Score:   1
Docket Number:   ED-NY  1:19-cr-00593
Case Name:   USA v. Comito
  Press Releases:
An indictment was unsealed today in federal court in Brooklyn charging John Comito, Chief Executive Officer of Staten Island-based AutoExec Computer Systems, Inc. (AutoExec) with mail and wire fraud in connection with the federal program known as E-rate.  Comito was arrested this morning, and was arraigned this afternoon before United States Magistrate Judge Steven M. Gold.  Comito was released on a $500,000 bond.   

Richard P. Donoghue, United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York, Philip R. Bartlett, Inspector-in-Charge, United States Postal Inspection Service, New York Division (USPIS), and David L. Hunt, Inspector General, Federal Communications Commission (FCC-OIG), announced the charges.

“Comito allegedly overbilled the E-rate program and schools for equipment and services in order to enrich himself at the expense of the children the program was designed to serve,” stated United States Attorney Donoghue.  “This Office will vigorously prosecute those who defraud taxpayer-supported programs for personal gain.”

“Instead of completing the work he was trusted and contracted to perform, the defendant allegedly chose to bilk the government and steal from those less fortunate.  Society will swiftly denounce this type of criminal behavior, and Comito will now he held accountable,” stated USPIS Inspector-in-Charge Bartlett.

“An important mission of the Office of Inspector General is to investigate allegations of fraud related to the E-rate Program,” stated FCC Inspector General Hunt.  “We will continue to work with our law enforcement partners to investigate these matters, where the allegation involves a service provider seeking to take advantage of the program by retaining funds for his own purposes rather than providing equipment and services to needy schoolchildren.”     

As set forth in the indictment and other court documents, the E‑rate program distributes funds to schools and libraries serving economically disadvantaged children to purchase telecommunication services, internet access and related equipment.  In order to qualify, educational institutions must certify that they are purchasing equipment and services from a private vendor. The vendor must certify that it is providing the services and equipment as ordered, and is otherwise in compliance with the requirements of the program.  If approved, the E-rate program defrays the cost by up to 90 percent.

From 2013 to 2017, 26 elementary, middle and high schools located in the Diocese of Brooklyn contracted with AutoExec to provide telecommunications equipment and services.  At least eight schools received no equipment or services, and the remaining schools received partial, substandard or non-approved equipment and services.  In total, Comito overbilled the E-rate program, and defrauded the program and schools, in the amount of approximately $426,000.

The charges in the superseding indictment are allegations, and the defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.

If convicted, Comito faces a maximum sentence of 20 years’ imprisonment on each count of mail fraud and wire fraud. 

Assistant United States Attorneys Francisco J. Navarro and Philip Pilmar are in charge of the prosecution. 

The Defendant:

JOHN COMITO

Age: 68

Staten Island, New York

E.D.N.Y. Docket No. 19-CR-593 (RMM)

 

Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1DENraqlkjsO2KjPqyDi_swkV8vX1IQkwwmjOHq6frUM
  Last Updated: 2024-04-12 09:29:02 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the second highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE2
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE2
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the third highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE3
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE3
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
F U C K I N G P E D O S R E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E