Score:   1
Docket Number:   ED-PA  2:18-cr-00306
Case Name:   USA v. SMITH
  Press Releases:
PHILADELPHIA – U.S. Attorney William M. McSwain announced that Eugene Smith, 45, of Lithonia, GA was sentenced today to 51 months imprisonment after being convicted of conspiracy to commit wire fraud, wire fraud, conspiracy to traffic in counterfeit goods, and trafficking in counterfeit goods, arising from Smith’s leadership role in the production and sale of counterfeit tickets to sporting events, including the National Football League’s Super Bowl LI (51) in Houston (between the Patriots and the Falcons) and Super Bowl LII (52) in Minneapolis (between the Eagles and the Patriots), a National Basketball Association All-Star game, National Collegiate Athletic Association Championship football and basketball games, and other sporting events and concerts. The counterfeit tickets bore the authentic trademarks of the respective organization or agency that was registered with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Smith sold the counterfeit tickets at the various venues and also distributed the counterfeit tickets to other sellers nationwide for resale to victims.

Smith targeted events and victims based on profitability – the bigger the event, the bigger the payoff. The scheme involved several steps and multiple players: after determining which events would draw the most profit, Smith provided a real ticket to the event to his printer for use in the production of multiple tickets for the event.  Smith would then travel to venues to sell the counterfeit tickets or he provided the counterfeit tickets to other sellers to resell to unwitting fans. This scheme involved sophisticated printing that mimicked the authentic tickets’ markings and hologram.  

At Smith’s sentencing hearing, Eric Ferguson, who was also charged with the same offenses, testified that he was recruited by Smith to produce the counterfeit tickets for the sporting events and concerts. The government presented evidence that the face value of the counterfeit tickets printed by Ferguson was at least $170,000, but the government estimated that the actual resale value of the tickets, particularly the Super Bowl tickets, far exceeded their face value.

“This case isn’t just about taking advantage of sports fans’ willingness to spend their hard-earned dollars to enjoy a game; this is about ensuring that consumers of all types can trust that when they spend their money, they are getting the authentic product for which they paid,” said U.S. Attorney McSwain.  “Smith is nothing more than a con-artist and thief, and I’m grateful that the judge saw it that way and gave him a sentence that ensures justice for his victims.”

The case was investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorneys Joan E. Burnes and Anita Eve.

ATLANTA, GEORGIA – United States Attorney William M. McSwain announced six separate indictments charging 13 individuals with a multitude of crimes, including conspiracy to traffic in counterfeit goods, trafficking in counterfeit goods, conspiracy to commit wire fraud, wire fraud, and aiding and abetting.  U.S. Attorney McSwain announced the charges at the NFL’s annual anti-counterfeit merchandise press conference event held in connection with Super Bowl LIII.

The indictments filed in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and announced today all relate to the production, distribution, and sale of counterfeit tickets to sporting and concert events.  This criminal behavior spanned several states and targeted multiple marquee sporting events, including Super Bowl LI, in Houston, Texas, and Super Bowl LII, in Minneapolis, Minnesota.  The details of each indictment, including the individuals charged and the sporting events that were targeted, are described more fully below.  The individual defendants face a range of penalties, largely depending on the amount of financial loss attributable to each.

Case No. 2:18-cr-00306 (RBS) (Smith) and Case No. 2:18-cr-00596 (RBS) (Ferguson) 

Eugene Smith, 45, of Lithonia, Georgia, and Eric Ferguson, 50, of Riverdale, Georgia, were both charged by indictment with conspiracy to commit wire fraud; wire fraud; conspiracy to traffic in counterfeit goods; and trafficking in counterfeit goods.  The indictments allege that Smith purchased real tickets to sporting events and concerts, provided them to his associate, Ferguson, who then printed counterfeit tickets for resale.  The indictments further allege that the counterfeit tickets were distributed to a network of individuals who would advertise and sell the counterfeit tickets to unsuspecting fans.  The indictments allege that from December 2016 to April 2018, the defendants conspired to traffic in counterfeit tickets for various sporting events, including Super Bowl LI; Super Bowl LII; a College Football Playoff game played in Tampa, Florida; and the Army-Navy Game played in Philadelphia.

Smith has pleaded guilty to all counts in the indictment and awaits sentencing.  Ferguson has pleaded not guilty and is awaiting trial, currently scheduled for February 11, 2019. 

Case No. 2:19-cr-00053 (RBS) (Williams et al.)

Sean Williams, 48, Damon Daniels, 48, Rahiem Watts, 30, Jermaine Jones, 41, all of New York, New York, and Rakee Russ, 40, of Philadelphia, are charged in a single indictment with conspiracy to commit wire fraud; wire fraud; conspiracy to traffic in counterfeit goods; and trafficking in counterfeit goods.  The indictment alleges a similar pattern of behavior: defendants Daniels and Watts created counterfeit tickets to various sporting events and worked with others, including their indicted co-defendants, to advertise and sell the tickets to unsuspecting victims.  It further alleges that that defendants conspired together to produce and sell counterfeit tickets to several sporting and concert events, including Super Bowl LI; an NCAA men’s college basketball game (Villanova University–University of Virginia) played in Philadelphia; an ACC men’s basketball tournament game played in New York City; and a FIFA World Cup qualifier soccer match between the United States and Costa Rica, played in Philadelphia.

Case No. 2:19-cr-0054 (RBS) (Warren and Higginbottom)

Khiale Warren, 52, and Rodney Higginbottom, 51, both of Philadelphia, are charged in a single indictment with trafficking in counterfeit tickets and wire fraud.  The indictment alleges that these defendants advertised through a third-party website and sold counterfeit tickets to several events, including the 1916-2016 Copa America Centenario soccer game played in Philadelphia; a Philadelphia Eagles–Minnesota Vikings NFL football game played in Philadelphia; an NCAA Football National Championship game played in Atlanta, Georgia; and a Phish concert in Philadelphia, in June 2018. 

Case No. 2:19-cr-0055 (RBS) (Tucker et al.)

Mustafa Tucker, 36, Malik Brown, 38, Kevin Sadat, 41, all of Philadelphia, are charged in a single indictment with conspiracy to commit wire fraud; wire fraud; conspiracy to traffic in counterfeit goods; and trafficking in counterfeit goods.  This indictment alleges that the defendants obtained copies of Ferguson-printed counterfeit tickets from Smith, advertised counterfeit tickets online, and sold tickets to unsuspecting victims. The indictment alleges the defendants conspired with Smith, Ferguson, and others to traffic in counterfeit tickets to Super Bowl LI and the NBA All-Star Game played in New Orleans, Louisiana.  It further alleges that Brown trafficked in counterfeit goods by selling tickets to the following events: a Phish concert  held in Philadelphia in June 2018, the 1916-2016 Copa America Centenario soccer game played in Philadelphia, and a Philadelphia Eagles-Atlanta Falcons game in Philadelphia, on September 8, 2018.

Case No. 2:19-cr-0056 (RBS) (Dunmore)

Edward Dunmore, 61, of Philadelphia, was charged with two counts of trafficking in counterfeit goods.  The indictment alleges that on two occasions, Dunmore sold tickets to a Phish concert in Philadelphia, in June 2018.

“Criminal counterfeiting and piracy are serious crimes,” said U.S. Attorney McSwain.  “When fans spend their hard-earned money on tickets and merchandise, they deserve the real deal.  These defendants repeatedly targeted events based on profitability and perpetrated a fraud on unsuspecting fans.  These indictments send a clear message that phony ticket sales are a federal case – one that we will pursue to the fullest extent of the law.”

“This case grew out of the public safety partnership between FBI Philadelphia's special events program, the NFL, and the Philadelphia Eagles,” said Michael T. Harpster, Special Agent in Charge of the FBI's Philadelphia Division.  “But as the scope of the investigation expanded nationwide, it truly became a collaboration, and for that I'd like to thank all of our law enforcement partners.  There were no less than 30 local, state, and federal law enforcement agencies and 23 FBI field offices that directly contributed on this case, allowing us to achieve our ultimate goal of protecting the ticket-buying public.”

The case was investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Philadelphia Police Department, New York Police Department, with assistance from the United States Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of Georgia, the Pennsylvania Attorney General’s Office, the New York District Attorney’s Office, and multiple local law enforcement authorities, including the Duluth, Georgia Police Department.  The case is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorneys Joan Burnes and Anita Eve.

An indictment, information, or criminal complaint is an accusation. A defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.

Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/15rC7hvyu3xIG3_Eh8ViLqQK85lih-5_7zeBl5egGjN4
  Last Updated: 2024-04-02 01:58:03 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: Case type associated with a magistrate case if the current case was merged from a magistrate case
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The docket number originally given to a case assigned to a magistrate judge and subsequently merged into a criminal case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a magistrate case
Format: A3

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the second highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE2
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE2
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the third highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE3
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE3
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the fourth highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE4
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE4
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
Magistrate Docket Number:   ED-PA  2:18-mj-00705
Case Name:   USA v. SMITH
Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Kab2KD3JHUJMiElsJPhjnh7hKsyF5RTs0eHgl7ZHMcs
  Last Updated: 2024-04-02 01:47:49 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: Case type associated with a magistrate case if the current case was merged from a magistrate case
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The docket number originally given to a case assigned to a magistrate judge and subsequently merged into a criminal case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a magistrate case
Format: A3

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the second highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE2
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE2
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the third highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE3
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE3
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the fourth highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE4
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE4
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
F U C K I N G P E D O S R E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E