Score:   1
Docket Number:   ED-NY  1:20-cr-00363
Case Name:   USA v. Sargeant Marine Inc.
  Press Releases:
Earlier today, in federal court in Brooklyn, Sargeant Marine Inc., an asphalt company incorporated and formerly headquartered in Boca Raton, Florida, pleaded guilty and agreed to pay $16.6 million to resolve foreign bribery charges stemming from conduct by the company and its employees and agents in Brazil, Venezuela and Ecuador.  In each one of the countries, the company paid bribes to government officials to obtain contracts to purchase or sell asphalt to the countries’ state-owned companies in violation of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA).   Today’s proceedings took place by video before the United States District Judge Eric N. Vitaliano.  Previously, a corporate executive for Sargeant Marine, Daniel Sargeant; two Sargeant Marine traders who were active in Brazil, Venezuela and Ecuador, Roberto Finocchi and Jose Tomas Meneses; an agent and a consultant who acted as bribe intermediaries in Brazil and Venezuela, Luiz Eduardo Andrade and David Diaz; and a former Venezuelan government official, Hector Nunez Troyano, who received some of the bribes, pled guilty.  In addition, on September 10, 2020, a criminal complaint was unsealed in federal court in Brooklyn charging another former Venezuelan official with conspiracy to commit money laundering, in part for his alleged role in the Sargeant Marine Venezuela scheme.

Seth D. DuCharme, Acting United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York, Brian C. Rabbitt, Acting Assistant Attorney General of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division, and Calvin A. Shivers, Assistant Director, Federal Bureau of Investigtion, Criminal Investigative Division (FBI), announced the guilty pleas and resolution.

“Today’s resolution is the result of a multi-year, multi-national, collaborative effort to root out corruption perpetrated by an American company in three countries,” stated Acting U.S. Attorney DuCharme.  “We will continue to investigate and prosecute any company that corrupts foreign government officials in order to gain a competitive edge, as well as any of their executives and employees who participate in those efforts.”

“With today’s guilty plea, Sargeant Marine has admitted to engaging in a long-running pattern of paying bribes to corrupt officials in three South American countries to obtain lucrative business,” stated Acting Assistant Attorney General Rabbitt.  “Today’s resolution, together with charges the department has brought against individuals involved in Sargeant Marine’s illegal schemes, demonstrates the department’s continuing commitment to holding companies and their executives responsible for international corruption.” 

“The FBI is dedicated to rooting corruption out of our market, keeping the United States fair for vendors and consumers alike," stated FBI Assistant Director Shivers.  “Sargeant Marine, Inc. attempted to get ahead of competitors by paying bribes to foreign officials in violation of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.  As today's guilty pleas demonstrate, the FBI will relentlessly investigate those attempting to cheat the market, and we will bring them to justice.”

According to the Statement of Facts stipulated to by Sargeant Marine in connection with its guilty plea and other court documents, between approximately 2010 and 2018, Sargeant Marine, through its employees and agents, conspired to pay bribes to foreign officials in Brazil, Venezuela and Ecuador to secure lucrative contracts.  As a result of these bribes, Sargeant Marine and its affiliated companies earned profits of over $38 million.  

In Brazil, Sargeant Marine and its related companies bribed officials at the state-owned oil company, Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras (Petrobras), to obtain contracts to sell asphalt to Petrobras.  From approximately 2010 to 2015, Sargeant Marine and its affiliates, through its employees and agents, concealed bribe payments to Brazilian government officials by creating fake consulting contracts and fake invoices by using cash payments and by wiring millions of dollars from the United States to offshore bank accounts held in the name of shell companies of bribe middlemen.  As a result of the Brazilian bribery scheme, Sargeant Marine and its affiliated companies earned profits of approximately $26.5 million.

The conduct in Brazil began when a Sargeant Marine senior executive officer traveled to Brazil in January 2010 in an effort to identify an agent with connections to a government official who could help the company obtain business from Petrobras.  Eventually, the company began paying bribes to a “lobbyist” who was known to receive payments for his connections to Petrobras officials.  At a dinner arranged by the Sargeant Marine intermediary with a Petrobras official and a Brazilian politician, the intermediary promised bribes in return for securing contracts between Petrobras and Sargeant Marine.  After a company affiliated with Sargeant Marine completed shipments of asphalt to Petrobras in August 2010, the affiliate’s executive emailed Daniel Sargeant stating, “Wow guess last Brazil trip with crooks paid off.  Should go again before contract next year gets hot and heavy.”

Between approximately 2012 and 2018, Sargeant Marine engaged in similar conduct in Venezuela, this time to purchase asphalt from the state-controlled oil company, Petroleos de Venezuela S.A. (PDVSA).  Sargeant Marine and its affiliates—which had been blacklisted by PDVSA—used a Swiss company that would resell the asphalt to Sargeant Marine at a small premium.  As it did in Brazil, Sargeant Marine concealed the bribes by creating fake consulting contracts and fake invoices and by making payments to offshore bank accounts held by a bribe middleman.  The bribe middleman then paid bribes to a PDVSA official. Sargeant Marine’s bribe payments also gave it access to non-public information from PDVSA officials to give Sargeant Marine a corrupt edge on its competition.  As a result of the Venezuela bribery scheme, Sargeant Marine earned about $8.2 million in profits.

Sargeant Marine paid bribes to an official working for Empresa Publica de Hidrocarburos del Ecuador (Petroecuador), a state-owned oil company of Ecuador that needed asphalt to supply the country.  Sargeant Marine and its affiliates used the same tactics as in Brazil and Venezuela to conceal bribe payments, made through an intermediary to a Petroecuador official, which were made to secure a contract with Petroecuador.  As a result of this scheme, Sargeant Marine earned profits of approximately $3.2 million.   

In September 2017, Andrade pleaded guilty to conspiring to violate the FCPA.  In November 2017, Finocchi pleaded guilty to conspiracy to defraud the United States.  In March 2018, Diaz pleaded guilty to two counts of conspiring to violate the FCPA.  In August 2018, Meneses pleaded guilty to conspiring to violate the FCPA.  In March 2019, Troyano pleaded guilty to money laundering conspiracy.  In December 2019, Daniel Sargeant pleaded guilty to conspiracy to violate the FCPA and conspiracy to commit money laundering.  The defendants are awaiting sentencing.

The investigation is being conducted by FBI's International Corruption squad in Miami. The government’s case is being handled by the Office’s Business and Securities Fraud Section and the Criminal Division’s Fraud Section.  Assistant United States Attorneys Whitman Knapp, Mark E. Bini and Andrey Spektor of the Eastern District of New York and Fraud Section Trial Attorney Derek J. Ettinger are prosecuting the case.

The government of Brazil provided significant assistance in this matter, as did the Criminal Division’s Office of International Affairs.

The Defendant:

SARGEANT MARINE, INC.

E.D.N.Y. Docket No.: 20-CR-363 (ENV)

DANIEL SARGEANT

Age: 53

Florida, United States

E.D.N.Y. Docket No.: 19-CR-319 (ENV)

ROBERTO FINOCCHI

Age: 58

Country of Origin: Venezuela

E.D.N.Y. Docket No.: 17-CR-600 (ENV)

JOSE TOMAS MENESES

Age: 65

Country of Origin: Venezuela

E.D.N.Y. Docket No.: 18-CR-358 (ENV)

LUIZ EDUARDO ANDRADE

Age: 61

Country of Origin: Brazil

E.D.N.Y. Docket No. 17-CR-497 (ENV)

DAVID DIAZ

Age: 56

Country of Origin: Venezuela

E.D.N.Y. Docket No.: 18-CR-140 (ENV)

Hector Nunez Troyano

Age: 43

Country of Origin: Venezuela

E.D.N.Y. Docket No. 19-CR-135 (ENV)

 

Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1lfT-4yc3Z7nZ6B4mbOBmumgf-OU0Q9uBaWOTyBA95qc
  Last Updated: 2024-04-16 01:56:38 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The number of days from the earlier of filing date or first appearance date to proceeding date
Format: N3

Description: The number of days from proceeding date to disposition date
Format: N3

Description: The number of days from disposition date to sentencing date
Format: N3

Description: The code of the district office where the case was terminated
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant at the time the case was closed
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense that carried the most severe disposition and penalty under which the defendant was disposed
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with TTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with TTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with TTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with TTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The code indicating the nature or type of disposition associated with TTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The number of months a defendant was sentenced to prison under TTITLE1
Format: N4

Description: The number of months of probation imposed upon a defendant under TTITLE1
Format: N4

Description: A period of supervised release imposed upon a defendant under TTITLE1
Format: N3

Description: The fine imposed upon the defendant at sentencing under TTITLE1
Format: N8

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
F U C K I N G P E D O S R E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E