Score:   1
Docket Number:   D-PR  3:19-cr-00431
Case Name:   USA v. Keleher et al
  Press Releases:
SAN JUAN, Puerto Rico– Julia Beatrice Keleher, former Secretary of the Puerto Rico Department of Education (“PR DOE”), and Ariel Gutiérrez-Rodríguez have been indicted for their participation in a bribery scheme and conspiracy to commit honest services fraud, announced U.S. Attorney for the District of Puerto Rico W. Stephen Muldrow. The Federal Bureau of Investigation is in charge of the investigation.

The indictment returned yesterday, January 14, 2020, by a federal grand jury in the District of Puerto Rico, includes nine counts as follows:  Count One: Julia Keleher and Ariel Gutiérrez-Rodríguez - Conspiracy to Commit Honest Services Fraud, Title 18, United States Code, Section 1349; Counts Two through Seven: Julia Keleher and Ariel Gutiérrez-Rodríguez - Wire Fraud,  Title 18, United States Code, Section 1343; Count Eight:  Julia Keleher - Federal Program Bribery (accepting a bribe),  Title 18, United States Code, Section 666(a)(1)(B); and Count Nine: Ariel Gutiérrez-Rodríguez - Federal Program Bribery (paying a bribe), Title 18, United States Code, Section 666(a)(2).

The indictment alleges that the purpose of the conspiracy was for Keleher to use her official position as the Secretary of Education to enrich herself by soliciting and accepting things of value from others, and for others to enrich themselves by obtaining favorable official action from Keleher through corrupt means.  Defendant Ariel Gutiérrez-Rodríguez facilitated Keleher’s receipt of financial benefits in connection with her lease and purchase of an apartment in the Ciudadela apartment complex in Santurce, Puerto Rico, in exchange for Keleher’s signing a letter purporting to give 1,034 square feet of the Padre Rufo School to a private company.

“Public corruption continues to erode the trust between government officials and our citizens. Defendant Keleher exploited her government position to benefit herself and other private individuals,” said U.S. Attorney Muldrow. “Government officials are entrusted with performing their duties honestly and ethically. When they fail to do so, they will be held to account.”

“Anyone involved in the bribery of a public official seeks to put their own interests above those of the People of Puerto Rico. However, those corrupt parties will eventually pay a much higher price to the criminal justice system, and we will continue to deliver them to the federal courthouse. This has been our commitment to the people of Puerto Rico and one we intend to keep in the years to come,” said Douglas A. Leff, Special Agent in Charge of the FBI.

The case is being prosecuted by Senior Litigation Counsel José Capó-Iriarte and Assistant U.S. Attorney Alexander Alum. If found guilty, the defendants are facing possible sentences of up to 10 years for conspiracy and federal program bribery,  and up to 20 years for wire fraud. The charges contained in the indictment are merely accusations. The defendants are presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.

# # #

SAN JUAN, Puerto Rico– Julia Beatrice Keleher, former Secretary of the Puerto Rico Department of Education (“PR DOE”), Ángela Ávila-Marrero, former Executive Director of the Puerto Rico Health Insurance Administration (“ASES”), Alberto Velázquez-Piñol, Fernando Scherrer-Caillet, Glenda Ponce-Mendoza, and Mayra Ponce-Mendoza have been indicted and arrested for their participation in a conspiracy to steal and convert federal funds involving fraudulently obtained contracts from the PR DOE and ASES, announced U.S. Attorney Rosa Emilia Rodríguez-Vélez of the District of Puerto Rico. The Federal Bureau of Investigation is handling the investigation with the United States Department of Education, Office of Inspector General, and the United States Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General.

The indictment returned yesterday, July 9, 2019, by a federal grand jury in the District of Puerto Rico, includes 32 counts against the following individuals:

Julia Beatrice Keleher (“Keleher”), the Secretary of the Puerto Rico Department of Education (PR DOE) from January 2017 until April 2019;

Ángela Ávila-Marrero (“Ávila-Marrero”), the Executive Director of the Puerto Rico Health Insurance Administration, from February 2017 until June 25, 2019;

Alberto Velázquez-Piñol (“Velázquez-Piñol”), President of Azur, L.L.C. (“Azur”);

Fernando Scherrer-Caillet (“Scherrer-Caillet”), managing partner of BDO, Puerto Rico, P.S.C.;

Glenda E. Ponce-Mendoza, Special Assistant to PR DOE Secretary Keleher;

Mayra Ponce-Mendoza, owner of Colón & Ponce, Inc., and sister of defendant Glenda E. Ponce-Mendoza.

The indictment alleges that the defendants used Keleher’s and Ávila-Marrero’s positions as Secretary of PR DOE and Executive Director of ASES, respectively, to benefit and enrich themselves and defraud the United States as follows:

Count 1 of the Indictment charges a wire fraud conspiracy. The purpose of the conspiracy was to steer contracts between the PR DOE and Colón & Ponce, a company owned by Mayra Ponce Mendoza. This was accomplished through a corrupted bidding process pursuant to a Request for Proposal (“RFP”), wherein Colón & Ponce was provided with a competitive advantage over other bidders based in part, on the close relationship between Keleher, Glenda Ponce-Mendoza, and her sister Mayra Ponce-Mendoza. Despite being unqualified under the terms of the RFP, Colón & Ponce was awarded a $43,500 contract, which was later increased to $95,000. The increased amount was used to pay in part the salary of one of Keleher’s special assistants. Keleher pressured a PR DOE official identified as Individual B in the indictment to execute the Colón & Ponce contract on behalf of PR DOE. Counts 2 through 11 list the wire communications transmitted by Keleher and the Ponce-Mendoza sisters in order to perpetrate the scheme set forth in Count 1.

Count 12 of the Indictment charges Keleher, Velázquez-Piñol, and Scherrer-Caillet with conspiring to violate 18 U.S.C. § 641 (theft and conversion of government money and property in excess of $1,000). The conspiracy and scheme to defraud involved federal funds paid by PR DOE to BDO for several contracts totaling over $13 million from January 2017 until April 2019. Despite express prohibitions in said contracts, BDO subcontracted other companies to perform the services, and paid Velázquez-Piñol, through his company Azur, a 10% commission for the contracts awarded through Velázquez-Piñol’s influence with government officials. By paying unauthorized commissions, the cost of government contracts was unnecessarily inflated and increased. Velázquez-Piñol, through Azur, received approximately $219,059 in commissions from BDO for the PR DOE contracts it was awarded. Counts 13 through 18 list the wire communications transmitted and caused to be transmitted in interstate commerce, all in furtherance of the conspiracy, scheme to defraud, and the theft of federal funds.

Count 19 charges Ávila-Marrero, Velázquez-Piñol, and Scherrer-Caillet with conspiring to violate 18 U.S.C. § 641 (theft and conversion of government money and property in excess of $1,000). The conspiracy and scheme to defraud involved federal funds paid by ASES to BDO for several contracts totaling $2.5 million during the period between January 2017 and June 2019. Ávila-Marrero provided internal ASES information on several contracts to Velázquez-Piñol. BDO and other companies used this internal information, provided by Velázquez-Piñol, to submit proposals to ASES, and replace the existing contracts. During ASES board meetings, Ávila-Marrero recommended the cancellation of the contracts and the award of replacement contracts to BDO and another company represented by Velázquez-Piñol. Despite express prohibitions in said contracts, BDO subcontracted other companies to provide the services, and paid Velázquez-Piñol, through his company Azur, a 10% commission for the contracts awarded through Velázquez-Piñol’s influence with government officials. By paying unauthorized commissions, the cost of government contracts was unnecessarily inflated and increased. Velázquez-Piñol received approximately $710,000 in payments from BDO for the ASES contracts it was awarded. Counts 20 through 25 list the wire communications transmitted and caused to be transmitted in interstate commerce, all in furtherance of the conspiracy, scheme to defraud, and the theft of federal funds.

 

The indictment also includes a money laundering conspiracy charge against Velázquez-Piñol and Scherrer-Caillet, and six substantive money laundering counts against Velázquez-Piñol.   

“Public corruption continues to erode the trust between government officials and our citizens. Defendants Keleher and Ávila-Marrero exploited their government positions and fraudulently awarded contracts funded with federal monies. The greed of the private individuals charged along with these former government officials, resulted in inflated government contracts which deprived our citizens of much needed education and health services,” said U.S. Attorney Rosa Emilia Rodríguez-Vélez. “Government officials are entrusted with performing their duties honestly and ethically. The charged offenses are reprehensible, more so in light of Puerto Rico’s fiscal crisis.”

“Yesterday’s indictment alleges that these individuals were involved in a public corruption campaign and profited at the expense of Puerto Rico’s children. That is completely unacceptable,” said Neil E. Sanchez, Special Agent in Charge of the U.S. Department of Education Office of Inspector General’s Southern Regional Office. “OIG Special Agents will continue to aggressively pursue those who seek to enrich themselves at the expense of our nation’s students. America’s students, their families, and taxpayers deserve nothing less.”

“The illegal granting of contracts paid with monies from the Medicaid program is unacceptable. The Medicaid program is intended to provide health care benefits to low-income individuals and families, and any improper use of these funds will jeopardize its future availability. HHS-OIG and its law enforcement partners will continue to aggressively pursue to the fullest extent of the law those who seek to unlawfully enrich themselves from Medicaid funds,” said Scott Lampert, Special Agent in Charge of HHS-OIG New York Regional Office.

“Today’s efforts are the result of true team work. Thanks to the admirable dedication of our partners at the United States Attorney’s Office, and the Inspectors General for both the Departments of Education and Health and Human Services, new schemes have been uncovered, along with attempts to hide the proceeds of those schemes. Moving forward with the help of our local partners, the FBI will continue to make apprehending and exposing those who would do harm to the People of Puerto Rico our top priority,” said Douglas A. Leff, Special Agent in Charge of the FBI.

The case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorneys José Capó-Iriarte and Marie Christine Amy. If found guilty, the defendants are facing possible sentences of up to 10 years for conspiracy and theft of government funds,  and up to 20 years for wire fraud and money laundering. The charges contained in the indictment are merely accusations. The defendants are presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.

# # #

Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1U1W8riuTIpe4NJuzLldMPYrnAIHBly6TxYkcClzW5IA
  Last Updated: 2024-04-12 01:34:26 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the second highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE2
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE2
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the third highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE3
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE3
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the fourth highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE4
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE4
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the fifth highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE5
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE5
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE5
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE5
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
F U C K I N G P E D O S R E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E