Score:   1
Docket Number:   ED-NC  5:19-cr-00220
Case Name:   USA v. Escalante et al
  Press Releases:
RALEIGH – Robert J. Higdon Jr., United States Attorney for the Eastern District of North Carolina, announces that a federal grand jury in Raleigh has returned a Superseding Indictment charging the following individuals with conspiracy to commit interstate transportation of stolen goods and money laundering:

SALVADOR IBARRA ESCALANTE, age 43, of Mexico, also known as “Billy Escalante”

RUTH NAVA-ABARCA, age 29, of  Mexico

FLORENTINO VALENCIA-TEPOZ, age 47 of Mexico

GREGORIO VAZQUEZ-CASTILLO, age 43, of Mexico, also known as “Jaime Castillo”

JUAN DE LA CRUZ-GONZALEZ, age 32, of Mexico

SAMUEL CRUZ, age 42, of Durham, North Carolina

MIGUEL GUTIERREZ, age 24, of Henderson, North Carolina

JAIME LABRA-TOVAR, age 23, of Henderson, North Carolina

OSCAR UGALDE-ESCALANTE, age 31, of Mexico

HASAN OZVATAN, age 40, of Turkey

EMILIO GOMEZ-GONZALEZ, age 36, of Mexico

JUAN MALDONADO-HERNANDEZ, age 28, of Mexico

GEORGE LUIS MORALES, age 21, of New York, New York

TORIBIO ESCALANTE-CAMPOS, age 59, of Mexico

ERIC EVO, age 24, of Richmond, Virginia

RYAN MERCADO-RODRIGUEZ, age 24, of Henderson, North Carolina

JUAN LOPEZ-POSADA, age 40, of El Salvador

RENE ESPINOZA-TORRES, age 45, of Mexico

KELVIN FE ARELLANO-VALENCIA, age 19, of Raleigh, North Carolina

DEMETRIO VALENCIA-FLORES, age 42, of Mexico

ALVARO MENDEZ-FLORES, age 38, of Mexico.

Moreover, GOMEZ-GONZALEZ was charged with failure to register with immigration officials. In addition, NAVA-ABARCA, VALENCIA-TEPOZ, ESCALANTE-CAMPOS, IBARRA-ESCALANTE, and VAZQUEZ-CASTILLO were charged with alien harboring. Furthermore, IBARRA-ESCALANTE, VALENCIA-TEPOZ, NAVA-ABARCA, and VAZQUEZ-CASTILLO were charged with immigration-related entrepreneurship fraud.

According to the Superseding Indictment, used cooking oil, historically viewed as a waste product, has become a valuable recycled commodity over the past decade. The majority of the recycled cooking oil sold is used for biofuel, fluctuating with market demand. It can also be used as a nutritional additive to animal feed and pet food, or in the production of many consumer and industrial products.

Legitimate businesses, known renderers, collect used cooking oil from restaurants in exchange of compensation and sell it to refineries so that it can be processed and recycled.  The rendering industry estimates that there is an annual loss of approximately $45-75 million dollars from the theft of used cooking oil.

According to court records, the objective of the conspiracy was to profit from the illicit trade in large quantities of used cooking oil stolen in North Carolina, Virginia, and Tennessee, and transported to New Jersey for sale and distribution.

In particular, the Superseding Indictment alleges that members of the conspiracy repeatedly traveled to restaurants in North Carolina, Virginia, and Tennessee, in box trucks equipped with containers designed to store and transport liquids, pumps, hoses, and burglary tools, for the purpose of stealing large quantities of used cooking oil.

Additionally, members of the conspiracy transported the stolen used cooking oil in the box trucks to a warehouse in Durham, North Carolina, for consolidation and storage. Thereafter, a tanker trailer was used to transport the consolidated stolen used cooking oil to Virginia and elsewhere.

 “Used cooking oil has become a sought-after commodity by biodiesel companies, and restaurants use the sale of this oil as another source of revenue,” said John Eisert, Acting Special Agent in Charge of Homeland Security Investigations in Charlotte, North Carolina. “This team of co-conspirators had an elaborate scheme to steal thousands of gallons of cooking oil for their own profit in violation of several U.S. laws.”

If convicted of conspiracy to commit interstate transportation of stolen goods and money laundering, IBARRA ESCALANTE, NAVA-ABARCA, VALENCIA-TEPOZ, VAZQUEZ-CASTILLO, DE LA CRUZ-GONZALEZ, CRUZ, GUTIERREZ, LABRA-TOVAR, UGALDE-ESCALANTE, OZVATAN, GOMEZ-GONZALEZ, MALDONADO-HERNANDEZ, MORALES, ESCALANTE-CAMPOS, EVO, MERCADO-RODRIGUEZ, LOPEZ-POSADA, ESPINOZA-TORRES, ARELLANO-VALENCIA, VALENCIA-FLORES, and MENDEZ-FLORES, face each a maximum of twenty five years in prison, a $500,000 fine, and a term of supervised release.

Furthermore, GOMEZ-GONZALEZ faces an additional maximum term of six months in prison for failing to register as an alien, and a $1,000 fine. In addition, NAVA-ABARCA, VALENCIA-TEPOZ, ESCALANTE-CAMPOS, IBARRA-ESCALANTE, and VAZQUEZ-CASTILLO each face an additional maximum of five years in prison for alien harboring, a $250,000 fine, and a term of supervised release. Moreover, IBARRA-ESCALANTE, VALENCIA-TEPOZ, NAVA-ABARCA, and VAZQUEZ-CASTILLO each face an additional maximum of five years in prison for immigration-related entrepreneurship fraud, a $250,000 fine, and a term of supervised release.

The following defendants are currently fugitives from justice:

JUAN DE LA CRUZ-GONZALEZ

RENE ESPINOZA-TORRES

EMILIO GOMEZ-GONZALEZ

JUAN MALDONADO-HERNANDEZ

RUTH NAVA-ABARCA

HASAN OZVATAN

If you have any information on the whereabouts of these individuals please contact the Homeland Security Investigations Tip-Line at 1-866-DHS-2-ICE or 1-866-347-2423.  Any information that you provide will remain confidential.

The charges and allegations contained in the Superseding Indictment are merely accusations.  The defendants are presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty in a court of law. This case is being investigated by Homeland Security Investigations.  

CourtListener:
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15703893/united-states-v-escalante/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15811146/united-states-v-escalante/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15703895/united-states-v-escalante/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15703892/united-states-v-escalante/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15703896/united-states-v-escalante/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15703898/united-states-v-escalante/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15703899/united-states-v-escalante/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15715233/united-states-v-escalante/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15715235/united-states-v-escalante/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15811128/united-states-v-escalante/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15811135/united-states-v-escalante/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15811153/united-states-v-escalante/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15811155/united-states-v-escalante/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15703888/united-states-v-escalante/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15811149/united-states-v-escalante/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15811147/united-states-v-escalante/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15703889/united-states-v-escalante/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15703890/united-states-v-escalante/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15811158/united-states-v-escalante/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/37796092/united-states-v-escalante/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15703897/united-states-v-escalante/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15811157/united-states-v-escalante/
Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13vtTPA6WXafwC1bW6Tun3Tv6th4ayRPvOp6QQ9N5vqY
  Last Updated: 2024-04-12 09:43:51 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the second highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE2
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE2
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the third highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE3
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE3
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the fourth highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE4
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE4
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the fifth highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE5
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE5
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE5
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE5
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
F U C K I N G P E D O S R E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E