distribute. Martinez-Luna, 35, unlawfully in the United States, is charged with knowingly possessing with the intent to distribute 50 grams or more of methamphetamine. The Drug Enforcement Administration and Tulsa Police Department are the investigative agencies.

Jeffrey Rahn Reetz. Felon in Possession of Firearms and Ammunition. Reetz, 65, of Claremore, is charged with being a felon in possession of a Mosin-Nagant bolt-action 7.62 caliber rifle; a Kimber .45 caliber pistol; a Beretta 9 mm pistol; a Springfield Arms bolt-action .30 caliber rifle; a Derringer .32 caliber pistol; a New Haven Mossberg 12 gauge shotgun; a Savage Arms .223 caliber rifle; an Olympic Arms 12 gauge shotgun; a Hopkins & Allen .22 caliber revolver; and 1,421 rounds of ammunition. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s Homeland Security Investigations is the investigative agency.

Jamal Rucker. Felon in Possession of a Firearm. Rucker, 30, of Tulsa, is charged with being a felon in possession of a Heritage Arms .38 caliber revolver The Tulsa Police Department and Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives are the investigative agencies.

Wesley Scott Stonebarger. Felon in Possession of Firearm and Ammunition; Drug Conspiracy (Methamphetamine); Possession of Methamphetamine With Intent to Distribute; Drug Conspiracy (Fentanyl); Possession of Fentanyl With Intent to Distribute; Carrying a Firearm During and in Relation to Drug Trafficking Crimes; Attempted Possession of Methamphetamine With Intent to Distribute (Count 7 and 8). Stonebarger, 36, of Tulsa, is charged with being a felon in possession of a Smith and Wesson .40-caliber semi-automatic pistol and associated ammunition. He is also charged with conspiring with others to possess with intent to distribute 500 grams or more of methamphetamine and to distribute 500 grams or more of the drug as early as October 2019. He is also charged with knowingly possessing with intent to distribute 50 grams or more of methamphetamine on Dec. 20, 2019. Stonebarger is also charged with conspiring with others to possess with intent to distribute fentanyl, and to distribute fentanyl. He is also charged with knowingly possessing with the intent to distribute fentanyl on Dec. 20, 2019. He is also charged with carrying a Smith and Wesson .40-caliber semi-automatic pistol during and relation to drug trafficking crimes. Finally, Stonebarger is charged with attempted possession of methamphetamine with intent to distribute (Counts 7 and 8). In Count 7, Stonebarger allegedly attempted to distribute and to possess with the intent to distribute 500 grams or more of methamphetamine contained in a U.S. Postal Service parcel. In Count 8, Stonebarger allegedly attempted to distribute and to possess with the intent to distribute 500 grams or more of methamphetamine contained in a second U.S. Postal Service parcel. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s Homeland Security Investigations, the U.S. Marshals Service, U.S. Postal Inspection Service; Tulsa County Sheriff’s Office and Wagoner County Sheriff’s Office are the investigative agencies.

Daniel Nathan West. Distribution and Receipt of Child Pornography; Possession of Child Pornography. From May 17, 2019, to Dec. 17, 2019, West, 47, of Claremore, is alleged to have knowingly distributed and received child pornography. He is also charged with knowingly possessing and accessing with intent to view one or more graphic image or video files of child pornography.  The production of the visual depictions involved the use of at least one prepubescent minor and a minor who had not attained 12 years of age engaging in sexually explicit conduct. The Tulsa Police Department and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s Homeland Security Investigations are the investigative agencies.

Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the second highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE2
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE2
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The number of days from the earlier of filing date or first appearance date to proceeding date
Format: N3

Description: The number of days from proceeding date to disposition date
Format: N3

Description: The number of days from disposition date to sentencing date
Format: N3

Description: The code of the district office where the case was terminated
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant at the time the case was closed
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense that carried the most severe disposition and penalty under which the defendant was disposed
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with TTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with TTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with TTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with TTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The code indicating the nature or type of disposition associated with TTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The number of months a defendant was sentenced to prison under TTITLE1
Format: N4

Description: A code indicating whether the prison sentence associated with TTITLE1 was concurrent or consecutive in relation to the other counts in the indictment or information or multiple counts of the same charge
Format: A4

Description: The number of months of probation imposed upon a defendant under TTITLE1
Format: N4

Description: A period of supervised release imposed upon a defendant under TTITLE1
Format: N3

Description: The fine imposed upon the defendant at sentencing under TTITLE1
Format: N8

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense under which the defendant was disposed that carried the second most severe disposition and penalty
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with TTITLE2
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with TTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with TTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with TTITLE2
Format: A3

Description: The code indicating the nature or type of disposition associated with TTITLE2
Format: N2

Description: The number of months a defendant was sentenced to prison under TTITLE2
Format: N4

Description: A code indicating whether the prison sentence associated with TTITLE2 was concurrent or consecutive in relation to the other counts in the indictment or information or multiple counts of the same charge
Format: A4

Description: The number of months of probation imposed upon a defendant under TTITLE2
Format: N4

Description: A period of supervised release imposed upon a defendant under TTITLE2
Format: N3

Description: The fine imposed upon the defendant at sentencing under TTITLE2
Format: N8

Description: The total prison time for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and prison time was imposed
Format: N4

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
F U C K I N G P E D O S R E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E