Score:   1
Docket Number:   ND-AL  6:18-cr-00435
Case Name:   USA v. Marks
  Press Releases:
BIRMINGHAM – Federal prosecutors today charged the vice president of sales for Northside Pharmacy, a Haleyville, Ala.-based compounding pharmacy doing business as Global Compounding Pharmacy, with participating in a conspiracy to generate prescriptions and defraud health care insurers and prescription drug administrators out of tens of millions of dollars.  

U.S. Attorney Jay E. Town, FBI Special Agent in Charge Johnnie Sharp Jr., U.S. Postal Inspector in Charge Adrian Gonzalez, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General, Special Agent in Charge Derrick L. Jackson, Defense Criminal Investigative Service Special Agent in Charge John F. Khin, and Internal Revenue Service Criminal Investigation Special Agent in Charge Thomas J. Holloman announced the charges.

The U.S. Attorney’s Office filed a 13-count information in U.S. District Court charging PHILLIP NATHAN MARKS, 49, of Winter Park, Fla., with conspiring between November 2014 and June 2016 to defraud multiple insurance plans including Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Medicare, and TRICARE, as well as their prescription drug administrators. The information also charges Marks with 12 counts of health care fraud for submitting fraudulent prescription claims to these entities. Prosecutors also filed a plea agreement with Marks.

“Global Compounding stole from insurance programs, including Medicare and TRICARE, by using a marketing scheme that increased the sales of expensive medications without regard for patient need or medical necessity,” Town said. “Schemes like this drive up health care costs for everyone. The U.S. Attorney’s Office and our law enforcement partners are committed to prosecuting everyone who sought personal enrichment by participating in this pharmacy’s health care fraud.”

 The charges stem from a larger investigation that already has resulted in guilty pleas from 13 individuals. Along with Marks, prosecutors also filed charges today against another Global sales representative, bringing to 15 the number of defendants in the case. The U.S. Attorney’s Office charged JODY HOBBS, 45, of Santa Rosa Beach, Fla., in a three-count information alleging conspiracy and health care fraud. Prosecutors also filed an associated plea agreement with Hobbs.

According to the court documents, Global, which described itself as “one of the top three largest compounding pharmacies in the United States,” primarily shipped compounded and other drugs from its Haleyville facility, but did most of its prescription processing, billing and customer service at its “call center” in Clearwater, Fla. The company hired sales representatives who were located in various states and were responsible for generating prescriptions from physicians and other prescribers.

The court documents describe a multi-faceted scheme that focused on obtaining and billing for high-dollar fraudulent prescriptions. In the scheme, Global would identify high-dollar drugs and instruct employees to obtain medically unnecessary prescriptions for themselves and family members. Global incentivized prescribers to issue these fraudulent prescriptions by hiring and paying their family members as sales representatives, and by directing sales representatives to work at practitioners’ offices to have better access to patients and their files. Global employees obtained prescriptions in various other fraudulent ways, including forging prescriptions. Global maximized proceeds on these fraudulent prescriptions by altering them to add or substitute drugs and automatically refilling and billing for them, regardless of patient need. It also routinely waived co-pays to encourage patients to accept unnecessary medications and refills. When insurance plans and their prescription drug managers attempted to police Global’s conduct, Global provided false and misleading information to them, and began billing through affiliate pharmacies. Court filings in Marks’ case note that two such affiliate pharmacies were The Prescription Shop in Haleyville and Tropic Pharmacy in Boca Raton, Fla.

According to the court documents, as vice president of sales, Marks routinely directed sales representatives to obtain medically unnecessary prescriptions for themselves and family members. One such drug was Silapak, which Global itself advertised as “not indicated for children.” Global employees nonetheless submitted Silapak prescriptions for children, some as young as two years old, which Global dispensed and billed. Nine of the health care fraud charges against Marks include multiple counts of fraudulent Silapak prescription billings for children of Global employees.

According to court documents, Global hired Hobbs as a sales representative because he had high-reimbursing health insurance from his other employer. Global billed for multiple medically unnecessary drugs for Hobbs, including a tube of wound care cream that cost $30,812. 

The 13 individuals previously charged and who have pleaded guilty are Global Operations Manager Jeffrey South, District Manager Angie Nelson, National Field Trainer and sales representative Bridget McCune, and sales representatives Roddrick Boykin, Joshylyn Bowen, Vanessa Case, Peter Eodice II, Robin Lowry, Kelley Norris and Dawn Whitten, and billers Fermin Alfonso, Stacey Cardozo, and Christopher Nunez.

The maximum punishment for the conspiracy charge is five years in prison and a $250,000 fine. The maximum penalty for health care fraud is 10 years in prison and a $250,000 fine.

FBI, USPIS, HHS-OIG, DCIS and IRS-CI investigated the cases, which Assistant U.S. Attorneys Chinelo Dike-Minor, Don Long, and Nicole Grosnoff are prosecuting.

 

An information or indictment contains only charges. Defendants are presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.

 

Marks Philip Information

Marks Phillip Plea Agreement

Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the second highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE2
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE2
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
F U C K I N G P E D O S R E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E