Score:   1
Docket Number:   ND-IL  1:18-cr-00356
Case Name:   USA v. Rak et al
  Press Releases:
CHICAGO — More than 50 individuals, including an alleged Mexico-based drug trafficker and a Wisconsin-based courier, are facing criminal charges as part of a joint federal and state investigation into heroin and fentanyl sales in Chicago.

The investigation, dubbed “Operation Full Circle,” centered on drug sales on the city’s West Side, and resulted in the seizure of more than two kilograms of heroin, a kilogram of fentanyl, and 300 pounds of marijuana.  Authorities also seized 17 illegal firearms, including three rifles, and approximately $8,000 in narcotics proceeds.

One of the defendants offered to kidnap a man who allegedly owed a debt to Mexico-based narcotics traffickers in exchange for cash and drugs.  The defendant was arrested and a search of his vehicle revealed two firearms, steel chains and duct tape.  Two other defendants engaged in a handgun-for-heroin transaction in December of last year, according to the federal charges.

The probe was conducted under the umbrella of the Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Force (OCDETF), in cooperation with the Chicago High Intensity Drug Trafficking Task Force (HIDTA).  OCDETF is a partnership between federal, state and local law enforcement agencies, whose principal mission is to identify, disrupt and dismantle the most serious drug trafficking organizations.

Criminal complaints and affidavits filed in U.S. District Court in Chicago charge seven defendants with various drug offenses, and two defendants with firearm offenses.  Several of the federal defendants were arrested Tuesday.  Detention hearings for some of the federal defendants will be held on June 22, 2018, before U.S. Magistrate Judge Daniel G. Martin. 

Forty-eight other defendants were charged in state complaints, and many of them were also arrested Tuesday.  They have begun making initial appearances in Cook County Criminal Court.

The charges were announced by John R. Lausch, Jr., United States Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois; Brian McKnight, Special Agent-in-Charge of the Chicago Field Division of the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration; Celinez Nunez, Special Agent-in-Charge of the Chicago Field Division of the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives; Nicholas Roti, Director of HIDTA; Kimberly M. Foxx, Cook County State’s Attorney; Eddie Johnson, Superintendent of the Chicago Police Department; and Gabriel L. Grchan, Special Agent-in-Charge of the IRS Criminal Investigation Division in Chicago.  Substantial assistance was provided by HIDTA DEA Group 43, the U.S. Marshals Service, and the U.S. Postal Inspection Service in Chicago.  Assistant U.S. Attorneys John Mitchell and Grayson Walker are representing the government.

According to the federal complaints, KRZYSZTOF RAK, 60, operates a drug trafficking organization in Mexico, and works with CHRISTOPHER J. DOSS, 47, of Racine, Wisc., to distribute wholesale quantities of fentanyl to customers in the Chicago area.  DONALD HOLMES, SR., 56, of Chicago, and IVAN WALTON, 45, of Lynwood, participated in the organization by regularly distributing Rak’s narcotics in the Chicago area and collecting payment from customers, according to the charges.  The federal complaints describe a meeting earlier this year between Doss and Walton in a restaurant parking lot in south suburban Matteson.  During the meeting, Doss supplied Walton with more than 880 grams of fentanyl, the charges allege.  Law enforcement conducted surveillance of the transaction after securing court authorization to wiretap certain telephones.

In another narcotics transaction described in the federal complaints, NAKIA MCCLINIC, 43, of Chicago, attempted to deliver heroin and fentanyl to an individual who had received the drug order from DESHAWN MOORE, 24, of Bellwood.  Law enforcement was watching when McClinic arrived at the meeting in a parking lot near the University of Illinois at Chicago, the complaints state.  Officers attempted to pull over McClinic’s vehicle but he sped off, tossing the drugs out of the driver’s side window, the charges allege.  McClinic’s vehicle was successfully stopped a short while later, and the narcotics were recovered nearby.

The kidnapping plot involved TEKOA Q. TINCH, 30, of Bloomington, Ill., who allegedly agreed to carry out the kidnapping in exchange for drugs and a split of any money recovered from the victim.  Last month, Tinch met with an undercover law enforcement officer, who was posing as a representative of the Mexico-based group, in a grocery store parking lot in the Little Village neighborhood of Chicago, the complaints state.  During the meeting, Tinch accepted a sham kilogram of cocaine as a purported down payment on the kidnapping, the complaints state.  Tinch was then arrested and his car was searched, revealing the guns, duct tape and chains, the charges allege.

The public is reminded that a complaint contains only charges and is not evidence of guilt.  The defendants are presumed innocent and are entitled to a fair trial at which the government has the burden of proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.  If convicted, the Court must impose reasonable sentences under federal sentencing statutes and the advisory United States Sentencing Guidelines.

Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1NwTqRHlx8KzpphDW5h3AB9I9bL_XJGPIi30E6b9NpLo
  Last Updated: 2024-04-08 21:04:58 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the second highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE2
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE2
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the third highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE3
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE3
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
F U C K I N G P E D O S R E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E