Score:   1
Docket Number:   D-SC  4:18-cr-01080
Case Name:   USA v. Stanley et al
  Press Releases:
Conway, South Carolina --- United States Attorney Sherri A. Lydon announced today during a press conference at the Horry County Police Department that a 46-count federal indictment has been unsealed that charges 27 defendants with federal drug conspiracy charges.  On Wednesday morning, 22 defendants were arrested in an early morning operation in Horry County that was conducted by more than 125 officers and agents from 12 law enforcement agencies.  These defendants were arraigned in federal court in Florence on Wednesday afternoon, and two defendants who were already in state custody will make their first appearance this Friday.  Three defendants have not yet been arrested, and the FBI is seeking information leading to their capture.

Beginning in 2017, the FBI Myrtle Beach Resident Agency, working alongside several other federal and local law enforcement partners, began a covert investigation of a large-scale drug trafficking organization operating in the Myrtle Beach and Horry County areas of South Carolina.  The defendants named in the indictment are members and/or associates of this drug trafficking organization, known by the name “G-Shine” and formerly known as “Gangster Killer Bloods.”  G-Shine is a Bloods Gang set that evolved from the United Blood Nation in the late 1990s.  G-Shine originated in the New York/New Jersey area and migrated along the east coast and now has sets, or sub-groups, in multiple states including New York, New Jersey, North Carolina and South Carolina.  Shine Money Gang is a sub-set of G-Shine that is based in the Longs, South Carolina, area.  The investigation revealed that G-Shine’s gang members and criminal associates engage in the sale of narcotics and use firearms to defend themselves and their criminal enterprise. 

The indictment charges the defendants with forming an agreement to distribute heroin, fentanyl, oxycodone, cocaine, crack cocaine, and marijuana in South Carolina.  Additionally, the indictment charges several defendants with the actual distribution of these drugs and the use of wireless communications devices to further the organization’s drug trafficking activity.  During the course of the investigation, agents used undercover surveillance, confidential source information, and other techniques to establish the agreement between coconspirators to sell these drugs.

“Drugs and violence are what we are talking about today,” said U.S. Attorney Lydon.  “I could not be more proud to lend my voice, and more importantly our resources, to help sound the alarm in this community.  There is a serious violent crime problem, and a serious opioid problem, in the Myrtle Beach area.  We are targeting groups that are directly destroying communities.  We will spare no resources.  We are here in full force, with a passion for making Myrtle Beach safe.  We are locking arms with our law enforcement partners to dismantle criminal enterprises right here at home. We applaud the great work done by our local, state, and federal law enforcement partners, and we consider it a great privilege to join forces with them.”

The following defendants are in custody:

Aaron Delond Stanley, a/k/a “Heat Santana,” of Myrtle Beach

Richard Earl Hemingway, Jr., a/k/a “Jeezy,” of Myrtle Beach

Rashea Omar Jenerette, a/k/a “Dog,” of Poplar

Thurston Jay Hardiman, a/k/a “Thirst,” of Longs

Christopher Lamont Pino, a/k/a “Pine,” of Little River

Trey Levert Cox, aka “Cheese” a/k/a “Sosa,” of Poplar

Terrance Damon Richardson, Jr., a/k/a “Juicy,” of Longs

Kennis Lorenzo Willard, a/k/a “Kilo,” of Longs

Terrice Bayshawn Livingston, a/k/a “Biz,” of Longs

Crystal Nicole Dickey, of Little River

Cory Antwan Pertell, of Loris

Jada Teal Abril Pyatt, of Myrtle Beach

Wendy Elaine Blue, of Longs

Michelle Denise McFee, of Little River

Kalaera Marie Gee, of Marion

Javarius Albert Grant Murray, of Myrtle Beach

Eddie Mario Jones, a/k/a “Coco,” of Myrtle Beach

Marcus Antonio Hemingway, a/k/a “Mark,” of Longs

Donte Raquan Xavier Livingston, a/k/a “Bootsie,” of Myrtle Beach

Xavier Jermaine Horne, a/k/a “Rush,” of Myrtle Beach

Montea Daryel Myers, of Myrtle Beach

Glen Garrick Holley, of Myrtle Beach

Michelle Lindsey Singleton, of Myrtle Beach

Blake Lashay Evans, a/k/a “Breezy,” of Longs

The FBI is actively looking for three additional defendants: Christopher Kayvon Giddens, a/k/a “Brisk,” of Longs; Rondric Tykeme Smith, of Conway; and Katelyn Anne Stetler, of Little River.  Any person having information as to the whereabouts of one of these fugitives should contact the FBI Columbia Tip Line at 803-551-4200.     

The investigation and arrests were a combined law enforcement effort between the following agencies: Horry County Police Department, Horry County Sheriff’s Office, 15th Circuit Drug Enforcement Unit and Solicitor’s Office, Myrtle Beach Police Department, Conway Police Department, South Carolina Law Enforcement Division, Drug Enforcement Administration, United States Marshals Service, and United States Postal Inspection Service. 

The investigation has been quarterbacked by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and is being prosecuted as part of the joint federal, state, and local Project CeaseFire initiative, which aggressively prosecutes firearm cases. Project CeaseFire is South Carolina’s implementation of Project Safe Neighborhoods (PSN), the centerpiece of the Department of Justice’s violent crime reduction efforts.  PSN is an evidence-based program proven to be effective at reducing violent crime. Through PSN, a broad spectrum of stakeholders work together to identify the most pressing violent crime problems in the community and develop comprehensive solutions to address them. As part of this strategy, PSN focuses enforcement efforts on the most violent offenders and partners with locally based prevention and reentry programs for lasting reductions in crime.  Assistant United States Attorneys Everett McMillian and Justin Holloway of the Florence office are prosecuting the case.

U.S. Attorney Lydon stated that all charges in this indictment are merely accusations and that the defendants are presumed innocent until and unless proven guilty.

 

#####

Florence, South Carolina --- U.S. Attorney Sherri A. Lydon announced today that less than nine months after 33 Horry County and Myrtle Beach drug traffickers were indicted based on a federal wiretap investigation into the G-Shine/SMG gang, all 33 have pleaded guilty and are being sentenced in federal court. 

“When we lock arms with our local, state, and federal agencies to get the most violent offenders off our streets, our communities notice an immediate and sustained positive impact,” said U.S. Attorney Lydon.  “In the first half of 2017, there were 14 homicides in Horry County.  After the Operation Rise and Shine takedown, that number dropped to three homicides in the first half of this year.  Robberies and aggravated assaults have also noticeably declined.  This case demonstrates the effectiveness of the Project Safe Neighborhoods model, and we will continue to replicate it across the state as we combat violent crime and the opioid epidemic.”

The evidence presented by Assistant United States Attorney Everett McMillian in court hearings reflects that each of the defendants named in the indictment were members and/or associates of a drug trafficking organization known by the name “G-Shine,” formerly known as Gangster Killer Bloods.  G-Shine is a Bloods Gang set that evolved from the United Blood Nation in the late 1990s.  G-Shine originated in the New York/New Jersey area and migrated along the east coast and now has sets, or sub-groups, in multiple states including New York, New Jersey, North Carolina, and South Carolina.  Shine Money Gang is a sub-set of G-Shine that is based in the Longs, South Carolina, area.  G-Shine’s gang members and associates engage in the sale of narcotics, including heroin, fentanyl, oxycodone, crack cocaine, and other substances, and use firearms to defend themselves and their criminal enterprise.  The evidence reflects that multiple overdoses are attributed to the drugs this gang distributed.  This group was specifically pursued for federal prosecution because local law enforcement identified it as one of the most problematic gangs in Horry County. 

Authorities used a number of investigative techniques to obtain the evidence needed to secure convictions against this group, including controlled purchases of narcotics, undercover surveillance, interviews of confidential human sources, and a court-authorized wiretap.  The investigation was a multi-year, collaborative effort by several local and state agencies, including the Horry County Police Department, Horry County Sheriff’s Office, 15th Circuit Drug Enforcement Unit, Myrtle Beach Police Department, Conway Police Department, South Carolina Law Enforcement Division, Drug Enforcement Administration, United States Marshals Service, and United States Postal Inspection Service.  The wiretap investigation was quarterbacked by the Federal Bureau of Investigation in concert with the other agencies.  Assistant United States Attorneys Everett McMillian and Justin Holloway are prosecuting the case with support from the 15th Circuit Solicitor’s Office.

Several defendants pleaded guilty within weeks of being arrested during the December 12, 2018, takedown of the organization that involved approximately 125 agents from 12 different law enforcement agencies in and around South Carolina.  The final two defendants pleaded guilty on July 22, 2019, just days before their jury trial was set to begin in Florence.  Twenty-six of the defendants have already been sentenced—with several of the organization’s leaders and suppliers receiving sentences of 10 years or more in federal prison, as follows: 

Christopher Kayvon Giddens, of Longs, sentenced to 198 months

Kennis Lorenzo Willard, of Longs, sentenced to 121 months

Aaron Delond Stanley, of Myrtle Beach, sentenced to 120 months

Farentino Santonia Green, of Conway, sentenced to 120 months

Christopher Lamont Pino, of Little River, sentenced to 120 months

Trey Levert Cox, of Poplar, sentenced to 120 months

Richard Earl Hemingway, Jr., of Myrtle Beach, sentenced to 108 months

Rashea Omar Jenerette, of Poplar, sentenced to 84 months

Shaquille Anthony Gore, of Myrtle Beach, sentenced to 84 months

Ralph Cleodus Willard, Jr., of Little River, sentenced to 72 months

Cory Antwan Pertell, of Loris, sentenced to 60 months

Glen Garrick Holley, of Myrtle Beach, sentenced to 60 months

Crystal Nicole Dickey, of Little River, sentenced to 54 months

Dennis Tyron Chestnut, of Myrtle Beach, sentenced to 46 months

Montea Daryel Myers, of Myrtle Beach, sentenced to 41 months

Marcus Antonio Hemingway, of Longs, sentenced to 36 months

Donte Raquan Xavier Livingston, of Myrtle Beach, sentenced to 36 months

Jada Teal Abril Pyatt, of Myrtle Beach, sentenced to 36 months

Myland Castelle Davis, of Conway, sentenced to 30 months

Xavier Jermaine Horne, of Myrtle Beach, sentenced to 30 months

Eddie Mario Jones, of Myrtle Beach, sentenced to 30 months

Wendy Elaine Blue, of Longs, sentenced to 30 months

Kalaera Marie Gee, of Aynor, sentenced to 21 months

Blake Lashay Evans, of Longs, sentenced to 18 months

Terrance Damon Richardson, Jr., of Longs, sentenced to 12 months

Katelyn Anne Stetler, of Little River, sentenced to Time Served

The remaining defendants will likely be sentenced in the coming weeks. 

“We truly believe that public safety is a shared responsibility, and this case is a perfect example,” said Myrtle Beach Police Chief Amy Prock.  “The efforts of all agencies involved in this case, and the support of the U.S. Attorney and those assisting in the coordination and prosecution, continue to impact the reduction of crime in the Myrtle Beach area. Year to date, Myrtle Beach has had a 14% reduction in Part I crimes, and we attribute this to the ongoing dedication of our team, the partnerships with our local, state and federal agencies, and our community working together to identify those individuals polluting our community with these behaviors. The collaborative enforcement and prosecution effort to address this has been impactful. We are continuously working internally and with our partners to fight the battle on crime. Our message is clear:  Don’t come to our area to commit crimes, because you will be caught.”

This prosecution is just one element of a continued and increased focus on stopping violent crime and eradicating the sources of supply of dangerous opioids and other illegal narcotics in the Myrtle Beach area, in Horry County, and across South Carolina.  This case was prosecuted as part of the joint federal, state, and local Project Safe Neighborhoods (PSN), the centerpiece of the Department of Justice’s violent crime reduction efforts.  PSN is an evidence-based program proven to be effective at reducing violent crime. Through PSN, a broad spectrum of stakeholders work together to identify the most pressing violent crime problems in the community and develop comprehensive solutions to address them. As part of this strategy, PSN focuses enforcement efforts on the most violent offenders and partners with locally based prevention and reentry programs for lasting reductions in crime.

#####

Additional information about this case can be found on the docket of the United States District Court, Criminal Case Number 4:18-CR-1080. 

CourtListener:
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/59877943/united-states-v-aaron-delond-stanley/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/60941843/united-states-v-aaron-delond-stanley/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/60941804/united-states-v-aaron-delond-stanley/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/60941792/united-states-v-aaron-delond-stanley/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/60941737/united-states-v-aaron-delond-stanley/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/60941747/united-states-v-aaron-delond-stanley/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/60944490/united-states-v-aaron-delond-stanley/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/14578361/united-states-v-aaron-delond-stanley/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/60941742/united-states-v-aaron-delond-stanley/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/60941745/united-states-v-aaron-delond-stanley/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/60941777/united-states-v-aaron-delond-stanley/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/60941748/united-states-v-aaron-delond-stanley/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/60941756/united-states-v-aaron-delond-stanley/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/60941758/united-states-v-aaron-delond-stanley/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/60941764/united-states-v-aaron-delond-stanley/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/60941772/united-states-v-aaron-delond-stanley/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/60941774/united-states-v-aaron-delond-stanley/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/60941776/united-states-v-aaron-delond-stanley/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/60941733/united-states-v-aaron-delond-stanley/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/60941738/united-states-v-aaron-delond-stanley/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/60941740/united-states-v-aaron-delond-stanley/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/60941781/united-states-v-aaron-delond-stanley/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/60941786/united-states-v-aaron-delond-stanley/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/60941787/united-states-v-aaron-delond-stanley/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/60941793/united-states-v-aaron-delond-stanley/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/60941799/united-states-v-aaron-delond-stanley/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/60941801/united-states-v-aaron-delond-stanley/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/60941818/united-states-v-aaron-delond-stanley/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/60941827/united-states-v-aaron-delond-stanley/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/60944495/united-states-v-aaron-delond-stanley/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/60944496/united-states-v-aaron-delond-stanley/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/60944510/united-states-v-aaron-delond-stanley/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/60944513/united-states-v-aaron-delond-stanley/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/60944514/united-states-v-aaron-delond-stanley/
Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Tjgb-jNfN2tni84lbQEID2Tl45HCnS8Y4c4L9ZSNDCU
  Last Updated: 2024-03-21 09:41:05 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the second highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE2
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE2
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the third highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE3
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE3
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the fourth highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE4
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE4
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the fifth highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE5
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE5
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE5
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE5
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The number of days from the earlier of filing date or first appearance date to proceeding date
Format: N3

Description: The number of days from proceeding date to disposition date
Format: N3

Description: The number of days from disposition date to sentencing date
Format: N3

Description: The code of the district office where the case was terminated
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant at the time the case was closed
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense that carried the most severe disposition and penalty under which the defendant was disposed
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with TTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with TTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with TTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with TTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The code indicating the nature or type of disposition associated with TTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The number of months a defendant was sentenced to prison under TTITLE1
Format: N4

Description: A code indicating whether the prison sentence associated with TTITLE1 was concurrent or consecutive in relation to the other counts in the indictment or information or multiple counts of the same charge
Format: A4

Description: The number of months of probation imposed upon a defendant under TTITLE1
Format: N4

Description: A period of supervised release imposed upon a defendant under TTITLE1
Format: N3

Description: The fine imposed upon the defendant at sentencing under TTITLE1
Format: N8

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense under which the defendant was disposed that carried the second most severe disposition and penalty
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with TTITLE2
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with TTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with TTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with TTITLE2
Format: A3

Description: The code indicating the nature or type of disposition associated with TTITLE2
Format: N2

Description: The number of months a defendant was sentenced to prison under TTITLE2
Format: N4

Description: The number of months of probation imposed upon a defendant under TTITLE2
Format: N4

Description: A period of supervised release imposed upon a defendant under TTITLE2
Format: N3

Description: The fine imposed upon the defendant at sentencing under TTITLE2
Format: N8

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense under which the defendant was disposed that carried the third most severe disposition and penalty
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with TTITLE3
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with TTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with TTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with TTITLE3
Format: A3

Description: The code indicating the nature or type of disposition associated with TTITLE3
Format: N2

Description: The number of months a defendant was sentenced to prison under TTITLE3
Format: N4

Description: The number of months of probation imposed upon a defendant under TTITLE3
Format: N4

Description: A period of supervised release imposed upon a defendant under TTITLE3
Format: N3

Description: The fine imposed upon the defendant at sentencing under TTITLE3
Format: N8

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense under which the defendant was disposed that carried the fourth most severe disposition and Penalty
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with TTITLE4
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with TTITLE4
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with TTITLE4
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with TTITLE4
Format: A3

Description: The code indicating the nature or type of disposition associated with TTITLE4
Format: N2

Description: The number of months a defendant was sentenced to prison under TTITLE4
Format: N4

Description: The number of months of probation imposed upon a defendant under TTITLE4
Format: N4

Description: A period of supervised release imposed upon a defendant under TTITLE4
Format: N3

Description: The fine imposed upon the defendant at sentencing under TTITLE4
Format: N8

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense under which the defendant was disposed that carried the fifth most severe disposition and penalty
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with TTITLE5
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with TTITLE5
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with TTITLE5
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with TTITLE5
Format: A3

Description: The code indicating the nature or type of disposition associated with TTITLE5
Format: N2

Description: The number of months a defendant was sentenced to prison under TTITLE5
Format: N4

Description: The number of months of probation imposed upon a defendant under TTITLE5
Format: N4

Description: A period of supervised release imposed upon a defendant under TTITLE5
Format: N3

Description: The fine imposed upon the defendant at sentencing under TTITLE5
Format: N8

Description: The total prison time for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and prison time was imposed
Format: N4

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
F U C K I N G P E D O S R E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E