Score:   1
Docket Number:   ED-PA  2:19-cr-00373
Case Name:   USA v. HANNIGAN
  Press Releases:
PHILADELPHIA – United States Attorney William M. McSwain announced that Myles Hannigan, 48, of Newtown Square, PA was sentenced to 52 months’ incarceration, one year supervised release, and ordered to pay $3,270,566 in restitution by United States District Judge Chad F. Kenney for filing false tax information with the Internal Revenue Service on behalf of his clients. At the conclusion of today’s sentencing hearing, Mr. Hannigan was immediately taken into custody and sent to federal prison.

The defendant pleaded guilty in July 2019 to obstructing the due administration of the IRS and seventeen counts of preparing materially false income tax returns, in connection with owning and operating Payroll Professionals, Incorporated (“PPI”) located in Media, Pennsylvania. PPI is a third-party payroll processor, which assists its clients by issuing payroll checks and forwarding tax payments to federal, state, and local authorities. PPI’s clients were small- to medium-sized businesses, and the clients relied on Hannigan to prepare and file tax Form 941, among others, with the IRS. Form 941 details employee wages that were paid by a company, and payroll tax withheld and paid to the IRS based on those wages. 

Beginning in January 2012 and continuing up to December 2016, Hannigan prepared and submitted Forms 941 that falsely reported information to the IRS. In particular, Hannigan reported depositing more money to pay tax debt than he had actually sent to the IRS, causing 35 of PPI’s client companies (who are considered victims in this case) to collectively underpay the IRS $3,270,566.89 for those tax years. These victims/companies gave Hannigan access to all necessary funds to pay the full tax debt, but Hannigan failed to do so. Hannigan hid his behavior from these victims/companies by presenting bogus documents that purported to be confirmation of payments he had made to the IRS on their behalf, and by re-directing IRS correspondence to his business address.

“This defendant – an accountant whose business it was to handle payroll taxes – committed fraud and stole from clients and the United States government,” said U.S. Attorney McSwain. “He also stole from the pockets of all taxpayers who do the right thing every year by paying their taxes. As we enter tax season this year, let this sentence serve as a warning to anyone who might be considering trying to get away with cheating the IRS: don’t do it – because it will not end well.”

“As the third-party payroll processor, Mr. Hannigan’s clients trusted him to prepare accurate employment tax returns and remit their payroll taxes to the IRS. Instead, he prepared fraudulent employment tax returns, lied to his clients and failed to remit their payroll taxes,” stated John R. Tafur, Special Agent in Charge, IRS Criminal Investigation, Newark Field Office. “Today’s sentencing holds Mr. Hannigan accountable for his crimes and shows how serious IRS Criminal Investigation is about pursuing individuals who intentionally cheat not only their clients but the entire taxpaying public.”

The case was investigated by the IRS and the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration, and is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Jason Bologna.

PHILADELPHIA – United States Attorney William M. McSwain announced that Myles Hannigan, 48, of Newtown Square, Pennsylvania, was charged by Information with one count of obstructing the due administration of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), and seventeen counts of preparing materially false income tax returns.

Hannigan owned and operated Payroll Professionals, Incorporated (“PPI”), which operated out of Media, Pennsylvania.  PPI is a third-party payroll processor that assists its clients by issuing payroll checks and forwarding tax payments to federal, state, and local authorities.  PPI’s clients were small to medium-sized businesses, and the clients relied on Hannigan to prepare and file Form 941 with the IRS.  Form 941 details employee wages that were paid by a company and income tax withheld and paid to the IRS based on those wages. 

Beginning in January 2012 and continuing up to December 2016, Hannigan allegedly prepared and submitted Form 941s that falsely reported information to the IRS.  In particular, Hannigan reported depositing more money to pay tax debt than he actually had sent to the IRS, causing 35 of PPI’s client companies (who are considered victims in this case) to collectively underpay the IRS $3,270,566.89 for those tax years.  These victims/companies gave Hannigan access to all necessary funds to pay the full tax debt, but Hannigan allegedly failed to do so.  Hannigan hid his behavior from these victims/companies by presenting bogus documents that purported to be confirmation of payments of taxes he had made to the IRS on their behalf, and by re-directing IRS correspondence to his business address.  In essence, Hannigan is alleged to have operated a “Ponzi scheme” of borrowing from one client’s money to pay the debts of another, which collapsed when the interest and penalties owed to the IRS (which he was hiding from clients) became too big to hide.

“As alleged in the Information, this defendant – an accountant in business to handle payroll taxes – committed fraud and stole from clients and the United States government,” said U.S. Attorney McSwain.  “He also stole from the pockets of all taxpayers who do the right thing by paying their taxes.  It will continue to be a priority of my Office to bring tax cheats to justice and thereby protect honest taxpayers.”

If convicted, the defendant faces a maximum possible sentence of up to 54 years in prison, one year of supervised release, a fine of up to $1,805,000, and a special assessment of $1,800.

The case was investigated by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), and the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA), and is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Jason P. Bologna.

An indictment, information, or criminal complaint is an accusation. A defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.

Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13DcA-absu4p3xFd35K1WEKYBWAorkac_Kn4C4bEqcXM
  Last Updated: 2024-04-12 10:26:44 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the second highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE2
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE2
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
F U C K I N G P E D O S R E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E