Score:   1
Docket Number:   ND-OH  5:18-cr-00340
Case Name:   United States of America v. McKnight
  Press Releases:
Six people were indicted in federal court for crimes related to child pornography or child exploitation.

Indicted are Jason Warner, 27, of Massillon; Austin Lloyd, 31, of Ravenna; Nicholas Snyder, 36, of Wooster; Andrew Pitts, 36, of Youngstown; Justin McKnight, 36, of North Canton, and Allen Bernhardt, 30, of Canton. Their cases are not otherwise related.

Warner was charged with transporting visual depictions of minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct. Warner in October 2016 used a computer to transport numerous computer files which contained visual depictions of real minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct, according to the indictment. 

Lloyd was charged with receiving, distributing and possessing visual depictions of minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct. He knowingly received and distributed numerous computer files between 2015 and 2018 which contained visual depictions of real minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct.  Lloyd possessed a cellular phone on June 7 which contained child pornography, according to the indictment.

Snyder was charged with receiving, distributing and possessing visual depictions of minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct. In June 2017, Snyder knowingly received and distributed numerous computer files which contained visual depictions of real minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct.  Snyder on July 18, 2017, also possessed a cellular phone which contained child pornography, according to the indictment.

Pitts was charged with enticement. The Indictment charges from around Feb. 25-26, 2018, Pitts did knowingly use facilities and means of interstate and foreign commerce, that is, a cell phone, to attempt to persuade, induce, entice and coerce an individual who had not attained the age of 18 years, that is, a 12-year-old boy to engage in illegal sexual activity with him, according to the indictment.

McKnight was charged with receiving, distributing and possessing visual depictions of minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct. The Indictment charges that from Jan. through March 30, 2018, McKnight knowingly received and distributed numerous computer files which contained visual depictions of real minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct. The indictment also charges that on or about April 24, 2018, Richards possessed a Samsung cellphone and an HP Blue laptop computer that contained child pornography.

Bernhardt was charged with receiving, distributing and possessing visual depictions of minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct. The Indictment charges from Dec. 29, 2017 through March 22, 2018, Bernhardt knowingly received and distributed numerous computer files which  contained visual depictions of real minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct. The indictment also charges that on or about March 23, 2018, Bernhardt possessed a Motorola Droid cell phone that contained child pornography.

If convicted, the defendant’s sentence will be determined by the Court after review of factors unique to this case, including the defendant’s prior criminal record, if any, the defendant's role in the offense and the characteristics of the violation.  In all cases the sentence will not exceed the statutory maximum and in most cases it will be less than the maximum.

The cases are being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Michael A. Sullivan and Carole Skutnik following investigations by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Ohio Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force, Ohio Bureau of Criminal Investigation and the Mahoning Valley Human Trafficking Task Force

An indictment is only a charge and is not evidence of guilt.  A defendant is entitled to a fair trial in which it will be the government’s burden to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1BeRU_zyh6s7Fwg5SThRPusT7KOcm95tELNnkGdMOdQ4
  Last Updated: 2024-03-25 20:35:18 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the second highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE2
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE2
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
Date of Announcement: Jun 28, 2018
Arrest Start Date: Jun 01, 2018
Arrest End Date: June 2018
Photo: N
Arrested: 1
Rescued: Unknown
Country: US
State: OH
Arresting Agencies Involved: 4
Comments: Project Safe Childhood-CP distribution & related charges
Additional data courtesy @ArrestAnon 👼  
F U C K I N G P E D O S R E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E