Score:   1
Docket Number:   ED-NY  1:19-cr-00543
Case Name:   USA v. Kamaldoss
  Press Releases:
Earlier today, a complaint was unsealed in federal court in Brooklyn charging eight defendants, Ezhil Sezhian Kamaldoss, Harpreet Singh, Parthiban Narayanasamy, Baljeet Singh, Deepak Manchanda, Gulab Gulab, Mukul Chugh and Vikas M. Verma with conspiring to possess with intent to distribute a controlled substance containing Tramadol, a synthetic opioid.  The defendants were arrested this morning, and their initial appearances are scheduled for this afternoon before United States Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom. 

Richard P. Donoghue, United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York; Mark McCormack, Special Agent-in-Charge, Food and Drug Administration, Office of Criminal Investigations, Metro Washington Field Office (FDA-OCI); Todd A. Wickerham, Special Agent-in-Charge, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Cincinnati Field Office (FBI);  Philip R. Bartlett, Inspector-in-Charge, United States Postal Inspection Service, New York Division (USPIS); John Eisert, Special Agent-in-Charge, Homeland Security Investigations (HSI), Baltimore Field Office; Peter C. Fitzhugh, Special Agent-in-Charge, HSI, New York Field Office; Troy Miller, Director of Field Operations, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, New York Field Office (CBP); and Brian D. Boyle, Special Agent-in-Charge, Drug Enforcement Administration, New England Field Office (DEA), announced the charges.   

Since approximately January 2018, law enforcement agents with FDA-OCI,  USPIS, HSI, CBP, DEA, FBI and other agencies have been investigating the large-scale importation of misbranded controlled substances, including Tramadol, into the United States from India.  As part of the defendants’ scheme, distributors in India shipped misbranded Tramadol and other drugs to individuals and entities in the United States through the U.S. mail and other commercial couriers.  The defendants primarily operated out of a warehouse in Queens where they repackaged the pills and mailed them to customers throughout the United States.  The defendants maintained daily ledgers detailing the names, addresses, pill size and pill amounts ordered by customers.  During the course of the investigation, the defendants distributed millions of Tramadol pills.   

Ezhil Sezhian Kamaldoss is also charged with money laundering.    

“As alleged, the defendants participated in a black market for prescription medications by distributing millions of opioid pills in tens of thousands of transactions in one year alone,” stated United States Attorney Donoghue.  “This Office and our law enforcement partners will continue to vigorously investigate and prosecute those who profit from the suffering wrought by opioid distribution in the United States.”  Mr. Donoghue expressed his appreciation to the United States Attorneys’ Offices for the District of Maryland, the District of Massachusetts and the Southern District of Ohio for their assistance in the case.

“The illegal manufacture and distribution of opioids can result in overdoses and deaths, further fueling the national crisis,” stated FDA Special Agent-in-Charge McCormack.  “The FDA is committed to disrupting and dismantling illegal prescription drug distribution networks, including those that import unapproved drugs from overseas, and distribute those drugs with reckless disregard of the risk to public health.”

“The importation of mislabeled drugs is both dangerous and illegal,” stated FBI Special Agent-in-Charge Wickerham. “It contributes to the ongoing opioid crisis in our nation and causes harm to our communities.”

“Postal Inspectors are always at the forefront in protecting communities from the scourge of illegal drugs, no matter how they enter this country, and today’s arrests are a shining example of our commitment to keep the public safe,” stated USPIS Inspector-in-Charge Bartlett.

“These individuals chose greed and profit at the cost of human lives. HSI is committed to investigating and ending these kinds of drug trafficking schemes to keep opioids off our streets,” stated HSI Special Agent-in-Charge Eisert.

“American communities continue to be plagued by synthetic opioids, often at the hands of dealers like those accused in this investigation,” stated HSI Special Agent-in-Charge Fitzhugh.  “HSI is committed to aggressively targeting every level of the opioid supply chain, from the overseas vendors to the street-level dealers, in an effort to end this crisis.”

“This case serves as a great example of collaborative law enforcement efforts to combat international opioid trafficking conspirators.  U.S. Customs and Border Protection thanks our partners at FBI, FDA, USPIS, HSI and DEA for their continued cooperation,” stated CBP Director of Field Operations Miller.

“DEA is addressing the threat of opioids, both internationally and domestically.  We prioritize our resources by identifying and targeting the world’s biggest and most powerful drug traffickers and their organizations,” stated DEA Special Agent-in-Charge Boyle.  “The diversion of prescription pain killers contribute to the widespread abuse of opioids which is a gateway to addiction and is devastating our communities.  DEA will continue to collaborate with our federal, state and local law enforcement partners to hold accountable those who are fueling this epidemic.”

The charges in the complaint are allegations, and the defendants are presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.  If convicted, Ezhil Sezhian Kamaldoss faces up to 25 years’ imprisonment.  The remaining defendants each face up to five years’ imprisonment.

First Assistant United States Attorney Mark Lesko and Assistant United States Attorneys Nicholas J. Moscow, Temidayo Aganga-Williams and Andrew D. Grubin are in charge of the prosecution.  Assistant United States Attorney Karin Orenstein of the Office’s Civil Division is handling forfeiture matters.

The Defendants:

MUKUL CHUGH

Age:  24

Long Island City, New York

GULAB GULAB

Age:  45

Richmond Hill, New York

EZHIL SEZHIAN KAMALDOSS (also known as Kamaldoss Sezhian,” “Kamal Doss” and “Ezhil Cezhian”)

Age:  46

Richmond Hill, New York

DEEPAK MANCHANDA

Age:  43

Deer Park, New York

PARTHIBAN NARAYANASAMY (also known as “Pat”)

Age:  58

Jamaica, New York

BALJEET SINGH (also known as “Sunny”)

Age:  29

Richmond Hill, New York

HARPREET SINGH (also known as “Vicky Singh”)

Age:  28

Plainview, New York

VIKAS M. VERMA

Age:  45

Dix Hills, New York

E.D.N.Y. Docket No. 19-MJ-793 (RLM)

Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/15yXSQz8OOuZTrMCDRXLuRqIrDZ2O6x29U4ntxINPqcE
  Last Updated: 2024-04-12 09:26:26 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: Case type associated with a magistrate case if the current case was merged from a magistrate case
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The docket number originally given to a case assigned to a magistrate judge and subsequently merged into a criminal case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a magistrate case
Format: A3

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
Magistrate Docket Number:   ED-NY  1:19-mj-00793
Case Name:   USA v. Kamaldoss et al.
  Press Releases:
Earlier today, a complaint was unsealed in federal court in Brooklyn charging eight defendants, Ezhil Sezhian Kamaldoss, Harpreet Singh, Parthiban Narayanasamy, Baljeet Singh, Deepak Manchanda, Gulab Gulab, Mukul Chugh and Vikas M. Verma with conspiring to possess with intent to distribute a controlled substance containing Tramadol, a synthetic opioid.  The defendants were arrested this morning, and their initial appearances are scheduled for this afternoon before United States Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom. 

Richard P. Donoghue, United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York; Mark McCormack, Special Agent-in-Charge, Food and Drug Administration, Office of Criminal Investigations, Metro Washington Field Office (FDA-OCI); Todd A. Wickerham, Special Agent-in-Charge, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Cincinnati Field Office (FBI);  Philip R. Bartlett, Inspector-in-Charge, United States Postal Inspection Service, New York Division (USPIS); John Eisert, Special Agent-in-Charge, Homeland Security Investigations (HSI), Baltimore Field Office; Peter C. Fitzhugh, Special Agent-in-Charge, HSI, New York Field Office; Troy Miller, Director of Field Operations, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, New York Field Office (CBP); and Brian D. Boyle, Special Agent-in-Charge, Drug Enforcement Administration, New England Field Office (DEA), announced the charges.   

Since approximately January 2018, law enforcement agents with FDA-OCI,  USPIS, HSI, CBP, DEA, FBI and other agencies have been investigating the large-scale importation of misbranded controlled substances, including Tramadol, into the United States from India.  As part of the defendants’ scheme, distributors in India shipped misbranded Tramadol and other drugs to individuals and entities in the United States through the U.S. mail and other commercial couriers.  The defendants primarily operated out of a warehouse in Queens where they repackaged the pills and mailed them to customers throughout the United States.  The defendants maintained daily ledgers detailing the names, addresses, pill size and pill amounts ordered by customers.  During the course of the investigation, the defendants distributed millions of Tramadol pills.   

Ezhil Sezhian Kamaldoss is also charged with money laundering.    

“As alleged, the defendants participated in a black market for prescription medications by distributing millions of opioid pills in tens of thousands of transactions in one year alone,” stated United States Attorney Donoghue.  “This Office and our law enforcement partners will continue to vigorously investigate and prosecute those who profit from the suffering wrought by opioid distribution in the United States.”  Mr. Donoghue expressed his appreciation to the United States Attorneys’ Offices for the District of Maryland, the District of Massachusetts and the Southern District of Ohio for their assistance in the case.

“The illegal manufacture and distribution of opioids can result in overdoses and deaths, further fueling the national crisis,” stated FDA Special Agent-in-Charge McCormack.  “The FDA is committed to disrupting and dismantling illegal prescription drug distribution networks, including those that import unapproved drugs from overseas, and distribute those drugs with reckless disregard of the risk to public health.”

“The importation of mislabeled drugs is both dangerous and illegal,” stated FBI Special Agent-in-Charge Wickerham. “It contributes to the ongoing opioid crisis in our nation and causes harm to our communities.”

“Postal Inspectors are always at the forefront in protecting communities from the scourge of illegal drugs, no matter how they enter this country, and today’s arrests are a shining example of our commitment to keep the public safe,” stated USPIS Inspector-in-Charge Bartlett.

“These individuals chose greed and profit at the cost of human lives. HSI is committed to investigating and ending these kinds of drug trafficking schemes to keep opioids off our streets,” stated HSI Special Agent-in-Charge Eisert.

“American communities continue to be plagued by synthetic opioids, often at the hands of dealers like those accused in this investigation,” stated HSI Special Agent-in-Charge Fitzhugh.  “HSI is committed to aggressively targeting every level of the opioid supply chain, from the overseas vendors to the street-level dealers, in an effort to end this crisis.”

“This case serves as a great example of collaborative law enforcement efforts to combat international opioid trafficking conspirators.  U.S. Customs and Border Protection thanks our partners at FBI, FDA, USPIS, HSI and DEA for their continued cooperation,” stated CBP Director of Field Operations Miller.

“DEA is addressing the threat of opioids, both internationally and domestically.  We prioritize our resources by identifying and targeting the world’s biggest and most powerful drug traffickers and their organizations,” stated DEA Special Agent-in-Charge Boyle.  “The diversion of prescription pain killers contribute to the widespread abuse of opioids which is a gateway to addiction and is devastating our communities.  DEA will continue to collaborate with our federal, state and local law enforcement partners to hold accountable those who are fueling this epidemic.”

The charges in the complaint are allegations, and the defendants are presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.  If convicted, Ezhil Sezhian Kamaldoss faces up to 25 years’ imprisonment.  The remaining defendants each face up to five years’ imprisonment.

First Assistant United States Attorney Mark Lesko and Assistant United States Attorneys Nicholas J. Moscow, Temidayo Aganga-Williams and Andrew D. Grubin are in charge of the prosecution.  Assistant United States Attorney Karin Orenstein of the Office’s Civil Division is handling forfeiture matters.

The Defendants:

MUKUL CHUGH

Age:  24

Long Island City, New York

GULAB GULAB

Age:  45

Richmond Hill, New York

EZHIL SEZHIAN KAMALDOSS (also known as Kamaldoss Sezhian,” “Kamal Doss” and “Ezhil Cezhian”)

Age:  46

Richmond Hill, New York

DEEPAK MANCHANDA

Age:  43

Deer Park, New York

PARTHIBAN NARAYANASAMY (also known as “Pat”)

Age:  58

Jamaica, New York

BALJEET SINGH (also known as “Sunny”)

Age:  29

Richmond Hill, New York

HARPREET SINGH (also known as “Vicky Singh”)

Age:  28

Plainview, New York

VIKAS M. VERMA

Age:  45

Dix Hills, New York

E.D.N.Y. Docket No. 19-MJ-793 (RLM)

Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1hTn8M-t_tamP3kU3l9qXf0vXmxtKCvVb8gY1X_liAsI
  Last Updated: 2024-04-12 09:20:42 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: Case type associated with a magistrate case if the current case was merged from a magistrate case
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The docket number originally given to a case assigned to a magistrate judge and subsequently merged into a criminal case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a magistrate case
Format: A3

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
F U C K I N G P E D O S R E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E