Score:   1
Docket Number:   D-PR  3:18-cr-00778
Case Name:   USA v. Gonzalez-Rodriguez et al
  Press Releases:
SAN JUAN, P.R. - On December 13, 2018, a federal Grand Jury returned a 37-count indictment charging 22 individuals with conspiracy to commit bank fraud, 18 substantive counts of bank fraud, and 16 counts of aggravated identity theft, announced Rosa Emilia Rodríguez-Vélez, U.S. Attorney for the District of Puerto Rico. During the course of the scheme, the defendants illegally obtained $560,640.43 from the Bureau of the Lottery of Puerto Rico (the “PR Lottery), a division of the Puerto Rico Treasury Department. The United States Secret Service was in charge of the investigation.

According to the indictment, defendant [1] Natalie Enid González-Rodríguez produced or procured fraudulent checks using the names and addresses of unsuspecting business concerns operating in Puerto Rico as apparent issuers of the checks (the “Fake Employers”) specifying the routing and account number for the PR Lottery’s bank account. The false checks were issued payable to one of the following defendants as employees or contractors: [2] Vanessa Pérez; [3] María Magdalena Silva, a.k.a. “María Magdalena Robaina/María Silva/María Robaina;” [4] Miguel Ángel Robaina, a.k.a. “Miguel Robaina;” [5] Destini Angelica Hanze, a.k.a. “Destini Hanze;” [6] Ángel Miguel Berríos-García, a.k.a. “Ángel M. Berrios-García/Ángel Berríos;” [7] Melissa Parilla-Belardo, a.k.a. “Melissa Parrilla;” [8] Luis Alberto Maldonado III, a.k.a. “Luis A. Maldonado/Luis Alberto Maldonado;” [9] Johanna Luciano-Velázquez, a.k.a. “Johanna Luciano;” [10] Martin Martínez-López, a.k.a. “Martin Martínez;” [11] Eric Alberto Delgado-Carmona, a.k.a. “Eric Delgado/Eric Delgado Carmona;” [12] Pedro Iván Cortés-Castañón, a.k.a. “Pedro Cortés/Pedro Iván Cortés;” [13] Allan R. Mercado-Serrano, a.k.a. “Allan Mercado;” [14] Julieanies Mercado-Laboy, a.k.a. “Julieanies Mercado;” [15] Marc Anthony Ramos-Medina, a.k.a. “Marc Anthony Ramos;” [16] Gustavo A. Cruz-Rosado, a.k.a. “Gustavo Cruz;” [17] Joshua A. Molina-Morales, a.k.a. “Joshua Molina;” [18] Natyshia Enid Soto-González, a.k.a. “Natyshia Enid Soto/Natyshia Soto;” [19] Edmilio Rosario-Ramírez, a.k.a. “Edmilio Rosario/Ángel Ruiz Rodríguez/El Millo;” [20] Angelo Rodríguez-Cortés, a.k.a. “Angelo Rodríguez;” [21] Antonio L. Pacheco-Ayala, a.k.a. “Antonio Pacheco;” and [22] Yalitza Quiñones-Figueroa, a.k.a. “Yaritza Quiñones.”

The indictment alleges that the co-conspirators would take the false checks to multiple discount stores to negotiate them in exchange for cash or to use them to buy consumer products and return the proceeds of the scheme to Natalie Enid González-Rodríguez, who would then give them a portion of those proceeds. By executing the scheme and cashing the false checks at the discount stores, supermarkets and department stores, the co-conspirators obtained and procured funds belonging to the PR Lottery by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises.

Defendant González-Rodríguez is facing 16 counts of aggravated identity theft. Between on or about October 2, 2015 through the date of this indictment, aided and abetted by the defendants listed in each count, and others known and unknown to the Grand Jury, did knowingly transfer, possess, and use, without lawful authority, a means of identification of another real person as detailed in each count during and in relation to the bank fraud.

“Defendant González-Rodríguez perpetrated this fraudulent scheme over many years, and involved many people who are defendants today for a fragment of the proceeds she generated. These charges once again demonstrate the U.S. Attorney’s Office resolve to investigate and prosecute those who perpetrate financial schemes to defraud unsuspected victims,” said U.S. Attorney Rosa Emilia Rodríguez-Vélez.

U.S. Secret Service Resident Agent in Charge Carlos Colón stated: “This case highlights the Secret Service’s investigative skills and our commitment to collaborate with our law enforcement partners in detecting and dismantling criminal organizations. These crimes have a detrimental impact to our nation’s critical financial infrastructure. Financial fraud is one of the largest challenges facing American citizens and businesses today. The United Secret Service will continue to collaborate with its law enforcement partners to target and arrest who commit this type of fraud.”

If convicted, the defendants face a maximum possible sentence of incarceration of 30 years for bank fraud, and a consecutive two-year mandatory minimum sentence for aggravated identity theft. The investigation was conducted by the United States Secret Service and the case is being prosecuted by AUSA Dennise N. Longo-Quiñones.

# # #

CourtListener:
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/8417841/united-states-v-gonzalez-rodriguez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/8417850/united-states-v-gonzalez-rodriguez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/8417837/united-states-v-gonzalez-rodriguez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/35907222/united-states-v-gonzalez-rodriguez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/8417834/united-states-v-gonzalez-rodriguez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/8417856/united-states-v-gonzalez-rodriguez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/8417863/united-states-v-gonzalez-rodriguez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/8417844/united-states-v-gonzalez-rodriguez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/8417846/united-states-v-gonzalez-rodriguez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/8417852/united-states-v-gonzalez-rodriguez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/8417859/united-states-v-gonzalez-rodriguez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/8417857/united-states-v-gonzalez-rodriguez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/8417835/united-states-v-gonzalez-rodriguez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/8417840/united-states-v-gonzalez-rodriguez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/8417853/united-states-v-gonzalez-rodriguez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/8417839/united-states-v-gonzalez-rodriguez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/8417855/united-states-v-gonzalez-rodriguez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/8417818/united-states-v-gonzalez-rodriguez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/8417861/united-states-v-gonzalez-rodriguez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/8417825/united-states-v-gonzalez-rodriguez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/8417832/united-states-v-gonzalez-rodriguez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/8417842/united-states-v-gonzalez-rodriguez/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/8417848/united-states-v-gonzalez-rodriguez/
Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1S63PNQ0SKuj3wikh3M3FekmqwN1DZnEt-iToOzAJ0Ow
  Last Updated: 2024-04-01 05:30:29 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the second highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE2
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE2
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the third highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE3
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE3
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the fourth highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE4
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE4
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the fifth highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE5
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE5
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE5
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE5
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
F U C K I N G P E D O S R E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E