Score:   0.9687
Docket Number:   SD-FL  1:19-cr-20374
Case Name:   USA v. Rodriguez
  Press Releases:
     Wifredo A. Ferrer, United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, Kelly R. Jackson, Special Agent in Charge, Internal Revenue Service, Criminal Investigation (IRS-CI), Miami Field Office, George L. Piro, Special Agent in Charge, Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Miami Field Office, Miami Field Office Juan P. Perez, Director, Miami Dade Police Department (MDPD), Timothy Camus, Deputy Inspector General for Investigations, Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA), Rafiq Ahmad, Special Agent in Charge, United States Department of Labor, Office of Inspector General, Miami Field Office (DOL-OIG), Mark Selby, Special Agent in Charge, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s Homeland Security Investigations (ICE-HSI), Brian Swain, Special Agent in Charge, U.S. Secret Service (USSS), Miami Field Office, Antonio J. Gomez, Inspector in Charge, U.S. Postal Inspection Service (USPIS), Miami Division, and Margaret Moore-Jackson, Special Agent in Charge, Social Security Administration, Office of Inspector General (SSA-OIG) announce the filing of federal charges against more than 100 defendants in 81 separate cases, dealing with over 30,000 stolen identities and the intended theft of over $60 million dollars from individuals, businesses and government agencies through fraudulent schemes.

     In August 2012, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida, with the collaboration of our federal, state and local law enforcement partners, established the South Florida Identity Theft Refund Fraud Strike Force (Strike Force) to combat an increase in stolen identity tax refund scams. The collective efforts of the Strike Force resulted in the successful prosecution of countless stolen identity tax refund cases. However, while the wave of these pernicious offenses subsided, evolving fraud schemes have spread across South Florida. No longer limited to stolen identity tax refund fraud, the Strike Force, now Stolen Identity Fraud (SIF) Strike Force is investigating and prosecuting a variety of cases stemming from stolen personal identifying information (PII). These cases include intrusion into proprietary government databases; theft of customer account information; takeovers by identity thieves of accounts as diverse as U.S. Social Security and unemployment benefits, retail credit card accounts, and bank accounts; and the use of skimmers to steal valuable PII. These cases demonstrate that law enforcement in general and the Strike Force in particular continue to adapt to meet this insidious identity theft threat.

Since the inception of the Strike Force in 2012, the U.S. Attorney’s Office has charged more than 600 defendants, who were responsible for over $400 million in intended losses.

“Law enforcement will not stand by as criminals attempt to disrupt our lives, steal our savings, ravage our credit, and compromise our government benefit programs through calculated and pervasive fraud schemes,” stated U.S. Attorney Wifredo A. Ferrer. “Today’s announcement demonstrates that the collective response by our federal, state, and local law enforcement partners has had a profound impact on protecting the community from identity theft.”

“I urge everyone to take steps to protect their personally identifiable information (PII) from criminals who seek illicit profits through stolen identity fraud,” said George L. Piro, Special Agent in Charge, FBI Miami. “Learn how you can protect your PII at FBI.GOV or FTC.GOV. The FBI and our partners continue to actively target these fraudsters who victimize hard-working taxpayers.”

     Kelly R. Jackson, Special Agent in Charge, Internal Revenue Service, Criminal Investigation (IRS-CI), stated, “Today’s announcement reinforces law enforcement’s continued commitment to combat identity theft in South Florida. As an agency, the IRS has made remarkable progress in its efforts to protect taxpayers, and we are focused on strengthening our systems and processes even more for this 2017 tax season. I urge taxpayers to protect their personal information and remain vigilant when choosing a return preparer. Beware of return preparers who claim they can get you a ‘higher’ refund then another preparer and those that set their fee based on a percentage of your refund. Ultimately, the taxpayer is responsible for what is filed with the IRS, so choose wisely. IRS-CI will continue to investigate significant Stolen Identity Refund Fraud (SIRF) schemes and egregious tax return preparers, and will collaborate with other federal agencies and IRS civil divisions to stop these thieves in their tracks.”

“The DOL-OIG is committed to working with our Identity Theft Strike Force partners to combat identity theft in the Southern District of Florida and safeguard the Nation's Unemployment Insurance program for those who seek relief from the financial impact of being unemployed,” stated Rafiq Ahmad, Special Agent in Charge, Atlanta Region, U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Inspector General.

"The impersonation of IRS employees continues to represent a serious threat to taxpayers and to the integrity of tax administration,” said Timothy P. Camus, Deputy Inspector General for the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA). “We are extremely grateful to the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Miami and their counterparts around the country for their excellent teamwork, collaboration, and support of our efforts on such cases. As these cases show, TIGTA agents continue to relentlessly pursue investigations of individuals who engage in this fraudulent activity and aggressively refer them for criminal prosecution.”

“These arrests are a reflection of the success that comes when federal, state and local law enforcement agencies work together to target criminal organizations and individuals in South Florida,” said Mark Selby, Special Agent in Charge of HSI Miami. “At HSI we will continue to aggressively investigate fraudulent financial schemes that put in jeopardy the integrity of our financial system and are often a gateway to further criminal activity.”

Antonio J. Gomez, Postal Inspector in Charge of the Miami Division stated, “The arrests of these individuals should serve as reassurance to our customers that the U.S. Postal Service remains one of the safest and securest ways of conducting both personal and private business and the U.S. Postal Inspection Service will stop at nothing to bring these criminals to account. Postal Inspectors will continue to partner with our federal and local law enforcement partners to aggressively investigate these types of crimes.”

Today’s Strike Force announcement reaffirms the collective joint federal, state and local commitment to the prosecution of perpetrators who steal, sell and use personal identification information to commit identity theft fraud schemes. The cases brought under the Strike Force operation, from October 2016 to the present day, include:

IRS IMPERSONATORS

United States v. Abhijeetsinh Jadeja and Rachel Jean Roragen, Case No. 17-CR-20085-Martinez

On January 27, 2017, Abhijeetsinh Jadeja, 29, of Miami, and, Rachel Jean Roragen, 41, of Miami Beach, were charged in a twelve-count indictment with conspiracy to commit wire fraud, possessing fifteen or more unauthorized access devices and aggravated identity theft.

to allegations contained in the indictment, between January 2014 and March 2016, Jadeja and Roragen’s co-conspirators impersonated officials from the IRS and other agencies during telephone calls in which they falsely represented to individual victims that they owed money to the IRS or fees on loans or grants. To satisfy their alleged debts, victims were fraudulently induced to send payments to bank accounts and debit cards under the control of Jadeja, Roragen and their conspirators.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the TIGTA, ICE-HSI, IRS-CI, and the Miami Beach Police Department. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Daya Nathan.

United States v. Andre Oakley Wellington, Case No. 17-CR-60027-Dimitrouleas

On January 27, 2017, Andre Oakley Wellington, 37, of Coral Springs, was charged in a two-count indictment for participating in a conspiracy to commit mail fraud and mail fraud.

According to the allegations contained in the criminal complaint and indictment, beginning in July of 2016 and ending in January 2017, Wellington’s conspirators impersonated IRS employees during telephone calls in which they falsely represented to an individual victim that he/she owed money to the IRS. Wellington’s conspirators fraudulently induced the victim to send payments via private and commercial mail carriers to addresses located throughout the United States, in order to satisfy the alleged IRS debt. In addition, Wellington’s co-conspirators demanded that the victim send a package containing $25,000 to Wellington’s address in Coral Springs. The conspirators provided Wellington with the FedEx tracking number, which the defendant used to track the package’s arrival. The package was delivered to Wellington’s residence, and was then recovered by TIGTA Special Agents. In total, Wellington and his co-conspirators fraudulently obtained over $550,000 from the victim.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of TIGTA and IRS-CI. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Daniel J. Marcet.

TAX REFUND FRAUD

United States v. Silvio Galvez, Case No. 16-CR-20016-Middlebrooks

On January 20, 2017, Silvio Galvez, 30, of Miami, was arrested on a criminal complaint and is charged by indictment for his alleged involvement in a $50 million stolen identity refund fraud scheme involving the cashing of fraudulently obtained large-dollar tax refund checks. Galvez was charged with conspiracy to commit theft of government money, conspiracy to commit bank fraud, theft of government money, and aggravated identity theft.

to allegations in the criminal complaint, Galvez was a leader in a conspiracy involving the filing of over $50 million in large tax refund claims — each claim ranging from approximately $130,000 to $170,000 — in 2013 and 2014. These fraudulent refund requests were submitted to the IRS for payment using stolen identity information. The tax refunds contained the same set of repeated addresses, including the defendant’s address. The IRS paid out at least $4.3 million via U.S. Treasury checks mailed to the addresses listed on the returns. Galvez directed individuals to deposit these fraudulently obtained tax refunds and other fraudulently obtained checks at a bank in Miami. Galvez separately directed a bank employee to open up accounts using stolen identity information so that fraudulently obtained tax refund checks could be deposited. Finally, Galvez directed the bank employee to obtain account information for accounts with substantial funds, in order to conduct account takeovers.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of IRS-CI, FBI and ICE-HSI. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Michael N. Berger.

United States v. Evelina Sophia Reid, Case No. 17-CR-20057-Williams

On January 26, 2017, Evelina Sophia Reid, 35, of Miami Gardens, was charged in a fourteen-count indictment with conspiracy to commit access device fraud, possessing fifteen or more unauthorized access devices, aggravated identity theft, and computer fraud.

According to the indictment and publicly available documents, Reid was an employee of Jackson Health System when she accessed Jackson’s computer databases to steal patient PII, including social security numbers, of over approximately 24,000 individuals during a five-year period. Using the stolen information, Reid’s co-conspirators filed fraudulent tax returns in the names of Jackson Hospital patients.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of SSA-OIG, IRS-CI, USSS, DOL-OIG, MDPD Professional Compliance Bureau and Public Corruption Section, and the Miami-Dade County Office of the Inspector General. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Daya Nathan.

United States v. Douglas McArthur Bentley, Jr., et al,

Case No. 17-CR-20033-Altonaga

On January 19, 2017, Douglas Mcarthur Bentley, Jr., 41, Yvonne Lynn Bentley, 40, and Willie Ellis Hayden, 25, all of Homestead, were charged in a thirteen-count indictment for participating in a conspiracy to defraud the government with respect to claims, theft of government funds and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, starting on or about January 29, 2010, and continuing to on or about April 16, 2013, the defendants and their co-conspirators obtained stolen PII from various individuals without their consent and used the PII to file false and fraudulent tax returns with the IRS. The defendants and their co-conspirators also directed the IRS to electronically transfer tax refunds from the false and fraudulent tax returns to personal and corporate bank accounts they controlled at several banks located in Miami-Dade County, Florida. Once the tax refunds were deposited in bank accounts the defendants controlled, the illicitly obtained refunds were used for their personal gain and profit. According to allegations made in court, the intended loss amount for the fraud scheme was approximately $472,393.07 and the actual loss was $414,838.07.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of IRS-CI and the Homestead Police Department. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Maurice A. Johnson.

United States v. Blain, et al., Case No. 16-CR-14076-Middlebrooks

On December 1, 2016, five people were charged in a three-count indictment for their participation in conspiracy to commit stolen identity tax refund fraud.

Charlton Tierry Blain, 30, Clifford Raoul Blain, 28, Stephane Randolph Blain, 25, all of Pembroke Pines, and Dorsey Sims, Jr., 31, and Luis Roberto Rodriguez, 38, both of Sebring, were charged with conspiracy to defraud the government with respect to claims; conspiracy to commit access device fraud; and unlawful transfer, possession or use of means of identification.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, between January of 2012 and December of 2013, the defendants conspired to unjustly enriched themselves by using unlawfully obtained personally identifiable information to file false and fraudulent income tax returns. The fraudulently obtained tax refunds were deposited into fraudulent bank accounts controlled by the defendants, and the illicit proceeds were then withdrawn from those accounts. In total, 679 fraudulent tax returns were filed, claiming $986,978.00 in total refunds.

Mr. Ferrer commends the efforts of IRS-CI. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Daniel E. Funk and Adam C. McMichael.

United States v. Teri Onick and Philip White,

Case No. 17-CR-20011-Williams

On January 6, 2017, Teri Onick, 44, of Miami, and Phillip White, 45, of Salt Lake City, UT, of Miami, were charged in a thirteen-count indictment for their participation in a conspiracy to defraud the U.S. government.

According to the allegations in the indictment, on various dates between February and October 2012, Onick and White unlawfully obtained and deposited the fraudulently obtained tax refund checks belonging to other persons, without their permission or authority, into Onick and White’s bank accounts for their personal use and benefit. The estimated fraud loss is over $150,000.00.

Mr. Ferrer commends the efforts of IRS-CI. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Cary Aronovitz.

United States v. Gregory Clermont, Case No. 17-mj-2128-Torres

On January 30, 2017, Gregory Clermont, 25, of Miami, was charged by criminal complaint with possession of fifteen or more unauthorized access devices, that is, social security numbers issued to other persons.

to the allegations contained in the criminal complaint, on May 7, 2013, Clermont was in possession of official tax documents and handwritten lists of names, dates of birth, and social security numbers belonging to other individuals, as well as other handwritten notes appearing to relate to the filing of tax returns. Clermont was also in possession of a composition book containing what appeared to be the names, dates of birth, and social security numbers of approximately 140 individuals, three H&R Block debit cards in other people’s names, and a laptop that contained user identification numbers associated with the filing and attempted filing of tax returns through TurboTax online. More than fifteen of the social security numbers in the composition book belonged to other individuals.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of IRS-CI. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney John P. Gonsoulin.

United States v. Johnathan Jameel Ford, Case No. 17-CR-20079-Williams

On January 27, 2017, Johnathan Jameel Ford a/k/a “Johnatan Jameel Ford”, 41, of Broward, was charged in a fourteen-count indictment for the theft of government money and aggravated identity theft.

According to the indictment, between September 2013 and July 2015, Ford received stolen tax refunds or deposited altered U.S. Treasury checks, totaling over $45,000, knowing that the tax refunds or U.S. Treasury checks had been stolen.

Mr. Ferrer commends the efforts of IRS-CI, TIGTA and USSS. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Daya Nathan.

United States v. Crystal Jesha Griffin, Case No. 17-CR-20076-Williams

On January 27, 2017, Crystal Jesha Griffin, 25, of Miramar, was charged in a nine-count indictment for theft of government money.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, Griffin did knowingly and willfully receive United States Department of Treasury tax refunds, knowing the tax refunds to have been stolen. Specifically, Griffin is accused of receiving nine different tax refunds, from nine different victims, totaling $8,074.00.

Mr. Ferrer commended the investigative efforts of the FBI and IRS-CI. The case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Jonathan Stratton.

United States v. Ronald Esperant, Case No. 17-mj-2122-O’Sullivan

On January 27, 2017, Ronald Esperant, 31, of Miami, was charged by criminal complaint with the theft of government money for his participation in a tax scheme that defrauded the U.S. government.

According to the allegations contained in the complaint, in April 2013 multiple tax refunds issued to other persons, without their permission or authority, were deposited into Esperant’s bank account for an actual loss amount of $5,885.00.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of IRS-CI. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Matthew J. Langley.

United States v. Ricardo Innocent, Case No. 17-mj-2123-O’Sullivan

On January 27, 2017, Ricardo Innocent, 34, of Miami, was charged by criminal complaint with the theft of government money for his participation in a tax scheme that defrauded the U.S. government.

According to the allegations contained in the complaint, Innocent, filed fraudulent tax returns from January 2011 through February 2014 and had those fraudulently obtained tax refunds deposited into his bank account for an actual loss amount of $77,381.18.

Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of IRS-CI. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Matthew J. Langley.

United States v. Michelin Petit-Maitre, Case No. 17-mj-2124-O’Sullivan

On January 27, 2017, Michelin Petit-Maitre, 36, of Miami, was charged by criminal complaint with the theft of government money for his participation in a tax scheme that defrauded the U.S. government.

According to the allegations contained in the complaint, Petit-Maitre filed fraudulent tax returns from June 2013 through in or around February 2014 in the names of other persons and had those fraudulently obtained tax refunds deposited into his bank for an actual loss amount of $41,840.00.

Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of IRS-CI. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Matthew J. Langley.

United States v. Martha Somayra Gomez, Case No. 17-CR-20061-King

On January 26, 2017, Martha Somayra Gomez, 28, of Miami, was charged in a nine-count indictment for the theft of government money.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, between August 20, 2012 and June 5, 2013, nine tax refunds issued to other persons were deposited into Gomez’s bank accounts for an actual loss amount of $24,922.00.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the FBI and IRS-CI. The case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney J. Mackenzie Duane.

United States v. Youri P. Baptiste, Case No. 17-CR-20048-Altonaga

On January 24, 2017, Youri P. Baptiste, 23, of Miami, was charged in a six-count indictment for the theft of government money.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, between September 5, 2012 and September 24, 2013, six tax refunds issued to other persons were deposited into Baptiste’s bank accounts for an actual loss amount of $22,048.00.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the FBI and IRS-CI. The case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney J. Mackenzie Duane.

United States v. Altagrace Shaina Descollines, Case No. 17-CR-20047-Scola

On January 24, 2017, Altagrace Shaina Descollines, 25, of Hollywood, was charged in a three-count indictment for the theft of government money.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, between December 5, 2012 and April 24, 2013, three tax refunds issued to other persons were deposited into Descollines’ bank account for an actual loss amount of $13,169.00.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the FBI and IRS-CI. The case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney J. Mackenzie Duane.

United States v. Quincy Thomas Cook, Case No. 17-CR-20059-Williams

On January 26, 2017, Quincy Thomas Cook, 24, of Miramar, was charged in a four-count indictment for the theft of government money.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, between April 2012 and April 2013, four tax refunds issued to other persons were deposited into Cook’s bank account for an actual loss amount of $5,896.00.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the FBI, IRS-CI and USPIS. The case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Jonathan Stratton.

United States v. Willie Lee Parker, III, Case No. 17-CR-20058-Middlebrooks

On January 26, 2017, Willie Lee Parker III, 23, of Opa-Locka, was charged in an eleven-count indictment for the theft of government money.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, between February 2013 and April 2013, eleven tax refunds issued to other persons were deposited into Parker III’s bank account for an actual loss amount of $6,610.00.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the FBI and IRS-CI. The case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Jonathan Stratton.

United States v. Damon Donnell Rhodes, Case No. 17-CR-20062-Lenard

On January 26, 2017, Damon Donnell Rhodes, 23, of Hialeah, was charged in a seven-count indictment for the theft of government money.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, between November 2012 and December 2012, seven tax refunds issued to other persons were deposited into Rhodes’ bank account for an actual loss amount of $5,495.00.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the FBI, USPIS and IRS-CI. The case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Jonathan Stratton.

United States v. Rashaundra Javanni Lewis, Case No. 17-CR-20060-Scola

On January 26, 2017, Rashaundra Javanni Lewis, 26, of Miami, was charged in a five-count indictment for the theft of government money.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, between September 19, 2012 and September 26, 2012, five tax refunds issued to other persons were deposited into Lewis’ bank account for an actual loss amount of $3,953.00.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the FBI and IRS-CI. The case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney J. Mackenzie Duane.

THEFT OF PUBLIC BENEFIT FUNDS

United States v. Phyllistone Termine, Case No. 17-mj-2098-O’Sullivan

On January 26, 2017, Phyllistone Termine, 19, of Miami, was charged by criminal complaint for access device fraud, possession of fifteen or more unauthorized access devices, possession of device making equipment, and aggravated identity theft related to his alleged participation in a fraudulent unemployment compensation scheme.

According to the court record, including allegations contained in the criminal complaint, an IP address connected to Termine’s residence was used to access and file fraudulent unemployment benefit claims for more than 800 individuals on the Florida Department of Employment and Opportunity’s online database between March 23, 2015, and March 7, 2016.

the course of the investigation law enforcement executed a search warrant at Termine’s residence and allegedly discovered the defendant in his bedroom, writing on a small notepad. The first line on the notepad read “Summer 2016th” and stated “Buy 3 Phones, 1 clean 2 dirty’s” and “Buy online – Merrick BNK & CCVs.” CCVs are numeric fraud-prevention codes on credit cards that are used to help verify possession of your credit card. They can also be purchased from internet sources, in order for people to obtain stolen credit card data. On the bed next to Termine were three cellular phones and a laptop computer. Hidden between the defendant’s mattress and box spring was a black case containing several debit and credit cards belonging to individuals who did not reside at Termine’s residence. Inside the black case were several white blank plastic cards with magnetic stripes that are used to make debit and credit cards. On the floor next to Termine’s bed was hardware used to encode the magnetic stripe on credit/debit cards. Several victims whose credit or debit cards were found during the search also had their identities used to file for unemployment benefits using the IP Address at Termine’s home. These victims had not filed unemployment claims within the last 5 years, did not authorize anyone else to, and did not know Termine.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of DOL-OIG and SSA-OIG. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Anne P. McNamara.

United States v. Kicksonley Azema and Abdul Pierrelus,

Case No. 17-CR-20081-Moore

On January 27, 2017, Kicksonley Azema, 26, and Abdul Pierrelus, 29, both of North Miami, were charged in a five-count indictment with conspiracy to commit access device fraud, using unauthorized access devices to fraudulently obtain something valued at $1,000 or more and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, beginning on or about January 26, 2015, and continuing through the date of the indictment, Azema and Pierrelus unlawfully used social security numbers of Michigan residents to fraudulently file unemployment benefit claims with the state of Michigan, and directed those fraudulently obtained funds to debit card accounts fraudulently established using the social security numbers belonging to other persons.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of DOL-OIG, ICE-HSI and the State of Michigan Unemployment Insurance Agency. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Brian J. Shack.

United States v. James Kelly Morency, Frantzy Morency, and Jakeem Amal Stevens, Case No. 17-CR-20075-Huck

On January 27, 2017, James Kelly Morency, 21, of Hallandale Beach, Frantzy Morency, 26, of Lehigh Acres, and Jakeem Amal Stevens, 28, of Hollywood, were charged in a thirteen-count indictment with conspiracy to commit access device fraud, aggravated identity theft, possession of 15 or more unauthorized access devices, access device fraud, and computer fraud.

According to the indictment, between May 2011 and February 2015, the defendants possessed, transferred and used the social security numbers of other persons to obtain Social Security Administration (SSA) benefits by creating online accounts with the SSA with the stolen social security numbers belonging to other persons and having the SSA benefits redirected to accounts that the defendants controlled.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the FBI, SSA-OIG, and IRS-CI. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Daya Nathan.

United States v. Sammie Nathaniel Williams, Jr., a/k/a “Old School,” Case No. 16-CR-20921-Scola

On December 9, 2016, Sammie Nathaniel Williams, Jr., a/k/a “Old School,” 58, of Miami, was charged in a six-count indictment for mail theft by a postal employee and theft of government money. On January 19, 2017, Williams pleaded guilty to theft of government money.

According to the court record, on November 29, 2016, Williams, a United States Postal Service employee, stole three U.S. Treasury checks from the mail.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of USPIS, TIGTA and IRS-CI. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Jonathan Stratton.

BANK ACCOUNT TAKEOVERS

United States v. Jonathan Phanor, Case No. 16-CR-60349-Dimitrouleas

On December 13, 2016, Jonathan Phanor, 33, of Margate, was charged in a four-count indictment for his participation in a conspiracy to commit bank fraud and identity theft scheme.

According to court documents, from May 18, 2013 through August 13, 2013, Phanor accessed Wells Fargo customers’ bank accounts to obtain their name, date of birth, social security number and bank account numbers and provided the information to his co-conspirator. A co-conspirator would then open joint bank accounts using Wells Fargo customer’s name, date of birth, social security number and bank account numbers and move Wells Fargo customers’ money to the joint account. Once the money was in the joint account, the co-conspirator would then transfer the money belonging to the Wells Fargo customers’ from the joint account to bank accounts controlled by the co-conspirators. The defendant and his co-conspirators used the customers’ identities without their permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the FBI. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Miesha Shonta Darrough.

United States v. Mike Edwing Brizard, Case No. 16-CR-20931-Altonaga

On December 13, 2016, Mike Edwing Brizard, 28, of Miramar, was charged in a seven-count indictment for his participation in a conspiracy to commit bank fraud and identity theft scheme. On January 20, 2017, Brizard pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit bank fraud and bank fraud. Brizard is scheduled to be sentenced by Judge Altonaga on April 3, 2017.

According to the court record, from August 20, 2012 through February 26, 2013, Brizard accessed Wells Fargo customers’ bank accounts to obtain their name, date of birth, social security number and bank account numbers and provided the information to his co-conspirator. A co-conspirator would then open joint bank accounts using Wells Fargo customers’ name, date of birth, social security number and bank account numbers and move Wells Fargo customers’ money to the joint account. Once the money was in the joint account, a co-conspirator would then transfer the money belonging to the Wells Fargo customers from the joint account to bank accounts controlled by the co-conspirators. The defendant and his co-conspirators used the customers’ identities without their permission or authority and were responsible for a loss totaling approximately $164,755.91.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the FBI. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Miesha Shonta Darrough.

ACCOUNT TAKEOVERS (INCLUDING CREDIT CARD FRAUD)

United States v. Yulier Blanco Perez, et al., Case No. 17-CR-20073-Altonaga

On January 27, 2017, Yulier Blanco Perez, 34, David Machado Frometa, 34, and Silvio Lopez Cuellar, 30, of Miami, were charged in an eleven-count indictment with conspiracy to commit access device fraud, access device fraud, aggravated identity theft, and possession of fifteen or more unauthorized access devices.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, from July 28, 2016 through October 27, 2016, Perez, Frometa and Cuellar conspired to use credit card account numbers issued to other persons to unlawfully obtain items with an aggregate value of at least $1,000.00. The defendants used the fraudulent credit card account numbers to purchase stone tile from various tile retailers in South Florida. Over four days, during the three-month conspiracy, the defendants fraudulently purchased over $96,000.00 worth of stone tile from three retailers.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the MDPD and USSS. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Jessica Kahn Obenauf.

United States v. Geraldine Hughes, Case No. 17-CR-20065-Gayles

On January 26, 2017, Geraldine Hughes, 30, of Pompano Beach, was charged in a four-count indictment for access device fraud and aggravated identity theft.

to the allegations contained in the indictment and other public records, in August of 2016, Hughes conspired with another person to create a Care Credit account in another person’s name to which Hughes was later fraudulently added on as an authorized user and able to charge dental procedures onto the Care Credit account. Hughes made several visits to dental offices in North Miami and Aventura. Approximately $7,000 worth of dental work was charged to the individual’s account, without his/her permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the Aventura Police Department and IRS-CI. The case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Breezye Telfair.

United States v. Fernando Garcia Cala, Case No. 17-CR-20072-Moore

On January 26, 2017, Fernandeo Garcia Cala, 32, of Miami, was charged in a nine-count indictment for access device fraud, possession of device-making equipment and aggravated identity theft.

According to the court record, including allegations contained in the indictment, Garcia operated a Ford F-350 diesel truck that was illegally outfitted with “bladders,” which are containers attached to the fuel line that allow the vehicle to hold more than 300 gallons of diesel fuel. Garcia used gift cards, fraudulently re-encoded with bank account numbers belonging to other individuals, to obtain hundreds of gallons of fuel from several different fuel stations. A search warrant executed at Garcia’s home revealed skimming devices that can be used to capture debit/credit card account number and pin numbers as they are inputted at the fuel pump, an encoding device that is used to place the skimmed numbers onto the magnetic stripes (such as those found on gift cards and hotel room keys), and more than 196 counterfeit access devices that were encoded with account numbers belonging to other individuals.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the USSS and MDPD. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Breezye Telfair.

United States v. Bamby Pierre, Case No. 16-CR-20945-Williams

On December 15, 2016, Bamby Pierre, 26, of Miami, was charged in an eight-count indictment for attempted use of unauthorized access devices, access device fraud and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, between November 2015 and April 2016, Pierre attempted to use and used the debit card numbers issued to other persons to make over $500,000 in withdrawals from ATMs. Bamby also unlawfully possessed and used the names and debit card numbers of other persons, without their permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the USPIS and Broward County Sheriff’s Office. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Jonathan Stratton.

United States v. Marcus Lee Grant, Case No. 17-CR-20077-Moreno

January 27, 2017, defendant Marcus Lee Grant, 26, of Miramar, was charged in a five-count indictment for his participation in a scheme to steal credit cards by directing and intercepting mail containing credit cards and other credit card account information. The indictment charges the defendant with conspiracy to commit access device fraud, access device fraud and aggravated identity theft. The indictment further charges that Grant and his co-conspirators changed the mailing addresses of other individuals, without their permission or authority, in order to intercept the mail and facilitate the fraudulent scheme.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the United States Postal Inspection Service (USPIS). The case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Cary Aronovitz.

United States v. Michel Gonzalez Suarez, et al., Case No. 16-CR-10053-King

On December 20, 2016, Michel Gonzalez Suarez, 38, and Beatriz Morales Saladriga, 20, both of Hialeah, were charged in a five-count indictment for their participation in a conspiracy to commit access device fraud, access device fraud, and aggravated identity theft in the Florida Keys.

to the allegations contained in the indictment, on October 5, 2016, Suarez and Saladriga conspired with each other and others to commit access device fraud. As part of the conspiracy, the defendants used counterfeit credit cards encoded with account numbers issued to other people to conduct a series of fraudulent transactions at several stores located in Monroe County. The defendants are also alleged to have unlawfully possessed fifteen or more counterfeit credit and debit cards encoded with unauthorized account numbers, and to have used one or more counterfeit credit cards encoded with account numbers issued to other persons.

Mr. Ferrer commends the efforts of ICE-HSI and the Monroe County Sheriff’s Office. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Anne P. McNamara.

United States v. Brandon Bair, et al., Case No. 17-CR-60005-Zloch

On January 10, 2017, Brandon Bair, 23, of Cutler Bay, Aimee Chin-Sang, 22, of Homestead, and Kevin Lawson Mitchell, 21, of Davie, were charged in a seven-count indictment for access fraud and aggravated identity theft indictment relating to trafficking in and using unauthorized AT&T merchant account numbers and credit card account numbers to commit more than $80,000 of fraud.

According to allegations contained in the indictment, on various dates in February, April and May of 2016, Bair and Chin-Sang used credit cards to conduct multiple fraudulent transactions at Home Depot stores located in Sunrise and Davie. Mitchell, an employee at the Davie Home Depot, helped Bair and Chin-Sang conduct several of these transactions. As part of the fraudulent scheme, Bair and Chin-Sang also presented counterfeit licenses and used unauthorized AT&T merchant account numbers to conduct fraudulent transactions involving thousands of dollars of Apple products at an AT&T store located in Fort Lauderdale. All three defendants are charged with conspiring to commit access device fraud. Bair and Chin-Sang are also charged with multiple counts of use of unauthorized access devices and aggravated identity theft.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the USSS, Fort Lauderdale Police Department, and Davie Police Department. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Anne P. McNamara.

United States v. Angela Maria Villegas, 17-CR-20086-Ungaro

On January 27, 2017, Angela Maria Villegas, 41, of Miami Beach, was charged in a five-count indictment for aggravated identity theft and use of unauthorized access devices.

According to the court record, including allegations contained in the indictment, from January 20, 2015, through April 12, 2016, Villegas, a high-end retail employee, made over $20,000 worth of unauthorized purchases using the credit card account numbers belonging to her high-end specialty customers, without their permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the efforts of the MDPD and USSS. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Matthew J. Langley.

United States v. Ahlaniee Maheei Chinn, 17-CR-20031-Middlebrooks

On January 7, 2017, Ahlaniee Maheei Chinn, 23, of Miami, was charged in a two-count indictment for access device fraud and aggravated identity theft.

to the court record, including allegations contained in the indictment, on March 4, 2016, Chinn, purchased more than two-thousand dollars’ worth of goods with a counterfeit credit card. The counterfeit card had the true account holders’ information shaved off and Chinn’s name was fraudulently embossed onto the credit card.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of IRS-CI and Aventura Police Department. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Breezye Telfair.

United States v. Suzelie Cheremond, Case No. 17-CR-60025-Bloom

On January 26, 2017, Suzelie Cheremond, 25, of Miami, was charged in a five-count indictment for access device fraud and aggravated identity theft.

According to the court record, including allegations contained in the indictment, in December of 2015, Cheremond, a Sam’s Club employee in Miramar, unlawfully obtained and used credit cards belonging to other persons to make purchases at Sam’s Club for $4,110.11.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of IRS-CI, the Aventura Police Department and Miramar Police Department. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Breezye Telfair.

United States v. Quienece Shedina Saintvil and Larod James Robinson,

Case No. 17-CR-20064-Ungaro

On January 26, 2017, Quienece Shedina Saintvil, 30, and Larod James Robinson, 34, both of Miami, were charged in a three-count indictment for their participation in a conspiracy to commit access device fraud and aggravated identity theft.

According to the court record, including allegations contained in the indictment, in August of 2016, Saintvil and Robinson entered the Bloomingdale’s Department store and unlawfully used a credit card account belonging to another person to make purchases. Saintvil and Robinson picked out merchandise and then Saintvil provided a Bloomingdale customer’s social security number in order to access the customer’s Bloomingdale’s credit account. Saintvil and Robinson made a total of three transactions, totaling $3,416.77, without the permission or authority of the true credit card account holder.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of IRS-CI and Aventura Police Department. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Breezye Telfair.

United States v. Shanisa Bell, Case No. 17-CR-60029-Bloom

On January 27, 2017, Shanisa Bell, 25, of Coconut Creek, was charged in a three-count indictment for using unauthorized access devices to fraudulently obtain something valued at $1,000 or more and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, between July 2015 and June 2016, Bell unlawfully used debit card account numbers issued in the names of other persons without their permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of DOL-OIG, ICE-HSI and the State of Michigan Unemployment Insurance Agency. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Brian J. Shack.

United States v. Edrey Acosta, Case No. 17-CR-20071-Martinez

On January 26, 2017, Edrey Acosta, 27, of Miami, was charged in a three-count indictment for access device fraud and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, on November 8, 2016, Acosta used counterfeit encoded with credit card account numbers issued to other persons.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the USSS and MDPD. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Breezye Telfair.

United States v. Crystal Henderson, Case No. 17-CR-20066-Gayles

On January 26, 2017, Crystal Henderson, 34, of Homestead, was charged in a four-count indictment for access device fraud and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, on various dates throughout September of 2016, Henderson unlawfully used a credit card account belonging to another person to make purchases over $1,000.00.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of IRS-CI, Stamford Connecticut Police Department, and Aventura Police Department. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Breezye Telfair.

United States v. Shante Marie Wesby, Case No. 17-CR-20032-Scola

On January 7, 2017, Shante Marie Wesby, 37, of Fort Lauderdale, was charged in a three-count indictment for access device fraud and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, on various dates throughout January and February of 2016, Wesby unlawfully used a social security number and a credit card account number belonging to another person, without his/her permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of IRS-CI and Aventura Police Department. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Breezye Telfair.

United States v. Kevin Martinez Morazan, Case No. 17-CR-60016-Bloom

On January 24, 2017, Kevin Martinez Morazan, 24, of Broward County, was charged in a five-count indictment with possessing fifteen or more unauthorized access devices and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, on May 7, 2015, Martinez unlawfully possessed names and social security numbers of other persons, without their permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the efforts of the Fort Lauderdale Police Department, USSS and IRS-CI. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Daya Nathan.

United States v. Tymonzo Ward, Case No. 16-CR-60306-Cohn

On October 28, 2016, Tymonzo Ward, 37, of Wilton Manors, was charged in a six-count indictment for access device fraud and aggravated identity theft.

According to allegations contained in the indictment, on May 21, 2015, Ward unlawfully possessed fifteen or more credit card account numbers and social security numbers belonging to other persons. Ward also unlawfully possessed and used the names, date of births, and driver licenses of other persons without their permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of IRS-CI, the USSS, and Fort Lauderdale Police Department. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Anne P. McNamara

United States v. Rayden Garcia Ramos, Case No. 16-CR-20808-Lenard

On October 21, 2016, Rayden Garcia Ramos, 46, of Hialeah, was charged in a six-count indictment for access device fraud, possession of fifteen or more unauthorized access devices and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, from September 8, 2015 through December 5, 2015, Ramos trafficked in and used one or more credit card account numbers issued to other persons in order to obtain something of value worth $1,000 or more. Additionally, on October 21, 2015, Ramos possessed unlawfully possessed fifteen or more counterfeit credit card account numbers belonging to other persons.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the USSS. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Anne P. McNamara.

United States v. Terry Tyrone Clowers, Case No. 17-CR-60004-Dimitrouleas

On January 10, 2017, Terry Tyrone Clowers, 30, of Fort Lauderdale, was charged in a two-count indictment for attempted use of unauthorized access devices and aggravated identity theft.

According to the court record, including allegations contained in the indictment, on January 2, 2017, Clowers used the name and social security number of another person in an attempt to purchase an All-Terrain Vehicle worth thousands of dollars from a Broward Motor Sports store in Fort Lauderdale.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the USSS and Fort Lauderdale Police Department. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Anne P. McNamara.

United States v. Halima Ouedraogo, Case No. 17-CR-60015-Moreno

On January 24, 2017, Halima Ouedraogo, 35, of Kirkland, Washington, was charged in a twelve-count indictment for access device fraud, possession of fifteen or more unauthorized access devices and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, from August 4, 2015 through August 25, 2015, in Broward County, Ouedraogo used credit cards issued to other persons to fraudulently obtain things valued at $1,000 or more. The indictment also alleges that on August 25, 2015, Ouedraogo possessed fifteen or more credit card account numbers and social security numbers belonging to other persons.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of IRS-CI, USSS, and the Fort Lauderdale Police Department. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Anne P. McNamara.

United States v. Terrell Tyrone Rivers and Preston Elijah Parrish, Case No. 17-CR-60024-Dimitrouleas

On January 26, 2017, Terrell Tyrone Rivers, 27, of Orlando, and Preston Elijah Parrish, 25, of Lauderhill, were charged in a ten-count indictment with conspiracy to commit access device fraud, possession of fifteen or more unauthorized access devices, and aggravated identity theft.

According to allegations contained in the indictment, from February 10, 2016 through February 24, 2016, Rivers and Parrish conspired to possess fifteen or more unauthorized access devices, that is, social security numbers issued to other persons. On February 24, 2016, Rivers drove from Orlando to Lauderhill, Florida, to meet Parrish. According to court documents, on February 24, 2016, Rivers and Parrish were pulled over in Lauderhill, Florida. Upon a search of Rivers, several driver licenses with other persons’ information and Rivers’ photograph were recovered, along with personalized checks in other persons’ names. In the vehicle, a black suitcase, printer, tablets, and multiple blank business checks were recovered. A search of Rivers’ electronics revealed the PII of more than fifteen other persons. A search of Parrish’s electronics also revealed the PII of more than fifteen other persons.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the USSS and the Lauderhill Police Department. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney J. Mackenzie Duane.

United States v. Jessie Aguilar, Case No. 16-CR-20944-Gayles

On December 15, 2016, Jesse Aguilar, 28, of Hallandale Beach, was charged in a five-count indictment for conspiring to commit access device fraud, access device fraud, and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, on or about November 2, 2014, through on or about September 15, 2015, Aguilar conspired with others to commit access device fraud. As part of the conspiracy, they used counterfeit credit cards encoded with account numbers issued to other people to conduct a series of fraudulent transactions at the Apple Store in Miami Beach, Florida. The loss amount was approximately $308,830.86.

Mr. Ferrer commends the efforts of ICE-HSI and the MDPD. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Miesha Shonta Darrough.

United States v. Dave Benggie Alin, Case No. 16-CR-20815-Williams

On October 25, 2016, Dave Benggie Alin, 21, of Miami, was charged in a three-count indictment with fraudulent use of a counterfeit credit card. aggravated identity theft, and possession of a firearm and ammunition by a convicted felon. On January 18, 2017, Alin pleaded guilty to all charges. He is currently set for sentencing on April 7, 2017.

According to the court record, on October 12, 2016, Alin was found by law enforcement to be in possession of a counterfeit credit card and a firearm. Alin used the credit card to check into a hotel in Miami, and then he continued to use the credit card to make purchases at the hotel.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the MDPD and IRS-CI. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Daniel Cervantes.

United States v. Luis Miniert, Case No. 16-CR-20941-Scola

On December 15, 2016, Luis Miniert, 26, of Miami, was charged in a five-count indictment for conspiring to commit access device fraud, access device fraud, and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, from November 2, 2014 through September 15, 2015, Miniert conspired with others to commit access device fraud. As part of the conspiracy, they used counterfeit credit cards encoded with account numbers issued to other people to conduct a series of fraudulent transactions at the Apple Store in Miami Beach, Florida. The loss amount was approximately $119,210.73.

Mr. Ferrer commends the efforts of ICE-HSI and the MDPD. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Miesha Shonta Darrough.

United States v. Anthony Leon, Case No. 17-CR-20068-Lenard

On January 26, 2017, Anthony Leon, 31, of Hialeah, was charged in a five-count indictment for conspiring to commit access device fraud, access device fraud, and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, March 20, 2014 through July 18, 2015, Leon conspired with others to commit access device fraud. As part of the conspiracy, they used counterfeit credit cards encoded with account numbers issued to other people to conduct a series of fraudulent transactions at the Apple Store in Miami Beach, Florida. The loss amount was approximately $158,690.37.

Mr. Ferrer commends the efforts of ICE-HSI and the MDPD. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Miesha Shonta Darrough.

United States v. Diana Leon a/k/a “Diana Montoya”, Case No.17-CR-20069-Altonaga

On January 26, 2017, Diana Leon a/k/a “Diana Montoya,” 22, of Hialeah, was charged in a five-count indictment for conspiring to commit access device fraud, access device fraud, and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, from September 20, 2014 through August 31, 2015, the defendant conspired with others to commit access device fraud. As part of the conspiracy, they used counterfeit credit cards encoded with account numbers issued to other people to conduct a series of fraudulent transactions at the Apple Store in Miami Beach, Florida. The loss amount was approximately $141,503.01.

Mr. Ferrer commends the efforts of ICE-HSI and the MDPD. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Miesha Shonta Darrough.

United States v. Stephanie Vargas, Case No. 17-CR-20070-Moreno

On January 26, 2017, Stephanie Vargas, 26, of Hialeah, was charged in a five-count indictment for conspiring to commit access device fraud, access device fraud, and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, from December 20, 2014 through July 17, 2015, Vargas conspired with others to commit access device fraud. As part of the conspiracy, they used counterfeit credit cards encoded with account numbers issued to other people to conduct a series of fraudulent transactions at the Apple Store in Miami Beach, Florida. The loss amount was approximately $174,152.60.

Mr. Ferrer commends the efforts of ICE-HSI and the MDPD. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Miesha Shonta Darrough.

UNLAWFULLY POSSESSING PII

United States v. Alvin Celius Andre, Case No. 17-CR-60014-Zloch

On January 20, 2017, Alvin Celius Andre, 26, of Miramar, was charged in a four-count indictment with access device fraud and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, on March 26, 2016, Andre possessed fifteen or more social security numbers issued to other persons. Andre also unlawfully possessed and used the names and date of births of other persons, without their permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of Miramar Police Department and ICE-HSI. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Matthew J. Langley.

United States v. Frantz Felix, Jr, Case No. 17-CR-20038-Williams

On January 20, 2017, Frantz Felix, Jr, 23, of Miramar, was charged in a six-count indictment with access device fraud and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, on March 26, 2016, Felix possessed fifteen or more social security numbers issued to other persons and used a credit card account number issued to another person. Felix, Jr. also unlawfully possessed and used the names and date of births of other persons, without their permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the Miramar Police Department and ICE-HSI. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Matthew J. Langley.

United States v. Marcus Allen Griffin, Case No. 17-CR-60011-Dimitrouleas

On January 13, 2017, Marcus Allen Griffin, 22, of Miramar, was charged in a six-count indictment with access device fraud and aggravated identity theft.

to the allegations contained in the indictment, on September 1, 2016, Griffin possessed fifteen or more social security numbers and credit card account numbers issued to other persons. Griffin also unlawfully possessed and used the names and date of births of other persons, without their permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the Miramar Police Department and ICE-HSI. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Matthew J. Langley.

United States v. Marc Antoine Riviere, Case No. 17-CR-20024-Moore

On January 13, 2017, Marc Antoine Riviere, 29, of Miami, was charged in a four-count indictment for identity theft in connection with his possession of at least fifteen social security numbers belonging to other individuals.

According to the allegations in the indictment, on July 17, 2014, Riviere was found in possession of fifteen or more social security numbers issued to other persons, without their permission or authority. Riviere also unlawfully possessed and used the names and date of births of other persons, without their permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of FBI, IRS-CI, and Miami-Dade County Schools Police Department. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Miesha Shonta Darrough.

United States v. Jacqueloi Trishauna Moreau, Case No. 17-CR-60003-Bloom

On January 10, 2017, Jacqueloi Trishauna Moreau, 28, of Lauderdale Lakes, was charged in a four-count indictment for identity theft in connection with her possession of at least fifteen social security numbers belonging to other individuals.

According to the allegations in the indictment, on July 18, 2016, Moreau was found in possession of fifteen or more names, dates and social security numbers issued to other persons. Moreau also unlawfully possessed and used the names and date of births of other persons, without their permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the efforts of USPIS, IRS-CI and Margate Police Department. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Miesha Shonta Darrough.

United States v. Elena Caridad Amaya, Case No. 17-CR-20067-Ungaro

On January 26, 2017, Elena Caridad Amaya, 42, of Lauderdale Lakes, was charged in a four-count indictment for identity theft in connection with her possession of at least fifteen social security numbers belonging to other individuals.

According to the allegations in the indictment, in April 2016, Amaya was found in possession of fifteen or more counterfeit card encoded with account numbers and social security numbers issued to other persons. Amaya used a credit card account number issued to another person, without his/her permission or authority, to make purchases totaling $20,681.64.

Mr. Ferrer commends the efforts of IRS-CI and MDPD. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Miesha Shonta Darrough.

United States v. Robert Jamorris Jackson, Case No. 16-CR-60337-Bloom

On December 2, 2016, Robert Jamorris Jackson, 33, of Broward County, was charged in a six count indictment with possession of fifteen or more unauthorized access devices and aggravated identity theft.

The indictment alleges that on February 18, 2016, in Broward County, Jackson possessed personal identifying information of more than fifteen people.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the USSS. This case was indicted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Daniel Cervantes and is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Jonathan Stratton.

United States v. Aamir Khan, Case No. 16-CR-20839-Lenard

On November 1, 2016, Aamir Khan, 20, of Miami, was charged in a six-count indictment with possession of fifteen or more unauthorized access devices and aggravated identity theft. On January 3, 2017, Khan pleaded guilty to possession of fifteen or more unauthorized access devices and one count of aggravated identity theft. Khan is scheduled to be sentenced on March 15, 2017.

According to the court record, on or about June 10, 2014, Khan was arrested for driving without a license. A search incident to arrest revealed that Khan had a USB drive in his pocket. A consensual search of the USB drive revealed PII for approximately 3,680 individuals, including their names, addresses, dates of birth, and social security numbers.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of IRS-CI and NMBPD. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Daniel Cervantes.

United States v. Victor Joseph, Case No. 16-CR-60335-Zloch

On November 29, 2016, Victor Joseph, 26, of Orlando, was charged in a seven-count indictment with using one or more unauthorized access devices, possessing fifteen or more unauthorized access devices and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations in the indictment, between January and March 2015, Joseph possessed and used social security numbers of other persons, without their permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the efforts of IRS-CI and USSS. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Daya Nathan.

United States v. Dave Pierre, Case No. 17-CR-60023-Moreno

On January 26, 2017, Dave Pierre, 28, of Miami, was charged in a five-count indictment with access device fraud and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, on November 7, 2016, Pierre unlawfully possessed fifteen or more names, dates of birth and social security numbers belonging to other persons. Pierre unlawfully possessed and used the names and date of births of other persons, without their permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of IRS-CI and the Broward County Sheriff’s Office. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Anne P. McNamara.

United States v. Ricky Cearc, Case No. 17-CR-20083-Moreno

On January 27, 2017, Ricky Cearc, 27, of Miami, was charged in a three-count indictment for access device fraud and aggravated identity theft.

According to allegations contained in the indictment, on August 29, 2013, Ricky Cearc unlawfully possessed fifteen or more social security numbers belonging to other persons. Ricky Cearc unlawfully possessed and used the date of births and social security numbers of other persons, without their permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of ICE-HSI and MDPD. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Jonathan D. Stratton.

United States v. Lyns Cearc, Case No. 17-CR-20084-Gayles

On January 27, 2017, Lyns Cearc, 34, of Miami, was charged in a three-count indictment for access device fraud and aggravated identity theft.

to allegations contained in the indictment, on August 29, 2013, Lyns Cearc unlawfully possessed fifteen or more social security numbers belonging to other persons. Lyns Cearc unlawfully possessed and used the date of births and social security numbers of other persons, without their permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of ICE-his and MDPD. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Jonathan D. Stratton.

United States v. Edouard Bastien, Case No. 16-CR-20953-Gayles

On December 19, 2016, a criminal information was filed, charging Edouard Bastien, 27, of North Miami Beach, with possession of fifteen or more unauthorized access devices and aggravated identity theft.

to the allegations contained in the information, on June 20, 2014, Bastien unlawfully possessed fifteen or more social security numbers belonging to other persons. Bastien also unlawfully possessed and used the names and social security numbers of other persons without their permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of ICE-HSI, DOL-OIG, IRS-CI and North Miami Beach Police Department (NMBPD). This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Joshua S. Rothstein.

United States v. D’Andre Nathaniel Watson. Case No. 16-CR-20958-Lenard

On December 20, 2016, D’Andre Nathaniel Watson, 19, of North Miami Beach, was charged in a six-count indictment for possession of fifteen or more unauthorized access devices and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, on February 25, 2016 and again on March 16, 2016, Watson unlawfully possessed fifteen or more social security numbers belonging to other persons. Watson also unlawfully possessed and used the names and the date of births of other persons, without their permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of ICE-HSI, DOL-OIG, and NMBPD. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Joshua S. Rothstein.

United States v. Brian Anthony Joseph, Case No. 17-CR-20004-Moore

On January 5, 2017, Brian Anthony Joseph, 21, of Miami, was charged in a four-count indictment for possession of fifteen or more unauthorized access devices and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, on November 9, 2015, Joseph unlawfully possessed fifteen or more social security numbers belonging to other persons. Watson also unlawfully possessed and used the names and the date of births of other persons, without their permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts ICE-HSI, DOL-OIG, NMBPD and the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Joshua S. Rothstein.

United States v. Richard Wayne Brown, Case No. 17-CR-60010-Cohn

On January 13, 2017, Richard Wayne Brown, 29, of Miramar, was charged in a seven-count indictment for possession of fifteen or more unauthorized access devices and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, on December 28, 2016 and January 6, 2017, Brown unlawfully possessed fifteen or more social security numbers belonging to other persons. Brown also unlawfully possessed and used the names and the date of births of other persons, without their permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of U.S. Department of Agriculture, Office of the Inspector General (USDA-OIG), FBI, USSS, and Fort Lauderdale Police Department. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Joshua S. Rothstein.

United States v. Peterson Joseph, Case No. 16-CR-20830-Moore

On October 28, 2016, Peterson Joseph, 24, of Miami, Florida, was charged in a four-count indictment with aggravated identity theft, possession of fifteen or more unauthorized access devices, and using unauthorized access devices to fraudulently obtain something valued at $1,000 or more.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, from June 17, 2014 through May 19, 2015, Joseph unlawfully possessed and used fifteen or more social security numbers belonging to other persons.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of DOL-OIG. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Brian J. Shack.

United States v. Jason Douglas, Case No. 16-CR-60308-Bloom

On October 28, 2016, Jason Douglas, 26, of New York, was charged in a three-count indictment with possessing fifteen or more unauthorized and counterfeit access devices and aggravated identity theft.

to the allegations contained in the indictment, on or about April 16, 2016, Douglas unlawfully possessed fifteen or more social security numbers issued to other persons and debit cards encoded with account numbers issued to other persons. Douglas also unlawfully possessed and used the names, date of births and social security numbers of other persons, without their permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of IRS-CI and the Broward County Sherriff’s Office. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Brian J. Shack.

United States v. Jerry Jean Baptiste and Stanley Auguste, Case No. 16-CR-20934-Cooke

On December 15, 2016, Jerry Jean Baptiste, 22, of Miami, and Stanley Auguste, 25, of Miami Gardens, were charged in a nine-count indictment with conspiracy to possess fifteen or more unauthorized access devices, possession of fifteen or more unauthorized access devices, and aggravated identity theft.

to the allegations contained in the indictment, from April 24, 2015 through August 5, 2015, Baptiste and Auguste conspired to possess unlawfully fifteen or more social security numbers issued to other persons. On or about April 30, 2015, Baptiste possessed and sold electronic files containing lists of PII of various individuals, including social security numbers issued to fifteen or more individuals. On or about May 6, 2015, and again on August 5, 2015, Baptiste and Auguste possessed and sold electronic files containing lists of PII, including fifteen or more social security numbers. Baptiste and Auguste possessed and used the names, social security numbers, and dates of birth of real individuals, without permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of ICE-HSI. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney John P. Gonsoulin.

ACCESS DEVICE FRAUD

United States v. Alexey Abreu Chapotin, et al., Case No. 17-CR-20043-Lenard

January 24, 2017, Alexey Abreu Chapotin, 22, Yankiel Blanco, 34, and Yuliesky Cespedes Perez, 26, all of Miami, were charged in a two-count indictment for conspiracy to commit access device fraud and possession of device making equipment.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, on August 16, 2016, Chapotin, Blanco and Perez possessed credit card “skimming” devices, drills, and other equipment which was used to modify the skimmers so that they could be surreptitiously installed onto credit card readers at gas pumps. The indictment further alleges that on August 16, 2016, the defendants installed one of these card “skimming” devices at a pump at the gas station, in order to capture customer credit card account information.

Mr. Ferrer commends ICE-HSI and the Aventura Police Department. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Anne P. McNamara.

United States v. Omar Pulido Sanchez, et al., Case No. 17-mj-2112-JJO

On January 27, 2017, Omar Pulido Sanchez, 38, Uriel Pulido Sanchez, 42, and Maria Castillo Sarmiento, all of Colombia, were charged by criminal complaint with conspiracy to possess fifteen or more access devices and conspiracy to possess access device making equipment.

According to the allegations contained in the complaint, in June of 2016, the defendants installed credit card skimming devices onto bank ATMs throughout South Florida. In total, the defendants stole the bank account information of at least three hundred victims, and of those three hundred victims, over sixty reported fraudulent withdrawals from their accounts.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the MDPD. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Daniel J. Marcet.

United States v. Rene Hernandez, Case No. 17-mj-2111-O’Sullivan

On January 27, 2017, Rene Hernandez, 57, of Miami, was charged by criminal complaint for possession of access device making equipment.

According to the allegations contained in the complaint, on April 5, 2016, Hernandez was found by law enforcement to be in possession of a magnetic stripe encoding device, multiple fuel pump credit card skimming devices, and several counterfeit credit cards in his own name.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the MDPD. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Daniel J. Marcet.

United States v. Cesar Castillo Vargas, Case No. 17-mj-6040-O’Sullivan

On January 27, 2017, Cesar Castillo Vargas, 37, of Colombia, was charged by criminal complaint with possession of access device making equipment.

According to the allegations contained in the complaint, on August 1, 2016, law enforcement found Castillo Vargas in possession of a magnetic strip encoder device, a fraudulent Colombian driver license, a fraudulent Mexican passport, and several blank credit or debit cards.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the MDPD. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Daniel J. Marcet.

United States v. Oberto Jean, Case No. 17-CR-20082-Scola

On January 27, 2017, Oberto Jean, 35, of Miami, Florida, was charged in a five-count indictment with possession of fifteen or more unauthorized access devices, possession of access device-making equipment, aggravated identity theft, and being a felon in possession of firearms and ammunition.

to the allegations contained in the indictment, on or about February 11, 2015, Jean unlawfully possessed access device-making equipment and fifteen or more social security numbers belonging to other persons. Jean unlawfully possessed and used the date of births and social security numbers of other persons, without their permission or authority. Jean, a convicted felon, also possessed two firearms and ammunition.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of IRS-CI, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) and the Miami Police Department (MPD). This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Brian J. Shack.

United States v. Anthony Reid, Case No. 16-CR-60307-Dimitrouleas

On October 28, 2016, Anthony Reid, 22, of Miami, was charged in a four-count indictment with possessing access device-making equipment, fifteen or more unauthorized and counterfeit access devices, and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, on April 16, 2016, Reid unlawfully possessed access device-making equipment, social security numbers issued to other persons, and counterfeit credit cards and debit cards encoded with account numbers issued to other persons.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of IRS-CI and the Broward County Sherriff’s Office. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Brian J. Shack.

United States v. Luis Perez Luis and Jose Luis Perez, Case No. 17-CR-20087-Altonaga

On January 27, 2017, Luis Perez Luis, 57, and Jose Luis Perez, 33, both of Miami, were charged in an eight-count indictment with aggravated identity theft, conspiracy to possess fifteen or more access devices, possession of fifteen or more unauthorized access devices, and possession of device making equipment

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, on August 31, 2016, Luis and Perez conspired to possess and possessed fifteen or more counterfeit credit cards and credit card account numbers issued to other persons, as well as access device making equipment.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the MDPD and USSS. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Matthew J. Langley.

United States v. Patrick Gaston Sebastian, Case No. 17-CR-20030-Williams

On January 20, 2017, Patrick Gaston Sebastian, 21, of Miami, Florida, was charged in a four-count indictment with aggravated identity theft, possession of fifteen or more unauthorized access devices and possession of device making equipment.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, on July 1, 2016, Sebastian possessed fifteen or more social security numbers and credit card account numbers issued to other persons as well as a credit card embosser and credit card skimmer. Sebastian also unlawfully possessed and used the names and the date of births of other persons, without their permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of MDPD and USSS. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Matthew J. Langley.

United States v. Luis Fernando Casallas Guzman, Case No. 17-CR-20022-Scola

On January 13, 2017, Luis Fernando Casallas Guzman, 61, of Colombia, was charged in a two-count indictment with possession of fifteen or more unauthorized access devices and possession of device making equipment.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, on March 12, 2015, Guzman possessed fifteen or more counterfeit credit cards and credit card account numbers of other individuals as well as a credit card skimmer and magnetic stripe encoder.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of ICE-HSI. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Matthew J. Langley.

     If convicted of the charged conduct, the defendants face a possible maximum statutory sentence of 10 years in prison for possession of fifteen or more unauthorized access devices; 10 years in prison for trafficking in or using one or more unauthorized access devices during a one-year period and by such conduct obtaining anything of value over $1,000; 5 years in prison for theft of mail; 10 years in prison for theft of government money; 5 in prison for conspiracy to commit theft of government money; 5 years in prison for conspiracy to defraud the United States; 15 years in prison for possession of access device making equipment; 20 years in prison for participating in a wire fraud conspiracy; 5 years in prison for conspiracy to pass Treasury checks bearing forged endorsements; and 2 years in prison consecutive to any other term for aggravated identity theft.

     Mr. Ferrer commends ATF, the Aventura Police Department, Broward County Sheriff’s Office, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), Davie Police Department, DOL-OIG, FBI , Florida Department of Economic Opportunity, Homestead Police Department, ICE-HSI, IRS-CI, Lauderhill Police Department, Margate Police Department, Miami Beach Police Department, MDPD Professional Compliance Bureau and Public Corruption Section, Miami-Dade County Office of the Inspector General, Miami-Dade Public Schools Police Department, Miramar Police Department, Monroe County Sheriff’s Office, MPD, NMBPD, Stamford Connecticut Police Department, State of Michigan Unemployment Insurance Agency, SSA-OIG, TIGTA, USDA-OIG, USPIS, USSS, for the investigative support they provide the Strike Force to combat fraud schemes throughout the Southern District of Florida.

     A criminal complaint or an indictment is an accusatory instrument that contains formal charges against a defendant. All persons charged in a criminal complaint or indictment are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Related court documents and information may be found on the website of the District Court for the Southern District of Florida at www.flsd.uscourts.gov or on http://pacer.flsd.uscourts.gov.

Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1DXz-xPk62WKDdz6obJMWKBqsDSLA6v5pOYK_jTOib88
  Last Updated: 2025-03-21 05:02:42 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the second highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE2
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE2
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the third highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE3
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE3
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
Score:   0.9687
Docket Number:   SD-FL  1:19-cr-20796
Case Name:   USA v. Perez et al
  Press Releases:
     Wifredo A. Ferrer, United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, Kelly R. Jackson, Special Agent in Charge, Internal Revenue Service, Criminal Investigation (IRS-CI), Miami Field Office, George L. Piro, Special Agent in Charge, Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Miami Field Office, Miami Field Office Juan P. Perez, Director, Miami Dade Police Department (MDPD), Timothy Camus, Deputy Inspector General for Investigations, Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA), Rafiq Ahmad, Special Agent in Charge, United States Department of Labor, Office of Inspector General, Miami Field Office (DOL-OIG), Mark Selby, Special Agent in Charge, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s Homeland Security Investigations (ICE-HSI), Brian Swain, Special Agent in Charge, U.S. Secret Service (USSS), Miami Field Office, Antonio J. Gomez, Inspector in Charge, U.S. Postal Inspection Service (USPIS), Miami Division, and Margaret Moore-Jackson, Special Agent in Charge, Social Security Administration, Office of Inspector General (SSA-OIG) announce the filing of federal charges against more than 100 defendants in 81 separate cases, dealing with over 30,000 stolen identities and the intended theft of over $60 million dollars from individuals, businesses and government agencies through fraudulent schemes.

     In August 2012, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida, with the collaboration of our federal, state and local law enforcement partners, established the South Florida Identity Theft Refund Fraud Strike Force (Strike Force) to combat an increase in stolen identity tax refund scams. The collective efforts of the Strike Force resulted in the successful prosecution of countless stolen identity tax refund cases. However, while the wave of these pernicious offenses subsided, evolving fraud schemes have spread across South Florida. No longer limited to stolen identity tax refund fraud, the Strike Force, now Stolen Identity Fraud (SIF) Strike Force is investigating and prosecuting a variety of cases stemming from stolen personal identifying information (PII). These cases include intrusion into proprietary government databases; theft of customer account information; takeovers by identity thieves of accounts as diverse as U.S. Social Security and unemployment benefits, retail credit card accounts, and bank accounts; and the use of skimmers to steal valuable PII. These cases demonstrate that law enforcement in general and the Strike Force in particular continue to adapt to meet this insidious identity theft threat.

Since the inception of the Strike Force in 2012, the U.S. Attorney’s Office has charged more than 600 defendants, who were responsible for over $400 million in intended losses.

“Law enforcement will not stand by as criminals attempt to disrupt our lives, steal our savings, ravage our credit, and compromise our government benefit programs through calculated and pervasive fraud schemes,” stated U.S. Attorney Wifredo A. Ferrer. “Today’s announcement demonstrates that the collective response by our federal, state, and local law enforcement partners has had a profound impact on protecting the community from identity theft.”

“I urge everyone to take steps to protect their personally identifiable information (PII) from criminals who seek illicit profits through stolen identity fraud,” said George L. Piro, Special Agent in Charge, FBI Miami. “Learn how you can protect your PII at FBI.GOV or FTC.GOV. The FBI and our partners continue to actively target these fraudsters who victimize hard-working taxpayers.”

     Kelly R. Jackson, Special Agent in Charge, Internal Revenue Service, Criminal Investigation (IRS-CI), stated, “Today’s announcement reinforces law enforcement’s continued commitment to combat identity theft in South Florida. As an agency, the IRS has made remarkable progress in its efforts to protect taxpayers, and we are focused on strengthening our systems and processes even more for this 2017 tax season. I urge taxpayers to protect their personal information and remain vigilant when choosing a return preparer. Beware of return preparers who claim they can get you a ‘higher’ refund then another preparer and those that set their fee based on a percentage of your refund. Ultimately, the taxpayer is responsible for what is filed with the IRS, so choose wisely. IRS-CI will continue to investigate significant Stolen Identity Refund Fraud (SIRF) schemes and egregious tax return preparers, and will collaborate with other federal agencies and IRS civil divisions to stop these thieves in their tracks.”

“The DOL-OIG is committed to working with our Identity Theft Strike Force partners to combat identity theft in the Southern District of Florida and safeguard the Nation's Unemployment Insurance program for those who seek relief from the financial impact of being unemployed,” stated Rafiq Ahmad, Special Agent in Charge, Atlanta Region, U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Inspector General.

"The impersonation of IRS employees continues to represent a serious threat to taxpayers and to the integrity of tax administration,” said Timothy P. Camus, Deputy Inspector General for the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA). “We are extremely grateful to the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Miami and their counterparts around the country for their excellent teamwork, collaboration, and support of our efforts on such cases. As these cases show, TIGTA agents continue to relentlessly pursue investigations of individuals who engage in this fraudulent activity and aggressively refer them for criminal prosecution.”

“These arrests are a reflection of the success that comes when federal, state and local law enforcement agencies work together to target criminal organizations and individuals in South Florida,” said Mark Selby, Special Agent in Charge of HSI Miami. “At HSI we will continue to aggressively investigate fraudulent financial schemes that put in jeopardy the integrity of our financial system and are often a gateway to further criminal activity.”

Antonio J. Gomez, Postal Inspector in Charge of the Miami Division stated, “The arrests of these individuals should serve as reassurance to our customers that the U.S. Postal Service remains one of the safest and securest ways of conducting both personal and private business and the U.S. Postal Inspection Service will stop at nothing to bring these criminals to account. Postal Inspectors will continue to partner with our federal and local law enforcement partners to aggressively investigate these types of crimes.”

Today’s Strike Force announcement reaffirms the collective joint federal, state and local commitment to the prosecution of perpetrators who steal, sell and use personal identification information to commit identity theft fraud schemes. The cases brought under the Strike Force operation, from October 2016 to the present day, include:

IRS IMPERSONATORS

United States v. Abhijeetsinh Jadeja and Rachel Jean Roragen, Case No. 17-CR-20085-Martinez

On January 27, 2017, Abhijeetsinh Jadeja, 29, of Miami, and, Rachel Jean Roragen, 41, of Miami Beach, were charged in a twelve-count indictment with conspiracy to commit wire fraud, possessing fifteen or more unauthorized access devices and aggravated identity theft.

to allegations contained in the indictment, between January 2014 and March 2016, Jadeja and Roragen’s co-conspirators impersonated officials from the IRS and other agencies during telephone calls in which they falsely represented to individual victims that they owed money to the IRS or fees on loans or grants. To satisfy their alleged debts, victims were fraudulently induced to send payments to bank accounts and debit cards under the control of Jadeja, Roragen and their conspirators.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the TIGTA, ICE-HSI, IRS-CI, and the Miami Beach Police Department. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Daya Nathan.

United States v. Andre Oakley Wellington, Case No. 17-CR-60027-Dimitrouleas

On January 27, 2017, Andre Oakley Wellington, 37, of Coral Springs, was charged in a two-count indictment for participating in a conspiracy to commit mail fraud and mail fraud.

According to the allegations contained in the criminal complaint and indictment, beginning in July of 2016 and ending in January 2017, Wellington’s conspirators impersonated IRS employees during telephone calls in which they falsely represented to an individual victim that he/she owed money to the IRS. Wellington’s conspirators fraudulently induced the victim to send payments via private and commercial mail carriers to addresses located throughout the United States, in order to satisfy the alleged IRS debt. In addition, Wellington’s co-conspirators demanded that the victim send a package containing $25,000 to Wellington’s address in Coral Springs. The conspirators provided Wellington with the FedEx tracking number, which the defendant used to track the package’s arrival. The package was delivered to Wellington’s residence, and was then recovered by TIGTA Special Agents. In total, Wellington and his co-conspirators fraudulently obtained over $550,000 from the victim.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of TIGTA and IRS-CI. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Daniel J. Marcet.

TAX REFUND FRAUD

United States v. Silvio Galvez, Case No. 16-CR-20016-Middlebrooks

On January 20, 2017, Silvio Galvez, 30, of Miami, was arrested on a criminal complaint and is charged by indictment for his alleged involvement in a $50 million stolen identity refund fraud scheme involving the cashing of fraudulently obtained large-dollar tax refund checks. Galvez was charged with conspiracy to commit theft of government money, conspiracy to commit bank fraud, theft of government money, and aggravated identity theft.

to allegations in the criminal complaint, Galvez was a leader in a conspiracy involving the filing of over $50 million in large tax refund claims — each claim ranging from approximately $130,000 to $170,000 — in 2013 and 2014. These fraudulent refund requests were submitted to the IRS for payment using stolen identity information. The tax refunds contained the same set of repeated addresses, including the defendant’s address. The IRS paid out at least $4.3 million via U.S. Treasury checks mailed to the addresses listed on the returns. Galvez directed individuals to deposit these fraudulently obtained tax refunds and other fraudulently obtained checks at a bank in Miami. Galvez separately directed a bank employee to open up accounts using stolen identity information so that fraudulently obtained tax refund checks could be deposited. Finally, Galvez directed the bank employee to obtain account information for accounts with substantial funds, in order to conduct account takeovers.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of IRS-CI, FBI and ICE-HSI. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Michael N. Berger.

United States v. Evelina Sophia Reid, Case No. 17-CR-20057-Williams

On January 26, 2017, Evelina Sophia Reid, 35, of Miami Gardens, was charged in a fourteen-count indictment with conspiracy to commit access device fraud, possessing fifteen or more unauthorized access devices, aggravated identity theft, and computer fraud.

According to the indictment and publicly available documents, Reid was an employee of Jackson Health System when she accessed Jackson’s computer databases to steal patient PII, including social security numbers, of over approximately 24,000 individuals during a five-year period. Using the stolen information, Reid’s co-conspirators filed fraudulent tax returns in the names of Jackson Hospital patients.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of SSA-OIG, IRS-CI, USSS, DOL-OIG, MDPD Professional Compliance Bureau and Public Corruption Section, and the Miami-Dade County Office of the Inspector General. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Daya Nathan.

United States v. Douglas McArthur Bentley, Jr., et al,

Case No. 17-CR-20033-Altonaga

On January 19, 2017, Douglas Mcarthur Bentley, Jr., 41, Yvonne Lynn Bentley, 40, and Willie Ellis Hayden, 25, all of Homestead, were charged in a thirteen-count indictment for participating in a conspiracy to defraud the government with respect to claims, theft of government funds and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, starting on or about January 29, 2010, and continuing to on or about April 16, 2013, the defendants and their co-conspirators obtained stolen PII from various individuals without their consent and used the PII to file false and fraudulent tax returns with the IRS. The defendants and their co-conspirators also directed the IRS to electronically transfer tax refunds from the false and fraudulent tax returns to personal and corporate bank accounts they controlled at several banks located in Miami-Dade County, Florida. Once the tax refunds were deposited in bank accounts the defendants controlled, the illicitly obtained refunds were used for their personal gain and profit. According to allegations made in court, the intended loss amount for the fraud scheme was approximately $472,393.07 and the actual loss was $414,838.07.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of IRS-CI and the Homestead Police Department. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Maurice A. Johnson.

United States v. Blain, et al., Case No. 16-CR-14076-Middlebrooks

On December 1, 2016, five people were charged in a three-count indictment for their participation in conspiracy to commit stolen identity tax refund fraud.

Charlton Tierry Blain, 30, Clifford Raoul Blain, 28, Stephane Randolph Blain, 25, all of Pembroke Pines, and Dorsey Sims, Jr., 31, and Luis Roberto Rodriguez, 38, both of Sebring, were charged with conspiracy to defraud the government with respect to claims; conspiracy to commit access device fraud; and unlawful transfer, possession or use of means of identification.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, between January of 2012 and December of 2013, the defendants conspired to unjustly enriched themselves by using unlawfully obtained personally identifiable information to file false and fraudulent income tax returns. The fraudulently obtained tax refunds were deposited into fraudulent bank accounts controlled by the defendants, and the illicit proceeds were then withdrawn from those accounts. In total, 679 fraudulent tax returns were filed, claiming $986,978.00 in total refunds.

Mr. Ferrer commends the efforts of IRS-CI. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Daniel E. Funk and Adam C. McMichael.

United States v. Teri Onick and Philip White,

Case No. 17-CR-20011-Williams

On January 6, 2017, Teri Onick, 44, of Miami, and Phillip White, 45, of Salt Lake City, UT, of Miami, were charged in a thirteen-count indictment for their participation in a conspiracy to defraud the U.S. government.

According to the allegations in the indictment, on various dates between February and October 2012, Onick and White unlawfully obtained and deposited the fraudulently obtained tax refund checks belonging to other persons, without their permission or authority, into Onick and White’s bank accounts for their personal use and benefit. The estimated fraud loss is over $150,000.00.

Mr. Ferrer commends the efforts of IRS-CI. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Cary Aronovitz.

United States v. Gregory Clermont, Case No. 17-mj-2128-Torres

On January 30, 2017, Gregory Clermont, 25, of Miami, was charged by criminal complaint with possession of fifteen or more unauthorized access devices, that is, social security numbers issued to other persons.

to the allegations contained in the criminal complaint, on May 7, 2013, Clermont was in possession of official tax documents and handwritten lists of names, dates of birth, and social security numbers belonging to other individuals, as well as other handwritten notes appearing to relate to the filing of tax returns. Clermont was also in possession of a composition book containing what appeared to be the names, dates of birth, and social security numbers of approximately 140 individuals, three H&R Block debit cards in other people’s names, and a laptop that contained user identification numbers associated with the filing and attempted filing of tax returns through TurboTax online. More than fifteen of the social security numbers in the composition book belonged to other individuals.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of IRS-CI. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney John P. Gonsoulin.

United States v. Johnathan Jameel Ford, Case No. 17-CR-20079-Williams

On January 27, 2017, Johnathan Jameel Ford a/k/a “Johnatan Jameel Ford”, 41, of Broward, was charged in a fourteen-count indictment for the theft of government money and aggravated identity theft.

According to the indictment, between September 2013 and July 2015, Ford received stolen tax refunds or deposited altered U.S. Treasury checks, totaling over $45,000, knowing that the tax refunds or U.S. Treasury checks had been stolen.

Mr. Ferrer commends the efforts of IRS-CI, TIGTA and USSS. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Daya Nathan.

United States v. Crystal Jesha Griffin, Case No. 17-CR-20076-Williams

On January 27, 2017, Crystal Jesha Griffin, 25, of Miramar, was charged in a nine-count indictment for theft of government money.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, Griffin did knowingly and willfully receive United States Department of Treasury tax refunds, knowing the tax refunds to have been stolen. Specifically, Griffin is accused of receiving nine different tax refunds, from nine different victims, totaling $8,074.00.

Mr. Ferrer commended the investigative efforts of the FBI and IRS-CI. The case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Jonathan Stratton.

United States v. Ronald Esperant, Case No. 17-mj-2122-O’Sullivan

On January 27, 2017, Ronald Esperant, 31, of Miami, was charged by criminal complaint with the theft of government money for his participation in a tax scheme that defrauded the U.S. government.

According to the allegations contained in the complaint, in April 2013 multiple tax refunds issued to other persons, without their permission or authority, were deposited into Esperant’s bank account for an actual loss amount of $5,885.00.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of IRS-CI. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Matthew J. Langley.

United States v. Ricardo Innocent, Case No. 17-mj-2123-O’Sullivan

On January 27, 2017, Ricardo Innocent, 34, of Miami, was charged by criminal complaint with the theft of government money for his participation in a tax scheme that defrauded the U.S. government.

According to the allegations contained in the complaint, Innocent, filed fraudulent tax returns from January 2011 through February 2014 and had those fraudulently obtained tax refunds deposited into his bank account for an actual loss amount of $77,381.18.

Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of IRS-CI. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Matthew J. Langley.

United States v. Michelin Petit-Maitre, Case No. 17-mj-2124-O’Sullivan

On January 27, 2017, Michelin Petit-Maitre, 36, of Miami, was charged by criminal complaint with the theft of government money for his participation in a tax scheme that defrauded the U.S. government.

According to the allegations contained in the complaint, Petit-Maitre filed fraudulent tax returns from June 2013 through in or around February 2014 in the names of other persons and had those fraudulently obtained tax refunds deposited into his bank for an actual loss amount of $41,840.00.

Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of IRS-CI. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Matthew J. Langley.

United States v. Martha Somayra Gomez, Case No. 17-CR-20061-King

On January 26, 2017, Martha Somayra Gomez, 28, of Miami, was charged in a nine-count indictment for the theft of government money.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, between August 20, 2012 and June 5, 2013, nine tax refunds issued to other persons were deposited into Gomez’s bank accounts for an actual loss amount of $24,922.00.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the FBI and IRS-CI. The case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney J. Mackenzie Duane.

United States v. Youri P. Baptiste, Case No. 17-CR-20048-Altonaga

On January 24, 2017, Youri P. Baptiste, 23, of Miami, was charged in a six-count indictment for the theft of government money.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, between September 5, 2012 and September 24, 2013, six tax refunds issued to other persons were deposited into Baptiste’s bank accounts for an actual loss amount of $22,048.00.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the FBI and IRS-CI. The case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney J. Mackenzie Duane.

United States v. Altagrace Shaina Descollines, Case No. 17-CR-20047-Scola

On January 24, 2017, Altagrace Shaina Descollines, 25, of Hollywood, was charged in a three-count indictment for the theft of government money.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, between December 5, 2012 and April 24, 2013, three tax refunds issued to other persons were deposited into Descollines’ bank account for an actual loss amount of $13,169.00.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the FBI and IRS-CI. The case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney J. Mackenzie Duane.

United States v. Quincy Thomas Cook, Case No. 17-CR-20059-Williams

On January 26, 2017, Quincy Thomas Cook, 24, of Miramar, was charged in a four-count indictment for the theft of government money.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, between April 2012 and April 2013, four tax refunds issued to other persons were deposited into Cook’s bank account for an actual loss amount of $5,896.00.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the FBI, IRS-CI and USPIS. The case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Jonathan Stratton.

United States v. Willie Lee Parker, III, Case No. 17-CR-20058-Middlebrooks

On January 26, 2017, Willie Lee Parker III, 23, of Opa-Locka, was charged in an eleven-count indictment for the theft of government money.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, between February 2013 and April 2013, eleven tax refunds issued to other persons were deposited into Parker III’s bank account for an actual loss amount of $6,610.00.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the FBI and IRS-CI. The case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Jonathan Stratton.

United States v. Damon Donnell Rhodes, Case No. 17-CR-20062-Lenard

On January 26, 2017, Damon Donnell Rhodes, 23, of Hialeah, was charged in a seven-count indictment for the theft of government money.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, between November 2012 and December 2012, seven tax refunds issued to other persons were deposited into Rhodes’ bank account for an actual loss amount of $5,495.00.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the FBI, USPIS and IRS-CI. The case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Jonathan Stratton.

United States v. Rashaundra Javanni Lewis, Case No. 17-CR-20060-Scola

On January 26, 2017, Rashaundra Javanni Lewis, 26, of Miami, was charged in a five-count indictment for the theft of government money.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, between September 19, 2012 and September 26, 2012, five tax refunds issued to other persons were deposited into Lewis’ bank account for an actual loss amount of $3,953.00.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the FBI and IRS-CI. The case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney J. Mackenzie Duane.

THEFT OF PUBLIC BENEFIT FUNDS

United States v. Phyllistone Termine, Case No. 17-mj-2098-O’Sullivan

On January 26, 2017, Phyllistone Termine, 19, of Miami, was charged by criminal complaint for access device fraud, possession of fifteen or more unauthorized access devices, possession of device making equipment, and aggravated identity theft related to his alleged participation in a fraudulent unemployment compensation scheme.

According to the court record, including allegations contained in the criminal complaint, an IP address connected to Termine’s residence was used to access and file fraudulent unemployment benefit claims for more than 800 individuals on the Florida Department of Employment and Opportunity’s online database between March 23, 2015, and March 7, 2016.

the course of the investigation law enforcement executed a search warrant at Termine’s residence and allegedly discovered the defendant in his bedroom, writing on a small notepad. The first line on the notepad read “Summer 2016th” and stated “Buy 3 Phones, 1 clean 2 dirty’s” and “Buy online – Merrick BNK & CCVs.” CCVs are numeric fraud-prevention codes on credit cards that are used to help verify possession of your credit card. They can also be purchased from internet sources, in order for people to obtain stolen credit card data. On the bed next to Termine were three cellular phones and a laptop computer. Hidden between the defendant’s mattress and box spring was a black case containing several debit and credit cards belonging to individuals who did not reside at Termine’s residence. Inside the black case were several white blank plastic cards with magnetic stripes that are used to make debit and credit cards. On the floor next to Termine’s bed was hardware used to encode the magnetic stripe on credit/debit cards. Several victims whose credit or debit cards were found during the search also had their identities used to file for unemployment benefits using the IP Address at Termine’s home. These victims had not filed unemployment claims within the last 5 years, did not authorize anyone else to, and did not know Termine.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of DOL-OIG and SSA-OIG. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Anne P. McNamara.

United States v. Kicksonley Azema and Abdul Pierrelus,

Case No. 17-CR-20081-Moore

On January 27, 2017, Kicksonley Azema, 26, and Abdul Pierrelus, 29, both of North Miami, were charged in a five-count indictment with conspiracy to commit access device fraud, using unauthorized access devices to fraudulently obtain something valued at $1,000 or more and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, beginning on or about January 26, 2015, and continuing through the date of the indictment, Azema and Pierrelus unlawfully used social security numbers of Michigan residents to fraudulently file unemployment benefit claims with the state of Michigan, and directed those fraudulently obtained funds to debit card accounts fraudulently established using the social security numbers belonging to other persons.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of DOL-OIG, ICE-HSI and the State of Michigan Unemployment Insurance Agency. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Brian J. Shack.

United States v. James Kelly Morency, Frantzy Morency, and Jakeem Amal Stevens, Case No. 17-CR-20075-Huck

On January 27, 2017, James Kelly Morency, 21, of Hallandale Beach, Frantzy Morency, 26, of Lehigh Acres, and Jakeem Amal Stevens, 28, of Hollywood, were charged in a thirteen-count indictment with conspiracy to commit access device fraud, aggravated identity theft, possession of 15 or more unauthorized access devices, access device fraud, and computer fraud.

According to the indictment, between May 2011 and February 2015, the defendants possessed, transferred and used the social security numbers of other persons to obtain Social Security Administration (SSA) benefits by creating online accounts with the SSA with the stolen social security numbers belonging to other persons and having the SSA benefits redirected to accounts that the defendants controlled.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the FBI, SSA-OIG, and IRS-CI. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Daya Nathan.

United States v. Sammie Nathaniel Williams, Jr., a/k/a “Old School,” Case No. 16-CR-20921-Scola

On December 9, 2016, Sammie Nathaniel Williams, Jr., a/k/a “Old School,” 58, of Miami, was charged in a six-count indictment for mail theft by a postal employee and theft of government money. On January 19, 2017, Williams pleaded guilty to theft of government money.

According to the court record, on November 29, 2016, Williams, a United States Postal Service employee, stole three U.S. Treasury checks from the mail.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of USPIS, TIGTA and IRS-CI. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Jonathan Stratton.

BANK ACCOUNT TAKEOVERS

United States v. Jonathan Phanor, Case No. 16-CR-60349-Dimitrouleas

On December 13, 2016, Jonathan Phanor, 33, of Margate, was charged in a four-count indictment for his participation in a conspiracy to commit bank fraud and identity theft scheme.

According to court documents, from May 18, 2013 through August 13, 2013, Phanor accessed Wells Fargo customers’ bank accounts to obtain their name, date of birth, social security number and bank account numbers and provided the information to his co-conspirator. A co-conspirator would then open joint bank accounts using Wells Fargo customer’s name, date of birth, social security number and bank account numbers and move Wells Fargo customers’ money to the joint account. Once the money was in the joint account, the co-conspirator would then transfer the money belonging to the Wells Fargo customers’ from the joint account to bank accounts controlled by the co-conspirators. The defendant and his co-conspirators used the customers’ identities without their permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the FBI. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Miesha Shonta Darrough.

United States v. Mike Edwing Brizard, Case No. 16-CR-20931-Altonaga

On December 13, 2016, Mike Edwing Brizard, 28, of Miramar, was charged in a seven-count indictment for his participation in a conspiracy to commit bank fraud and identity theft scheme. On January 20, 2017, Brizard pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit bank fraud and bank fraud. Brizard is scheduled to be sentenced by Judge Altonaga on April 3, 2017.

According to the court record, from August 20, 2012 through February 26, 2013, Brizard accessed Wells Fargo customers’ bank accounts to obtain their name, date of birth, social security number and bank account numbers and provided the information to his co-conspirator. A co-conspirator would then open joint bank accounts using Wells Fargo customers’ name, date of birth, social security number and bank account numbers and move Wells Fargo customers’ money to the joint account. Once the money was in the joint account, a co-conspirator would then transfer the money belonging to the Wells Fargo customers from the joint account to bank accounts controlled by the co-conspirators. The defendant and his co-conspirators used the customers’ identities without their permission or authority and were responsible for a loss totaling approximately $164,755.91.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the FBI. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Miesha Shonta Darrough.

ACCOUNT TAKEOVERS (INCLUDING CREDIT CARD FRAUD)

United States v. Yulier Blanco Perez, et al., Case No. 17-CR-20073-Altonaga

On January 27, 2017, Yulier Blanco Perez, 34, David Machado Frometa, 34, and Silvio Lopez Cuellar, 30, of Miami, were charged in an eleven-count indictment with conspiracy to commit access device fraud, access device fraud, aggravated identity theft, and possession of fifteen or more unauthorized access devices.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, from July 28, 2016 through October 27, 2016, Perez, Frometa and Cuellar conspired to use credit card account numbers issued to other persons to unlawfully obtain items with an aggregate value of at least $1,000.00. The defendants used the fraudulent credit card account numbers to purchase stone tile from various tile retailers in South Florida. Over four days, during the three-month conspiracy, the defendants fraudulently purchased over $96,000.00 worth of stone tile from three retailers.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the MDPD and USSS. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Jessica Kahn Obenauf.

United States v. Geraldine Hughes, Case No. 17-CR-20065-Gayles

On January 26, 2017, Geraldine Hughes, 30, of Pompano Beach, was charged in a four-count indictment for access device fraud and aggravated identity theft.

to the allegations contained in the indictment and other public records, in August of 2016, Hughes conspired with another person to create a Care Credit account in another person’s name to which Hughes was later fraudulently added on as an authorized user and able to charge dental procedures onto the Care Credit account. Hughes made several visits to dental offices in North Miami and Aventura. Approximately $7,000 worth of dental work was charged to the individual’s account, without his/her permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the Aventura Police Department and IRS-CI. The case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Breezye Telfair.

United States v. Fernando Garcia Cala, Case No. 17-CR-20072-Moore

On January 26, 2017, Fernandeo Garcia Cala, 32, of Miami, was charged in a nine-count indictment for access device fraud, possession of device-making equipment and aggravated identity theft.

According to the court record, including allegations contained in the indictment, Garcia operated a Ford F-350 diesel truck that was illegally outfitted with “bladders,” which are containers attached to the fuel line that allow the vehicle to hold more than 300 gallons of diesel fuel. Garcia used gift cards, fraudulently re-encoded with bank account numbers belonging to other individuals, to obtain hundreds of gallons of fuel from several different fuel stations. A search warrant executed at Garcia’s home revealed skimming devices that can be used to capture debit/credit card account number and pin numbers as they are inputted at the fuel pump, an encoding device that is used to place the skimmed numbers onto the magnetic stripes (such as those found on gift cards and hotel room keys), and more than 196 counterfeit access devices that were encoded with account numbers belonging to other individuals.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the USSS and MDPD. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Breezye Telfair.

United States v. Bamby Pierre, Case No. 16-CR-20945-Williams

On December 15, 2016, Bamby Pierre, 26, of Miami, was charged in an eight-count indictment for attempted use of unauthorized access devices, access device fraud and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, between November 2015 and April 2016, Pierre attempted to use and used the debit card numbers issued to other persons to make over $500,000 in withdrawals from ATMs. Bamby also unlawfully possessed and used the names and debit card numbers of other persons, without their permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the USPIS and Broward County Sheriff’s Office. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Jonathan Stratton.

United States v. Marcus Lee Grant, Case No. 17-CR-20077-Moreno

January 27, 2017, defendant Marcus Lee Grant, 26, of Miramar, was charged in a five-count indictment for his participation in a scheme to steal credit cards by directing and intercepting mail containing credit cards and other credit card account information. The indictment charges the defendant with conspiracy to commit access device fraud, access device fraud and aggravated identity theft. The indictment further charges that Grant and his co-conspirators changed the mailing addresses of other individuals, without their permission or authority, in order to intercept the mail and facilitate the fraudulent scheme.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the United States Postal Inspection Service (USPIS). The case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Cary Aronovitz.

United States v. Michel Gonzalez Suarez, et al., Case No. 16-CR-10053-King

On December 20, 2016, Michel Gonzalez Suarez, 38, and Beatriz Morales Saladriga, 20, both of Hialeah, were charged in a five-count indictment for their participation in a conspiracy to commit access device fraud, access device fraud, and aggravated identity theft in the Florida Keys.

to the allegations contained in the indictment, on October 5, 2016, Suarez and Saladriga conspired with each other and others to commit access device fraud. As part of the conspiracy, the defendants used counterfeit credit cards encoded with account numbers issued to other people to conduct a series of fraudulent transactions at several stores located in Monroe County. The defendants are also alleged to have unlawfully possessed fifteen or more counterfeit credit and debit cards encoded with unauthorized account numbers, and to have used one or more counterfeit credit cards encoded with account numbers issued to other persons.

Mr. Ferrer commends the efforts of ICE-HSI and the Monroe County Sheriff’s Office. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Anne P. McNamara.

United States v. Brandon Bair, et al., Case No. 17-CR-60005-Zloch

On January 10, 2017, Brandon Bair, 23, of Cutler Bay, Aimee Chin-Sang, 22, of Homestead, and Kevin Lawson Mitchell, 21, of Davie, were charged in a seven-count indictment for access fraud and aggravated identity theft indictment relating to trafficking in and using unauthorized AT&T merchant account numbers and credit card account numbers to commit more than $80,000 of fraud.

According to allegations contained in the indictment, on various dates in February, April and May of 2016, Bair and Chin-Sang used credit cards to conduct multiple fraudulent transactions at Home Depot stores located in Sunrise and Davie. Mitchell, an employee at the Davie Home Depot, helped Bair and Chin-Sang conduct several of these transactions. As part of the fraudulent scheme, Bair and Chin-Sang also presented counterfeit licenses and used unauthorized AT&T merchant account numbers to conduct fraudulent transactions involving thousands of dollars of Apple products at an AT&T store located in Fort Lauderdale. All three defendants are charged with conspiring to commit access device fraud. Bair and Chin-Sang are also charged with multiple counts of use of unauthorized access devices and aggravated identity theft.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the USSS, Fort Lauderdale Police Department, and Davie Police Department. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Anne P. McNamara.

United States v. Angela Maria Villegas, 17-CR-20086-Ungaro

On January 27, 2017, Angela Maria Villegas, 41, of Miami Beach, was charged in a five-count indictment for aggravated identity theft and use of unauthorized access devices.

According to the court record, including allegations contained in the indictment, from January 20, 2015, through April 12, 2016, Villegas, a high-end retail employee, made over $20,000 worth of unauthorized purchases using the credit card account numbers belonging to her high-end specialty customers, without their permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the efforts of the MDPD and USSS. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Matthew J. Langley.

United States v. Ahlaniee Maheei Chinn, 17-CR-20031-Middlebrooks

On January 7, 2017, Ahlaniee Maheei Chinn, 23, of Miami, was charged in a two-count indictment for access device fraud and aggravated identity theft.

to the court record, including allegations contained in the indictment, on March 4, 2016, Chinn, purchased more than two-thousand dollars’ worth of goods with a counterfeit credit card. The counterfeit card had the true account holders’ information shaved off and Chinn’s name was fraudulently embossed onto the credit card.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of IRS-CI and Aventura Police Department. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Breezye Telfair.

United States v. Suzelie Cheremond, Case No. 17-CR-60025-Bloom

On January 26, 2017, Suzelie Cheremond, 25, of Miami, was charged in a five-count indictment for access device fraud and aggravated identity theft.

According to the court record, including allegations contained in the indictment, in December of 2015, Cheremond, a Sam’s Club employee in Miramar, unlawfully obtained and used credit cards belonging to other persons to make purchases at Sam’s Club for $4,110.11.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of IRS-CI, the Aventura Police Department and Miramar Police Department. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Breezye Telfair.

United States v. Quienece Shedina Saintvil and Larod James Robinson,

Case No. 17-CR-20064-Ungaro

On January 26, 2017, Quienece Shedina Saintvil, 30, and Larod James Robinson, 34, both of Miami, were charged in a three-count indictment for their participation in a conspiracy to commit access device fraud and aggravated identity theft.

According to the court record, including allegations contained in the indictment, in August of 2016, Saintvil and Robinson entered the Bloomingdale’s Department store and unlawfully used a credit card account belonging to another person to make purchases. Saintvil and Robinson picked out merchandise and then Saintvil provided a Bloomingdale customer’s social security number in order to access the customer’s Bloomingdale’s credit account. Saintvil and Robinson made a total of three transactions, totaling $3,416.77, without the permission or authority of the true credit card account holder.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of IRS-CI and Aventura Police Department. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Breezye Telfair.

United States v. Shanisa Bell, Case No. 17-CR-60029-Bloom

On January 27, 2017, Shanisa Bell, 25, of Coconut Creek, was charged in a three-count indictment for using unauthorized access devices to fraudulently obtain something valued at $1,000 or more and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, between July 2015 and June 2016, Bell unlawfully used debit card account numbers issued in the names of other persons without their permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of DOL-OIG, ICE-HSI and the State of Michigan Unemployment Insurance Agency. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Brian J. Shack.

United States v. Edrey Acosta, Case No. 17-CR-20071-Martinez

On January 26, 2017, Edrey Acosta, 27, of Miami, was charged in a three-count indictment for access device fraud and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, on November 8, 2016, Acosta used counterfeit encoded with credit card account numbers issued to other persons.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the USSS and MDPD. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Breezye Telfair.

United States v. Crystal Henderson, Case No. 17-CR-20066-Gayles

On January 26, 2017, Crystal Henderson, 34, of Homestead, was charged in a four-count indictment for access device fraud and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, on various dates throughout September of 2016, Henderson unlawfully used a credit card account belonging to another person to make purchases over $1,000.00.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of IRS-CI, Stamford Connecticut Police Department, and Aventura Police Department. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Breezye Telfair.

United States v. Shante Marie Wesby, Case No. 17-CR-20032-Scola

On January 7, 2017, Shante Marie Wesby, 37, of Fort Lauderdale, was charged in a three-count indictment for access device fraud and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, on various dates throughout January and February of 2016, Wesby unlawfully used a social security number and a credit card account number belonging to another person, without his/her permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of IRS-CI and Aventura Police Department. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Breezye Telfair.

United States v. Kevin Martinez Morazan, Case No. 17-CR-60016-Bloom

On January 24, 2017, Kevin Martinez Morazan, 24, of Broward County, was charged in a five-count indictment with possessing fifteen or more unauthorized access devices and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, on May 7, 2015, Martinez unlawfully possessed names and social security numbers of other persons, without their permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the efforts of the Fort Lauderdale Police Department, USSS and IRS-CI. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Daya Nathan.

United States v. Tymonzo Ward, Case No. 16-CR-60306-Cohn

On October 28, 2016, Tymonzo Ward, 37, of Wilton Manors, was charged in a six-count indictment for access device fraud and aggravated identity theft.

According to allegations contained in the indictment, on May 21, 2015, Ward unlawfully possessed fifteen or more credit card account numbers and social security numbers belonging to other persons. Ward also unlawfully possessed and used the names, date of births, and driver licenses of other persons without their permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of IRS-CI, the USSS, and Fort Lauderdale Police Department. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Anne P. McNamara

United States v. Rayden Garcia Ramos, Case No. 16-CR-20808-Lenard

On October 21, 2016, Rayden Garcia Ramos, 46, of Hialeah, was charged in a six-count indictment for access device fraud, possession of fifteen or more unauthorized access devices and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, from September 8, 2015 through December 5, 2015, Ramos trafficked in and used one or more credit card account numbers issued to other persons in order to obtain something of value worth $1,000 or more. Additionally, on October 21, 2015, Ramos possessed unlawfully possessed fifteen or more counterfeit credit card account numbers belonging to other persons.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the USSS. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Anne P. McNamara.

United States v. Terry Tyrone Clowers, Case No. 17-CR-60004-Dimitrouleas

On January 10, 2017, Terry Tyrone Clowers, 30, of Fort Lauderdale, was charged in a two-count indictment for attempted use of unauthorized access devices and aggravated identity theft.

According to the court record, including allegations contained in the indictment, on January 2, 2017, Clowers used the name and social security number of another person in an attempt to purchase an All-Terrain Vehicle worth thousands of dollars from a Broward Motor Sports store in Fort Lauderdale.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the USSS and Fort Lauderdale Police Department. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Anne P. McNamara.

United States v. Halima Ouedraogo, Case No. 17-CR-60015-Moreno

On January 24, 2017, Halima Ouedraogo, 35, of Kirkland, Washington, was charged in a twelve-count indictment for access device fraud, possession of fifteen or more unauthorized access devices and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, from August 4, 2015 through August 25, 2015, in Broward County, Ouedraogo used credit cards issued to other persons to fraudulently obtain things valued at $1,000 or more. The indictment also alleges that on August 25, 2015, Ouedraogo possessed fifteen or more credit card account numbers and social security numbers belonging to other persons.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of IRS-CI, USSS, and the Fort Lauderdale Police Department. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Anne P. McNamara.

United States v. Terrell Tyrone Rivers and Preston Elijah Parrish, Case No. 17-CR-60024-Dimitrouleas

On January 26, 2017, Terrell Tyrone Rivers, 27, of Orlando, and Preston Elijah Parrish, 25, of Lauderhill, were charged in a ten-count indictment with conspiracy to commit access device fraud, possession of fifteen or more unauthorized access devices, and aggravated identity theft.

According to allegations contained in the indictment, from February 10, 2016 through February 24, 2016, Rivers and Parrish conspired to possess fifteen or more unauthorized access devices, that is, social security numbers issued to other persons. On February 24, 2016, Rivers drove from Orlando to Lauderhill, Florida, to meet Parrish. According to court documents, on February 24, 2016, Rivers and Parrish were pulled over in Lauderhill, Florida. Upon a search of Rivers, several driver licenses with other persons’ information and Rivers’ photograph were recovered, along with personalized checks in other persons’ names. In the vehicle, a black suitcase, printer, tablets, and multiple blank business checks were recovered. A search of Rivers’ electronics revealed the PII of more than fifteen other persons. A search of Parrish’s electronics also revealed the PII of more than fifteen other persons.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the USSS and the Lauderhill Police Department. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney J. Mackenzie Duane.

United States v. Jessie Aguilar, Case No. 16-CR-20944-Gayles

On December 15, 2016, Jesse Aguilar, 28, of Hallandale Beach, was charged in a five-count indictment for conspiring to commit access device fraud, access device fraud, and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, on or about November 2, 2014, through on or about September 15, 2015, Aguilar conspired with others to commit access device fraud. As part of the conspiracy, they used counterfeit credit cards encoded with account numbers issued to other people to conduct a series of fraudulent transactions at the Apple Store in Miami Beach, Florida. The loss amount was approximately $308,830.86.

Mr. Ferrer commends the efforts of ICE-HSI and the MDPD. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Miesha Shonta Darrough.

United States v. Dave Benggie Alin, Case No. 16-CR-20815-Williams

On October 25, 2016, Dave Benggie Alin, 21, of Miami, was charged in a three-count indictment with fraudulent use of a counterfeit credit card. aggravated identity theft, and possession of a firearm and ammunition by a convicted felon. On January 18, 2017, Alin pleaded guilty to all charges. He is currently set for sentencing on April 7, 2017.

According to the court record, on October 12, 2016, Alin was found by law enforcement to be in possession of a counterfeit credit card and a firearm. Alin used the credit card to check into a hotel in Miami, and then he continued to use the credit card to make purchases at the hotel.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the MDPD and IRS-CI. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Daniel Cervantes.

United States v. Luis Miniert, Case No. 16-CR-20941-Scola

On December 15, 2016, Luis Miniert, 26, of Miami, was charged in a five-count indictment for conspiring to commit access device fraud, access device fraud, and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, from November 2, 2014 through September 15, 2015, Miniert conspired with others to commit access device fraud. As part of the conspiracy, they used counterfeit credit cards encoded with account numbers issued to other people to conduct a series of fraudulent transactions at the Apple Store in Miami Beach, Florida. The loss amount was approximately $119,210.73.

Mr. Ferrer commends the efforts of ICE-HSI and the MDPD. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Miesha Shonta Darrough.

United States v. Anthony Leon, Case No. 17-CR-20068-Lenard

On January 26, 2017, Anthony Leon, 31, of Hialeah, was charged in a five-count indictment for conspiring to commit access device fraud, access device fraud, and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, March 20, 2014 through July 18, 2015, Leon conspired with others to commit access device fraud. As part of the conspiracy, they used counterfeit credit cards encoded with account numbers issued to other people to conduct a series of fraudulent transactions at the Apple Store in Miami Beach, Florida. The loss amount was approximately $158,690.37.

Mr. Ferrer commends the efforts of ICE-HSI and the MDPD. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Miesha Shonta Darrough.

United States v. Diana Leon a/k/a “Diana Montoya”, Case No.17-CR-20069-Altonaga

On January 26, 2017, Diana Leon a/k/a “Diana Montoya,” 22, of Hialeah, was charged in a five-count indictment for conspiring to commit access device fraud, access device fraud, and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, from September 20, 2014 through August 31, 2015, the defendant conspired with others to commit access device fraud. As part of the conspiracy, they used counterfeit credit cards encoded with account numbers issued to other people to conduct a series of fraudulent transactions at the Apple Store in Miami Beach, Florida. The loss amount was approximately $141,503.01.

Mr. Ferrer commends the efforts of ICE-HSI and the MDPD. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Miesha Shonta Darrough.

United States v. Stephanie Vargas, Case No. 17-CR-20070-Moreno

On January 26, 2017, Stephanie Vargas, 26, of Hialeah, was charged in a five-count indictment for conspiring to commit access device fraud, access device fraud, and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, from December 20, 2014 through July 17, 2015, Vargas conspired with others to commit access device fraud. As part of the conspiracy, they used counterfeit credit cards encoded with account numbers issued to other people to conduct a series of fraudulent transactions at the Apple Store in Miami Beach, Florida. The loss amount was approximately $174,152.60.

Mr. Ferrer commends the efforts of ICE-HSI and the MDPD. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Miesha Shonta Darrough.

UNLAWFULLY POSSESSING PII

United States v. Alvin Celius Andre, Case No. 17-CR-60014-Zloch

On January 20, 2017, Alvin Celius Andre, 26, of Miramar, was charged in a four-count indictment with access device fraud and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, on March 26, 2016, Andre possessed fifteen or more social security numbers issued to other persons. Andre also unlawfully possessed and used the names and date of births of other persons, without their permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of Miramar Police Department and ICE-HSI. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Matthew J. Langley.

United States v. Frantz Felix, Jr, Case No. 17-CR-20038-Williams

On January 20, 2017, Frantz Felix, Jr, 23, of Miramar, was charged in a six-count indictment with access device fraud and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, on March 26, 2016, Felix possessed fifteen or more social security numbers issued to other persons and used a credit card account number issued to another person. Felix, Jr. also unlawfully possessed and used the names and date of births of other persons, without their permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the Miramar Police Department and ICE-HSI. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Matthew J. Langley.

United States v. Marcus Allen Griffin, Case No. 17-CR-60011-Dimitrouleas

On January 13, 2017, Marcus Allen Griffin, 22, of Miramar, was charged in a six-count indictment with access device fraud and aggravated identity theft.

to the allegations contained in the indictment, on September 1, 2016, Griffin possessed fifteen or more social security numbers and credit card account numbers issued to other persons. Griffin also unlawfully possessed and used the names and date of births of other persons, without their permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the Miramar Police Department and ICE-HSI. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Matthew J. Langley.

United States v. Marc Antoine Riviere, Case No. 17-CR-20024-Moore

On January 13, 2017, Marc Antoine Riviere, 29, of Miami, was charged in a four-count indictment for identity theft in connection with his possession of at least fifteen social security numbers belonging to other individuals.

According to the allegations in the indictment, on July 17, 2014, Riviere was found in possession of fifteen or more social security numbers issued to other persons, without their permission or authority. Riviere also unlawfully possessed and used the names and date of births of other persons, without their permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of FBI, IRS-CI, and Miami-Dade County Schools Police Department. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Miesha Shonta Darrough.

United States v. Jacqueloi Trishauna Moreau, Case No. 17-CR-60003-Bloom

On January 10, 2017, Jacqueloi Trishauna Moreau, 28, of Lauderdale Lakes, was charged in a four-count indictment for identity theft in connection with her possession of at least fifteen social security numbers belonging to other individuals.

According to the allegations in the indictment, on July 18, 2016, Moreau was found in possession of fifteen or more names, dates and social security numbers issued to other persons. Moreau also unlawfully possessed and used the names and date of births of other persons, without their permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the efforts of USPIS, IRS-CI and Margate Police Department. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Miesha Shonta Darrough.

United States v. Elena Caridad Amaya, Case No. 17-CR-20067-Ungaro

On January 26, 2017, Elena Caridad Amaya, 42, of Lauderdale Lakes, was charged in a four-count indictment for identity theft in connection with her possession of at least fifteen social security numbers belonging to other individuals.

According to the allegations in the indictment, in April 2016, Amaya was found in possession of fifteen or more counterfeit card encoded with account numbers and social security numbers issued to other persons. Amaya used a credit card account number issued to another person, without his/her permission or authority, to make purchases totaling $20,681.64.

Mr. Ferrer commends the efforts of IRS-CI and MDPD. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Miesha Shonta Darrough.

United States v. Robert Jamorris Jackson, Case No. 16-CR-60337-Bloom

On December 2, 2016, Robert Jamorris Jackson, 33, of Broward County, was charged in a six count indictment with possession of fifteen or more unauthorized access devices and aggravated identity theft.

The indictment alleges that on February 18, 2016, in Broward County, Jackson possessed personal identifying information of more than fifteen people.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the USSS. This case was indicted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Daniel Cervantes and is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Jonathan Stratton.

United States v. Aamir Khan, Case No. 16-CR-20839-Lenard

On November 1, 2016, Aamir Khan, 20, of Miami, was charged in a six-count indictment with possession of fifteen or more unauthorized access devices and aggravated identity theft. On January 3, 2017, Khan pleaded guilty to possession of fifteen or more unauthorized access devices and one count of aggravated identity theft. Khan is scheduled to be sentenced on March 15, 2017.

According to the court record, on or about June 10, 2014, Khan was arrested for driving without a license. A search incident to arrest revealed that Khan had a USB drive in his pocket. A consensual search of the USB drive revealed PII for approximately 3,680 individuals, including their names, addresses, dates of birth, and social security numbers.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of IRS-CI and NMBPD. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Daniel Cervantes.

United States v. Victor Joseph, Case No. 16-CR-60335-Zloch

On November 29, 2016, Victor Joseph, 26, of Orlando, was charged in a seven-count indictment with using one or more unauthorized access devices, possessing fifteen or more unauthorized access devices and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations in the indictment, between January and March 2015, Joseph possessed and used social security numbers of other persons, without their permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the efforts of IRS-CI and USSS. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Daya Nathan.

United States v. Dave Pierre, Case No. 17-CR-60023-Moreno

On January 26, 2017, Dave Pierre, 28, of Miami, was charged in a five-count indictment with access device fraud and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, on November 7, 2016, Pierre unlawfully possessed fifteen or more names, dates of birth and social security numbers belonging to other persons. Pierre unlawfully possessed and used the names and date of births of other persons, without their permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of IRS-CI and the Broward County Sheriff’s Office. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Anne P. McNamara.

United States v. Ricky Cearc, Case No. 17-CR-20083-Moreno

On January 27, 2017, Ricky Cearc, 27, of Miami, was charged in a three-count indictment for access device fraud and aggravated identity theft.

According to allegations contained in the indictment, on August 29, 2013, Ricky Cearc unlawfully possessed fifteen or more social security numbers belonging to other persons. Ricky Cearc unlawfully possessed and used the date of births and social security numbers of other persons, without their permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of ICE-HSI and MDPD. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Jonathan D. Stratton.

United States v. Lyns Cearc, Case No. 17-CR-20084-Gayles

On January 27, 2017, Lyns Cearc, 34, of Miami, was charged in a three-count indictment for access device fraud and aggravated identity theft.

to allegations contained in the indictment, on August 29, 2013, Lyns Cearc unlawfully possessed fifteen or more social security numbers belonging to other persons. Lyns Cearc unlawfully possessed and used the date of births and social security numbers of other persons, without their permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of ICE-his and MDPD. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Jonathan D. Stratton.

United States v. Edouard Bastien, Case No. 16-CR-20953-Gayles

On December 19, 2016, a criminal information was filed, charging Edouard Bastien, 27, of North Miami Beach, with possession of fifteen or more unauthorized access devices and aggravated identity theft.

to the allegations contained in the information, on June 20, 2014, Bastien unlawfully possessed fifteen or more social security numbers belonging to other persons. Bastien also unlawfully possessed and used the names and social security numbers of other persons without their permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of ICE-HSI, DOL-OIG, IRS-CI and North Miami Beach Police Department (NMBPD). This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Joshua S. Rothstein.

United States v. D’Andre Nathaniel Watson. Case No. 16-CR-20958-Lenard

On December 20, 2016, D’Andre Nathaniel Watson, 19, of North Miami Beach, was charged in a six-count indictment for possession of fifteen or more unauthorized access devices and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, on February 25, 2016 and again on March 16, 2016, Watson unlawfully possessed fifteen or more social security numbers belonging to other persons. Watson also unlawfully possessed and used the names and the date of births of other persons, without their permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of ICE-HSI, DOL-OIG, and NMBPD. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Joshua S. Rothstein.

United States v. Brian Anthony Joseph, Case No. 17-CR-20004-Moore

On January 5, 2017, Brian Anthony Joseph, 21, of Miami, was charged in a four-count indictment for possession of fifteen or more unauthorized access devices and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, on November 9, 2015, Joseph unlawfully possessed fifteen or more social security numbers belonging to other persons. Watson also unlawfully possessed and used the names and the date of births of other persons, without their permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts ICE-HSI, DOL-OIG, NMBPD and the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Joshua S. Rothstein.

United States v. Richard Wayne Brown, Case No. 17-CR-60010-Cohn

On January 13, 2017, Richard Wayne Brown, 29, of Miramar, was charged in a seven-count indictment for possession of fifteen or more unauthorized access devices and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, on December 28, 2016 and January 6, 2017, Brown unlawfully possessed fifteen or more social security numbers belonging to other persons. Brown also unlawfully possessed and used the names and the date of births of other persons, without their permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of U.S. Department of Agriculture, Office of the Inspector General (USDA-OIG), FBI, USSS, and Fort Lauderdale Police Department. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Joshua S. Rothstein.

United States v. Peterson Joseph, Case No. 16-CR-20830-Moore

On October 28, 2016, Peterson Joseph, 24, of Miami, Florida, was charged in a four-count indictment with aggravated identity theft, possession of fifteen or more unauthorized access devices, and using unauthorized access devices to fraudulently obtain something valued at $1,000 or more.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, from June 17, 2014 through May 19, 2015, Joseph unlawfully possessed and used fifteen or more social security numbers belonging to other persons.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of DOL-OIG. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Brian J. Shack.

United States v. Jason Douglas, Case No. 16-CR-60308-Bloom

On October 28, 2016, Jason Douglas, 26, of New York, was charged in a three-count indictment with possessing fifteen or more unauthorized and counterfeit access devices and aggravated identity theft.

to the allegations contained in the indictment, on or about April 16, 2016, Douglas unlawfully possessed fifteen or more social security numbers issued to other persons and debit cards encoded with account numbers issued to other persons. Douglas also unlawfully possessed and used the names, date of births and social security numbers of other persons, without their permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of IRS-CI and the Broward County Sherriff’s Office. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Brian J. Shack.

United States v. Jerry Jean Baptiste and Stanley Auguste, Case No. 16-CR-20934-Cooke

On December 15, 2016, Jerry Jean Baptiste, 22, of Miami, and Stanley Auguste, 25, of Miami Gardens, were charged in a nine-count indictment with conspiracy to possess fifteen or more unauthorized access devices, possession of fifteen or more unauthorized access devices, and aggravated identity theft.

to the allegations contained in the indictment, from April 24, 2015 through August 5, 2015, Baptiste and Auguste conspired to possess unlawfully fifteen or more social security numbers issued to other persons. On or about April 30, 2015, Baptiste possessed and sold electronic files containing lists of PII of various individuals, including social security numbers issued to fifteen or more individuals. On or about May 6, 2015, and again on August 5, 2015, Baptiste and Auguste possessed and sold electronic files containing lists of PII, including fifteen or more social security numbers. Baptiste and Auguste possessed and used the names, social security numbers, and dates of birth of real individuals, without permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of ICE-HSI. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney John P. Gonsoulin.

ACCESS DEVICE FRAUD

United States v. Alexey Abreu Chapotin, et al., Case No. 17-CR-20043-Lenard

January 24, 2017, Alexey Abreu Chapotin, 22, Yankiel Blanco, 34, and Yuliesky Cespedes Perez, 26, all of Miami, were charged in a two-count indictment for conspiracy to commit access device fraud and possession of device making equipment.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, on August 16, 2016, Chapotin, Blanco and Perez possessed credit card “skimming” devices, drills, and other equipment which was used to modify the skimmers so that they could be surreptitiously installed onto credit card readers at gas pumps. The indictment further alleges that on August 16, 2016, the defendants installed one of these card “skimming” devices at a pump at the gas station, in order to capture customer credit card account information.

Mr. Ferrer commends ICE-HSI and the Aventura Police Department. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Anne P. McNamara.

United States v. Omar Pulido Sanchez, et al., Case No. 17-mj-2112-JJO

On January 27, 2017, Omar Pulido Sanchez, 38, Uriel Pulido Sanchez, 42, and Maria Castillo Sarmiento, all of Colombia, were charged by criminal complaint with conspiracy to possess fifteen or more access devices and conspiracy to possess access device making equipment.

According to the allegations contained in the complaint, in June of 2016, the defendants installed credit card skimming devices onto bank ATMs throughout South Florida. In total, the defendants stole the bank account information of at least three hundred victims, and of those three hundred victims, over sixty reported fraudulent withdrawals from their accounts.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the MDPD. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Daniel J. Marcet.

United States v. Rene Hernandez, Case No. 17-mj-2111-O’Sullivan

On January 27, 2017, Rene Hernandez, 57, of Miami, was charged by criminal complaint for possession of access device making equipment.

According to the allegations contained in the complaint, on April 5, 2016, Hernandez was found by law enforcement to be in possession of a magnetic stripe encoding device, multiple fuel pump credit card skimming devices, and several counterfeit credit cards in his own name.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the MDPD. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Daniel J. Marcet.

United States v. Cesar Castillo Vargas, Case No. 17-mj-6040-O’Sullivan

On January 27, 2017, Cesar Castillo Vargas, 37, of Colombia, was charged by criminal complaint with possession of access device making equipment.

According to the allegations contained in the complaint, on August 1, 2016, law enforcement found Castillo Vargas in possession of a magnetic strip encoder device, a fraudulent Colombian driver license, a fraudulent Mexican passport, and several blank credit or debit cards.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the MDPD. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Daniel J. Marcet.

United States v. Oberto Jean, Case No. 17-CR-20082-Scola

On January 27, 2017, Oberto Jean, 35, of Miami, Florida, was charged in a five-count indictment with possession of fifteen or more unauthorized access devices, possession of access device-making equipment, aggravated identity theft, and being a felon in possession of firearms and ammunition.

to the allegations contained in the indictment, on or about February 11, 2015, Jean unlawfully possessed access device-making equipment and fifteen or more social security numbers belonging to other persons. Jean unlawfully possessed and used the date of births and social security numbers of other persons, without their permission or authority. Jean, a convicted felon, also possessed two firearms and ammunition.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of IRS-CI, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) and the Miami Police Department (MPD). This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Brian J. Shack.

United States v. Anthony Reid, Case No. 16-CR-60307-Dimitrouleas

On October 28, 2016, Anthony Reid, 22, of Miami, was charged in a four-count indictment with possessing access device-making equipment, fifteen or more unauthorized and counterfeit access devices, and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, on April 16, 2016, Reid unlawfully possessed access device-making equipment, social security numbers issued to other persons, and counterfeit credit cards and debit cards encoded with account numbers issued to other persons.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of IRS-CI and the Broward County Sherriff’s Office. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Brian J. Shack.

United States v. Luis Perez Luis and Jose Luis Perez, Case No. 17-CR-20087-Altonaga

On January 27, 2017, Luis Perez Luis, 57, and Jose Luis Perez, 33, both of Miami, were charged in an eight-count indictment with aggravated identity theft, conspiracy to possess fifteen or more access devices, possession of fifteen or more unauthorized access devices, and possession of device making equipment

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, on August 31, 2016, Luis and Perez conspired to possess and possessed fifteen or more counterfeit credit cards and credit card account numbers issued to other persons, as well as access device making equipment.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the MDPD and USSS. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Matthew J. Langley.

United States v. Patrick Gaston Sebastian, Case No. 17-CR-20030-Williams

On January 20, 2017, Patrick Gaston Sebastian, 21, of Miami, Florida, was charged in a four-count indictment with aggravated identity theft, possession of fifteen or more unauthorized access devices and possession of device making equipment.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, on July 1, 2016, Sebastian possessed fifteen or more social security numbers and credit card account numbers issued to other persons as well as a credit card embosser and credit card skimmer. Sebastian also unlawfully possessed and used the names and the date of births of other persons, without their permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of MDPD and USSS. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Matthew J. Langley.

United States v. Luis Fernando Casallas Guzman, Case No. 17-CR-20022-Scola

On January 13, 2017, Luis Fernando Casallas Guzman, 61, of Colombia, was charged in a two-count indictment with possession of fifteen or more unauthorized access devices and possession of device making equipment.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, on March 12, 2015, Guzman possessed fifteen or more counterfeit credit cards and credit card account numbers of other individuals as well as a credit card skimmer and magnetic stripe encoder.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of ICE-HSI. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Matthew J. Langley.

     If convicted of the charged conduct, the defendants face a possible maximum statutory sentence of 10 years in prison for possession of fifteen or more unauthorized access devices; 10 years in prison for trafficking in or using one or more unauthorized access devices during a one-year period and by such conduct obtaining anything of value over $1,000; 5 years in prison for theft of mail; 10 years in prison for theft of government money; 5 in prison for conspiracy to commit theft of government money; 5 years in prison for conspiracy to defraud the United States; 15 years in prison for possession of access device making equipment; 20 years in prison for participating in a wire fraud conspiracy; 5 years in prison for conspiracy to pass Treasury checks bearing forged endorsements; and 2 years in prison consecutive to any other term for aggravated identity theft.

     Mr. Ferrer commends ATF, the Aventura Police Department, Broward County Sheriff’s Office, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), Davie Police Department, DOL-OIG, FBI , Florida Department of Economic Opportunity, Homestead Police Department, ICE-HSI, IRS-CI, Lauderhill Police Department, Margate Police Department, Miami Beach Police Department, MDPD Professional Compliance Bureau and Public Corruption Section, Miami-Dade County Office of the Inspector General, Miami-Dade Public Schools Police Department, Miramar Police Department, Monroe County Sheriff’s Office, MPD, NMBPD, Stamford Connecticut Police Department, State of Michigan Unemployment Insurance Agency, SSA-OIG, TIGTA, USDA-OIG, USPIS, USSS, for the investigative support they provide the Strike Force to combat fraud schemes throughout the Southern District of Florida.

     A criminal complaint or an indictment is an accusatory instrument that contains formal charges against a defendant. All persons charged in a criminal complaint or indictment are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Related court documents and information may be found on the website of the District Court for the Southern District of Florida at www.flsd.uscourts.gov or on http://pacer.flsd.uscourts.gov.

Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1YmDCP-bctu0LUXADRLu4DOmA-k7HpskPYVhBghXSyEU
  Last Updated: 2025-03-21 10:55:13 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: Case type associated with a magistrate case if the current case was merged from a magistrate case
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The docket number originally given to a case assigned to a magistrate judge and subsequently merged into a criminal case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a magistrate case
Format: A3

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the second highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE2
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE2
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the third highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE3
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE3
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the fourth highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE4
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE4
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the fifth highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE5
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE5
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE5
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE5
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
Magistrate Docket Number:   SD-FL  1:19-mj-03798
Case Name:   USA v. Perez
Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ehXP686NTtiDo4C0rW_6Aity8ODhRkZlSLAaEZtP2GU
  Last Updated: 2025-03-21 10:25:11 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: Case type associated with a magistrate case if the current case was merged from a magistrate case
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The docket number originally given to a case assigned to a magistrate judge and subsequently merged into a criminal case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a magistrate case
Format: A3

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the second highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE2
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE2
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the third highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE3
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE3
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the fourth highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE4
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE4
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the fifth highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE5
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE5
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE5
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE5
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
Magistrate Docket Number:   SD-FL  1:19-mj-03817
Case Name:   USA v. Arguelles et al
Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1DzRGIo-6cfAby5EC47VNeAoz8CbTSI6LJMps6gJxfD4
  Last Updated: 2025-03-21 10:26:43 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: Case type associated with a magistrate case if the current case was merged from a magistrate case
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The docket number originally given to a case assigned to a magistrate judge and subsequently merged into a criminal case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a magistrate case
Format: A3

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the second highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE2
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE2
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the third highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE3
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE3
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the fourth highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE4
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE4
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the fifth highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE5
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE5
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE5
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE5
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
Magistrate Docket Number:   SD-FL  1:19-mj-03842
Case Name:   USA v. Verdura
Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1zC5L_dexfiNRI-xBghsiOckO5x5TelfHDzIBk3PxuQg
  Last Updated: 2025-03-21 10:28:49 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: Case type associated with a magistrate case if the current case was merged from a magistrate case
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The docket number originally given to a case assigned to a magistrate judge and subsequently merged into a criminal case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a magistrate case
Format: A3

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the second highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE2
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE2
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the third highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE3
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE3
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the fourth highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE4
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE4
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the fifth highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE5
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE5
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE5
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE5
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
Score:   0.9687
Docket Number:   aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanVzdGljZS5nb3YvdXNhby1tZGZsL3ByL2FwcGVhbHMtY291cnQtdXBob2xkcy1zY2llbnRpc3RzLWZyYXVkLWNvbnZpY3Rpb25z
  Press Releases:
Tampa, Florida – United States Attorney Maria Chapa Lopez announces that the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit has affirmed the convictions for two Belleair Beach scientists, Mahmoud Aldissi (a/k/a Matt) and his wife Anastassia Bogomolova (a/k/a Anastasia), for conspiracy to commit wire fraud, wire fraud, aggravated identity theft, and falsification of records. The Court’s opinion describes how Aldissi and Bogomolova lied about their facilities, equipment, and employees, fabricated price quotes, and forged endorsements from respected scientists to obtain $10.5 million in small-business research funding from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and other government agencies. When government officials began investigating, the defendants submitted falsified business records for their companies, Fractal Systems, Inc. and Smart Polymers Research Corp., to cover up the fraud.

The Eleventh Circuit explained that had Congress established the programs that Aldissi and Bogomolova defrauded in order to provide qualified small businesses with research-and-development support to turn research into actual commercial products and services. In a highly competitive process, researchers submit detailed proposals outlining their research, a panel of experts selects winners, and the winning proposals become contracts between the researchers and the government for the research.

On appeal, the defendants had admitted that their proposals were faked and that, “under the terms of the bid contracts, they were not eligible for any of the contracts or grants for which they applied.” They nonetheless claimed that their convictions should be overturned because they had performed research and published the results in scientific journals. However, after hearing oral argument, the Court of Appeals rejected all of their arguments, stating, “These are not job programs for unemployed scientists and do not fund research merely for the sake of research.” Because the defendants’ “lies, forgeries, and fabricated price quotes” related to key ingredients for commercialization, their frauds deprived the government of what it actually was paying for and of the money that should have been awarded to other researchers.

The Court also affirmed the defendants’ sentences, which were based in part on the $24.5 million that they sought from their fraudulent proposals. Aldissi is serving 15 years in prison, and Bogomolova is serving 13 years in prison. And both have been ordered to repay as restitution the $10.5 million that they obtained from the government.

“The Defense Criminal Investigative Service investigation into these fraud crimes uncovered and documented clear evidence of egregious violations of the law, leading to the conviction of these defendants,” said Special Agent in Charge John F. Khin, Southeast Field Office. “That these convictions were upheld on appeal is a testament to the compelling results of the thorough and detailed investigation pursued by DCIS and our partners.”

“We concur and appreciate today's affirmation of sentence from the 11th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals,” said the Director of the U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Command’s Major Procurement Fraud Unit, Frank Robey. “Regardless of the extraordinary plots that people create to attempt to corrupt the system and satisfy their own greed, we will root them out and sooner or later unravel their criminal schemes. Along with the DOJ and our other law enforcement partners, we will continue to tirelessly work shoulder-to-shoulder to protect the integrity of the DOD contracting system,” Robey said.  

“In affirming the district court, the Eleventh Circuit has recognized that defendants thwarted the important purpose behind the SBIR and STTR programs, to promote the progress of science by increasing opportunities for small businesses to commercialize cutting-edge scientific research,” said Allison Lerner, Inspector General for the National Science Foundation. “This decision is an important step in protecting the integrity of this program. The NSF Office of Inspector General is committed to vigorously pursuing oversight of these taxpayer funds and I commend the U.S. Attorney’s Office and our investigative partners for their strong support in this effort.”

The appeal was handled by Assistant United States Attorney Roberta J. Bodnar, and the underlying criminal case—including an 18-day trial—was prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Thomas N. Palermo. It was investigated by the Defense Criminal Investigative Service, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s Office of the Inspector General, the Major Procurement Fraud Unit of the United States Army Criminal Investigation Division, the National Science Foundation’s Office of the Inspector General, the Environmental Protection Agency’s Office of the Inspector General, the Department of Energy’s Office of the Inspector General, and the Department of Homeland Security’s Office of the Inspector General.

Score:   0.9687
Docket Number:   aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanVzdGljZS5nb3YvdXNhby1uZGNhL3ByL2ZvdXItZGVmZW5kYW50cy1wbGVhZC1ndWlsdHktcmFja2V0ZWVyaW5nLWNvbnNwaXJhY3ktbmF0aW9ud2lkZS1wcmVzY3JpcHRpb24tZHJ1Zw
  Press Releases:
SAN FRANCISCO – Mihran Stepanyan, Artur Stepanyan, Yan German, and Khachig Geuydjian pleaded guilty today to crimes stemming from their respective roles in a wide-ranging racketeering conspiracy involving diversion of prescription drugs, money laundering, bank fraud, identity theft, and additional crimes, announced United States Attorney David L. Anderson; Federal Bureau of Investigation Special Agent in Charge John F. Bennett; and Internal Revenue Service, Criminal Investigation, Special Agent in Charge Kareem Carter.  The pleas were accepted by the Hon. Charles R. Breyer, United States District Judge, and leaves one remaining defendant to stand trial for allegations made in a Second Superseding Indictment filed in February of 2016 against 38 defendants. 

“Patients needing prescription drugs shouldn’t have to worry that their medications came out of a back alley,” said U.S. Attorney Anderson.  “The defendants and their co-conspirators were able to make massive profits by diverting street drugs back into mainstream channels while creating false paperwork to conceal their true source.  Thanks to the FBI, IRS, and federal prosecutors in San Francisco, the defendants now face the prospect of lengthy prison sentences for their criminal conduct.”

“The American public was victimized twice by this scheme,” said FBI San Francisco Special Agent in Charge John F. Bennett. “The majority of the profits were subsidized both by American taxpayers and by those paying private insurance premiums.” “Additionally, patients were put at risk by the movement of these black market drugs, as the defendants disregarded general safety protocols and guidelines, to include expiration dates and pharmaceutical lot numbers.”

“Today’s guilty pleas bring us one step closer to closing the chapter on this criminal enterprise,” said Kareem Carter, Special Agent in Charge IRS Criminal Investigation. “The crimes committed by these defendants ranged from picking up drugs at a pizza shop to a half-million-dollar tax check fraud scheme.  In total, more than $199 million in diverted prescription drug proceeds were laundered through bank accounts established with false identities and shell companies.  IRS-CI is committed to following the money so we can financially disrupt and dismantle criminal organizations like these.”

All four defendants pleading guilty today—Mihran Stepanyan (M. Stepanyan), his cousin Artur Stepanyan (A. Stepanyan), German, and Geuydjian—have acknowledged that they were members of a nationwide conspiracy referred to in court documents as the Karapedyan-Stepanyan Enterprise (Enterprise).  One key aspect of the criminal activity was a multi-million dollar prescription drug diversion scheme.  According to the plea agreements filed today, members and associates of the Enterprise procured prescription drugs from unlicensed sources, usually street dealers, and resold the drugs to unknowing customers.  The Stepanyans also admitted that they are not licensed to sell drugs, that they procured millions of dollars of drugs through street suppliers and other unlicensed sources, and that the drugs they procured eventually were resold as legitimate products.

The Stepanyans’ plea agreements include an overview of the complexity and sophistication of the Enterprise’s operations.  Members of the Enterprise conducted the affairs of the organization through a pattern of racketeering and committed crimes throughout California as well as in Minnesota, Ohio, and Puerto Rico.  Further, the Stepanyans’ plea agreements describe how members and associates of the Enterprise procured and distributed a wide variety of drugs from unlicensed sources for distribution throughout the country.  The drugs included medications used to treat HIV infection, Type-2 diabetes, dementia, and high blood pressure, among other conditions.  Members and associates of the Enterprise also created false and fraudulent paperwork, referred to as pedigrees, to make it appear that those drugs had been purchased from legitimate sources.  In addition, they created sham companies and used multiple bank accounts to receive and distribute the proceeds from their fraudulent transactions.  The plea agreements also describe how the Stepanyans, along with other members and associates of the Enterprise, intentionally used the identities of real people to carry out their unlawful objectives.  The plea agreements of Geuydjian and German provide further details of the Enterprise’s operations.  Specifically, Geuydjian’s plea agreement describes how he negotiated fraudulent personal and tax checks for the benefit of the Enterprise, and German’s plea agreement describes how he supplied drugs for distribution by the Enterprise and managed aspects of the Enterprise’s money laundering operations. 

According to M. Stepanyan’s plea agreement, he became a member of the Enterprise as early as January 2010.  He admitted that he agreed with his co-conspirators to commit multiple criminal acts involving money laundering, mail fraud, wire fraud, bank fraud, identity theft, and multiple acts involving the distribution of drugs from unlicensed sources to conduct the affairs of the Enterprise.  In his plea agreement, M. Stepanyan admitted that he controlled several entities, including Red Rock Capital Group, Inc.; Trans Atlantic Capital Group, Inc.; GC National Wholesale, Inc.; and Sky Atlantic Group, Inc., in addition to numerous bank accounts through which approximately $199 million of pharmaceutical money flowed between 2010 and 2014.  M. Stepanyan also admitted purchasing approximately $56 million in gold using the illicit proceeds from the unlawful sale of prescription drugs.  As a further example of his participation in the Enterprise, M. Stepanyan used an entity called Niva Pharmaceuticals to facilitate transactions related to the criminal conspiracy.  Specifically, M. Stepanyan admitted that in January of 2014, he purchased Niva from a co-conspirator who had set up the company.  Although Niva was licensed to engage in drug wholesaling in California, it was not and did not engage in wholesale drug distribution.  Instead, M. Stepanyan acknowledged, Niva was nothing more than a shell company with offices that generally were empty except for a desk, a computer, and tables for drugs that the Enterprise procured.  The plea agreement describes how Enterprise members stored boxes of drugs in Niva’s offices and shipped them throughout the country using fraudulent labels that suggested the drugs were being shipped by or to authentic companies, including a legitimate drug company operating in Puerto Rico. 

A. Stepanyan also admitted in his plea agreement that he was a member of the Enterprise beginning in at least January of 2010.  Between 2010 and 2015, he directed and participated in a prescription drug diversion scheme whereby he procured drugs from various unlicensed sources and sold them to a co-defendant who, in turn, sold the drugs to pharmacies throughout the United States.  Further, A. Stepanyan admitted that the gross receipts for the sale of those diverted prescription drugs was at least $199 million.  According to the plea agreement, A. Stepanyan and his cousin, M. Stepanyan, laundered those proceeds through various bank accounts established in false identities, which M. Stepanyan controlled. 

German admitted in his plea agreement that he was a member of the Enterprise between 2013 and 2015.  He acknowledged that he was responsible for establishing a network of unlicensed street suppliers to provide drugs for the distribution scheme.  As described in his plea agreement, German had multiple sources of drugs.  Between 2013 and 2014, he obtained boxes full of prescription drugs from one of his co-conspirators in Los Angeles, California.  For example, he would pick up drugs from one of his sources at a pizza shop with the help of one of his associates, load the boxes into the trunk of a car, and drive them to a nearby mall or another pre-arranged location where he would deliver them to the Stepanyans.  German also admitted that in his role managing money-laundering operations for the Enterprise, he assisted with wire fraud, bank fraud, identity theft, and illegal check cashing schemes.  In the plea agreement, German admits that he used his birth name, Henrik Hartyunyan, during some of the underlying illegal conduct he performed on behalf of the Enterprise.

Geuydjian admitted that he was a member of the Enterprise from at least 2012 through approximately 2014.  In his plea agreement, he describes himself as a “money launderer for the Enterprise.”  Geuydjian acknowledged that he and others in the Enterprise created sham companies and used multiple bank accounts to receive and distribute the proceeds from the fraudulent transactions.  Geuydjian liquidated tax fraud and drug diversion proceeds by making deposits to a number of sham corporate entities that he created and allowed other members and associates of the Enterprise to use his businesses to send illicit funds and other merchandise.  Furthermore, Geuydjian used the identities of real people to carry out many of the Enterprise’s unlawful objectives.  For example, the plea agreement describes how Geuydjian’s co-conspirators acquired and possessed stolen identifying information for dozens of individuals in order to file fraudulent tax returns online.  The Enterprise obtained checks issued by the federal government and mailed from the United States Treasury based on fraudulent tax returns.  From approximately August 2012 through August 2013, Geuydjian fraudulently liquidated approximately 51 checks totaling more than $538,295 though accounts he held in the names of three companies he controlled.  Geuydjian also used photocopies of driver’s licenses, social security cards, or other personal identifying with the identities of real people to open bank accounts or gain access to the victims’ bank accounts, to negotiate checks made out in the victims’ names.  Furthermore, Geudjian and his co-conspirators perpetrated a tax check fraud scheme.  For example, in March 2014, Geudjian deposited two tax refund checks into fraudulent Wells Fargo bank accounts—one in the amount of $117,887 and another in the amount of $131,205.  These checks, which were from legitimate tax return filings, were stolen out of the mail by “runners” employed by members of the conspiracy.  Geudjian also liquidated approximately $71,806 that his co-conspirators stole from a victim’s Fidelity 401K retirement account.

On February 11, 2016, a federal grand jury handed down the Second Superseding Indictment charging the four defendants—as well as 34 additional individuals—with various crimes in connection with the activities of the Enterprise.  All four defendants pleading guilty today are released on bond pending sentencing.  A majority of the defendants in this case have pleaded guilty to various charges, including the following:



Defendant





Charges To Which Defendant Pleaded Guilty





Status of Sentencing





MIHRAN STEPANYAN, 34, Glendale, Calif.

 





Pleaded guilty today to racketeering conspiracy, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d). 





Sentencing scheduled for September 21, 2020

(statutory maximum of 20 years in prison and $250,000 fine)





ARTUR STEPANYAN, 43, Glendale, Calif.

 





Pleaded guilty today to racketeering conspiracy, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d). 





Sentencing scheduled for September 21, 2020

(statutory maximum of 20 years in prison and $250,000 fine)





KHACHIG GEUYDJIAN, 79, Chatsworth, Calif.

 





Pleaded guilty today to racketeering conspiracy, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d). 





Sentencing scheduled for September 21, 2020

(statutory maximum of 20 years in prison and $250,000 fine)





YAN GERMAN

a/k/a Henrik Hartyunyan, 40, Encino, Calif.





Pleaded guilty today to racketeering conspiracy, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d). 





Sentencing scheduled for September 21, 2020

(statutory maximum of 20 years in prison and $250,000 fine)





GEVORK TER-MKRTCHYAN, 58, Encino, Calif.





Pleaded guilty on August 23, 2017, racketeering conspiracy, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d). 





Sentenced on January 30, 2018, to 21 months in prison





ARMAN PETROSYAN, 37, Northridge, Calif.

 





Pleaded guilty on August 28, 2019, this defendant pled guilty pursuant to racketeering conspiracy, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d). 





Sentencing is scheduled for September 21, 2020

(statutory maximum of 20 years in prison and $250,000 fine)





LANNA KARAPEDYAN, 30, Los Angeles, Calif.

 





Pleaded guilty on October 22, 2019, to a Superseding Information charging her with aiding and abetting receiving, retaining, and concealing stolen or forged Treasury checks, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 510(b) and 2. 





Sentencing is scheduled for September 21, 2020 (statutory maximum of 10 years in prison and $250,000 fine)





MAXWELL STARSKY, 41, Studio City, Calif.

 





Pleaded guilty on August 29, 2017, racketeering conspiracy, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d).





Sentenced on March 9, 2018, to 18 months in prison.





SEVAK GHARGHANI, 48, Burbank, Calif.

 





Pleaded guilty on August 28, 2019, to racketeering conspiracy, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d).





Sentencing is scheduled for September 21, 2020 (statutory maximum of 20 years in prison and $250,000 fine)





JEAN DUKMAJIAN, 66, Los Angeles, Calif.

 





Pleaded guilty on October 22, 2019, to racketeering conspiracy, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d).





Sentencing is scheduled for September 21, 2020 (statutory maximum of 20 years in prison and $250,000 fine)





KARINE DUKMAJIAN, 38, Reseda, Calif.





Pleaded guilty on October 22, 2019, to one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1343 and 1349.





Sentencing is scheduled for September 21, 2020 (maximum of 20 years in prison and $1,000,000, per count)





ANGELA DUKMAJIAN, 30, Los Angeles, Calif.





Pleaded guilty on October 22, 2019, to one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1343 and 1349.





Sentencing is scheduled for September 21, 2020 (maximum of 20 years in prison and $1,000,000)





ARMAN DANIELIAN, 44, Burbank, Calif.





Pleaded guilty on October 22, 2019, to one count of conspiracy to engage in unlicensed wholesale distribution of prescription drugs, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 331(t), 333(b)(1)(D), and 353(e)(2)(A).





Sentencing is scheduled for September 21, 2020 (maximum of 10 years in prison and $250,000, per count)





ASATOUR MAGZANYAN, 58, Los Angeles, Calif.





Pleaded guilty on March 15, 2019, to racketeering conspiracy, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d).





Sentencing is scheduled for September 21, 2020 (statutory maximum of 20 years in prison and $250,000 fine)





TIGRAN SARKISYAN, 45, Toluca Lake, Calif.





Pleaded guilty on May 10, 2017, to racketeering conspiracy, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d).





Sentenced on August 1, 2018, to 15 months in prison. 





HRIPSIME KHACHTRYAN, 45, Toluca Lake, Calif.





Pleaded guilty on May 10, 2017, to racketeering conspiracy, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d).





Sentenced on August 1, 2018, to 12 months and one day in prison. 





LOUI ARTIN, 58, North Hollywood, Calif.





Pleaded guilty on November 15, 2017, to racketeering conspiracy, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d).





Sentencing is scheduled for September 21, 2020 (statutory maximum of 20 years in prison and $250,000 fine)





ARMAN ZARGARYAN, 37, Granada Hills, Calif.





Pleaded guilty on November 20, 2019, to racketeering conspiracy, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d).





Sentencing is scheduled for September 21, 2020 (statutory maximum of 20 years in prison and $250,000 fine)





DMITRIY KUSTOV, 50, Los Angeles, Calif.





Pleaded guilty on May 10, 2017, to racketeering conspiracy, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d).





Sentenced on August 29, 2018 to a term of probation.





MICHAEL INMAN, 58, Los Angeles, Calif.





Pleaded guilty on February 8, 2017, to one count of conspiracy to commit bank fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1349.





Sentenced on June 7, 2017, to 34 months in prison.





ARAXIA NAZARYIAN, 29, Van Nuys, Calif.





Pleaded guilty on December 18, 2019, to a Superseding Information charging her with misdemeanor introduction or delivery for introduction of adulterated or misbranded drugs, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 331(a) and 333(a)(1)). 





Sentencing is scheduled for September 21, 2020 (maximum statutory sentence is one year in prison and a $1,000 fine)





CHERYL BARNDT, 46, Spicewood, Texas





Pleaded guilty on August 21, 2019, to a Superseding Information charging her with misdemeanor introduction or delivery for introduction of adulterated or misbranded drugs, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 331(a) and 333(a)(1)).





Sentencing is scheduled for September 21, 2020 (maximum statutory sentence is one year in prison and a $1,000 fine)





ERIC FIGUEROA, 35, Los Angeles, Calif.





Pleaded guilty on June 13, 2018, to one count of conspiracy to engage in the unlicensed wholesale distribution of drugs, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 331(t), 333(b)(1)(D), 353(e)(2)(A), and 18 U.S.C. § 371.





Sentenced on February 22, 2019, to three years’ probation, six months of home detention, and 200 hours of community service.





MARC ASHEGHIAN, 59, Sherman Oaks, Calif.





Pleaded guilty on December 11, 2019 to a Superseding Information charging him with aiding and abetting the unlicensed wholesale distribution of drugs, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 331(t), 333(b)(1)(D), 353(e)(2)(A), and 18 U.S.C. § 2.





Sentencing is scheduled for September 21, 2020 (maximum statutory sentence is 10 years in prison and a $250,000 fine)





MICHAEL ASHEGHIAN, 71, Vernon, Calif.





Pleaded guilty on December 11, 2019 to a Superseding Information charging him with aiding and abetting the unlicensed wholesale distribution of drugs, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 331(t), 333(b)(1)(D), 353(e)(2)(A), and 18 U.S.C. § 2. 





Sentencing is scheduled for September 21, 2020 (maximum statutory sentence is 10 years in prison and a $250,000 fine)





ARARAT YESAYAN, 39, Glendale, Calif.





Pleaded guilty on February 6, 2017, to one count of conspiracy to commit identity theft, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1028(f).





Sentenced on June 9, 2017 to a term of five years of probation. 





ILIA NALBANS, 57, Montbello, Calif.





Pleaded guilty on March 15, 2019 to two counts of forging endorsements on Treasury checks and aiding and abetting the same, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 510 and 2. 





Sentenced on June 19, 2019, to restitution of $17,215 and a term of two years of supervised release.



For those defendants who have not yet been sentenced, in addition to a term of imprisonment and fine, the court also may order additional periods of supervised release, restitution, and special assessments.  However, any sentence following conviction would be imposed by the court only after consideration of the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and the federal statute governing the imposition of a sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3553.

A separate investigation resulted in another indictment filed on May 6, 2015 in the Southern District of Ohio charging M. Stepanyan, A. Stepanyan, and others with various crimes arising from their sale of millions of dollars of illicitly-procured drugs.  That matter was transferred to the Northern District of California and consolidated with the instant case.

Assistant United States Attorneys Claudia A. Quiroz, Andrew Dawson, and Chris Kaltsas are prosecuting the case with the assistance of Adrienne DelaPena and Kevin Costello.  The prosecution is the result of an investigation by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the IRS.  

Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanVzdGljZS5nb3YvdXNhby1zZHR4L3ByL2Zvcm1lci1wb2xpY2Utb2ZmaWNlci1nZXRzLTMwLXllYXJzLXZpb2xhdGluZy1jaXZpbC1yaWdodHMtdHdvLW1lbg
  Press Releases:
McALLEN, Texas - A 26-year-old former local police officer has been ordered to federal prison after sexually assaulting two men while in his custody, announced Acting U.S. Attorney Jennifer B. Lowery. 

A federal jury deliberated for approximately two hours before returning guilty verdicts March 10 against Matthew Lee Sepulveda, Edinburg, on two violations of civil rights following a two-day trial.

Today, U.S. District Judge Randy Crane ordered Sepulveda to serve a 360-month sentence to be immediately followed by five years of supervised release. In handing down the sentence, Judge Crane commented on the shame and embarrassment to law enforcement as a result of Sepulveda’s actions. The court further noted its disappointment in Sepulveda’s lack of empathy for the victims.

“The vast majority of law enforcement officers in the United States are deeply committed to fulfilling their oath to serve and protect our community,” said Special Agent in Charge Christopher Combs of the FBI. “Sepulveda betrayed this oath by preying on his victims, exploiting his authority to serve his own personal, depraved interests.”

Sepulveda served as a law enforcement officer with the Progreso Police Department from April 17 to July 2, 2019. The jury heard that while acting under his authority as a uniformed police officer, Sepulveda performed oral sex on two victims while they were in his custody.

At trial, The jury heard from the two men.

The first explained that after he was arrested, Sepulveda took him from the jail cell and escorted him to another office at the police department. Sepulveda then began asking him questions of a sexual nature and performed oral sex on him. The victim testified because Sepulveda was a police officer, he was scared and did not think he could leave.

The evidence showed that Sepulveda’s DNA was found on the victim’s underwear. The jury also heard that Sepulveda logged the victim’s arrest and case after the fact.

The second victim, who was only 17 at the time, was taken to the police department because he was unable to contact his parents subsequent to a traffic stop in which he was a passenger. He described how Sepulveda took him to an office located within the police department where he began asking the victim questions of a sexual nature and also performed oral sex on the victim.

The defense attempted to portray one of the victims as a liar and questioned some of the evidence. The jury was unconvinced and found Sepulveda guilty of two civil rights violations. They also found that on the second count, his conduct resulted in bodily injury and included attempted aggravated sexual abuse, aggravated sexual abuse and kidnapping.

Sepulveda will remain in custody pending transfer to a U.S. Bureau of Prisons facility to be determined in the near future.

The Hidalgo County Sheriff’s Office conducted the investigation with the assistance of the FBI. Assistant U.S. Attorneys Sarina S. DiPiazza and Angel Castro prosecuted the case.

Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanVzdGljZS5nb3YvdXNhby1zZHR4L3ByL3NlbGYtcHJvY2xhaW1lZC1raW5nLWJpc3Nvbm5ldC1oZWFkcy1wcmlzb24tbXVsdGktc3RhdGUtc2V4LXRyYWZmaWNraW5nLXNjaGVtZQ
  Press Releases:
HOUSTON – A 48-year-old man has been sentenced for sex trafficking four women by means of force and of taking three women across state lines to engage in prostitution, announced U.S. Attorney Alamdar S. Hamdani.

On Oct. 10, 2023, a federal jury in Houston deliberated for approximately three hours before convicting Larry “Lavish” Lewis following a six-day trial.

Chief U.S. District Judge Randy Crane has now ordered Lewis to serve 480 months in federal prison to be immediately followed by 10 years of supervised release. At the hearing, the government asked the court to consider the victims in the case and highlighted Lewis’s complete absence of remorse for his crimes.



“Today, the victims of  Lewis’s abhorrent crimes have finally received the answer they have been waiting to hear for years,” said Hamdani. “The message the court delivered in its sentence is clear: traffickers do not get to profit from the sale of victims’ bodies. They do not get to use drugs, beatings and threats to compel others to engage in prostitution. Traffickers, like Lewis, are not welcome in the Southern District of Texas, or anywhere outside of a federal penitentiary, and my office will see to that.” 



Lewis used physical force and coercion to compel four women to engage in commercial sex in the Bissonnet street area of Houston and various cities in Texas and Louisiana. The jury also found he coerced them to cross state lines to engage in prostitution.

At trial, the victims detailed how Lewis recruited them on false promises of good money and a good life. Lewis confiscated the identification cards of two women and tightly controlled access to their hotel rooms. The women were completely dependent on him for food, lodging and basic necessities.

Lewis’ rules dictated where and how long they worked. The women were required to give Lewis all money they earned after commercial sex dates.

The victims detailed the consequences of breaking Lewis’ rules. He kicked one victim in the head into a window because he believed she disrespected him. During another incident, Lewis whipped the same victim with an electrical cord following an attempt to escape using his vehicle. Another victim described how Lewis broke her ribs and left bruises all over her body after receiving many beatings.

The jury ultimately did not believe defense claims that the women sought out Lewis because of his marketing expertise in the commercial sex industry.

Lewis has been and will remain in custody pending transfer to a U.S. Bureau of Prisons facility to be determined in the near future.

Assistant U.S. Attorneys Sebastian A. Edwards and Christine J. Lu prosecuted the case.

Texas Department of Public Safety and the Harris County District Attorney’s Office conducted the investigation with the assistance of the FBI as part of the Human Trafficking Rescue Alliance (HTRA).

HTRA law enforcement includes members of the Houston Police Department, FBI, Homeland Security Investigations, Texas Attorney General’s Office, IRS-Criminal Investigation, Department of Labor (DOL), DOL – Wage and Hour Division, Department of State, Texas Alcoholic and Beverage Commission, Texas Department of Public Safety, Department of Homeland Security – Office of Inspector General (OIG), Social Security Administration – OIG and Sheriff’s Offices in Harris and Montgomery counties in coordination with District Attorney’s offices in Harris, Montgomery and Fort Bend Counties.

Established in 2004, the United States Attorney’s office in Houston formed HTRA to combine resources with federal, state and local enforcement agencies and prosecutors, as well as non-governmental service organizations to target human traffickers while providing necessary services to those that the traffickers victimized. Since its inception, HTRA has been recognized as both a national and international model in identifying and assisting victims of human trafficking and prosecuting those engaged in trafficking offenses.

Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanVzdGljZS5nb3YvdXNhby1zZHR4L3ByL3NleC1vZmZlbmRlci1zZW50LXByaXNvbi10d28tY2hpbGQtcG9ybm9ncmFwaHktY29udmljdGlvbnM
  Press Releases:
HOUSTON – A 40-year-old previous Houston resident has been ordered to federal prison following his admission that he received and possessed child pornography, announced U.S. Attorney Jennifer B. Lowery. 

Joshua Tannery pleaded guilty Nov. 16, 2020.

Today, U.S. District Judge George C. Hanks Jr. sentenced him to 97 months in federal prison. At the hearing, the court also heard additional information including a victim impact statement detailing the sexual abuse Tannery committed on a child. The court noted he had a duty to the victims whose voices are not always heard. He hoped the prison term discouraged others from following in his footsteps, gave Tannery the opportunity to change and showed there were consequences to Tannery’s conduct. He will also serve five years on supervised release following completion of his prison term. During that time, he will have to comply with numerous requirements designed to restrict his access to children and the internet. Tannery will also be ordered to register as a sex offender.

In September 2019, law enforcement initiated an investigation of child pornography sharing which led them to Tannery. They executed a search warrant and seized his electronic devices. Forensic analysis resulted in the discovery of child pornography, including images of prepubescent children, some as young as 10 years of age.  

Following Tannery’s arrest, a sexual assault victim came forward reporting that Tannery had abused her years ago.

Tannery was permitted to remain on bond and voluntarily surrender to a U.S. Bureau of Prisons facility to be determined in the near future.

The FBI conducted the investigation.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Zahra Jivani Fenelon is prosecuting the case, which was brought as part of Project Safe Childhood (PSC), a nationwide initiative the Department of Justice (DOJ) launched in May 2006 to combat the growing epidemic of child sexual exploitation and abuse. U.S. Attorneys' Offices and the Criminal Division's Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section leads PSC, which marshals federal, state and local resources to locate, apprehend and prosecute individuals who sexually exploit children and identifies and rescues victims. For more information about PSC, please visit DOJ’s PSC page. For more information about internet safety education, please visit the resources link on that page.

Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanVzdGljZS5nb3YvdXNhby1zZHR4L3ByL2Zvcm1lci1lbmVyZ3ktdHJhZGVyLXZpdG9sLWluYy1ndWlsdHktaW50ZXJuYXRpb25hbC1icmliZXJ5LWFuZC1tb25leS1sYXVuZGVyaW5n
  Press Releases:
HOUSTON – A 50-year-old former energy trader from Houston has pleaded guilty for his role in a scheme to bribe Mexican government officials to secure contracts for his then-employer Vitol Inc., the U.S. affiliate of the largest independent energy trading firm in the world.

According to court documents, Javier Aguilar and his co-conspirators paid approximately $600,000 in bribes to two senior officials at PEMEX Procurement International Inc. (PPI), a wholly owned affiliate of the Mexican state-owned oil company Petróleos Mexicanos (PEMEX), in exchange for assistance in winning business for Vitol. 



“The Southern District of Texas (SDTX) is ground zero in the fight against foreign bribery and corruption in Latin America,” said U.S. Attorney Alamdar S. Hamdani. “My office’s prosecutors - experts on the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) - will continue to bring justice against those who damage the integrity of Texas’s vital energy sector with illegal advantages fueled by greed. This guilty plea begins the process of repairing the damage caused by Aguilar as well as put on notice those who might seek to emulate him and his cohorts.”





Aguilar was a trader in Vitol’s Houston office. Between 2017 and 2020, he and his co-conspirators paid approximately $600,000 in bribes to two senior officials at PPI to obtain numerous contracts for Vitol to supply hundreds of millions of dollars of ethane to PEMEX. To conceal the scheme, Aguilar and his co-conspirators used a series of fake contracts, sham invoices and shell entities incorporated in Curaçao and Mexico. Aguilar and others also used alias email accounts to communicate about the scheme and code words including “shoes,” “medicine,” “invitations” and “coffee,” to describe the bribes.

“Javier Aguilar has now admitted that he bribed foreign officials to win business when he worked as an oil and gas trader at Vitol Inc., using shell companies, fake contracts, sham invoices and alias email accounts,” said Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Nicole M. Argentieri, head of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division. “Aguilar’s guilty plea yesterday follows his conviction at trial on related charges earlier this year. His illegal conduct netted Vitol hundreds of millions of dollars in contracts, and now he will pay the price.”

“With this guilty plea, the defendant admits his role in the widespread corruption of the international commodities market and to casting aside laws and rules that apply to all to unfairly line the pockets of the few,” stated U.S. Attorney Breon Peace of the Eastern District of New York (EDNY). “The actions of the defendant and his co-conspirators and of those who act similarly, destroys people’s faith in their governments, disadvantages those who play by the rules, undermines confidence in American businesses worldwide and will not be tolerated by this office or our law enforcement partners.”

“The FCPA has been the law of the land, and enforceable worldwide, for decades. Yet unscrupulous businessmen still try to bribe their way to profit,” said Special Agent in Charge Jeffrey B. Veltri for the FBI’s Miami Field Office. “My message to them is that the charges and penalties you will face are not worth the gain. I want to commend the U.S Attorney’s Offices for EDNY and SDTX and the Department of Justice’s Office of International Affairs for their diligence pursuing this case, but especially the agents and analysts who leave no stone unturned in pursuit of FCPA violators.”

Aguilar pleaded guilty to conspiracy to violate the FCPA and to a violation of the Travel Act. The FCPA conspiracy charge, which an SDTX grand jury brought, related to conduct that was initially charged in the EDNY. As part of his guilty plea, Aguilar consented to transfer the Texas case to New York, to consolidate the cases and to forfeit $7,129,938. The plea follows Aguilar’s related conviction at trial in February for conspiracy to violate the FCPA, violating the FCPA and conspiracy to commit money laundering in connection with schemes to bribe Ecuadorian and Mexican officials. At sentencing, he faces a maximum of 20 years in federal prison on the money laundering conviction and five years on each of the other offenses.

In December 2020, Vitol admitted to bribing officials in Ecuador, Mexico and Brazil in violation of the anti-bribery provisions of the FCPA. Vitol entered into a deferred prosecution agreement with the Criminal Division’s Fraud Section and the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the EDNY. As a part of the resolution, Vitol agreed to pay a combined $135 million in penalties as part of a coordinated resolution with the Department of Justice, Commodity Futures Trading Commission and authorities in Brazil.

Seven of Aguilar’s co-conspirators have pleaded guilty for their role in the scheme and are awaiting sentencing. These individuals have agreed to forfeit more than $63 million in connection with this and related schemes.

FBI Miami’s International Corruption Squad conducted the investigation.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Sherin Daniel and Deputy Chief Suzanne Elmilady for the SDTX are prosecuting the case along with Trial Attorney Clayton P. Solomon and Assistant Chiefs Derek J. Ettinger and Jonathan P. Robell of the Criminal Division’s Fraud Section, Trial Attorney D. Hunter Smith and Deputy Chief Adam J. Schwartz of the Money Laundering and Asset Recovery Section (MLARS) and EDNY Assistant U.S. Attorneys Matthew R. Galeotti, Nick M. Axelrod and Jonathan P. Lax. MLARS Special Financial Investigations Unit and Justice Department’s Office of International Affairs also provided substantial assistance.

The Criminal Division’s Fraud Section is responsible for investigating and prosecuting FCPA and Foreign Extortion Prevention Act matters. Additional information about the Justice Department’s FCPA enforcement efforts can be found at www.justice.gov/criminal/fraud/fcpa.

The Kleptocracy Asset Recovery Initiative is led by a team of dedicated prosecutors in MLARS, in partnership with federal law enforcement agencies, and often with U.S. Attorneys’ Offices, to forfeit the proceeds of foreign official corruption. Individuals with information about possible proceeds of foreign corruption located in or laundered through the United States should contact federal law enforcement or send an email to kleptocracy@usdoj.gov or https://tips.fbi.gov/.

Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanVzdGljZS5nb3YvdXNhby1zZHR4L3ByL2NsaW5pYy1vd25lci1zZW50LXByaXNvbi1vcmNoZXN0cmF0aW5nLTE1bS1tZWRpY2FyZS1mcmF1ZC1hbmQta2lja2JhY2stc2NoZW1l
  Press Releases:
HOUSTON – The owner of a Houston-area mental health clinic has been sentenced for conspiracy to commit healthcare fraud, announced U.S. Attorney Alamdar S. Hamdani.

Gwendolyn Gibbs, 72, pleaded guilty Dec. 3, 2021.

U.S. District Judge Charles R. Eskridge has now ordered Gibbs to serve 84 months in federal prison to be immediately followed by three years of supervised release. At the hearing, the court heard additional evidence Gibbs fraudulently billed Medicare for services provided to vulnerable adults with intellectual disabilities who did not require mental health services. In addition, Gibbs was ordered to pay $8,680,380.42 in restitution to Medicare. In handing down the sentence, the court noted Gibbs’ role as leader, the length of the fraud scheme and her long history in the medical field as evidence she knew what she was doing was wrong.



“Gwendolyn Gibbs exploited vulnerable adults with intellectual disabilities and residents of group homes in order to defraud Medicare of millions of dollars,” said Hamdani. “Public resources for mental health services should go to the patients that actually need them, not to enrich criminal actors like Gibbs.”



Gibbs was the owner of Daybreak Rehabilitation Center. From 2007 until 2016, she submitted fraudulent claims for partial hospitalization program (PHP) services to Medicare that were not provided or not medically necessary. A PHP is a form of intensive outpatient treatment for severe mental illness. Daybreak patients, including individuals with intellectual disabilities, did not need PHP services. Gibbs admitted to falsifying medical records to make it appear that patients were sicker than they actually were.

Gibbs also paid kickbacks to owners of group homes and patient recruiters in exchange for referring Medicare beneficiaries to Daybreak. The owners of the group homes required their residents to attend Daybreak and, in exchange, Gibbs and her co-conspirators provided transportation, supervision and meals to the group home residents.

Charles Guidry Jr., 70, Houston, a manager at Daybreak and Gibbs’ ex-husband, was previously sentenced to 70 months imprisonment followed by three years of supervised release.

Gibbs will remain in custody pending transfer to a U.S. Bureau of Prisons facility to be determined in the near future.

FBI, Department of Health and Human Services - Office of the Inspector General, Texas Attorney General’s Medicaid Fraud Control Unit and the Railroad Retirement Board-OIG conducted the investigation. Assistant U.S. Attorneys Kathryn Olson and Michael Day prosecuted the case.

Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanVzdGljZS5nb3YvdXNhby1zZHR4L3ByL3dvbWFuLXNlbnRlbmNlZC10cmFmZmlja2luZy1tZXRoYW1waGV0YW1pbmU
  Press Releases:
McALLEN, Texas – A United States citizen who had been residing in Mexico has been ordered to prison for importing methamphetamine into the country from Mexico, announced Acting U.S. Attorney Abe Martinez. Dina Maria Palacios, 37, pleaded guilty April 4, 2017.

 

Today, U.S. District Judge Micaela Alvarez took into consideration Palacios’ conduct as well as the fact that she had her 16-year-old daughter with her during the crime. She was ordered to serve 87 months in federal prison to be immediately followed by three years supervised release. In handing down the sentence, Judge Alvarez noted that methamphetamine is one of the worst drugs that destroys people and the high purity level involved in this case made it even more toxic.

 

At the time of her guilty plea, Palacios admitted that on Jan. 6, 2017, she had driven a vehicle from Mexico into the United States through the Pharr port of entry, knowing the vehicle contained a controlled substance. Upon inspection, Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officers discovered methamphetamine hidden within the rear cargo area of the vehicle. Agents seized 23 packages weighing approximately 25 kilograms of methamphetamine.

 

Palacios has been in custody without bond since her arrest where she will remain pending transfer to a U.S. Bureau of Prisons facility to be determined in the near future.

 

Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s Homeland Security Investigations and CBP conducted the investigation. Assistant U.S. Attorney Linda Requénez prosecuted the case.

Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   WD-TX  4:20-cr-00252
Case Name:   USA v. Bock
  Press Releases:
In Pecos today, 47-year-old Harry George Bock, II, pleaded guilty to his role in a scheme to illegally sell protected living rock cactus plants, announced U.S. Attorney John F. Bash; Phillip Land, Special Agent in Charge of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), Office of Law Enforcement of the Southwest Region; and, Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) Acting Special Agent in Charge Erik P. Breitzke, El Paso Division.

Appearing before U.S Magistrate Judge David Fannin, Bock pleaded guilty to one count of mislabeled exports.  According to court records, from May 2017 to August 2018, Bock conspired with others in a scheme whereby they submitted false identification of actual living rock cacti (Ariocarpus fissuratus), a protected species, with the intent to export and sell the plants for financial gain.  On May 14, 2018, 41 living rock cacti shipped by Bock were seized by authorities at the International Mail Facility in Chicago, IL.

In 2012, Texas-based FWS Special Agents uncovered a substantial trafficking organization smuggling thousands of protected living rock cactus from the Big Bend region of Western Texas.  Cooperative investigative work led to the execution of six residential search warrants served mostly in remote areas of far southwest Texas where the living rock cacti naturally occur.  The living rock cacti were advertised through internet sales and mostly consummated with end purchasers from Europe and Asia.  Several parcels containing the live cacti were intercepted at international mail facilities and were found to be falsely labeled which substantiated felony charges to the sellers.

“When you mess with protected Texas cacti, you’re messing with Texas. My office will continue to work with our law-enforcement partners to protect our State’s natural heritage,” stated U.S. Attorney Bash.

The living rock cacti are afforded protection through the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) and listed as Appendix I protected plant species that prohibit foreign commerce.  The CITES Appendix I listing categories the species as threatened with extinction and limits international movements to scientific research and zoological display. 

Bock remains on bond pending formal sentencing.  No sentencing date has been scheduled. Five other individuals have been prosecuted and sentenced in relation to this scheme.

“Breaking up international and domestic smuggling rings that target imperiled plants and animals is an important part of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s work,” said FWS Special Agent in Charge Land.  “This case demonstrates how cooperation between enforcement agencies can achieve strong results. We thank our partners at the National Park Service, Department of Homeland Security, Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, the U.S. Postal Service, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture for their help with this case.”

“Individuals who deal in protected native plants are not only doing damage to the environment, but they are stealing from the American people,” said HSI Acting Special Agent in Charge Breitzke. “HSI will continue to work with our law enforcement partners to investigate and prosecute these criminals to ensure the protection of these West Texas natural treasures.”

Thousands of live cacti seized by law enforcement during this investigation were cared for and donated to non-profit entities through assistance from the Sul Ross State University.  

Assistant U.S. Attorney James J. Miller, Jr., is prosecuting this case on behalf of the government.

#####

The year 2020 marks the 150th anniversary of the Department of Justice.  Learn more about the history of our agency at www.Justice.gov/Celebrating150Years.

Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1XZ1X41lGcFlYJLuIofaCw3sZZz6k6GoNf9q6vedjmQU
  Last Updated: 2025-04-02 03:40:31 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanVzdGljZS5nb3YvdXNhby13ZHR4L3ByL3Nhbi1hbnRvbmlvLWNvdXBsZS1zZW50ZW5jZWQtcmVzdGF1cmFudC1pbnZlc3RtZW50LWZyYXVkLXNjaGVtZQ
  Press Releases:
SAN ANTONIO – A Mexican national man and his wife, both residing in San Antonio, were sentenced in federal court today for a scheme to defraud business investors of over $1 million and failing to properly declare their income to the Internal Revenue Service.

Juan Enrique Kramer, 46, was sentenced to three years in prison, forfeiture of $59,589 in proceeds, restitution of $1,171,497 payable to the victims of his wire fraud, and restitution of $727,936 to the IRS. Adriana Pastor, 47, was sentenced to 18 months in prison and is also liable for the $727,936 to the IRS. Both Kramer and Pastor were also sentenced to three years of post-release supervision.

According to court documents, Kramer and other co-conspirators promoted a “turn-key” business venture to Mexican nationals, consisting of a chain of Mexican food restaurants throughout the United States and Mexico known as “Las Quesadillas.” Kramer charged buyers a set fee ranging from $105,000 to $250,000 and promised to perform all tasks necessary for establishing a fully functional restaurant, including finding and renting a suitable location; obtaining all permits; providing assistance in obtaining visas for buyers; completing construction; training employees; and handling all legal fees and incorporation issues.

The defendants took funds from buyers but failed to provide the promised services. Instead, they used the funds for personal gain or to provide partial payments to previous customers who were demanding their money back.  In addition to partial refunds, Kramer would also offer stakes in other businesses as an alternative to repayment.  If buyers refused, Kramer would threaten to sue them for breach of contract. The defendants perpetrated their scheme on at least eight different victims resulting in a total loss of more than $1 million.

“Investment fraud schemes such as what Kramer and Pastor engaged in are specifically designed to take advantage of vulnerable, trusting individuals,” said U.S. Attorney Ashley C. Hoff. “Today’s sentences underscore that this is unacceptable criminal conduct and violators will be held accountable.”

Kramer and Pastor did not declare any of the investor income to the IRS. In 2016, Pastor signed a tax return which falsely stated a net income loss. In 2017 and 2018, the couple did not file any tax returns whatsoever, despite still running restaurants and taking in investor money.    

On February 1, 2022, Kramer pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud and one count of failure to file an individual tax return. On February 22, 2022, Pastor pleaded guilty to one count of aiding or assisting in filing a false tax return. Two co-defendants who remain are pending sentencing. 

“With Kramer and Pastor came a scheme that caused harm and created victims to citizens in two nations. Our efforts to coordinate with our law enforcement partners at home and abroad help ensure justice is served and criminals pay the price regardless of international borders,” said Special Agent in Charge Ramsey E. Covington, of IRS Criminal Investigation’s Houston Field Office. “These two are con artists who swindled people out of money.”

The IRS-CI and the FBI investigated the case with assistance from the Texas State Securities Board.

Assistant U.S. Attorneys Justin Chung, Matthew W. Kinskey and Antonio Franco Jr. prosecuted the case.

###

Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanVzdGljZS5nb3YvdXNhby1hei9wci9hcml6b25hLW1hbi1hcnJlc3RlZC1tYWtpbmctb25saW5lLXRocmVhdHMtYWdhaW5zdC1mZWRlcmFsLWFnZW50cy1hbmQtZW1wbG95ZWVz
  Press Releases:
PHOENIX, Ariz. – Michael Lee Tomasi, 37, of Rio Verde, Arizona, was arrested on Friday after a grand jury indicted him on three counts of Threat Against a Federal Official and three counts of making Interstate Threats.

From May 2021 through November 2023, while living in Colorado and Arizona, Tomasi used a social media platform to express a desire to incite violence and threaten a variety of individuals and groups, including elected officials, a judge, and federal officials and law enforcement officers. The charges against Tomasi relate to threats he made in Arizona to federal law enforcement agents and employees.

“The threats of violence against public officials alleged in this indictment are abhorrent,” said Attorney General Merrick B. Garland. “The defendant is specifically charged with threatening to kill FBI agents and other FBI employees just for doing their jobs. I am deeply proud of the work the FBI does every day; its personnel should not have to deal with threats against themselves as they work to protect the American people. The Justice Department will not stand for such heinous behavior and will prosecute threats against its employees to the fullest extent of the law.”

“Threats against law enforcement personnel like those alleged in this indictment are not just polemics, they are illegal under federal law and corrosive to civic life and dialogue," said United States Attorney Gary Restaino.

Each count alleging Threat Against a Federal Official carries a maximum sentence of 10 years in prison, a fine of up to $250,000, and up to three years of supervised release. Counts alleging Interstate Threat carry a maximum sentence of five years in prison, a fine of up to $250,000, and up to three years of supervised release.

An indictment is simply a method by which a person is charged with criminal activity and raises no inference of guilt. An individual is presumed innocent until evidence is presented to a jury that establishes guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation is conducting the investigation in this case. The United States Attorney’s Office, District of Arizona, is handling the prosecution.

 

CASE NUMBER:           CR-23-01751-PHX-DWL

RELEASE NUMBER:    2023-202_Tomasi

 

# # #

For more information on the U.S. Attorney’s Office, District of Arizona, visit http://www.justice.gov/usao/az/

Follow the U.S. Attorney’s Office, District of Arizona, on Twitter @USAO_AZ for the latest news.

Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanVzdGljZS5nb3YvdXNhby1hei9wci93b21hbi1zZW50ZW5jZWQtdGhyZWUteWVhcnMtcHJpc29uLWRpc3RyaWJ1dGluZy1veHljb2RvbmU
  Press Releases:
     PHOENIX – This week, Ma de Lourdes Casas-Franco, 45, of Nogales, Sonora, Mexico, was sentenced to 36 months in prison by U.S. District Judge Steven P. Logan. Casas-Franco had previously pleaded guilty to conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute a controlled substance and money laundering conspiracy.

 

     According to the plea agreement, Casas-Franco worked at a Mexican pharmacy, Sonora's Desert Pharmacy, from June 2010 through July 2011. On numerous occasions, Casas-Franco arranged to have oxycodone pills, a Schedule II controlled substance, delivered from the pharmacy in Mexico to a customer in the United States. She also arranged to have the part of the purchase price deposited into a bank account in her name maintained in a bank in the United States and part of the purchase price to be deposited into another's bank account. On at least one occasion, the total value of the order was in excess of $10,000.

 

     The investigation in this case was conducted by agencies participating in the Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Force, which include, but are not limited to, the Mesa Police Department, Homeland Security Investigations, and the U. S. Postal Inspection Service. The lead agencies were the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration and Internal Revenue Service-Criminal Investigation. The prosecution was handled by Karen McDonald and Maria Gutierrez, Assistant U.S. Attorneys, District of Arizona, Phoenix.

 

CASE NUMBER: CR-16-00763-PHX-SPL

RELEASE NUMBER: 2017-034_ Casas-Franco

 

# # #

 

For more information on the U.S. Attorney’s Office, District of Arizona, visit http://www.justice.gov/usao/az/

Follow the U.S. Attorney’s Office, District of Arizona, on Twitter @USAO_AZ for the latest news.

 

Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanVzdGljZS5nb3YvdXNhby1hei9wci91cy1hdHRvcm5leS1zLW9mZmljZS1hbm5vdW5jZXMtYmUtaGVyZS1raWRzLWNoaWxkLXNhZmV0eS1ldmVudC10dWNzb24
  Press Releases:
 

     TUCSON, Ariz. - The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Arizona, as part of the Department of Justice’s Project Safe Childhood initiative, is hosting the ‘Be Here for Kids’ event on Friday, June 8, 2018 at the University of Arizona’s Student Recreation Center, located at 1400 E. 6th Street.  The event will take place from 11:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.

     The National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC) created the ‘Be Here for Kids’ campaign to promote awareness about all child safety issues.  The campaign is designed to help parents and others teach children to be aware, alert, and cautious to potential threats and to provide steps that children can take to stay safe, both on the Internet and in daily life.

     This year’s event is being presented in partnership with the University of Arizona Youth and Activities Department of Campus Recreation. Agencies participating in the event include, but are not limited to, The Arizona Rangers, Arizona Poison & Drug Information Center, Be Smart Gun Safety, Girl Scouts of Southern Arizona, MADD, Pima County Sheriff’s Office, Red Cross, and UMC Banner Child Life Program and Volunteer Resources, along with several local, state, and federal law enforcement agencies.

     There will be several special four legged guests attending this year’s event. McGuff the Crime Dog, ATF’s Kira, Border Patrol’s Beny, and Tucson Police Department’s Luna. A few activities of interest include Ko Sho Martial Training Institute’s interactive self-defense demonstration at 1:30. Beginning at 2:30, Tucson Fire Department will have a wet-down for the children. After the event, there will be a presentation for children and parents to discuss the importance of good online citizenship and protecting yourself from online predators.

     For more information on NCMEC, visit www.missingkids.com. For more information about the Be Here for Kids campaign, visit www.missingkids.com/behereforkids. For more information on Project Safe Childhood, visit www.projectsafechildhood.gov. 

           

RELEASE NUMBER:    2018-075_Be Here for Kids_Tsn

 

For more information on the U.S. Attorney’s Office, District of Arizona, visit http://www.justice.gov/usao/az/

Follow the U.S. Attorney’s Office, District of Arizona, on Twitter @USAO_AZ for the latest news.

 

Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanVzdGljZS5nb3YvdXNhby1zZGNhL3ByL21lbWJlcnMtYW5kLWFzc29jaWF0ZXMtd2VzdHNpZGUtY3JpcHMtYW5kLWhvdGVsLW1hbmFnZXItaW5kaWN0ZWQtcmFja2V0ZWVyaW5n
  Press Releases:
Assistant U. S. Attorneys Alessandra P. Serano (619) 546-8104 or Joseph Orabona (619) 546-7951

NEWS RELEASE SUMMARY – February 10, 2017

 

SAN DIEGO – Eleven alleged gang members and associates of the Westside Crips street gang and the manager of two national brand hotels in Oceanside are charged in a federal grand jury indictment with participating in a racketeering conspiracy involving narcotics trafficking, prostitution and other crimes.

 

Early this morning, detectives and agents from the Narcotics Task Force, U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration and Oceanside Police Department, with assistance from other agencies, made five arrests in North County and one in New Mexico. One defendant remained at large at midday; five were already in state custody and will be transferred to federal custody.

 

Some of the local defendants are scheduled to make their first court appearances today at 2 p.m. before U.S. Magistrate Judge Barbara L. Major and Monday before U.S. Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler.

 

The indictment, unsealed today, alleges that the defendants are associated with the Westside Crips, a criminal street gang that primarily operates in Oceanside. According to the indictment and other court documents, the members of the conspiracy were involved in drug trafficking, prostitution, attempted murder, assaults and robberies. The acts alleged date back to 2004 and continue to up to 2016.

 

According to court documents, members of Westside Crips are akin to a crime family, where all members work together committing various crimes for the purpose of making money. The indictment alleges that the defendants took on different responsibilities within the criminal enterprise. Some sold narcotics. Others managed prostitutes and transported them all over the country. The hotel manager provided a safe haven for the alleged gang members to conduct their illegal activities. For that reason, the defendants are charged with racketeering conspiracy—the statute traditionally used for organized-crime syndicates and mobsters.

 

This is the fourth time the U.S. Attorney’s office here has used the racketeering statute to charge large numbers of gang members, associates, and facilitators with operating a criminal enterprise that included drugs, human trafficking, and violence. In the first case, 39 Oceanside gang members and associates were charged with racketeering, and, to date, 35 have pleaded guilty. The second case involved gangs in North Park; that case is pending, with 21 guilty pleas so far and two guilty verdicts after a jury trial in July 2016. The third case involved 22 defendants as members and associates of the Tycoons street gang. To date, all 22 defendants in that case have pleaded guilty.

 

“This case, along with many others like it in our district, demonstrates that human and drug trafficking by criminal street gangs is rampant,” said Acting U.S. Attorney Alana Robinson. “Not only are we targeting the traffickers and customers, but we are also going after the businesses that facilitate this type of gang activity.”

 

“The members of the criminal street gang that were arrested today face serious charges,” said DEA San Diego Special Agent in Charge William Sherman. “It is critical to the safety of our citizens to get these violent drug traffickers off the streets.”

 

“The Oceanside Police Department continues to be committed to fighting gang crime and gang activity in our City,” said Chief Frank S. McCoy. “The arrests today are an example of our commitment to utilize law enforcement agencies at all levels to help us to that end. I am very proud of all the hard teamwork and commitment our officers and the other law enforcement agencies had in this operation to make it such a success.”

 

“Today's enforcement actions mark the beginning of the end for the Westside Crip street gang,” said IRS Criminal Investigation’s Acting Special Agent in Charge Anthony J. Orlando. “Our agency plays a unique role in federal law enforcement’s resolve to dismantle the criminal gang enterprises terrorizing our streets. Our agents target the profit and financial gains of these organizations, following the money in an effort to disrupt these organizations and bring their members to justice.”

 

DEFENDANTS Case Number 17cr0270-JAH

Corey Austin aka Westwood Age: 36 Oceanside, CA

William Bright aka “Slim” Age: 51 Oceanside, CA

Ameer Roby aka “Tiny Dum” Age: 36 Oceanside, CA

Michael Sullivan aka “Du-Low” Age: 33 Oceanside, CA

Peter Miranda aka “Lil’ Burger” Age: 33 Oceanside, CA

Shane Anderson aka “Tiny West” Age: 25 Oceanside, CA

Jasiri Lacey aka “Baby West” Age: 25 Oceanside, CA

Demetrius McFarland aka “Mecchi Ruu” Age: 23 Oceanside, CA

Travion McHenry aka “2Much” Age: 25 Oceanside, CA

Richard Cleveland aka “Face” Age: 37 Oceanside, CA

Larry Monroe Age: 59 Oceanside, CA

Umesh Oza aka “Kevin” Age: 32 Oceanside, CA

 

SUMMARY OF CHARGES

 

Title 18, United States Code, Section 1962(d) - Conspiracy to Conduct Enterprise Affairs Through a Pattern of Racketeering Activity; Title 18, United States Code, Section 1963 - Criminal Forfeiture

Maximum Penalties: 20 years’ incarceration, a fine of $250,000, three years of supervised release

 

AGENCIES

 

North County Narcotics Task Force

Drug Enforcement Administration

Oceanside Police Department

Internal Revenue Service Criminal Investigation

U.S. Marshal’s Service

 

*The charges and allegations contained in an indictment or complaint are merely accusations, and the defendants are considered innocent unless and until proven guilty.

Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   SD-CA  3:19-cr-03401
Case Name:   USA v. Ahmed
  Press Releases:
Assistant U.S. Attorney Nicholas W. Pilchak (619) 546-9709

NEWS RELEASE SUMMARY – December 9, 2019

SAN DIEGO – A Las Vegas business owner was sentenced to prison today for running a years-long conspiracy to import counterfeit electronics from China into the United States. 

Saad Ahmed was sentenced to six months in custody today by U.S. District Judge Thomas J. Whelan, based on Saad’s conviction for Conspiracy to Traffic in Counterfeit Goods. 

Ahmed, 32, owns and operates PhonePartsUSA, a Las Vegas, Nevada-based company that sells cellular telephone parts and other electronics throughout the United States—including to customers in San Diego.  In his plea agreement, Ahmed acknowledged conspiring with a variety of individuals in China to bring counterfeit cell phone parts and accessories from China to the United States.  The conspiracy stretched back to at least September 2012.

PhonePartsUSA trafficked $1,499,999 worth of counterfeit goods during this period, per Ahmed’s plea agreement.  The phony merchandise bore trademarks from Samsung, Apple and the electronic quality certification company UL, but the goods were actually inauthentic copies.  Court filings relate that some of Ahmed’s customers had quality complaints about counterfeit parts purchased from his business. 

Part of Ahmed’s scheme involved grossly undervaluing his international imports to deflect U.S. Customs’ attention from his shipments, according to court documents.  Ahmed then directed his staff to destroy the false undervalued invoices when the shipments arrived at his warehouse. 

Ahmed agreed to pay restitution to the three trademark holders in an amount totaling $269,681, which constituted the proceeds Ahmed’s business received from trafficking in the counterfeit merchandise.  Ahmed also agreed not to contest the forfeiture of 4,453 cell phone parts and accessories seized from PhonePartsUSA as part of a search by Homeland Security Investigations in June 2018.  

“Counterfeit merchandise is a threat to consumers, to legitimate producers, and to the entire economy,” said U.S. Attorney Robert Brewer.  “The public is entitled to trust that a trademark means a product is authentic, and not that an unscrupulous merchant is trying to make a quick buck at their expense.  Counterfeit goods are not easy money.  They are a crime.”

“HSI takes great pride in getting justice for the victims of this counterfeit merchandise scheme, which preyed on unsuspecting customers,” said Francisco Burrola, Special Agent in Charge, Homeland Security Investigations (Nevada).  “Counterfeiting and intellectual property rights violations are anything but victimless crimes—they harm legitimate businesses, consumers and governments.”

DEFENDANT                       Case Number 19-cr-3401-W

Saad Ahmed                           Las Vegas, NV                       Age: 32

SUMMARY OF CHARGES

Conspiracy to Traffic in Counterfeit Goods – Title 18, U.S.C., Sections 371 & 2320(a)

Maximum penalty: Five years in prison, $250,000 fine (or twice the pecuniary gain or loss), restitution and forfeiture.

AGENCIES

Homeland Security Investigations

U.S. Customs & Border Protection

Assistant U.S. Attorney Nicholas W. Pilchak (619) 546-9709

NEWS RELEASE SUMMARY – September 5, 2019

SAN DIEGO – A Las Vegas business owner admitted today to running a years-long conspiracy to import counterfeit electronics from China into the United States. 

During a hearing this morning before U.S. Magistrate Judge Barbara L. Major, Saad Ahmed pleaded guilty to Conspiracy to Traffic in Counterfeit Goods. 

Ahmed, 32, owns and operates PhonePartsUSA, a Las Vegas, Nevada-based company that sells cellular telephone parts and other electronics throughout the United States—including to customers in San Diego.  As part of his plea agreement, Ahmed acknowledged conspiring with a variety of individuals in China to bring counterfeit cell phone parts and accessories from China to the United States.  The conspiracy stretched back to at least September 2012, according to court documents.

PhonePartsUSA trafficked $1,499,999 worth of counterfeit goods during this period, per Ahmed’s plea agreement.  The phony merchandise bore trademarks from Samsung, Apple and the electronic quality certification company UL, but were actually inauthentic copies.  The charges against Ahmed also allege that he grossly undervalued his international imports to deflect U.S. Customs’ attention from his shipments. 

Ahmed agreed to pay restitution to the three trademark holders in an amount totaling $269,681, which constituted the net proceeds received by Ahmed’s business from trafficking in the counterfeit merchandise.  Ahmed also agreed not to contest the forfeiture of 4,453 cell phone parts and accessories seized from PhonePartsUSA as part of a search by Homeland Security Investigations last summer.  

“Counterfeit goods confuse and deceive the public, damage legitimate manufacturers, and can even pose a serious risk to consumers’ safety,” said U.S. Attorney Robert Brewer.  “This office and our agency partners will aggressively prosecute who seeks to make a quick illegal profit at the public’s expense.”

 “Trafficking counterfeit merchandise hurts legitimate businesses and poses a significant public safety risk as these individuals prey on unsuspecting consumers who believe they are getting name brand products at a reduced price,” said Francisco Burrola, Special Agent in Charge, Homeland Security Investigations (Nevada), U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. “HSI Nevada agents are committed to conducting intellectual property theft investigations that not only protect the companies who have trademarked licensed products, but also the consumers who believe they are buying authentic and/or safe products.”

Ahmed is scheduled to be sentenced on December 9, 2019, before U.S. District Judge Thomas Whelan.

DEFENDANT                       Case Number 19-cr-3401-W

Saad Ahmed                           Las Vegas, NV                       Age: 32

SUMMARY OF CHARGES

Conspiracy to Traffic in Counterfeit Goods – Title 18, U.S.C., Sections 371 & 2320(a)

Maximum penalty: Five years in prison, $250,000 fine (or twice the pecuniary gain or loss), restitution and forfeiture.

AGENCY

Homeland Security Investigations

U.S. Customs & Border Protection

Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1-_TTo87kiOaXCS7EMkXpUy5Wn5wvEovuPqrc_RmUKcM
  Last Updated: 2025-03-20 18:57:38 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The number of days from the earlier of filing date or first appearance date to proceeding date
Format: N3

Description: The number of days from proceeding date to disposition date
Format: N3

Description: The number of days from disposition date to sentencing date
Format: N3

Description: The code of the district office where the case was terminated
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant at the time the case was closed
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense that carried the most severe disposition and penalty under which the defendant was disposed
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with TTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with TTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with TTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with TTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The code indicating the nature or type of disposition associated with TTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The number of months a defendant was sentenced to prison under TTITLE1
Format: N4

Description: A code indicating whether the prison sentence associated with TTITLE1 was concurrent or consecutive in relation to the other counts in the indictment or information or multiple counts of the same charge
Format: A4

Description: The number of months of probation imposed upon a defendant under TTITLE1
Format: N4

Description: A period of supervised release imposed upon a defendant under TTITLE1
Format: N3

Description: The fine imposed upon the defendant at sentencing under TTITLE1
Format: N8

Description: The total prison time for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and prison time was imposed
Format: N4

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanVzdGljZS5nb3YvdXNhby1zZGNhL3ByL3Blc3RpY2lkZS1zbXVnZ2xlci1zZW50ZW5jZWQtOTAtZGF5cy1jdXN0b2R5LW9yZGVyZWQtcGF5LTEwMDAw
  Press Releases:
Assistant U. S. Attorney Melanie K. Pierson (619) 546-7976    

NEWS RELEASE SUMMARY – June 18, 2021

SAN DIEGO –Felix Gutierrez Valencia of Perris, California, was sentenced in federal court today to 90 days in custody for attempting to smuggle pesticides into the United States.  In addition, Gutierrez was ordered to pay a fine of $2,500 and restitution of $8,807 for the cost of disposal of the pesticides, and perform 100 hours of community service during three years of supervised release. 

In pleading guilty, Gutierrez admitted that, on April 16, 2020, he entered the United States at the Otay Mesa Port of Entry, where 48 containers of undeclared Mexican pesticides were discovered in his truck.  Gutierrez had concealed some of the containers of pesticides in cereal and cookie boxes.  The pesticides included Furadan, Monitor, Bayfolan, Biomec, Ridomil Gold, Kanemite and Rodentox.  Gutierrez later acknowledged that, after his arrest in April, he offered to pay another individual to smuggle pesticides into the United States. However, that person was also caught at the border with 37 containers of Furadan, Biomec, Biozyme and Tetrasan.

Two of the pesticides smuggled by Gutierrez contain active ingredients that are cancelled in the United States, and thus are not permitted to be imported or sold. Furadan contains the cancelled pesticide carbofuran, which is a highly toxic insecticide that affects the central nervous systems by the same mechanism as chemical warfare nerve agents. It is highly toxic to birds, fish and mammals and is classified by the EPA as Toxicity Category I, the highest category, based upon its lethal potency. Monitor contains the cancelled pesticide methamidophos, which is one of the most acutely toxic organophosphate pesticides, also related to chemical warfare nerve agents. Rodentox contains zinc phosphide, an extremely toxic rodenticide.  Ingestion of 7 drops to one teaspoons of zinc phosphide would likely kill a 150-pound person.

According to the sentencing documents, all of the chemicals smuggled by the defendant are commonly found at locations where marijuana is illegally cultivated.  Exposure to these pesticides during eradication efforts has cause law enforcement officers to be hospitalized, has polluted soils and streams, and has killed wildlife.  Cannabis users are also at risk,  In one study, the pesticide transfer rate into the blood stream of a cannabis smoker using a glass pipe was as high as 70 percent.

“Trafficking in illegal pesticides is big business, and we are aggressively prosecuting many of these smuggling cases in order to protect the public,” said Acting U.S. Attorney Randy Grossman. “The toxic chemicals are extremely dangerous, with the power to poison people, wildlife, water sources and soil.  Smugglers like this defendant are attempting to sneak banned pesticides across the border as if they are illicit narcotics, and they are getting caught and going to prison. That’s how serious these offenses are.” Grossman praised Assistant U.S. Attorney Melanie Pierson for her excellent work prosecuting environmental crimes, and he also commended agents from Homeland Security Investigations and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Criminal Investigation Division.    

“There’s a reason the federal government prohibits the importation of certain types of pesticides,” said Cardell T. Morant, Special Agent in Charge of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) San Diego. “Some of the chemicals may be toxic and exposure can be dangerous or fatal to both humans and wildlife. This individual not only disregarded the hazards associated with improperly handling these types of chemicals, he attempted to smuggle the chemicals into the U.S., which is a very serious crime. HSI and its partner organizations will continue to pursue, arrest, and bring to justice, anyone who tries to smuggle these highly toxic chemicals into the U.S.”

“The pesticides involved in this case pose serious public health and environmental dangers,” said Special Agent in Charge Scot Adair of EPA’s Criminal Investigation Division in California. “The sentence in this case demonstrates that individuals who intentionally violate smuggling and environmental protection laws will be held responsible for their crimes.”

DEFENDANT                                               Case Number 20cr2058-JLS                            

Felix Gutierrez Valencia                                Age: 40                                   Perris, CA

SUMMARY OF CHARGES

Smuggling – Title 18, U.S.C., Section 545

Maximum penalty: Twenty years in prison and $250,000 fine

AGENCY

Homeland Security Investigations

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Criminal Investigation Division

Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanVzdGljZS5nb3YvdXNhby1zZGNhL3ByL3Nhbi1kaWVnby1yZXNpZGVudC1zZW50ZW5jZWQtZmlyZWFybXMtY2hhcmdlcw
  Press Releases:
Assistant U. S. Attorneys Timothy F. Salel and Jonathan Shapiro 619-546-8225

NEWS RELEASE SUMMARY – August 16, 2021

SAN DIEGO – Grey Zamudio, a San Diego resident who has expressed racist and violent extremist sentiments on social media, was sentenced in federal court today to 24 months in custody for possessing a short barrel rifle and two silencers, none of which was registered as required by law. 

Zamudio pleaded guilty on December 1, 2020, to all three counts of possession of an unregistered rifle with a barrel of less than 16 inches and two unregistered silencers in violation of the National Firearms Registration and Transfer Act. 

As the government noted at Zamudio’s detention hearing in this matter, “There are really no legitimate uses for silencers, other than to kill people. They are not used in hunting. They are not used for recreation purposes.”

The government’s sentencing memorandum notes that the circumstances of Zamudio’s crimes underscore the danger that he continues to pose to the public. The memo said Zamudio is motivated by a violent ideology and appears eager to commit acts of violence against Black people, liberals and others. The FBI was alerted to Zamudio by a tipster who viewed his social media posts, which included statements about “the need for ‘vigilante militias’” and “to crush the liberal terrorists” and that Zamudio was “ready to die” for his beliefs. These statements, together with the allegation that Zamudio had multiple firearms, were apparently so alarming that they led the tipster to share this information with the FBI, which then led to further investigation, including court authorization to search Zamudio’s telephone.

“This defendant has demonstrated a very troubling violent ideology, an intent to harm people, a lack of remorse, and a willingness to illegally possess firearms,” said Acting U.S. Attorney Randy Grossman. “For these reasons, he continues to pose a threat to public safety.” Grossman commended the work of prosecutors Timothy F. Salel and Jonathan I. Shapiro as well as the Joint Terrorism Task Force, including FBI and ATF agents and San Diego Police Department detectives and officers who worked on this matter. Grossman also urged anyone with information about similar threats made on social media to report it to authorities.

According to the complaint, on August 1, 2020, agents executed federal court-authorized search warrants on Zamudio’s apartment and truck. During the search of the apartment, agents seized two silencers and the short barrel rifle. As the FBI executed the court-authorized search, the San Diego Police Department served Zamudio with a California State Gun Violence Restraining Order (“GVRO”) based on recent threats of violence in numerous social media posts by Zamudio. Pursuant to the GVRO, the San Diego Police Department (SDPD) seized another rifle (in addition to the short barrel rifle seized by the agents), two pistols, a large number of magazines, and several hundred to several thousand rounds of ammunition.

The sentencing memo said Zamudio’s text messages provide a window into his motivations and intentions. In one text dated June 5, 2020, Zamudio apparently boasted about getting ’to pull my Glock on a n**** (racial epithet) last Thurs...” On July 30, 2020, two days before his arrest in this matter, Zamudio posted a screenshot of a Tweet in which he stated, “They trying to dox me lol. I’m really hoping to get to kill someone finally.’” A couple of weeks earlier, on June 13, 2020, the Zamudio texted, “Tomorrow they gunna riot in la mesa again, wanna join the Patriots an smash on some BLM?”

The review of the Zamudio’s phone led to the prosecution of Cody Richard Griggers, now a former deputy sheriff in Georgia. Zamudio and Griggers exchanged messages on a Facebook group. In one exchange, Griggers indicated his desire to use his status as a law enforcement officer to get flashbangs and entry charges, and Zamudio responded, “’yeah I’ll pay big money for bang and boom . . . I’m ready to terrorize la.”

Violent ideology and illegal firearms are a dangerous combination. According to the sentencing memo, in a January 19, 2019, response to texts about how to improve the country, Zamudio wrote, “Assassinate the bad politians (sic), i feel as though we are protected under the Constitution to do so.”

“Mr. Zamudio's violent, threatening posts on social media led to serious concern for the safety of those who wished to exercise their first amendment right of peaceful protest, and I'm proud we were able to intervene so quickly,” said FBI Special Agent in Charge Suzanne Turner. “Thanks to a tip from the public, the San Diego FBI's Joint Terrorism Task Force mitigated the threat within 72 hours. The FBI and our law enforcement partners will use all available tools to detect and disrupt threats which put our communities in danger. This case demonstrates the importance of the public immediately reporting any suspicious activity or threats they encounter to enable law enforcement to act quickly.”

“This investigation is a great example of cooperation between law enforcement agencies to keep our communities safe,” said San Diego Police Chief David Nisleit. “I want to thank the officers, detectives, and agents who worked together on this case to prevent a potential act of gun violence.”

SUMMARY OF CHARGES                        Case Number 20CR2451

Grey Zamudio                                                 Age: 33

Title 26, United States Code, Sections 5861(d), 5845(a)(3), 5845(a)(7), and 5871 – Receipt and Possession of Firearms (One Short Barrel Rifle and Two Silencers) in Violation of the National Firearms

Registration and Transfer Act

Maximum Penalty: Ten years in prison, $250,000 fine

INVESTIGATING AGENCIES

Joint Terrorism Task Force

Federal Bureau of Investigation

Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives

San Diego Police Department

 

Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanVzdGljZS5nb3YvdXNhby1uZG1zL3ByL2Zvcm1lci1hbW9yeS1zY2hvb2wtdGVhY2hlci1zZW50ZW5jZWQtMTkyLXllYXJzLXNleHVhbC1hYnVzZS1mb3JtZXItc3R1ZGVudHM
  Press Releases:
GREENVILLE, Miss. – Toshemie Wilson, a former educator in the Amory School District, was sentenced today to 192 years in prison following his conviction for multiple counts of sexual exploitation of a child.  Wilson was ordered to pay $123,353.34 in restitution to victims of the offense and a $5,000 trafficking assessment.

In December of 2023, a jury in Greenville found Wilson guilty of eight counts of sexual exploitation of children based on his conduct while he was a teacher employed by the Amory School District. Testimony at the trial revealed that Wilson used his position as a teacher and advisor for the student group Technology Students of America (TSA) to groom students to eventually produce child sexual abuse videos and pictures in exchange for money and drugs.

At the trial in this matter, seven witnesses testified that Toshemie Wilson approached them while they were students and solicited them to make masturbation videos in exchange for pay between 2005 and 2014. The witnesses identified multiple places Wilson had them make the videos including the school bathroom, an office space rented specifically for this purpose, and the Amory Wal-Mart bathroom. Several of the witnesses stated they were induced to make videos while on out-of-town school trips with TSA.

An investigation in this case initially began when one former student reported the abuse to a counselor. That counselor then reported the statement to law enforcement. 

Following a sentencing hearing in Greenville today, Chief U.S. District Judge Debra M. Brown sentenced Wilson to 192 years in prison followed by a lifetime of supervised release.

“Parents and children should be able to trust teachers, and Toshemie Wilson profoundly betrayed that trust and deserves every hour of every day that he spends in prison,” opined U.S. Attorney Clay Joyner.  “I cannot say enough about the courage of the victims who came forward, and I commend AUSA Parker King for leading the prosecution and the efforts of the Mississippi Attorney General’s Office, the FBI, and our local law enforcement partners.  Wilson is now exactly where he belongs.”

“Protecting the innocence of society’s youth is one of the many noble missions of the FBI. Toshemie Wilson’s heinous actions of preying on children will not be tolerated. Today’s sentencing reflects the unyielding dedication of the FBI, DOJ and our local law enforcement partners in assuring offenders like Mr. Wilson, are held accountable and brought to justice,” said FBI SAC Robert Eikhoff.

“Predators who seek to exploit the children that they are trusted to care for will not go unpunished,” said Attorney General Lynn Fitch. “Today’s sentencing serves as a reminder that those who abuse positions of power will be prosecuted to the fullest extent. I am thankful for the U.S. Attorney’s Office, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the state and local law enforcement agencies for their partnership on this case. My hope is that these victims and their families find justice and healing.”

The investigation of this case was a joint effort by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Mississippi Attorney General’s Office, and multiple state and local law enforcement agencies.

Assistant U.S. Attorneys Parker S. King and Clyde McGee prosecuted the case.

Project Safe Childhood is a nationwide initiative to combat the growing epidemic of child sexual exploitation and abuse launched in May 2006 by the Department of Justice.  Project Safe Childhood marshals federal, state and local resources to better locate, apprehend and prosecute individuals who exploit children via the Internet, as well as to identify and rescue victims. The goal of Project Safe Childhood is to reduce the incidence of sexual exploitation of children.

Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanVzdGljZS5nb3YvdXNhby1zZGNhL3ByL3Nhbi1kaWVnby10cmlhbC10ZWFtLXBsYXlzLWNyaXRpY2FsLXJvbGUtbGFuZG1hcmstZG9qLWVmZm9ydC1wcm9zZWN1dGUtamFudWFyeS02
  Press Releases:
SAN DIEGO – Prosecutors and an intelligence analyst from the U.S. Attorney’s Office in San Diego have handled more than 60 cases — including nine trials — in support of the massive Department of Justice effort to hold accountable those who violently disrupted a joint session of the U.S. Congress convened to certify the results of the 2020 U.S. presidential election.As of today, the fourth anniversary of the Jan. 6, 2021, breach of the U.S. Capitol, the Department of Justice has charged more than 1,500 individuals in federal court in the District of Columbia for crimes related to the events of that day. These cases are being prosecuted through a collaboration led by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia and the Department of Justice National Security Division’s Counterterrorism Section. Five prosecutors and an analyst from San Diego were detailed at various times to the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Washington, D.C., to help them investigate and prosecute these cases.Each San Diego prosecutor volunteered to join DOJ’s nationwide team and did so with the full support of the United States Attorney’s Office. The Southern District of California, among many other districts across the nation, provided essential assistance to these cases through the time, talents, and experience of federal prosecutors and support staff.“We are extremely proud of our contribution to this extraordinary investigative and prosecutorial undertaking,” said U.S. Attorney Tara McGrath. “These cases hold accountable the individuals who battered, ransacked, and brought terror into the seat of our democracy. This collective effort has been vital to fortify the rule of law and serves as a reminder that armed threats, violence, and insurrection are not protected under the ruse of a lawful protest.”Examples of trials handled by the San Diego-based Assistant U.S. Attorneys over the past three years include: United States v Michael Bradley – 23-cr-0435-RBW – Michael Bradley of Forsyth, Georgia, who swung his baton at police officers as they attempted to fend off rioters during the breach of the U.S. Capitol, was convicted by a judge on August 28, 2024, of multiple felony and misdemeanor offenses, including civil disorder; assaulting, resisting, or impeding certain officers with a deadly or dangerous weapon; entering and remaining in a restricted building or grounds with a deadly or dangerous weapon; disorderly and disruptive conduct in a restricted building or grounds with a deadly or dangerous weapon; and engaging in physical violence in a restricted building or grounds with a deadly or dangerous weapon. He was sentenced on December 17, 2024, to 60 months in prison for his part in the sweeping violence. For further information please see https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/pr/georgia-man-sentenced-prison-assaulting-law-enforcement-and-other-offenses-during-jan-6









Side-by-side images of Bradley straddling the railing, preparing to swing his baton at the police.



 United States v. Michael Sparks –21-cr-87-TJK – Michael Sparks of Elizabethtown, Kentucky, the first rioter to enter the Capitol building, was convicted by a federal jury on March 1, 2024, of felony civil disorder; entering and remaining in a restricted building or grounds; disorderly and disruptive conduct in a restricted building or grounds; disorderly conduct in a Capitol building; and parading, demonstrating, or picketing in a Capitol building. On August 27, 2024, he was sentenced to 53 months in prison. Please see https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/pr/kentucky-man-sentenced-prison-felony-and-misdemeanor-charges-actions-during-jan-6.









Sparks, top center, turns and waves the mob forward as he leads a group of violent rioters past the final police line protecting the U.S. Capitol building, moments before he became the first rioter to breach the building.



 United States v. Ronald Colton McAbee – 21-cr-0035-RC – Ronald Colton McAbee of Unionville, Tennessee, who assaulted multiple police officers, to include dragging one down a set of stairs in front of the Lower West Terrace Tunnel, was convicted on all counts by a federal jury on October 22, 2023, of inflicting bodily injury on an officer; civil disorder; entering or remaining in a restricted building or grounds with a deadly or dangerous weapon; disorderly or disruptive conduct in a restricted building or grounds with a deadly or dangerous weapon; and engaging in physical violence in a restricted building or grounds with a deadly or dangerous weapon. He was sentenced on February 29, 2024, to 70 months in prison. Please see https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/defendants/mcabee-ronald-colton.









McAbee (a sheriff’s deputy at the time) was captured on police body-worn camera holding down the victim police officer, before pulling him down the stairs into the mob.



 United States v. Ryan Samsel, James Grant, Stephen Randolph, Paul Johnson and Jason Blythe – 21-cr-537-JMC – Ryan Samsel, James Grant, Stephen Randolph, Paul Johnson and Jason Blythe were convicted on February 2, 2024, of various felonies, including assaulting a police officer with a deadly or dangerous weapon or while inflicting bodily injury, following a bench trial. Randolf of Harrodsburg, Kentucky; Grant of Cary, North Carolina; Blythe of Fort Worth, Texas; Samsel of Bristol, Pennsylvania; and Johnson of Lanexa, Virginia, were the first to break through a manned barrier and assault officers, one of whom suffered multiple blows to the head that resulted in a concussion and a loss of consciousness. Samsel went on to assault additional officers. On September 20, 2024, all but Samsel were sentenced for their actions on January 6. Randolph was sentenced to eight years; Grant was sentenced to 36 months; Blythe was sentenced to 30 months; Johnson was sentenced to five years of probation. Samsel is scheduled to be sentenced on February 4, 2025. Please see https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/defendants/samsel-ryan and https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/pr/four-men-sentenced-prison-actions-during-jan-6-capitol-breach.









Defendants Grant, Blythe, Johnson, Samsel and Randolph lifting and pushing a barricade into a U.S. Capitol police officer.



 United States v. Douglas Austin Jensen – 21-cr-6-TJK – Douglas Jensen of Des Moines, Iowa was convicted by a jury on September 23, 2022, of assaulting, resisting, or impeding a law enforcement officer; obstruction of an official proceeding; interfering with a law enforcement officer during a civil disorder; entering and remaining in a restricted building or grounds with a dangerous weapon; and disorderly and disruptive conduct in a restricted building or grounds with a dangerous weapon. Video of Jensen leading an angry mob chasing a lone U.S. Capitol Police officer up the stairs to the Senate was widely circulated online in the days following the Capitol attack, and Jensen reported to the FBI that he wanted to be the “poster boy” of January 6. He was sentenced on December 16, 2022, to 60 months in prison. Please see https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/pr/iowa-man-sentenced-five-years-felony-charges-related-capitol-breach.









Douglas Jensen led a mob of angry men chasing a lone U.S. Capitol Police officer up the stairs to the hallway directly outside the Senate Chamber, then faced off with police officers in the hallway despite their orders to leave, as Senators sheltered in place on the other side of the wall.



 United States v. Zachary Alam – 21-cr-190-DLF – Zachary Jordan Alam from Centreville, Virginia was convicted by federal jury on Sept. 12, 2023, of multiple felonies, including assaulting, resisting, or impeding certain officers; assaulting, resisting, or impeding certain officers using a dangerous weapon; civil disorder; destruction of government property; engaging in physical violence in a restricted building with a deadly or dangerous weapon, and related offenses. Alam roamed the building and antagonized officers at the House Main Doors, then went around to a back entrance to the House Chamber as House members and staffers were still evacuating. There he assaulted officers, punched glass door panels with his fists, and once the officers moved, kicked the doors and completely removed the window panels by smashing them with a helmet. On November 7, 2024, he was sentenced to eight years in prison. Please see https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/pr/virginia-man-sentenced-eight-years-prison-assaulting-law-enforcement-and-other-charges\. 









Alam (in fur hat) inciting other rioters, with windows he shattered visible behind him and fleeing Congressmembers and staffers visible behind the doors.













Alam using a helmet to smash through window panels of the doors outside the House Chamber.



 United States v. Jonathan Copeland – 23-cr-224-DLF – On May 8, 2024, Jonathan Copeland of Lima, Ohio, was found guilty after a bench trial of eight crimes, including two counts of felony civil disorder and one count each of assaulting, resisting, or impeding certain officers using a dangerous weapon; entering and remaining in a restricted building or ground with a deadly and dangerous weapon; disorderly and disruptive conduct in a restricted building or grounds with a deadly and dangerous weapon; and engaging in physical violence in a restricted building or ground with a deadly and dangerous weapon. Copeland helped push a barricade into U.S. Capitol Police Officers at the Peace Circle, worked with others to use a massive metal Trump sign as a battering ram to push past the police line at the West Front of the Capitol, and was involved in an altercation with a cameraman. Copeland yelled at the cameraman and shoved him several times, and then a group of rioters attacked the photographer and pushed him off a ledge. On December 2, 2024, Copeland was sentenced to almost 6 years in prison. Please see https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/pr/ohio-man-sentenced-prison-assaulting-law-enforcement-trump-billboard-and-other-offenses.









Copeland, in the green bandana, pushing a Trump billboard into the police.



 United States v. Joshua Black – 21-cr-127-AJB – Joshua Black of Leeds, Alabama, was found guilty following a bench trial on January 13, 2023, of entering and remaining in a restricted building or grounds with a deadly or dangerous weapon; disorderly and disruptive conduct in a restricted building or grounds with a deadly or dangerous weapon; unlawful possession of a dangerous weapon on Capitol grounds or buildings; entering and remaining on the floor of Congress; and disorderly conduct in a Capitol building. As he approached the Capitol building from the West side, Black was part of a violent mob of rioters fighting the police; he was struck by a non-lethal round that wounded his face and caused bleeding. Despite this clear warning to retreat, Black entered the Capitol building and the Senate chamber armed with a knife. On May 16, 2023, he was sentenced to 22 months in prison. Please see https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/pr/alabama-man-found-sentenced-felony-and-misdemeanor-charges-related-capitol-breach.









Joshua Black sat on the floor of the Senate Chamber as rioters took over the Dias, shortly after Senators had been evacuated from the Chamber.



*All photos were obtained by the government and admitted as evidence for various trials.  
Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanVzdGljZS5nb3YvdXNhby1zZGNhL3ByL2Zvcm1lci1jYW1wYWlnbi1ndXJ1LXJhdm5lZXQtc2luZ2gtc2VudGVuY2VkLWhpcy1yb2xlLWxhdW5kZXJpbmctNjAwMDAwLWZvcmVpZ24tbW9uZXk
  Press Releases:
Assistant U.S. Attorneys Phillip L.B. Halpern (619) 546-6964, Mark W. Pletcher (619) 546-9714, Helen Hong (619) 546-6990, Billy Joe McLain (619) 546-6762

 

NEWS RELEASE SUMMARY – August 31, 2017

 

SAN DIEGO – Political consultant Ravneet Singh, former CEO of ElectionMall Technologies, was sentenced today to 15 months in prison and ordered to pay a $10,000 fine for his role in funneling more than $600,000 in illegal foreign campaign contributions from Mexican citizen Jose Susumo Azano Matsura to candidates in the 2012 San Diego mayoral election.

 

U.S. District Court Judge Michael M. Anello ordered the defendant to report to prison on October 12, 2017, to begin serving his sentence.

 

In September 2016, after six weeks of trial and five days of deliberations, a federal jury in San Diego returned guilty verdicts against Singh, Azano and Azano’s son, Edward Susumo, who were convicted of felony counts associated with a series of illegal campaign contributions by Azano to the campaigns of Bonnie Dumanis and Bob Filner.

 

“American elections are not for sale,” said Executive U.S. Attorney Blair Perez. “We will not allow our sacred electoral process to be compromised. This prison sentence underscores an important message: Anyone who tries to manipulate the American electorate will pay a high price.”

 

“Public corruption undermines the strength and confidence in our system of government which is why these cases are a top criminal priority for the FBI,” said Special Agent in Charge Eric S. Birnbaum. “Today’s sentence stands as a stark condemnation of Azano’s and Singh’s willful efforts to undermine the fundamental principles of our representative democracy. The American people can count on the FBI to continue to bring these complex, sensitive, and important cases to justice.”

 

“Using a series of complex financial transactions, Mr. Singh conspired to funnel illegal money to influence the outcome of San Diego political races,” stated Special Agent in Charge R. Damon Rowe of IRS Criminal Investigation. “IRS Criminal Investigation remains committed to the fight against campaign finance crimes. This case exemplifies the strong impact we are making in this arena working in cooperation with our law enforcement partners.”

 

According to evidence presented at trial, Azano, Singh, and others conspired to inject hundreds of thousands of dollars in cash and in-kind consulting services to the Bonnie Dumanis and Bob Filner campaigns, despite the fact that Azano’s foreign national status made such contributions illegal. To conceal his connection to these contributions, Azano arranged with his son Edward Hester and others to funnel this illegal foreign money through corporate and third person “straw donor” contributions. The conspirators, moreover, arranged for at least $267,000 worth of Singh’s in-kind consulting services to be secretly funneled to the campaigns.

 

In return for his political contributions, Azano sought to buy political influence. For example, he wanted support for his vision of Miami West – a San Diego waterfront development project with a yacht marina, a branded five-star hotel, and luxury bayside condominiums that promised Azano millions in profit. In other instances, Azano wanted access, like the ability to call on influential political figures or obtain letters of reference to secure his son’s admission to the University of San Diego.

 

Ultimately, with Azano’s help, Filner won the election, though he was forced to resign shortly thereafter.

 

For his part, Singh used his specialized skills and knowledge to facilitate the crimes. Evidence at trial demonstrated that Singh used code names for the Dumanis and Filner work that Azano paid for but never for any other domestic candidate for office; harshly reprimanded employees for using those code names in emails; and on one particularly candid occasion, referenced the “legal ramifications” of discussing these topics. Singh further concealed the payments from Azano by structuring the wires from a Mexican company, Broadlink, controlled by Azano, which had nothing to do with electoral politics, to company Singh controlled, not Election Mall, but eSolutions, which primarily developed software from India.

 

In addition to the jury’s guilty verdicts against Azano, Singh, and Hester, the jury was unable to reach a verdict on several charges brought against San Diego lobbyist Marco Polo Cortes, and acquitted Cortes on several charges of falsifying campaign donation records. The jury also acquitted Hester on several charges related to the falsification of campaign donation records, and could not reach a verdict on several other charges. Finally, the jury could not reach a verdict on a firearm charge against Azano.

 

Retrial on a firearm charge against Azano is set to begin September 5, 2017. Azano is, thereafter, scheduled to be sentenced on October 23, 2017, followed by Edward Hester on November 6, 2017. The retrial of Marco Polo Cortes is scheduled for December 5, 2017.

 

Assistant U.S. Attorneys Phillip L.B. Halpern, Mark W. Pletcher, Helen Hong, and Billy Joe McLain of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of California are prosecuting the case.

 

DEFENDANTS                             Case Number: 14cr0388-MMA

 

Ravneet Singh                                Age: 45                   Naperville, IL

Jose Susumo Azano Matsura         Age: 52                   Guadalajara, Mexico

Edward Susumo Azano Hester      Age: 25                   San Diego, CA

 

SUMMARY OF CONVICTIONS

 

Count 1: Conspiracy to Commit Offenses Against the United States – Title 18, U.S.C., Sec. 371.

Maximum Penalties: Up to five years in prison and $250,000 fine

Defendants Azano, Singh and Hester

 

Count 3: Donation and Contribution by a Foreign National Aggregating $25,000 or more – Title 2, U.S.C., Secs. 437g (d) (1) (A) (i) and 441e (A) (1).

Maximum Penalties: Up to five years in prison and $250,000 fine

Defendants Azano, Singh and Hester

 

Count 4: Contribution in the Name of Another Aggregating $25,000 or more – Title 2, U.S.C., Secs. 437g(d) (1) (A) (i) and 441f.

Maximum Penalties: Up to five years in prison and $250,000 fine

Defendant Azano

 

Counts 5-37: Falsification of Records – Title 18, U.S.C., Sec. 1519.

Maximum Penalties: Up to 20 years in prison per count and $250,000 fine per count.

Defendant Azano on all counts; Singh guilty on counts 32 and 37

 

AGENCIES

 

Federal Bureau of Investigation

Internal Revenue Service, Criminal Investigation

San Diego Police Department

*The charges and allegations contained in an indictment or complaint are merely accusations, and the defendants are considered innocent unless and until proven guilty.

 

Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   D-NM  1:19-cr-04597
Case Name:   USA v. Rodriguez
  Press Releases:
ALBUQUERQUE – Mauricio Varela, 48, of Silver City, N.M., was sentenced today in federal court in Las Cruces, N.M., to 168 months of imprisonment followed by three years of supervised release for his conviction on racketeering and assault charges.

Varela and his three co-defendants, David Calbert, 42, Robert Martinez, 54, and Mario Rodriguez, 33, were charged with racketeering offenses in a four-count indictment filed in Dec. 2015.  The indictment charged the four defendants with participating in a criminal organization known as the Syndicato de Nuevo Mexico (SNM) Prison Gang that engaged in acts of violence and other criminal activities, including murder, kidnapping, attempted murder, conspiracy to manufacture and distribute narcotics, and firearms trafficking.  The indictment alleged that the defendants were members and associates of the SNM Prison Gang, a statewide gang operating in New Mexico prisons and in communities throughout the state.  According to the indictment, the SNM Prison Gang was formed in the early 1980s at the Penitentiary of New Mexico after the prison riot in Feb. 1980, and expanded throughout the New Mexico penal system.  The indictment alleged that gang members and associates are expected to remain loyal to the Gang and work to further its objectives after they have completed their prison sentences and those who do not are subject to violent forms of discipline.  According to the indictment, significant goals of the SNM Prison Gang included controlling and profiting from drug trafficking both within and outside the penal system; intimidating and influencing other gangs for the purpose of expanding the network for its illegal activities; and engaging in violence to assert its gang identity and protect its territory.

The indictment charged Varela and Calbert with conspiring to murder an individual referred to as P.S. in March 2011, and with assaulting P.S. with a deadly weapon on March 14, 2011.  It also charged Martinez and Rodriguez with conspiring to murder an individual referred to as A.S., in June 2011, and with assaulting A.S. resulting in serious bodily injury on June 24, 2011.  The indictment charged the four defendants with committing the offenses in Santa Fe County, N.M.

On Oct. 19, 2017, Varela pled guilty to assault with a dangerous weapon in aid of the racketeering enterprise.  In entering the guilty plea, Varela admitted that in 2000, while incarcerated in the New Mexico Department of Corrections, he became a member of the SNM Prison Gang and thus became engaged in racketeering activity.  Varela further admitted that in March 2011, he and another SNM Prison Gang member assaulted P.S. by hitting and holding P.S. while the other SNM member stabbed P.S. with a dangerous weapon, which resulted in serious bodily injury to P.S.  Varela acknowledged committing this assault because of his SNM membership and to increase his status within the Prison Gang.

Varela’s three co-defendants have previously entered guilty pleas and are awaiting sentencing.

This case was investigated by Albuquerque Division of the FBI with assistance from the New Mexico Corrections Department, New Mexico State Police, Bernalillo County Sheriff’s Office, Metropolitan Correctional Center, Albuquerque Police Department, U.S. Marshals Service, and the El Paso, Phoenix, Denver, Las Vegas and Knoxville FBI Divisions.  Assistant U.S. Attorneys of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of New Mexico are prosecuting the case.

Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Gy2j4zE6A0Y-YEqDfm8fKqizs2cE_ZjuWULSDBzFJ8s
  Last Updated: 2025-03-17 21:59:28 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: Case type associated with a magistrate case if the current case was merged from a magistrate case
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The docket number originally given to a case assigned to a magistrate judge and subsequently merged into a criminal case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a magistrate case
Format: A3

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The number of days from the earlier of filing date or first appearance date to proceeding date
Format: N3

Description: The number of days from proceeding date to disposition date
Format: N3

Description: The number of days from disposition date to sentencing date
Format: N3

Description: The code of the district office where the case was terminated
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant at the time the case was closed
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense that carried the most severe disposition and penalty under which the defendant was disposed
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with TTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with TTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with TTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with TTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The code indicating the nature or type of disposition associated with TTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The number of months a defendant was sentenced to prison under TTITLE1
Format: N4

Description: A code indicating whether the prison sentence associated with TTITLE1 was concurrent or consecutive in relation to the other counts in the indictment or information or multiple counts of the same charge
Format: A4

Description: The number of months of probation imposed upon a defendant under TTITLE1
Format: N4

Description: A period of supervised release imposed upon a defendant under TTITLE1
Format: N3

Description: The fine imposed upon the defendant at sentencing under TTITLE1
Format: N8

Description: The total prison time for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and prison time was imposed
Format: N4

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
Magistrate Docket Number:   D-NM  1:19-mj-03093
Case Name:   USA v. Rodriguez
Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1r0tK7uTRZglxLMMqviTV6f3vZMKU_RTxynVYL1A4Q08
  Last Updated: 2025-03-17 15:45:51 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: Case type associated with a magistrate case if the current case was merged from a magistrate case
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The docket number originally given to a case assigned to a magistrate judge and subsequently merged into a criminal case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a magistrate case
Format: A3

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The number of days from the earlier of filing date or first appearance date to proceeding date
Format: N3

Description: The number of days from proceeding date to disposition date
Format: N3

Description: The number of days from disposition date to sentencing date
Format: N3

Description: The code of the district office where the case was terminated
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant at the time the case was closed
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense that carried the most severe disposition and penalty under which the defendant was disposed
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with TTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with TTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with TTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with TTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The code indicating the nature or type of disposition associated with TTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The number of months a defendant was sentenced to prison under TTITLE1
Format: N4

Description: A code indicating whether the prison sentence associated with TTITLE1 was concurrent or consecutive in relation to the other counts in the indictment or information or multiple counts of the same charge
Format: A4

Description: The number of months of probation imposed upon a defendant under TTITLE1
Format: N4

Description: A period of supervised release imposed upon a defendant under TTITLE1
Format: N3

Description: The fine imposed upon the defendant at sentencing under TTITLE1
Format: N8

Description: The total prison time for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and prison time was imposed
Format: N4

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanVzdGljZS5nb3YvdXNhby1ubS9wci9mb3JtZXIteW91dGgtbWluaXN0ZXItbGFzLWNydWNlcy1wbGVhZHMtZ3VpbHR5LWZlZGVyYWwtY2hpbGQtc2V4dWFsLWV4cGxvaXRhdGlvbi1jaGFyZ2U
  Press Releases:
ALBUQUERQUE – U.S. Attorney John C. Anderson and Acting Special Agent in Charge Jack P. Staton of Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) in El Paso announced today that Stephen Mendoza Arellano, 30, of Las Cruces, N.M., pleaded guilty in federal court to traveling in interstate commerce for the purpose of engaging in sexual contact with a minor.    The plea agreement recommends that Arellano be sentenced to a prison term of 57 to 71 months followed by 15 years of supervised release. 

HSI Special Agents arrested Arellano on Oct. 7, 2017, on a criminal complaint charging him with attempted production of child pornography, enticement of a child to engage in sexual activity, and travel to meet a minor to engage in sexual conduct between May 2017 and Aug. 2017 in Dona Ana County, N.M., and elsewhere.  At the time of his arrest, Arellano was an ordained minister of the Apostolic Assembly Church and was serving as the Church’s District of New Mexico Youth President.  According to the criminal complaint, Arellano traveled from Las Cruces to El Paso, Tex., with the intention of having illicit sexual contact with the child victim who was 15-years-old when he began contacting her.

The complaint noted that Arellano was a National Ordained Minister for the Apostolic Assembly Church, at the time, held the title of District of New Mexico Youth President, and was a member of the same church as the victim.  HSI initiated the investigation into Arellano after receiving a report from the parents of Arellano’s victim.  According to the criminal complaint, Arellano began communicating with the victim in a sexually explicit manner in May 2017, when the victim was fifteen-years-old; sent nude photos of himself to the victim and requested nude photos of the victim via cellular phone messaging between May 2017 and Aug. 2017; and engaged in sexual activity with the victim in July and Aug. 2017.  The investigation revealed that Arellano was aware of the victim’s age because he assisted in making a video for the victim’s Sweet 16 birthday party. 

During today’s proceedings, Arellano pled guilty to a felony information charging him with interstate travel with intent to engage in a sexual act with a minor.  In entering the guilty plea, Arellano admitted that in the early summer of 2017, he began to pursue a romantic relationship with the 15-year-old minor victim, whom he knew through the Apostolic Assembly Church and their families’ relationship.  Arellano admitted that in June 2017, he traveled from Las Cruces to El Paso, Texas, with the intent to engage in illicit sexual contact with the victim.  Arellano also admitted to attempting to engage in that contact.

Arellano has been in custody since his arrest and remains detained pending his sentencing hearing, which has yet to be scheduled. 

This case was investigated by the Las Cruces office of HSI and the Las Cruces Police Department.  The case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Marisa A. Ong as part of Project Safe Childhood, a nationwide initiative launched in May 2006 by the Department of Justice (DOJ) to combat the growing epidemic of child sexual exploitation and abuse.  Led by United States Attorneys’ Offices and DOJ’s Criminal Division’s Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section, Project Safe Childhood marshals federal, state and local resources to better locate, apprehend and prosecute individuals who exploit children via the Internet, as well as to identify and rescue victims.  For more information about Project Safe Childhood, please visit http://www.justice.gov/psc/.

Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanVzdGljZS5nb3Yvb3BhL3ByL2Zvcm1lci1vcmVnb24tY29ycmVjdGlvbnMtbnVyc2Utc2VudGVuY2VkLTMwLXllYXJzLWZlZGVyYWwtcHJpc29uLXNleHVhbGx5LWFzc2F1bHRpbmctbmluZQ
  Press Releases:
A former Oregon Department of Corrections employee was sentenced yesterday for sexually assaulting nine female inmates while serving as a nurse at the Coffee Creek Correctional Facility, Oregon’s only women’s prison.

Tony Daniel Klein, 38, of Clackamas County, Oregon, was sentenced to 30 years in prison and five years of supervised release. A restitution hearing will be held at a later date.

“The sentence in this case should send a significant message to any official working inside jails and prisons across our country, including those who provide medical care, that they will be held accountable when they sexually assault women inmates in their custody,” said Assistant Attorney General Kristen Clarke of the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division. “Women detained inside jails and prisons should be able to turn to medical providers for care and not subjected to exploitation by those bent on abusing their power and position. We will listen to and investigate credible allegations put forward by people who are sexually assaulted and, where appropriate, bring federal prosecutions. The Justice Department stands ready to hold accountable those who abuse their authority by sexual assaulting people in their custody and under their care.”

“Today’s sentence sends a clear message that using a position of authority to prey on individuals in custody will never be tolerated by the Justice Department,” said U.S. Attorney Natalie Wight for the District of Oregon. “Holding Tony Klein accountable for his crimes would not have been possible without the courage and resolve of the women he abused and the dedication of our partners at the FBI and Civil Rights Division.”

“We know this prison sentence cannot undo the trauma Tony Klein inflicted on numerous victims, but we hope this brings them one step closer to healing,” said Special Agent in Charge Kieran L. Ramsey of the FBI Portland Field Office. “As a state prison nurse, Klein abused his position and abused multiple women, violating the public’s trust, while doing everything he could to avoid being caught. The investigators and prosecutors should be applauded for their efforts to hold Klein accountable, but we recognize this lengthy sentence is also because of a group of brave women who came forward and helped ensure that Klein was held accountable for being a sexual predator within Coffee Creek Correctional Facility.”

According to court documents, from 2010 until January 2018, Klein served as a nurse at the Coffee Creek Correctional Facility in Wilsonville, Oregon. In his position, Klein interacted with female inmates who either sought medical treatment or worked as orderlies in the prison’s medical unit. Aided by his access to the women and his position of power as a corrections employee, Klein sexually assaulted or engaged in nonconsensual sexual conduct with many female inmates entrusted to his care.

By virtue of his position as a medical provider, Klein was often alone with his victims and assaulted many before, during or after medical treatment. For women who worked in the medical unit, Klein manufactured reasons to get them alone in secluded areas such as medical rooms, janitor’s closets or behind privacy curtains. Klein made it clear to his victims that he was in a position of power over them, and that they would not be believed if they tried reporting his abuse. Fearing punishment if they fought back against or reported his misconduct, most of Klein’s victims submitted to his unwanted advances or endured his assaults.

On March 8, 2022, a federal grand jury in Portland returned an indictment charging Klein with depriving his victims of their constitutional right not to be subjected to cruel and unusual punishment by sexual assault. The indictment also charged Klein with perjury.

On July 25, a federal jury in Portland found Klein guilty of 17 counts of depriving his victims of their constitutional right not to be subjected to cruel and unusual punishment by sexual assault and four counts of perjury.

The FBI Portland Field Office investigated the case.

Trial Attorney Cameron A. Bell of the Civil Rights Division’s Criminal Section and Assistant U.S. Attorney Gavin W. Bruce for the District of Oregon prosecuted the case. Assistant U.S. Attorney Hannah Horsley for the District of Oregon assisted the trial team.

Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   SD-FL  1:19-cr-20674
Case Name:   USA v. Joles et al
  Press Releases:
Joshua Ryan Joles, the CEO of LLC Wholesale Supply, LLC, Mohammad Mehdi Salemi, the CEO of Wholesalers Group, Inc. and Wholesalers Group, LLC, and bank account holders Angel Caminero Alvarez and Leonides Herrera were indicted on charges of money laundering, committing violations of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, and mail fraud, related to their alleged participation in a scheme to sell diverted pharmaceuticals to unwitting pharmacies and consumers.

U.S. Attorney Ariana Fajardo Orshan for the Southern District of Florida stated, “The allegations set forth in this scheme strike at the peace of mind we should all feel when we buy prescription drugs from a pharmacy.  We all expect and should rest assured knowing that the drugs we are buying are safe, effective, and properly stored and handled.  Today and whenever necessary, we will continue to strike back at those who seek to profit by robbing the public of that peace of mind through brazen, criminal schemes.”

According to the indictment, Joles and Salemi are alleged to have purchased and distributed millions of dollars in diverted pharmaceuticals, which are prescription drugs illegally trafficked in a secondary or underground market (Case No. 19-20674-CR-Gayles).  The indictment explains that the diverted pharmaceuticals are not controlled substances, but rather, high priced medical drugs used to treat such conditions as mental illness, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), and cancer.  They are branded drugs, produced by the original pharmaceutical developers as opposed to lower-priced generic drugs, but are acquired unlawfully -- through fraud, pharmacy burglaries, and cargo thefts.

Joles and Salemi are alleged to have acquired such drugs in large quantities, at a cost well-below normal wholesale prices, and then introduced the diverted drugs back into the legitimate marketplace.  The indictment further alleges that, because the pharmaceutical distribution system is regulated, to get diverted drugs back into the market, the diverters must, among other things, establish seemingly legitimate wholesale companies and bank accounts, produce fraudulent paperwork, and professionally package and ship the medicines to their pharmacy customers.  Joles and Salemi are alleged to have produced or caused the production of fraudulent paperwork, including falsified pedigrees, which are documents that identify the products and batch numbers of pharmaceuticals, describe their dates of manufacture and origin, indicate who purchased them, show when and where they were shipped, how they were purchased, and other information needed to trace them through the marketing chain.  Utilizing these false pedigrees, Joles and Salemi allegedly sold or caused the sale of these diverted pharmaceuticals to unsuspecting pharmacies and their patients. 

Additionally, Joles and Salemi, with the assistance of Alvarez and Herrera, are alleged to have laundered money as part of this scheme, including conducting financial transactions to promote the carrying on of the scheme and to conceal the nature, source and ownership of the money.

“This investigation into a South Florida based drug diversion group spanned the entire country, from California to Puerto Rico,” said George L. Piro, Special Agent in Charge of the FBI’s Miami Field Office.  “It is truly an example of multiple federal and state agencies working together with private industry to take out of circulation thousands of bottles of potentially dangerous drugs, and also disrupt a money laundering scheme that moved millions of dollars a month through South Florida.”

“U.S. consumers are put at risk when prescription drugs are diverted from the FDA-regulated supply chain and then returned clandestinely for distribution to the public, as there is no longer any assurance that the products are safe and effective for their intended uses,” said Justin D. Green, Special Agent in Charge of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Office of Criminal Investigations’ (FDA-OCI) Miami Field Office. “We will continue to pursue and bring to justice those who put the public health at risk.”

Herrera was arrested this morning and will have his initial appearance Monday afternoon, Oct. 21, 2019, before U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia M. Otazo-Reyes.  Joles and Salemi will have their initial appearances on later dates.  Alvarez remains a fugitive.

The prosecution was part of Operation Southern Hospitality, one of the ongoing efforts by the Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Force (OCDETF), a partnership between federal, state and local law enforcement agencies.  The OCDETF mission is to identify, investigate, and prosecute high level members of drug trafficking and money laundering enterprises, bringing together the combined expertise and unique abilities of federal, state and local law enforcement.

U.S. Attorney Fajardo Orshan praised the outstanding investigative work of the FBI and FDA-OCI.  She also thanked the U.S. Attorney’s Offices for the Northern District of California, the District of Arizona, and the Western District of Washington, the FBI’s Los Angeles, Phoenix and Seattle Field Offices, the U.S. Marshal’s Service in Miami, Florida Department of Law Enforcement, Attorney General's Office of Statewide Prosecution in Fort Lauderdale, and Medicaid Fraud Control Unit for their invaluable assistance. 

The prosecution of this case is being handled by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Frank Tamen and Walter M. Norkin.  Assistant U.S. Attorney Nicole Grosnoff is handling the asset forfeiture aspects of this matter.

The charges contained in the indictment are merely accusations and the defendants are presumed innocent unless proven guilty in a court of law.

Related court documents and information may be found on the website of the District Court for the Southern District of Florida at www.flsd.uscourts.gov or on http://pacer.flsd.uscourts.gov.

Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1H150EH88hC1XMYKkCQhDBD5ynUUG3-pDSViR39vfO4I
  Last Updated: 2025-03-21 09:37:40 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the second highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE2
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE2
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the third highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE3
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE3
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the fourth highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE4
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE4
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the fifth highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE5
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE5
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE5
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE5
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
Magistrate Docket Number:   SD-FL  1:19-mj-03756
Case Name:   USA v. Cambara Ortiz
Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1tfe5HzanAP5hMmIKALnMleCd8DhotIlGSQ5minx8eAY
  Last Updated: 2025-03-21 10:00:48 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: Case type associated with a magistrate case if the current case was merged from a magistrate case
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The docket number originally given to a case assigned to a magistrate judge and subsequently merged into a criminal case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a magistrate case
Format: A3

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanVzdGljZS5nb3YvdXNhby1zZGZsL3ByL2pvYXF1aW4tZWwtY2hhcG8tZ3V6bWFuLXNpbmFsb2EtY2FydGVsLWxlYWRlci1jb252aWN0ZWQtcnVubmluZy1jb250aW51aW5nLWNyaW1pbmFs
  Press Releases:
Joaquin Archivaldo Guzman Loera, known by various aliases, including “El Chapo” and “El Rapido,” was convicted today by a federal jury in Brooklyn, New York of being a principal operator of a continuing criminal enterprise – the Mexican organized crime syndicate known as the Sinaloa Cartel – a charge that includes 26 drug-related violations and one murder conspiracy.  Guzman Loera was convicted of all 10 counts of a superseding indictment, including narcotics trafficking, using a firearm in furtherance of his drug crimes and participating in a money laundering conspiracy.  The verdict followed a 12-week trial before U.S. District Judge Brian M. Cogan.  Guzman Loera faces a mandatory sentence of life imprisonment at his sentencing scheduled on June 25.

Acting Attorney General Matthew G. Whitaker, U.S. Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen, Assistant Attorney General Brian A. Benczkowski of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division, U.S. Attorney Richard P. Donoghue for the Eastern District of New York, U.S. Attorney Ariana Fajardo Orshan for the Southern District of Florida, Acting Administrator Uttam Dhillon of the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), FBI Director Christopher Wray, Executive Associate Director Derek Benner of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) and Acting U.S. Marshal Bryan T. Mullee of the Eastern District of New York, announced the verdict.

The Evidence at Trial:

As proven at trial, Guzman Loera was a principal leader of the Sinaloa Cartel, a Mexico-based international drug trafficking organization responsible for importing and distributing vast quantities of cocaine, marijuana, methamphetamine and heroin into the United States.  The evidence at trial, including testimony from 14 cooperating witnesses; narcotics seizures totaling over 130,000 kilograms of cocaine and heroin; weapons, including AK-47s and a rocket-propelled grenade launcher; ledgers; text messages; videos; photographs and intercepted recordings, detailed the drug trafficking activity of Guzman Loera and his co-conspirators over a 25-year period from January 1989 until December 2014.  Guzman Loera was repeatedly referred to by witnesses as one of the leaders of the Sinaloa Cartel.

Guzman Loera oversaw the smuggling of narcotics to wholesale distributors in Arizona, Atlanta, Chicago, Los Angeles, Miami, New York, and elsewhere.  The billions of illicit dollars generated from drug sales in the United States were then clandestinely transported back to Mexico.  Guzman Loera also used “sicarios,” or hit men, who carried out hundreds of acts of violence in Mexico to enforce Sinaloa’s control of territories and to eliminate those who posed a threat to the Sinaloa Cartel.

Drug Trafficking

In the course of the decades-long drug trafficking conspiracy, the Sinaloa Cartel transported tens of thousands of kilograms of narcotics from Central and South America for distribution in the United States.  Guzman Loera used various methods to transport the cartel’s narcotics into the United States, including submarines, carbon fiber airplanes, trains with secret compartments and transnational underground tunnels.  Multiple witnesses testified about seizures by law enforcement officers of massive amounts of cocaine, heroin and marijuana linked to the Sinaloa Cartel.  One of the largest seizures of drugs bound for the United States involved over seven tons of cocaine concealed in jalapeño cans. 

The jury also heard recordings of Guzman Loera’s own damning words discussing his drug trafficking, corruption and violence.  The calls included Guzman Loera discussing sending “ice,” meaning methamphetamine, to Los Angeles, California; Minneapolis, Minnesota; Ohio and Tucson, Arizona. 

Communications Network

Guzman Loera also utilized a sophisticated encrypted communications network to operate the global narcotics trafficking operation.  As an information technology engineer testified at trial, Guzman Loera paid him one million dollars to purchase and set up a network to enable the defendant to communicate via the internet with his drug trafficking associates in Colombia, Ecuador, Canada and the United States without fear of being intercepted by law enforcement or his rivals.  The witness devised a secret and secure system, consisting of encrypted cell phones and encrypted apps.

Cartel Violence

The success of the Sinaloa Cartel relied upon the use of violence to maintain their power throughout the region and beyond.  Numerous co-conspirators testified that Guzman Loera directed his hitmen to kidnap, interrogate, torture and shoot members of rival drug organizations, at times carrying out acts of violence himself.  A former hitman testified that Guzman Loera beat two men with a tree branch until their bodies “were completely like rag dolls,” before shooting the men and ordering their bodies be tossed into a bonfire.  The former hitman also testified that Guzman Loera interrogated a rival drug cartel member, shot him and ordered that he be buried alive.  In an intercepted call, the jury heard Guzman Loera order one of his sicarios to kidnap rival cartel members, but not to kill them without first checking with him.

Weapons

The Sinaloa Cartel had unfettered access to weapons.  A law enforcement witness showed the jury over 40 AK-47s that were seized in El Paso, Texas before they could be delivered to Guzman Loera in Mexico.  Additionally, witnesses identifed photographs of various weapons, including grenades and a rocket-propelled grenade launcher utilized by the Sinaloa Cartel.  Guzman Loera’s personal arsenal included a gold plated AK-47 and three diamond-encrusted .38 caliber handguns, one emblazoned with his initials, “JGL.” 

Corruption

              The evidence presented at trial demonstrated that to further the interests of the Sinaloa Cartel, Guzman Loera and his organization took advantage of a vast network of corrupt government officials.  These officials ranged from local law enforcement officers, prison guards, state officials, high ranking members of the armed forces, as well as politicians.  These corrupt officials assisted Guzman Loera and his organization in exchange for millions of dollars’ worth of bribery payments.  For example, according to the testimony of several witnesses, in many instances, Guzman Loera and his workers were warned of pending law enforcement operations which allowed Guzman Loera to avoid capture on multiple occasions.  In other instances, Guzman Loera, through his employees, paid officials to turn a blind eye to trafficking activities in an effort to facilitate the shipment of drugs, weapons, and bulk cash. 

Money Laundering

Guzman Loera’s lucrative drug trafficking business generated billions of dollars in illicit proceeds.  Guzman Loera used various methods to launder money including bulk cash smuggling from the United States to Mexico.  One of the largest seizures was of $1.26 million seized from hidden compartments in a truck driven by Guzman Loera’s brother in Douglas, Arizona in 1989.  In addition to the bulk cash smuggling, Guzman Loera oversaw numerous shell companies, including a juice company and a fish flour company to launder the cartel’s narcotics trafficking proceeds.

“I am pleased that the Department has brought Joaquin Guzman Loera (El Chapo) to justice by securing a conviction against this drug kingpin, who was a principal leader of the Sinaloa Cartel,” said Acting Attorney General Whitaker.  “As was clear to the jury, Guzman Loera’s massive, multi-billion dollar criminal enterprise was responsible for flooding the streets of the United States with hundreds of tons of cocaine, as well as enormous quantities of other dangerous drugs such as heroin and methamphetamine.  The trial evidence also overwhelmingly showed that Guzman’s unceasing efforts to expand his cartel’s control and consolidate its power left a wake of corruption and violence in communities in both Mexico and the United States.  This case demonstrated the extraordinary reach of the U.S. government, our tenacity and commitment to pursuing kingpins like Guzman whom if their power is unchecked — will, like Guzman, develop what for 25 years was an almost unstoppable capacity to move massive quantities of drugs into our country.  Guzman had the capital to absorb huge losses and run his enterprise with impunity; the enormous power to corrupt; and the capability to employ violence on a massive scale.  This case, and more importantly, this conviction serves as an irrefutable message to the kingpins that remain in Mexico, and those that aspire to be the next Chapo Guzman, that eventually you will be apprehended and prosecuted.  Finally, this verdict demonstrates that the United States, working in close partnership with the Mexican government, will continue to bring all possible resources to bear in its fight against international drug traffickers and their violent organizations.”

“The guilty verdict against Joaquin Guzman Loera, one of the most violent and feared drug kingpins of our time, is a testament to the hard work and courage of America’s frontline law enforcement personnel, including ICE’s Homeland Security Investigations,” said DHS Secretary Nielsen.  “They gathered substantial evidence over multiple investigations, which made his extradition to the United States and a successful prosecution possible.  Today’s verdict sends an unmistakable message to transnational criminals: you cannot hide, you are not beyond our reach, and we will find you and bring you to face justice.  Like Guzman, you will suffer the consequences of your criminal behavior.  I applaud the brave men and women at DHS who helped make this conviction possible and thank our interagency and international partners for their exceptional work.”

“Guzman Loera’s bloody reign atop the Sinaloa Cartel has come to an end, and the myth that he could not be brought to justice has been laid to rest,” said U.S. Attorney Donoghue.  “Today, Guzman Loera has been held accountable for the tons of illegal narcotics he trafficked for more than two decades, the murders he ordered and committed, and the billions of dollars he reaped while causing incalculable pain and suffering to those devastated by his drugs.  Today’s verdict is the culmination of the tireless work of countless brave members of law enforcement, here and abroad, and we congratulate them.  The Department of Justice is committed to eradicating criminal organizations that fuel America’s drug epidemic, and our mission will continue until it is completed.”

“The conviction of former Sinaloa Cartel leader Joaquin Guzman Loera strips the power from a man who employed horrific acts of violence to infect communities, throughout the United States and abroad, with the venom of illicit drugs,” said U.S. Attorney Fajardo Orshan.  “Today’s verdict is a reminder to all, that our international borders do not protect narco-traffickers and the cartels’ criminal enterprises from federal prosecution.  U.S. Attorney’s Offices across the nation stand united with our domestic and foreign law enforcement partners, as we continue our fight against transnational criminal organizations.”

“The reign of Joaquin Guzman Loera’s crime and violence has come to an end,” said FBI Director Wray.  “As leader of the Sinaloa Cartel, Guzman Loera carried out and directed acts of brazen violence as he oversaw the import and distribution of vast amounts of illegal drugs throughout the United States.  But today, through the steadfast determination and collective efforts of the FBI and our law enforcement partners both domestic and abroad, and due to our continuing partnership with the Government of Mexico, justice has been served.”

“Today’s conviction of Joaquin “El Chapo” Guzman demonstrates the dedication and determination of the men and women of DEA to bring the world’s most dangerous and prolific drug trafficker to justice,” said DEA Acting Administrator Dhillon.  “Those who bring drugs and violence into the United States that destroy lives and communities will not be tolerated, nor evade our reach. The success of this case is a testament to the strength of our relationship with our Mexican counterparts. DEA will continue to pursue justice worldwide and protect Americans.”

“HSI is committed to using our unique border authority to target and dismantle transnational criminal organizations responsible for trafficking narcotics and bringing violence into the United States,” said HSI Executive Associate Director Benner.  “Through collaboration with local, federal and international law enforcement partners, HSI special agents were able to bring an end to Joaquin Guzman Loera’s criminal activities, and help ensure he was brought to justice.”

“The conviction of Joaquin “El Chapo” Guzman demonstrates what is possible when law enforcement works collectively and coordinates their efforts,” said Acting U.S. Marshal Mullee.  “The U.S. Marshals Service ensured the integrity of the judicial process in this case.  From providing safe and secure detention and transportation of the world’s most notorious drug kingpin to ensuring the anonymity of the jury, protecting the judge, attorneys, witnesses and the public, the Marshals Service proudly played its important role in the process.  I would like to express my gratitude to all of our law enforcement partners who worked tirelessly in support of our mission.  They are the talented men and women of the New York City Police Department, Federal Protective Service, 24th Civil Support Team of the New York National Guard, and the Federal Bureau of Prisons.  The U.S. Marshals take our responsibility of protecting the federal judicial process very seriously.  We must anticipate and deter threats, while continuously developing and employing innovative protective tactics.  We carry out these responsibilities with precision every day across the country.  The successful prosecution of Joaquin “El Chapo” Guzman stands as a shining example of our mission.”

When sentenced by Judge Cogan, Guzman Loera faces a mandatory life sentence without the possibility of parole for leading a continuing criminal enterprise, and a sentence of up to life imprisonment on the seven remaining drug counts.  After the verdict, the government will seek a forfeiture money judgment for billions of dollars constituting the cartel’s illegal drug-trafficking proceeds.

The government’s case is being prosecuted by U.S. Department of Justice Trial Attorneys Amanda Liskamm, Anthony Nardozzi, Michael Lang and Brett Reynolds of the Criminal Division’s Narcotic and Dangerous Drug Section, Assistant U.S. Attorneys Gina Parlovecchio, Andrea Goldbarg, Michael Robotti, Patricia Notopoulos and Hiral Mehta of the Eastern District of New York and Assistant U.S. Attorneys Adam Fels and Lynn Kirkpatrick of the Southern District of Florida.

The case was investigated by the DEA, HSI and the FBI, in cooperation with Mexican, Ecuadorian, Netherlands, Dominican, and Colombian law enforcement authorities. Substantial assistance was provided by the U.S. Attorneys’ Offices in the Northern District of Illinois, the Western District of Texas, the Southern District of New York, the Southern District of California and the District of New Hampshire.  The Department of Justice’s Office of International Affairs also played an integral role in securing the extradition of Guzman Loera to the United States, in cooperation with authorities of the Mexican government, without which his extradition and prosecution would not have been possible.  The investigative efforts in this case were coordinated with the Department of Justice’s Special Operations Division, comprising of agents, analysts and attorneys from the Criminal Division’s Narcotic and Dangerous Drug Section; DEA New York, DEA Miami, FBI Washington Field Office, FBI New York Field Office, FBI Miami Field Office; HSI New York, HSI Nogales; Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives; U.S. Marshals Service; IRS Criminal Investigation; U.S. Bureau of Prisons, NYPD and New York State Police.

This case is the result of the ongoing efforts by the Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Force (OCDETF), a partnership that brings together the combined expertise and unique abilities of federal, state and local law enforcement agencies. The principal mission of the OCDETF program is to identify, disrupt, dismantle and prosecute high level members of drug trafficking, weapons trafficking and money laundering organizations and enterprises.

Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanVzdGljZS5nb3YvdXNhby1zZGZsL3ByL3NvdXRoZXJuLWRpc3RyaWN0LWZsb3JpZGEtYWxvbmctdGhyZWUtb3RoZXItdXMtYXR0b3JuZXktb2ZmaWNlcy1kaXN0cmljdHMtYWZmZWN0ZWQ
  Press Releases:
Miami, FL - The National Center for Disaster Fraud (NCDF) and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida, along with U.S. Attorney Offices in the District of Puerto Rico, Middle District of Florida, and Northern District of Florida announced the formation of task forces comprised of local, state and federal agencies in our respective areas to combat Hurricane Irma related illegal activity. The NCDF and U.S. Attorneys in these districts urge residents and businesses to immediately report suspected fraudulent activity relating to recovery and cleanup operations, fake charities claiming to be providing relief for victims, individuals submitting false claims for disaster relief and any other disaster fraud related activity.

The U.S. Department of Justice established the National Center for Disaster Fraud to investigate, prosecute, and deter fraud in the wake of Hurricane Katrina, when billions of dollars in federal disaster relief poured into the Gulf Coast region. Its mission has expanded to include suspected fraud from any natural or manmade disaster. More than 30 federal, state, and local agencies participate in the National Center for Disaster Fraud, which allows the center to act as a centralized clearinghouse of information related to disaster relief fraud.

While compassion, assistance, and solidarity are generally prevalent in the aftermath of natural disasters, unscrupulous individuals and organizations also use these tragic events to take advantage of those in need. In the wake of Hurricanes Harvey and Irma, the NCDF has already received more than 400 complaints. Examples of illegal activity being reported to the NCDF and law enforcement include:

Impersonation of federal law enforcement officials;

Identity theft;

Fraudulent submission of claims to insurance companies and the federal government;

Fraudulent activity related to solicitations for donations and charitable giving;

Fraudulent activity related to individuals and organizations promising high investment returns from profits from recovery and cleanup efforts;

Price gouging;

Theft, looting, and other violent crime

“Unfortunately, criminals can exploit disasters, such as Hurricanes Harvey and Irma, for their own gain by sending fraudulent communications through email or social media and by creating phony websites designed to solicit contributions,” said Acting Executive Director Corey R. Amundson of the National Center for Disaster Fraud. “Once the NCDF receives a complaint, it routes the complaints to the appropriate federal, state, or local law enforcement agency in the appropriate jurisdiction. In the process, we are able to de-conflict and identify trends, national schemes, and offenders operating in multi-jurisdictions. The Justice Department will aggressively pursue those who commit disaster fraud.”

“As our South Florida community recovers from Hurricane Irma, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida and our law enforcement partners stand ready to investigate and prosecute in federal court anyone who seeks to re-victimize, defraud or exploit the individuals and businesses in need,” said Acting U.S. Attorney Benjamin G. Greenberg for the Southern District of Florida. “Our united enforcement front will work hard to combat criminal activity, including fraud schemes associated with the hurricane’s devastation. Our mission is to ensure that federal, state and local programs, as well as reputable public and charitable assistance initiatives reach those struck by the impact of our recent natural disaster and are not fraudulently diverted to the criminals’ pockets.”

“We will aggressively investigate and prosecute anyone who seeks to defraud or exploit the federal assistance programs established to help individuals, families, or businesses that have lost so much as a result of Hurricane Irma,” said Acting U.S. Attorney W. Stephen Muldrow for the Middle District of Florida. “Our Office will continue to protect the rights of our honest citizens affected by this disaster and ensure that they receive the necessary public and charitable assistance they deserve. If you suspect any fraud, we urge you to call the NCDF Hotline. Our efforts to combat fraud associated with Hurricane Irma will supplement the outstanding and ongoing efforts by the State of Florida and Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi.”

“Our efforts are directed at enforcing a zero tolerance policy,” said U.S. Attorney Rosa Emilia Rodríguez-Vélez for the District of Puerto Rico. “In the midst of the distress and losses caused by Hurricane Irma and the attending need for recovery and rebuilding, there can be no place for fraud and abuse.”

“We do not tolerate fraud,” said U.S. Attorney Christopher P. Canova for the Northern District of Florida. “Individuals, families, and businesses have suffered, and will continue to suffer, tremendous losses. Emergency funds are needed to help them get back on their feet. Dozens of agencies, investigators, and prosecutors are ready to respond to credible allegations of fraud and abuse. If you are aware of fraud, we urge you to call the National Disaster Fraud Hotline.”

Members of the public who suspect fraud, waste, abuse, or allegations of mismanagement involving disaster relief operations, or believe they have been the victim of fraud from a person or organization soliciting relief funds on behalf of disaster victims, should contact the National Disaster Fraud Hotline toll free at (866) 720-5721. The telephone line is staffed by a live operator 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. You can also fax information to the Center at (225) 334-4707, or email it to disaster@leo.gov (link sends e-mail).

Members of the public are reminded to apply a critical eye and do their due diligence before giving contributions to anyone soliciting donations on behalf of disaster victims. Solicitations can originate from e-mails, websites, door-to-door collections, mailings and telephone calls, and similar methods. Learn more about the NCDF at www.justice.gov/disaster-fraud. Tips for the public on how to avoid being victimized of fraud are at https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/tips-avoiding-fraudulent-charitable-contribution-schemes.

Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanVzdGljZS5nb3YvdXNhby1zZGZsL3ByL21pYW1pLXJlZ2lzdGVyZWQtbnVyc2UtaGVhZGVkLWZlZGVyYWwtcHJpc29uLXN3YXBwaW5nLW1lZGljYWwtZmVudGFueWwtc2FsaW5l
  Press Releases:
MIAMI – A federal district judge in South Florida has sentenced a registered nurse to prison for more than two years for tampering with medical-grade fentanyl meant to treat patients’ pain during their cardiac catheterization procedures at a Miami hospital.Emmanuel Valentin, 40, of Miami, admitted the conduct on December 13, 2024, pleading guilty to tampering with consumer products. Valentin worked as a registered nurse at a Miami hospital’s cardiac catheterization lab. While on duty from July 10 to August 18, 2023, Valentin used a syringe to extract liquid painkillers (medical-grade fentanyl and midazolam) from their vials for his personal use. He replaced them with saline solution, knowing that the liquid in the vials would be dispensed to hospital patients for pain relief during medical procedures, such as cardiac catheterization and stent placement.  In addition, Valentin retrieved empty and discarded vials from the biohazard waste disposal bin, filled them with saline, and used them to replace vials that he stole.  This waste disposal bin contained other contaminated medical waste.  Valentin’s conduct not only exposed patients to the risk of unnecessary pain, it also put them at risk of contracting Hepatitis C and other bloodborne disease infections.The hospital fired Valentin, notified patients of possible contamination, and offered patients free blood testing.  No acute infections were discovered.On May 15, 2024, in a separate state prosecution, Valentin admitted to stealing fentanyl from another Miami area hospital in March 2023.U.S. Attorney Hayden P. O’Byrne for the Southern District of Florida and Acting Special Agent in Charge Kerry Mannion of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Office of Criminal Investigations (FDA-OCI), Miami Field Office, made the announcement.FDA-OCI Miami and Miami-Dade Sheriff’s Office (formerly Miami-Dade Police Department) investigated this case.  AUSA Timothy Abraham prosecuted it.You may find a copy of this press release (and any updates) on the website of the United States Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida at www.justice.gov/usao-sdfl.Related court documents and information may be found on the website of the District Court for the Southern District of Florida at http://www.flsd.uscourts.gov  or at http://pacer.flsd.uscourts.gov under 24-cr-20435.###
Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanVzdGljZS5nb3YvdXNhby1zZGZsL3ByL2NvbW11bml0eS1lbmdhZ2VtZW50LWVmZm9ydHMtc3VyZ2UtdXMtYXR0b3JuZXlzLW9mZmljZS1ob3N0cy1tdWx0aXBsZS1ldmVudHMtd2l0aGlu
  Press Releases:
MIAMI – It was a busy week for the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida’s Law Enforcement Coordination and Community Outreach Section, which held three significant events over a four-day period in early April.

“This is something you just don’t see very often,” said LEC/COS Chief J.D. Smith. “We’ll usually host one big event per week, with other smaller ones interspersed throughout. But to host this many large events and to be spread out over our agency’s footprint was a real challenge.”

Smith and crew first hosted a Farm Share Drive-Thru Food Distribution at Wells Recreational Center in Riviera Beach, Fla. Groceries and resource materials were given to nearly 500 families. These food drives—held each Tuesday—have gone on for years and helped thousands of South Florida residents.

Next up was a Re-Entry Simulation also held at Wells Recreational Center on April 5. More than 100 community stakeholders attended the event to get a better perspective on what former inmates face when attempting to re-enter society.

“This will be unlike any training you’ve experienced,” Smith told participants. “I went through it twice and it was physically and mentally challenging both times. You’re going to get various types of customer service. Not everyone is going to be helpful.”

Stations had been set up prior to the participants’ arrival and were labeled bank, employer, transportation, and counselor, among others. Each participant had a folder with bio, background situation, education level, and limited resources to navigate the course. They had to find housing, pay rent, pass drug tests, acquire health care, and try not to end up back in “jail,” which was located in a corner of the gymnasium.

“You have to be able to play the game,” said Re-entry and Community Outreach Specialist Keisha Bazile. “This training is a unique way to bring light to the hardships of re-entering society. Hopefully, it will spark compassion in those who come in contact with returning citizens.”

Most participants had no clue what they were in for as the event unfolded. It was intended to be frustrating to navigate, exactly how it is for returning citizens. Several threw up their hands in disgust because customer service wasn’t as helpful as they thought it should be. The point of the training was to open the minds of the community stakeholders in hopes that the system can change … that the path for returning citizens can be made easier, which benefits everyone.

“Most attendees are apprehensive at the beginning of the training because it’s set up to be difficult,” said Bazile. “But once it was over, several people expressed how much they enjoyed it. For me, that’s a success.”

The week culminated with the 3rd Spring Classic Youth & Cops Basketball Tournament at the Betty T. Ferguson Recreational Complex in Miami Gardens, Fla. Ten teams participated and were comprised of law enforcement personnel and local kids who had been recruited via community outreach efforts.

“Each year I’m amazed at the talent we see from both the adult players and the kids,” said Smith. “The games are very entertaining to watch but for me the most special thing to see is how the adults and kids interact and work together as teammates.”

Miramar Police Department took the title with a win over North Miami Police Department. The basketball was great, but in the end, it was about creating and fostering relationships.

“The main goal of this tournament is to develop a level of togetherness between youth and law enforcement,” said Bazile. “Usually, law enforcement interacts with youth when they are in trouble. However, this gives them an opportunity to meet under different circumstances. It’s about building trust.

Law Enforcement Coordination Specialist Mark McKinney unpacks frozen chickens in preparation for a recent Farm Share Drive-Thru Food Distribution where more than 500 families were served.

U.S. Attorney Markenzy Lapointe for the Southern District of Florida gives closing remarks following a Re-Entry Simulation held at Wells Recreational Center in Riviera Beach, Fla. The simulation gave community stakeholders a view into what former inmates face when trying to re-integrate into society.  

U.S. Attorney Markenzy Lapointe for the Southern District of Florida takes a moment to pose with the U.S. Attorney’s Office’s basketball team during the recent 3rd Spring Classic Youth & Cops Basketball Tournament at the Betty T. Ferguson Recreational Complex in Miami Gardens, Fla.   

###

Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   SD-FL  1:19-cr-20178
Case Name:   USA v. Shapiro et al
  Press Releases:
On August 7, 2019, Sherman Oaks, California native, Robert Shapiro, 61, pled guilty to orchestrating and leading a massive investment fraud scheme, in which more than 7,000 victims suffered financial losses, as well as tax evasion, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1349 and 26 U.S.C. § 7201.  Shapiro is the former owner, president, and CEO of Woodbridge Group of Companies LLC (“Woodbridge”). Shapiro is scheduled for sentencing on October 15, 2019, at 8:30 a.m. before United States District Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga.  He faces a possible maximum sentence of 25 years in prison.

Ariana Fajardo Orshan, U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, George L. Piro, Special Agent in Charge, Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Miami Field Office, Michael J. De Palma, Special Agent in Charge, Internal Revenue Service, Criminal Investigation (IRS-CI), and the Florida Office of Financial Regulation (OFR), made the announcement.

According to the indictment and court documents, Shapiro spearheaded and concealed an enormous Ponzi scheme through his business, Woodbridge.  Woodbridge employed approximately 130 people and had offices located throughout the United States, including in Boca Raton, Florida; Sherman Oaks, California; Colorado; Tennessee; and Connecticut.  The scheme ran from at least July 2012 to December 2017, when Woodbridge filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy and defaulted on its obligations to investors.

Throughout the conspiracy, Woodbridge’s main business model was to solicit money from investors and, in exchange, issue investors promissory notes reflecting purported loans to Woodbridge that paid high monthly interest rates.  Woodbridge falsely claimed that these investments were tied to real property owned by third parties and that the third parties would be making the interest payments to Woodbridge and its investors; it was portrayed as an investment in a hard-money lending business.  Using high pressure sales tactics, Shapiro and his co-conspirators marketed and promoted these investments as low-risk, safe, simple, and conservative.  And at minimum, investors were made to believe that Woodbridge’s real estate dealings would generate the funds used to pay the return on their investments. 

Despite Woodbridge’s claims that these investments would be backed by properties owned by third-parties, in fact, to the extent that the properties existed, they were secretly owned by Shapiro.  Unbeknownst to investors, Shapiro created and controlled a network of more than 270 limited liability companies, which he used to acquire and sell the properties pitched to investors. 

Shapiro and his co-conspirators falsely claimed that Woodbridge was profitable and advertised high rates of return to investors.  However, Shapiro’s real estate portfolio failed to generate sufficient cash flow to satisfy the loan obligations and interest payments owed to investors.  To make up for the cash deficiency, Shapiro and his co-conspirators resorted to making Ponzi payments, i.e., hundreds of millions of dollars invested by new investors were used to pay “returns” to older, existing Woodbridge investors.  In some instances, Shapiro made these fraudulent “interest” payments even when the advertised investment properties were never acquired. 

The Woodbridge sales operation functioned as a “boiler room” and featured high-pressure sales tactics, deception, and manipulation.  Woodbridge promoted investments through telephone and in-person conversations, emails and website displays.  The scheme also involved misrepresentations to financial planners who helped Woodbridge to sell investments to potential investors. 

At least five states issued cease and desist orders against one or more of the Woodbridge entities based on their unregistered sale of securities. Shapiro and his co-conspirators nonetheless continued to sell Woodbridge investments to residents of those states, and engaged in deceptive conduct with respect to pending state regulatory actions against Woodbridge, in violation of the cease and desist orders.

At some point in 2017, Shapiro made the decision that Woodbridge would file for bankruptcy. Without disclosing to investors that Woodbridge was insolvent and on the verge of bankruptcy, Shapiro caused Woodbridge to collect additional money from investors through the filing of Woodbridge’s bankruptcy in December 2017.  Shapiro also admitted that, immediately prior to Woodbridge’s bankruptcy filing, he diverted millions of dollars in investor funds to several bank accounts opened in the name of his wife, J.S., which he used for new ventures. 

In total, Shapiro and his co-conspirators convinced more than approximately 9,000 investors to invest more than $1.29 billion to Woodbridge.  According to the Indictment, at least 2,600 of these investor victims invested their retirement savings, totaling approximately $400 million.  Of that, Shapiro misappropriated approximately $25 million to $95 million in investor money for himself and for the benefit of his immediate family members.  Shapiro spent millions on personal expenditures, such as $3.1 million for chartering private planes and travel, $6.7 million on a personal home, $2.6 million on home improvements, $1.8 million on personal income taxes, and over $672,000 on luxury automobiles.  Shapiro further admitted that he used bank accounts and credit cards opened in the name of his wife, J.S., to divert millions of dollars to his family.

Shapiro also pled guilty to tax evasion based upon his failure to pay more than $6 million in taxes due and owing to the IRS for calendar years 2000 through 2005.

As part of his plea, Shapiro and his wife agreed to forfeit certain assets, many of which were seized during a search executed by federal agents at his home in Sherman Oaks, California.  They include, but are not limited to: artworks by Pablo Picasso, Alberto Giacometti, Marc Chagall, and Pierre-August Renoir; a collection of 603 bottles of wine; a 1969 Mercury convertible; luxury jewelry, including a pair of 14-karat, white gold earrings with two black diamonds (61.81 carats), two grey diamonds (23.92 carats), two rose-cut diamonds, and 266 round diamonds; a platinum ring with an oval-cut ruby (10.91 carats), two trapezoid diamonds and 70 round-cut diamonds; a platinum ring with certified Colombia emerald-cut emerald (9.54 carats), trapezoid-cut diamonds, and 166 round-cut diamonds; and other items detailed in court documents.

The indictment also charged two co-defendants, Dane Roseman, a/k/a “Dayne Roseman,” and Ivan Acevedo, who are scheduled for trial in February 2020.  The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filed parallel civil enforcement actions against Woodbridge, Shapiro, his wife, and co-defendants Acevedo and Roseman related to the Ponzi scheme. 

U.S. Attorney Fajardo Orshan commended the investigative efforts of the FBI, IRS-CI and OFR in this matter.  She thanked the SEC Miami Regional Office and the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Central District of California for their assistance.  This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Roger Cruz and Lisa H. Miller.  Assistant U.S. Attorneys Nalina Sombuntham and Alison Lehr are responsible for the asset forfeiture component of the case.

Related court documents and information may be found on the website of the District Court for the Southern District of Florida at www.flsd.uscourts.gov or on http://pacer.flsd.uscourts.gov.

The owner of Woodbridge Group of Companies LLC and two former directors of investments have been charged criminally, in the Southern District of Florida, with orchestrating a massive investment fraud (Ponzi) scheme. 

Ariana Fajardo Orshan, U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, George L. Piro, Special Agent in Charge, Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Miami Field Office, Michael J. De Palma, Special Agent in Charge, Internal Revenue Service, Criminal Investigation (IRS-CI), and Ronald L. Rubin, Commissioner, Florida Office of Financial Regulation (OFR), made the announcement.

Robert Shapiro, 61, of Sherman Oaks, California, Dane R. Roseman, a/k/a “Dayne Roseman,” 35, of Encino, California, and Ivan Acevedo, 42, of Chatsworth, California, were charged, by an indictment out of the Southern District of Florida that was unsealed today, with conspiracy to commit mail and wire fraud and substantive mail fraud counts (Case No. 19-20178-CR-Altonaga/Goodman). Shapiro and Roseman were also charged with substantive wire fraud counts.  In addition, Shapiro was charged with conspiracy to commit money laundering and evasion of payment of federal income taxes.  Shapiro, Roseman and Acevedo were arrested today in California and had their initial appearances before a U.S. Magistrate Judge in the Central District of California.  Shapiro was ordered to be detained in prison.  Roseman and Acevedo were ordered to appear in the Southern District Florida for their arraignment.  An arraignment date has not yet been scheduled.

According to the indictment, the owner of Woodbridge Group of Companies LLC (Woodbridge) Shapiro, and his former Directors of Investments, Acevedo and Roseman, orchestrated a massive Ponzi scheme through the business.  They ran their scheme through Woodbridge offices located throughout the United States, including Boca Raton, Florida and Sherman Oaks, California.  The conspiracy ran from July 2012 to December 2017, and involved material misrepresentations and material omissions to investors in the sale of Woodbridge investments.  Through telephone and in-person conversations, emails and website displays, Shapiro, Acevedo, Roseman and their co-conspirators promoted speculative and fraudulent securities to potential investors, targeting elderly investors who had Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs).  Shapiro hired sales agents to solicit potential investors from the Woodbridge “phone room” that Roseman and Acevedo managed.  The phone room functioned as a “boiler room,” and featured high-pressure sales tactics, deception, material misrepresentations, and investor manipulation. Through telemarketing, Woodbridge sales agents contacted potential investors located throughout the United States, and solicited, offered, and sold Woodbridge investments to them.  For the fraud-based investments, the defendants and their co-conspirators’ main business model was to solicit money from investors and, in exchange, issue investors promissory notes reflecting purported loans to Woodbridge that paid monthly interest and matured in twelve to eighteen months.  The defendants claimed that the investments were tied to real property owned by third-party property owners.

The indictment alleges that Shapiro, Acevedo, Roseman and their co-conspirators, made and caused others to make materially false and fraudulent statements to induce investors to provide money, such as, that Woodbridge investments were “low risk,” “simpler,” “safe” and “conservative;” that Woodbridge was profitable, but in reality new Woodbridge investor money was used to pay prior Woodbridge investors, and that third-party affiliates were property owners, when in fact Shapiro owned nearly all of the real property at the center of every investment product offered by Woodbridge. 

According to the indictment, Shapiro took approximately $35 million in investor money for his benefit, spending millions on personal expenditures, such as $3.1 million for chartering private planes and travel, $6.7 million on a personal home, $2.6 million on home improvements, $1.8 million on personal income taxes, $1.4 million to his ex-wife, and over $672,000 on luxury automobiles. 

The indictment further alleges that Shapiro caused most of the Woodbridge companies to file Chapter 11 bankruptcy, which caused investors to suffer substantial losses, as they were owed close to $1 billion in principal. 

At least 2,600 of these investor victims invested their retirement savings, totaling approximately $400 million.

According to information presented to the court, search warrants related to the indictment were executed today in California.

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filed parallel civil enforcement actions against Acevedo and Roseman related to the Ponzi scheme.

An indictment contains allegations.  Every defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty in a court of law.

U.S. Attorney Fajardo Orshan commended the investigative efforts of the FBI, IRS-CI and OFR in this matter.  She thanked the SEC Miami Regional Office and the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Central District of California for their assistance.  This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U. S. Attorneys Roger Cruz and Michael Sherwin.

Related court documents and information may be found on the website of the District Court for the Southern District of Florida at www.flsd.uscourts.gov or at http://pacer.flsd.uscourts.gov.

Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1PFc86pb3CLfOHala97tLeKfuNJ8wiQJ4NC2ovPzjomE
  Last Updated: 2025-03-21 03:19:31 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the second highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE2
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE2
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the third highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE3
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE3
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the fourth highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE4
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE4
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the fifth highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE5
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE5
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE5
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE5
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanVzdGljZS5nb3YvdXNhby1zZGZsL3ByL2p1c3RpY2UtZGVwYXJ0bWVudC1zZWN1cmVzLXRoaXJkLXNldHRsZW1lbnQtbm9uLWRlcG9zaXRvcnktbW9ydGdhZ2UtY29tcGFueS1yZXNvbHZl
  Press Releases:
MIAMI — The Justice Department announced today that The Mortgage Firm, Inc. (The Mortgage Firm) agreed to pay $1.75 million to resolve allegations that it engaged in a pattern or practice of lending discrimination by redlining predominantly Black and Hispanic neighborhoods in the Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, Florida, Metropolitan Statistical Area (Miami MSA).Redlining is an illegal practice by which lenders avoid providing credit services to individuals living in communities of color because of the race, color or national origin of residents in those communities.“Our efforts to protect everyone’s civil rights is never ending,” said U.S. Attorney Markenzy Lapointe for the Southern District of Florida. “The unlawful practice of lending discrimination is not merely a thing of the past, but persists in this country, to include within the Southern District of Florida. Our office is fully committed in ensuring that every person living in the Southern District of Florida, to include residents in predominantly Black and Hispanic neighborhoods, can achieve the American dream of building wealth through home ownership. We will continue to work with the Civil Rights Division to hold those lenders accountable who engage in unlawful discriminatory practices in our diverse district.”“Non-depository institutions, including mortgage companies, are now originating a higher share of loans to homebuyers than banks and credit unions,” said Assistant Attorney General Kristen Clarke of the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division. “With this trend comes the obligation to ensure full compliance with our federal laws that prohibit redlining. By denying predominantly Black and Hispanic neighborhoods in the greater Miami area access to credit, The Mortgage Firm violated the law, denied communities equal access to credit and exacerbated the racial wealth gap. This settlement will provide impacted communities in Miami with expanded access to homeownership, and makes clear that no matter the type of financial institution — bank, credit union or mortgage company — the department is committed to rooting out redlining across the country.”The Mortgage Firm is a non-depository mortgage company headquartered in Altamonte Springs, Florida. The complaint, filed today in the Southern District of Florida, alleges that The Mortgage Firm violated the Fair Housing Act and Equal Credit Opportunity Act by failing to provide equal access to mortgage lending services to majority- and high-Black and Hispanic neighborhoods in the Miami MSA and discouraging people seeking credit in those communities from obtaining home loans. The Mortgage Firm located its offices in predominantly white neighborhoods and took inadequate steps to market to and develop referral networks within Black and Hispanic neighborhoods. As a result, The Mortgage Firm generated mortgage loan applications in predominantly Black and Hispanic neighborhoods in the Miami MSA at rates far below peer institutions.    The proposed consent order, which awaits court approval, would require The Mortgage Firm to:Conduct a Community Credit Needs Assessment to identify the credit needs of residents of predominantly Black and Hispanic neighborhoods in the Miami MSA and to consider the results of that assessment to develop future loan programs, marketing campaigns and outreach efforts.Provide $1.75 million for a loan subsidy program to offer affordable home purchase, refinance and home improvement loans in predominantly Black and Hispanic neighborhoods in the Miami MSA. The program may provide lower interest rates, down payment assistance, closing cost assistance or payment of initial mortgage insurance premiums.Conduct a detailed assessment of its fair lending program in the Miami MSA, specifically as it relates to fair lending obligations and lending in predominantly Black and Hispanic neighborhoods.Enhance its fair lending training and staffing to ensure equal access to credit is provided across The Mortgage Firm’s market area, including by maintaining a Director of Community Lending.Expand its outreach and advertising efforts by maintaining an office location in a majority-Black and Hispanic neighborhood in Miami-Dade County, translating its website into Spanish and requiring all of its loan officers in the Miami MSA to engage in marketing to majority-Black and Hispanic neighborhoods.Bolster connections with the community and build referral sources in predominately Black and Hispanic neighborhoods by providing four outreach events per year, six financial education seminars per year and partnering with one or more community partner to increase access to credit in predominately Black and Hispanic neighborhoods in the Miami MSA.The Justice Department opened this investigation into The Mortgage Firm’s lending practices after receiving a referral from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. This settlement marks the Justice Department’s 16th redlining settlement under the Combating Redlining Initiative, and the third non-depository institution to reach a redlining settlement with the department. Non-depository lenders, which are not traditional banks and do not provide typical banking services, engage in mortgage lending and now make the majority of mortgages in this country. Under the Combating Redlining Initiative, the department has secured over $153 million in relief for communities of color that have been the victims of lending discrimination. This historic amount of relief is expected to generate over $1 billion in investment to address unequal access to credit in communities of color across the country.A copy of the complaint and proposed consent order, as well as information about the Justice Department’s fair lending enforcement work, can be found at www.justice.gov/fairhousing. Individuals may report lending discrimination by calling the Justice Department’s housing discrimination tip line at 1-833-591-0291 or submitting a report online.###
Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   WD-WA  2:19-cr-00208
Case Name:   USA v. Verschoor
  Press Releases:
Seattle – One defendant has pleaded guilty, and three others and a physician- owned testing lab have been indicted following the investigation of kickbacks in connection with laboratory testing services.  The grand jury returned indictments on November 6, 2019, against JAE LEE, 48, of Bellevue, RICHARD REID, 50, of Astoria, Oregon, KEVIN PULS, 54, of Bellevue, and Northwest Physicians Laboratory of Bellevue, Washington.  Both the company and the individual defendants are scheduled to make their first appearance in U.S. District Court in Seattle on December 5, 2019.

Northwest Physicians Laboratory (NWPL) and its relationship to Molecular Testing Labs (MTL) of Vancouver, Washington, are described in the plea agreement of STEVEN P. VERSCHOOR, 52, of Boise, Idaho, a co-founder of MTL.  VERSCHOOR pleaded guilty on October 30, 2019, admitting that he paid kickbacks to NWPL for referring urine tests to be performed at MTL.  According to the plea statements, starting in 2014, MTL agreed to pay NWPL as much as $100,000 per month to send patient urine tests to the Vancouver lab.  NWPL is physician-owned, and for that reason could not test urine samples for patients covered by government health programs such as Medicare, Medicaid, and TRICARE.  In order to conceal the payment of the kickbacks, MTL and NWPL described the fees as being for marketing services; however, VERSCHOOR was not aware of any marketing services being performed.  In all, MTL paid NWPL $450,000.  In exchange, MTL was able to bill the government more than $2,000,000 for urine testing services.

In December 2018, MTL agreed to pay $1,777,738 to settle allegations that it violated the False Claims Act by paying illegal kickbacks to obtain referrals for government healthcare insurance programs.  According to the settlement, between August 2014 and July 2015, the government claimed that MTL made payments to local laboratories in exchange for referrals of Medicare and TRICARE program business, in violation of the Anti-Kickback Statute.  Paying remuneration to medical providers or provider-owned laboratories in exchange for referrals encourages providers to order medically unnecessary services.  The False Claims Act and the Anti-Kickback Statute function, in part, to discourage such behavior.

The indictment charges NWPL and the three executives with conspiracy to both solicit kickbacks and pay kickbacks.  The indictment charges four additional counts of receipt of kickbacks.

Conspiracy to pay kickbacks involving federal healthcare programs is punishable by up to five years in prison.  Receipt of kickbacks involving federal healthcare programs is punishable by up to 10 years in prison. 

The charges contained in the indictment are only allegations.  A person is presumed innocent unless and until he or she is proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.

VERSCHOOR is scheduled to be sentenced by U.S. District Judge James L. Robart on January 21, 2020. VERSCHOOR has agreed to pay $461,752 in restitution.  Some of that amount may be paid by the MTL in its settlement with DOJ.

The case is being investigated by the FBI, Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General (HHS-OIG), and the Defense Criminal Investigative Service (DCIS).

The case is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorneys Brian Werner and Matthew Diggs.

nwpl_indictment.pdf

Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1wyjv1PPydefOKkLPde8B196S4Qp2sd1FA6RJqbEeryA
  Last Updated: 2025-03-26 01:22:49 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanVzdGljZS5nb3YvdXNhby13ZHdhL3ByL2J1cmllbi13YXNoaW5ndG9uLXNlYWZvb2QtYnJva2VyLXNlbnRlbmNlZC1pbGxlZ2FsbHktc2hpcHBpbmctcG90ZW50aWFsbHktdGFpbnRlZC1jbGFtcw
  Press Releases:
Seattle – A Burien, Washington, seafood broker was sentenced today in U.S. District Court in Seattle to 90 days in prison, and three years of supervised release, for smuggling goods from the United States, announced U.S. Attorney Nick Brown. Jeffrey Hallin Olsen, 52, owner of Absolute Seafoods LLC, falsified documents and lied to authorities about disposing of 46 cases of potentially tainted geoduck from Alaska.  U.S District Judge John C. Coughenour sentenced Olsen’s company, Absolute Seafoods LLC, to probation and was ordered to pay a $25,000 fine. 

“Mr. Olson chose to gamble with the lives of customers across the globe – putting them at risk of shellfish poisoning,” said U.S. Attorney Brown. “We’ll likely never know if any of the Chinese customers became ill from these clams, but a prison sentence is justified by the danger of his conduct and his repeated lies to authorities, claiming he had destroyed the potentially harmful geoduck.”

According to records filed in the case, on February 20 or 21, 2019, Olsen purchased 2,500 pounds of geoduck from various Alaska divers.  The geoduck were mixed together in crates for shipping, and were picked up at Sea-Tac Airport, to be trucked to Vancouver B.C and shipped to Hong Kong.  Olsen produced a U.S. Department of Commerce Export Health Certificate stating that the geoduck met health requirements.

One day after the purchase, but before the geoduck were exported, one of the divers notified Alaska state officials that he had mistakenly harvested his geoduck from an area that had not been approved for harvest.   The area had not been tested for the toxins that cause paralytic shellfish poisoning, which has been a recurring problem in Alaskan waters.  An Alaska Wildlife Trooper notified Olsen that he needed to destroy the shipment as it was unsafe to consume.  Olsen told the trooper he would destroy the geoduck.

Instead of destroying the geoduck, Olsen illegally shipped most of the geoduck to Hong Kong for human consumption.  Olsen shipped an additional 10 cases of potentially tainted geoduck to a buyer in Oakland, California.  Olsen prepared false shipping paperwork that falsely identified the contents of the crates as “fresh Yelloweye.”

Olsen falsely told Alaskan officials that he had destroyed the geoduck and provided them with a bill from the King County garbage transfer station as proof the geoduck had been destroyed.  However, investigators reviewed surveillance video from the transfer station showing that at the time of the receipt, Olsen only disposed of a small amount of household waste.  Investigators also retrieved video showing Olsen personally delivering the crates for shipment to Oakland. 

The case was investigated by NOAA Fisheries Enforcement, the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Police and the Alaska Department of Public Safety, with assistance from the California Department of Fish and Game, and the Department of Fisheries and Oceans – Canada. 

The case was prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Seth Wilkinson.





NOAA photo

Potentially tainted geoduck









NOAA photo







 

Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanVzdGljZS5nb3YvdXNhby13ZHdhL3ByL25pZ2VyaWFuLXN0YXRlLW9mZmljaWFsLXNlbnRlbmNlZC01LXllYXJzLXByaXNvbi1zdGVhbGluZy11cy1kaXNhc3Rlci1haWQtYW5kLXRheHBheWVy
  Press Releases:
Tacoma – A 45-year-old resident of Lekki, Nigeria, was sentenced today in U.S. District Court in Tacoma to 5 years in prison for wire fraud and aggravated identity theft for his attempt to steal nearly $2.4 million from the United States government, including approximately $500,000 in pandemic-related unemployment benefits, announced U.S. Attorney Nick Brown.  At the time of his arrest, Abidermi Rufai was the Special Assistant to the Governor of Nigeria’s Ogun State.  He admitted a long history of using stolen identities to defraud U.S. disaster programs, including aid for Hurricanes Harvey and Irma, and file fraudulent U.S. tax returns.  At the sentencing hearing U.S. District Judge Benjamin H. Settle said, “The motivation was greed, unrestrained greed, and a callousness towards those who have suffered.”

“Mr. Rufai was relentless in his scheme to use the stolen identities of Americans for fraud,” said U.S. Attorney Nick Brown.  “He orchestrated ‘mystery shopper’ scams, business email compromise attempts, and filed fake tax returns to financially harm individuals and businesses. But when disaster struck, so did Mr. Rufai. Whether it was hurricane disaster relief, small business loans, or COVID unemployment benefits, he stole aid that should have gone to disaster victims in the United States.”

”Abdemi Rufai chose to exploit the pandemic for personal gain, using stolen identities of Americans to support his lavish lifestyle overseas,” said Associate Deputy Attorney General Kevin Chambers, the Justice Department‘s Director of COVID-19 Fraud Enforcement. “The U.S. Attorney’s Office and their law enforcement partners did exceptional work bringing this defendant to justice. The Department will continue to pursue fraudsters who abused these programs and seek to recover their ill-gotten gains, whether they are in the United States or overseas.”

According to records filed in the case, since 2017, Rufai stole the personal identifying information of more than 20,000 Americans to submit more than $2 million in claims for federally funded disaster relief benefits and fraudulent tax returns.  The various agencies involved paid out more than $600,000.

The largest amount of fraud was committed against the Washington State Employment Security Department, which paid out $350,763 in fraudulent pandemic unemployment claims to accounts controlled by Rufai.  Rufai also submitted fraudulent pandemic unemployment claims in at least 17 other states. 

“The Employment Security Department deeply appreciates the tireless efforts of the Department of Justice, federal agencies and law enforcement in this matter,” said Cami Feek, Commissioner for the Employment Security Department. “We always stand ready to hold those accountable who steal public funds and we appreciate the partnership in catching and prosecuting this individual.”

Rufai also defrauded the Small Business Administration (SBA) by attempting to obtain Economic Injury Disaster loans (EIDL) tied to the COVID-19 pandemic.  Between April 8, 2020, and June 26, 2020, he submitted 19 fraudulent EIDL applications.  SBA paid out $10,000 based on the applications.

Between 2017 and 2020, Rufai attempted to obtain more than $1.7 million in IRS tax refunds by submitting 675 false claims.  The IRS paid out $90,877 on these claims.

Rufai’s efforts to exploit disaster in the United States did not start with COVID-19.  In September and October 2017, he submitted 49 disaster relief claims connected to Hurricane Harvey and Hurricane Irma.  He filed $24,500 in false claims and was paid on 13 claims totaling $6,500.

In asking for a nearly six-year prison sentence Assistant United States Attorney Cindy Chang noted that Rufai’s scheme damaged real people who needed help. “In this case, Rufai successfully used the stolen identities of at least 238 real individuals who qualified for disaster aid and may have needed it urgently. This number does not account for the number of stolen identities Rufai attempted to use but failed.”

Rufai has agreed to pay full restitution of $604,260 to the defrauded agencies, however he has not fully cooperated with efforts to identify and forfeit assets that could be used for restitution.

"Mr. Rufai did not care if the disaster was the pandemic or a hurricane, or if the victim was a hard-working American taxpayer, a small business, or the U.S. government," said Richard A. Collodi, Special Agent in Charge of the FBI Seattle Field Office. "He could have used his influence to be a role model in his community. Instead, he stole the identities of Washington state residents and money meant for those in need.”

“Mr. Rufai said, ‘The choices we make are ultimately our responsibility,’ and he is correct. This sentence is a result of the culmination of choices he made funding his luxurious lifestyle. His fraud schemes began with filing fraudulent tax returns from stolen identities to pilfering economic aid designed to help disadvantaged workers and families suffering through the COVID-19 pandemic,” said Seattle Field Office Special Agent in Charge Bret Kressin. “IRS-CI continues to provide our financial expertise to investigate large-scale fraud with our law enforcement partners.”

“Rufai used stolen personal identifying information of thousands of Americans in order to defraud more than $600,000 in government benefits, including approximately $350,000 from the Washington Employment Security Department.  We will continue to work with our law enforcement partners to aggressively investigate and prosecute those who defrauded unemployment insurance programs during the global health crisis,” said Quentin Heiden, Special Agent-in-Charge of the U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Inspector General, Los Angeles Region.

Abidemi Rufai has been in custody since his arrest at New York’s JFK airport in May 2021.   The Eastern District of New York U.S. Attorney’s Office assisted with detention hearings following Rufai’s arrest.

This case was investigated by the FBI, with assistance from the Department of Labor Office of Inspector General, Internal Revenue Service Criminal Investigations, Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General, and the United States Small Business Administration Office of the Inspector General, and the Washington Employment Security Department (ESD).

The case is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorneys Cindy Chang and Seth Wilkinson of the Western District of Washington.

On May 17, 2021, the Attorney General established the COVID-19 Fraud Enforcement Task Force to marshal the resources of the Department of Justice in partnership with agencies across government to enhance efforts to combat and prevent pandemic-related fraud. The Task Force bolsters efforts to investigate and prosecute the most culpable domestic and international criminal actors and assists agencies tasked with administering relief programs to prevent fraud by augmenting and incorporating existing coordination mechanisms, identifying resources and techniques to uncover fraudulent actors and their schemes, and sharing and harnessing information and insights gained from prior enforcement efforts. For more information on the department’s response to the pandemic, please visit https://www.justice.gov/coronavirus.

Anyone with information about allegations of attempted fraud involving COVID-19 can report it by calling the Department of Justice’s National Center for Disaster Fraud (NCDF) Hotline via the NCDF Web Complaint Form at https://www.justice.gov/disaster-fraud/ncdf-disaster-complaint-form.

Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanVzdGljZS5nb3YvdXNhby13ZHdhL3ByL3VzLWF0dG9ybmV5LXMtb2ZmaWNlLWFsZXJ0LWZyYXVkLWFsbGVnYXRpb25zLXJlZ2FyZGluZy1jb3ZpZC0xOQ
  Press Releases:
Seattle – U.S. Attorney Brian T. Moran is asking our federal, state, and local law enforcement partners to be alert to frauds preying on those concerned about COVID-19. 

“In a time of high stress and fear it is critical that for the public to know that law enforcement at all levels remains dedicated to  protecting them from harm  – whether it is from scams, frauds or violent crime,” said U.S. Attorney Moran. “As Attorney General Barr has directed, we will remain vigilant in detecting, investigating and prosecuting wrongdoing related to the crisis.  To those who are engaged in perpetrating these schemes, you are on notice that my office will aggressively pursue you and hold you to answer for preying on our communities.”      

The Western District of Washington has extensive expertise in cybercrime and is already monitoring issues related to phishing attempts and efforts to infect emails, links and postings with malware.  Members of the public need to be wary of emails or online posts that could be infected with malware that could then infect their electronic devices and steal personal and financial information.

“The pandemic is dangerous enough without wrongdoers seeking to profit from public panic and this sort of conduct cannot be tolerated,” Attorney General William Barr said in his communication to the U.S. Attorneys.

If you or someone you know believe you’ve been the target or victim of an outbreak-related fraud scheme, please contact the FBI’s Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3) by visiting www.IC3.gov.

Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanVzdGljZS5nb3YvdXNhby13ZHdhL3ByL2Rvai1hbGVydHMtaW5kZXBlbmRlbnQtay0xMi1zY2hvb2xzLWFib3V0LW9ibGlnYXRpb25zLXVuZGVyLWFtZXJpY2Fucy1kaXNhYmlsaXRpZXMtYWN0
  Press Releases:
Seattle – The U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Washington, is reminding independent schools of their obligations under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) with respect to the accommodation of students with type 1 diabetes. There are approximately 215,000 Americans under the age of 20 currently diagnosed with type 1 diabetes. A letter sent to independent schools in Seattle serving elementary and middle-school aged students, arriving this week, not only reminds educators of their obligations under the ADA, but also provides resources to assist schools in setting up policies and procedures for monitoring a child’s blood sugar in compliance with the ADA.

“Our office continues to receive complaints from parents that their school-age children with type 1 diabetes are not afforded full and equal access to services provided by independent schools,” said Acting U.S. Attorney Tessa M. Gorman. “I hope the letter, which is a reminder for schools, as well as the online resources referenced in the letter, will motivate educators and administrators to make the modifications necessary for a truly inclusive environment for all our children.”

The letter for the schools makes note of this settlement with a school in Virginia. See Settlement Agreement Between the United States of America and Alexandria Country Day School, available at https://archive.ada.gov/alexandria_settle.htm.

The letter makes clear that staff at the school may need to be trained to support children with type 1 diabetes.  Where a parent or guardianand a child’s physician or other qualified health care professional deem it appropriate (based on the child’s current health status) for a child to be assisted in diabetes care by a layperson, training child care staff members to assist with routine diabetes care tasks, including the administration of insulin by pen, syringe, or pump, is generally a reasonable modification under the ADA unless an independent school can demonstrate that the individual circumstances cause a fundamental alteration to  its goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, or accommodations.  

The letter also offers online resources such as:



Washington Superintendent of Public Instruction and Department of Health, “Guidelines for Care of Students with Disabilities,” available online at https://www.k12.wa.us/sites/default/files/public/healthservices/pubdocs/diabetes/diabetesmanual-ada.pdf;





National Diabetes Education Program, “Helping the Student with Diabetes Succeed: A Guide for School Personnel,” available online at https://diabetes.org/sites/default/files/2020-02/NDEP-School-Guide-Full-508.pdf;





American Diabetes Association, “Sample Diabetes Management Plan,” available online at https://diabetes.org/sites/default/files/2022-11/DMMP-updated-11-11-22.pdf.



In addition to schools, DOJ has entered into settlements with childcare centers and summer camps that failed to accommodate children with type 1 diabetes. 

As the new school year begins, independent schools should examine their procedures to ensure a child’s diabetes care is integrated into the daily routine, with the proper support from school staff.

The full letter from the U.S. Attorney’s Office Civil Rights unit is below.





independent_schools_seattle_-_t1d_dcl_for_website.pdf

(248.29 KB)







Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanVzdGljZS5nb3YvdXNhby13ZHdhL3ByL2ZpbmFsLWZlZGVyYWwtZGVmZW5kYW50LW9wZXJhdGlvbi1uZXctZGF5LXNlbnRlbmNlZC1maXZlLXllYXJzLXByaXNvbg
  Press Releases:
Seattle – A 56-year-old Seattle man was sentenced today in U.S. District Court in Seattle to 5 years in prison for dealing drugs in downtown Seattle while armed with a handgun, announced U.S. Attorney Tessa M. Gorman. Cuong Quoc Cao, pleaded guilty to possession of a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime. Art the sentencing hearing U.S. District Judge James L. Robart said, “At 56 you should know better… We have someone who has absolutely no respect for the law…. We are not effectively dealing with these open-air drug situations.”

According to records filed in the case, in late January and February 2022, the Seattle Police Department and Drug Enforcement Administration targeted open air drug dealing at 12th and Jackson as part of “Operation New Day.” Cao was photographed and observed making hand-to-hand drug sales. Cao left the area when a woman nearby was being treated for an overdose. Police approached Cao and placed him under arrest. A 9mm semi-automatic pistol with a loaded magazine was found in his backpack. Cao also had crack cocaine, methamphetamine, heroin, and fentanyl pills.







Cao was indicted in March 2022, and pleaded guilty to possession of a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime on the eve of trial in April 2024.

In asking for the five-year sentence with three years of supervised release, Assistant United States Attorney Cecelia Gregson wrote to the court, “While the amount of fentanyl the defendant possessed with the intent to distribute is not substantial, the fact that he brazenly sold drugs and illegally packed a firearm to protect himself, however, are cause for great concern. A sentence of sixty months imprisonment provides a reasonable punishment for the defendant’s decision to traffic fentanyl – a drug which is poisoning our community - and provides a modicum of safety to the community through incapacitation. Following release from custody, the defendant should avail himself to the services coordinated by United States Probation, most importantly substance abuse treatment.”

The case was investigated by the Seattle Police Department and DEA.

The case was prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorneys Cecelia Gregson and Carolyn Forstein.

Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanVzdGljZS5nb3YvdXNhby1jZGNhL3ByL3VzLWludGVydmVuZXMtd2hpc3RsZWJsb3dlci1sYXdzdWl0LWFnYWluc3QtY2l0eS1sb3MtYW5nZWxlcy1hbGxlZ2VzLWNpdHktcmVjZWl2ZWQ
  Press Releases:
          LOS ANGELES – The United States has intervened in a lawsuit against the City of Los Angeles and the CRA/LA (formerly the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Los Angeles) alleging that they falsely certified compliance with federal accessibility laws in connection with housing grants from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), the Department of Justice announced today.

          The lawsuit alleges that the city and the CRA/LA violated accessibility laws – including Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act and the Fair Housing Act – and the duty to affirmatively further fair housing, which are meant to ensure that people with disabilities have fair and equal access to public housing.

          The lawsuit alleges that the City of Los Angeles applied for and received millions of dollars in federal housing funds, a portion of which it provided to the CRA/LA, to develop affordable housing that was accessible to people with disabilities. As recipients of HUD funds, the city and the CRA/LA were required to comply with the accessibility laws.

          Among other things, the accessibility laws require that 5 percent of all units in certain federally-assisted multifamily housing units be accessible to people with mobility impairments, and an additional 2 percent be accessible to people with visual and auditory impairments. The laws also require that the City of Los Angeles and the CRA/LA maintain a publicly available list of accessible units and their accessibility features. The laws further require that the city and the CRA/LA have a monitoring program in place to ensure that people with disabilities are not excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of, or otherwise subjected to discrimination in federally-assisted housing programs and activities solely on the basis of a disability.

          As a precondition for receiving HUD funds, each year the city certified compliance with Section 504 and the Fair Housing Act, and certified that it satisfied its duty to affirmatively further fair housing. The lawsuit alleges that the city and CRA/LA failed to operate their housing programs in compliance with these federal civil rights laws, which resulted in public housing that was built without the minimum number of accessible units. The lawsuit also alleges that the city and the CRA/LA neither monitored sub-recipients of HUD funds to ensure that they complied with federal accessibility laws nor maintained a publicly-available list of accessible units.

          “This case alleges that the City of Los Angeles repeatedly violated the law by falsely certifying that millions of federal dollars were being used to build housing that included units accessible to people with disabilities,” said Acting United States Attorney Sandra R. Brown. “While people with disabilities struggled to find accessible housing, the city and its agents denied them equal access to housing while falsely certifying the availability of such housing to keep the dollars flowing. The conduct alleged in this case is very troubling because of the impact on people who did not have access to housing that met their needs.”

          “Recipients of federal housing funds must honor their commitments to accommodate people with disabilities,” said Acting Assistant Attorney General Chad A. Readler of the Justice Department’s Civil Division. “Denying people with disabilities equal access to public housing deprives one of the most disadvantaged groups in society of fair housing opportunities.”

          The lawsuit, United States ex rel. Ling, et al. v. City of Los Angeles, et al., CV11-974 (PG), was filed in United States District Court in Los Angeles by Mei Ling, a resident of Los Angeles who uses a wheelchair, and the Fair Housing Council of San Fernando Valley, a nonprofit civil rights advocacy group. After a lengthy investigation, the United States elected to intervene in the lawsuit, which was unsealed on May 31 in an order signed by United States District Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. The government learned that the case was unsealed earlier this week.

          The lawsuit was filed under the qui tam – or whistleblower – provisions of the False Claims Act, which permit private parties to sue on behalf of the United States when they believe that a party has submitted false claims for government funds, and to receive a share of any recovery. The False Claims Act permits the government to intervene in such a lawsuit, as it has done in this case. The United States has until July 31 to file its complaint in intervention.

          “This case demonstrates the important role whistleblowers play in the process of uncovering waste, fraud, and abuse,” said HUD Inspector General David A. Montoya. “It further displays our commitment to fully pursue allegations that are brought to our attention.”

          This matter was investigated by Assistant United States Attorney Lisa A. Palombo of the Civil Fraud Section of the United States Attorney’s Office, the Commercial Litigation Branch of the Justice Department’s Civil Division, and the HUD Office of Inspector General.

          The claims asserted against the City of Los Angeles and the CRA/LA are allegations only. There has not yet been a determination of liability.

Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   CD-CA  2:19-cr-00149
Case Name:   USA v. Mitchell et al
  Press Releases:
          LOS ANGELES – A federal grand jury today returned an eight-count superseding indictment that charges a Lynwood man with being the organizer and leader of a crew that committed at least 15 armed robberies of independent and “mom-and-pop” pharmacies across Southern California. The robbers allegedly stole a variety of prescription medications – in particular, oxycodone – with the intent of selling the stolen drugs on the black market.

          The suspected organizer and leader, Tyrome Lewis, 24, a.k.a. “Boobie,” was charged with one count of conspiracy to interfere with commerce by robbery, one count of conspiracy to distribute oxycodone, two counts of interference with commerce by robbery, two counts of possession with intent to distribute oxycodone, and two counts of knowingly using and brandishing a firearm during a crime of violence. Lewis, who was previously arrested and charged in a criminal complaint, is being held without bond. His arraignment is scheduled for August 22.

          The superseding indictment filed today adds Lewis to a case in which another man – Darrell Mitchell, 29, of Long Beach – was previously charged. Darrell Mitchell, who is a fugitive, also faces conspiracy, narcotics and firearms offenses.

          The initial indictment charged two additional co-conspirators, Terrell Mitchell, 31, (Darrell Mitchell’s brother) and Deandre Bonney, 29, both from Compton. Terrell Mitchell and Bonney have signed plea agreements in which they admitted their involvement in a December 2018 robbery of a Glendale pharmacy. Terrell Mitchel and Bonney are not named in the superseding indictment, and they are expected to enter guilty pleas in September.

          Over an 18-month period that ended just a few weeks ago, Lewis allegedly led an armed crew that robbed pharmacies in Bellflower, Cerritos, South Los Angeles, Westminster, Pico Rivera, Fullerton, Hawthorne, Huntington Park, Anaheim, Glendale, Riverside, Paramount, and Claremont. Lewis allegedly picked out the robbery locations and provided details to the crew’s participants as to how the robberies should be conducted, including what medications to target. Lewis also traveled to the robbery locations in advance to scout the targeted stores and later oversaw the robberies as they were committed, the indictment alleges.

          Each of the robberies shared a common modus operandi, including targeting smaller pharmacies, placing the stolen prescription drugs into the pharmacy’s trash bags or trash cans, using a black semi-automatic handgun to threaten and intimidate store employees, forcing employees to open the medication vault, and taking the store employees’ cell phones to prevent them from immediately calling police, according to court documents.

          In addition to the Southern California robberies, the indictment alleges that Lewis was involved in a burglary of a Walgreens pharmacy in Anthony, Texas in January 2018.

          If convicted of all charges, Lewis and Mitchell each would face a statutory maximum sentence of life in federal prison.

          Three additional co-conspirators have been charged in a separate indictment. Aaron Ganner, 27, Karon Lofton, 28, and Devon Jackson, 30, all from Compton, were indicted for their role in a June 12 robbery of a pharmacy in Torrance. Ganner, Lofton and Jackson were arraigned Thursday in United States District Court, where they were ordered held without bond and a trial was scheduled for October 8.

          An indictment contains allegations that a defendant has committed a crime. Every defendant is presumed innocent until and unless proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

          This matter was investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department, with assistance from the Torrance Police Department.

          This case is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorneys Jeffrey M. Chemerinsky and Joseph D. Axelrad of the Violent and Organized Crimes Section.

Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1GjePe_rW0lk1LfOKM76FnkRt_MFVSZjRBo2wzBf_h80
  Last Updated: 2025-03-15 03:30:26 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the second highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE2
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE2
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the third highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE3
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE3
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the fourth highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE4
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE4
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
Magistrate Docket Number:   CD-CA  2:19-mj-03021
Case Name:   USA v. Lewis
Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1oXvVprmtvSHPZWsRIXf31-_m-2Dd50PUvgN0epiMn5I
  Last Updated: 2025-03-15 04:33:10 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: Case type associated with a magistrate case if the current case was merged from a magistrate case
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The docket number originally given to a case assigned to a magistrate judge and subsequently merged into a criminal case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a magistrate case
Format: A3

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the second highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE2
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE2
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the third highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE3
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE3
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the fourth highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE4
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE4
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the fifth highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE5
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE5
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE5
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE5
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   CD-CA  2:19-cr-00436
Case Name:   USA v. Ganner et al
  Press Releases:
          LOS ANGELES – A federal grand jury today returned an eight-count superseding indictment that charges a Lynwood man with being the organizer and leader of a crew that committed at least 15 armed robberies of independent and “mom-and-pop” pharmacies across Southern California. The robbers allegedly stole a variety of prescription medications – in particular, oxycodone – with the intent of selling the stolen drugs on the black market.

          The suspected organizer and leader, Tyrome Lewis, 24, a.k.a. “Boobie,” was charged with one count of conspiracy to interfere with commerce by robbery, one count of conspiracy to distribute oxycodone, two counts of interference with commerce by robbery, two counts of possession with intent to distribute oxycodone, and two counts of knowingly using and brandishing a firearm during a crime of violence. Lewis, who was previously arrested and charged in a criminal complaint, is being held without bond. His arraignment is scheduled for August 22.

          The superseding indictment filed today adds Lewis to a case in which another man – Darrell Mitchell, 29, of Long Beach – was previously charged. Darrell Mitchell, who is a fugitive, also faces conspiracy, narcotics and firearms offenses.

          The initial indictment charged two additional co-conspirators, Terrell Mitchell, 31, (Darrell Mitchell’s brother) and Deandre Bonney, 29, both from Compton. Terrell Mitchell and Bonney have signed plea agreements in which they admitted their involvement in a December 2018 robbery of a Glendale pharmacy. Terrell Mitchel and Bonney are not named in the superseding indictment, and they are expected to enter guilty pleas in September.

          Over an 18-month period that ended just a few weeks ago, Lewis allegedly led an armed crew that robbed pharmacies in Bellflower, Cerritos, South Los Angeles, Westminster, Pico Rivera, Fullerton, Hawthorne, Huntington Park, Anaheim, Glendale, Riverside, Paramount, and Claremont. Lewis allegedly picked out the robbery locations and provided details to the crew’s participants as to how the robberies should be conducted, including what medications to target. Lewis also traveled to the robbery locations in advance to scout the targeted stores and later oversaw the robberies as they were committed, the indictment alleges.

          Each of the robberies shared a common modus operandi, including targeting smaller pharmacies, placing the stolen prescription drugs into the pharmacy’s trash bags or trash cans, using a black semi-automatic handgun to threaten and intimidate store employees, forcing employees to open the medication vault, and taking the store employees’ cell phones to prevent them from immediately calling police, according to court documents.

          In addition to the Southern California robberies, the indictment alleges that Lewis was involved in a burglary of a Walgreens pharmacy in Anthony, Texas in January 2018.

          If convicted of all charges, Lewis and Mitchell each would face a statutory maximum sentence of life in federal prison.

          Three additional co-conspirators have been charged in a separate indictment. Aaron Ganner, 27, Karon Lofton, 28, and Devon Jackson, 30, all from Compton, were indicted for their role in a June 12 robbery of a pharmacy in Torrance. Ganner, Lofton and Jackson were arraigned Thursday in United States District Court, where they were ordered held without bond and a trial was scheduled for October 8.

          An indictment contains allegations that a defendant has committed a crime. Every defendant is presumed innocent until and unless proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

          This matter was investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department, with assistance from the Torrance Police Department.

          This case is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorneys Jeffrey M. Chemerinsky and Joseph D. Axelrad of the Violent and Organized Crimes Section.

Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Qva_jgdUrq91aS1M0FJHyCqL7BNdyA9IeotZQnm5e5I
  Last Updated: 2025-03-15 04:30:48 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the second highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE2
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE2
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the third highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE3
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE3
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanVzdGljZS5nb3YvdXNhby1jZGNhL3ByL2RlcGFydG1lbnQtanVzdGljZS1maWxlcy1jb21wbGFpbnRzLWFnYWluc3QtZmxvcmlkYS1hbmQtY2FsaWZvcm5pYS1jb21wYW5pZXMtc3RvcC11c2U
  Press Releases:
          WASHINGTON – The United States filed civil complaints in Florida and California to enjoin two companies that purport to offer stem cell treatments, the Justice Department announced today.

          The first complaint, filed May 9, 2018, in the Southern District of Florida, is against US Stem Cell Clinic LLC, of Sunrise, Florida, US Stem Cell, Inc., and company officers Kristin Comella and Theodore Gradel. A separate complaint was filed the same day in the Central District of California against California Stem Cell Treatment Center Inc., of Rancho Mirage and Beverly Hills, California, Cell Surgical Network Corporation, and company owners Elliot Lander, M.D. and Mark Berman, M.D.

          Both complaints allege that the respective defendants manufacture “stromal vascular fraction” (SVF) products from patient adipose (fat) tissue, which the companies then market as stem cell-based treatments for a host of serious conditions and diseases, including cancer, pulmonary disease, arthritis, stroke, ALS, and multiple sclerosis, in the case of the California defendants; and Parkinson’s disease, spinal cord injuries, stroke, pulmonary disease, and traumatic brain injury, in the case of the Florida defendants. According to the complaints, both sets of defendants manufacture their products for these conditions without FDA approval and without proof of safety and efficacy. The Justice Department filed the complaints at the request of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

          “Marketing unproven and potentially unsafe treatments puts consumers at risk,” said Acting Assistant Attorney General Chad A. Readler of the Justice Department’s Civil Division. “The Department of Justice will continue to work with the FDA to make sure manufacturers of experimental therapies conduct their research within the safe and legal bounds for drug innovation.”

          According to the complaints, the defendants and their affiliates have used their products on thousands of patients without first obtaining necessary FDA approvals. The complaints allege that that in some cases, adverse events that harmed patients occurred after treatment with the SVF products. In addition, the complaints allege that the defendants’ misbranded products fail to include adequate directions for use, such as dosages, warnings, and side effects. According to the complaints, recent FDA inspections showed that the defendants’ products are not manufactured, processed, packed, or held in conformance with current good manufacturing practice (CGMP), and they are adulterated as a matter of law.

          The Florida matter is being handled by Trial Attorney Roger J. Gural of the Civil Division’s Consumer Protection Branch, with the assistance of Assistant U.S. Attorney James A. Weinkle of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida and Associate Chief Counsel for Enforcement Michael Helbing of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of General Counsel.

          The California matter is being handled by Trial Attorney Natalie N. Sanders of the Civil Division’s Consumer Protection Branch, with the assistance of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Central District of California and Associate Chief Counsel for Enforcement Michael Shane of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of General Counsel.

          A complaint is merely a set of allegations that, if the case were to proceed to trial, the government would need to prove by a preponderance of the evidence.

          For more information about the Consumer Protection Branch and its enforcement efforts, visit its website at https://www.justice.gov/civil/consumer-protection-branch. For more information about the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida, visit its website at https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdfl. For more information about the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Central District of California, visit its website at https://www.justice.gov/usao-cdca

Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanVzdGljZS5nb3YvdXNhby1jZGNhL3ByL2p1c3RpY2UtZGVwYXJ0bWVudC1yZWFjaGVzLWFkYS1zZXR0bGVtZW50LWxvcy1hbmdlbGVzLXNwYS1vd25lci13aG8tZGVuaWVkLWJsaW5k
  Press Releases:
          LOS ANGELES – C.J. Spa Group, Inc., a company that operates Spa Palace in the Westlake neighborhood in the city of Los Angeles, has entered into a settlement agreement with the Department of Justice to ensure that individuals with disabilities can access the spa’s facilities.

          The settlement agreement resolves a complaint under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) that Spa Palace staff denied entry to a blind customer, telling him that “his kind” would not be able to follow instructions and that a massage therapist could not care for him. Spa Palace also maintained a policy requiring individuals with disabilities to be accompanied at all times by a personal attendant. \

          In the settlement, Spa Palace has agreed to change its policies and implement training to ensure that individuals with disabilities will not be discriminated against. In addition, Spa Palace agreed to pay $5,000 in damages to the complainant and a civil penalty of $5,000 to the U.S. Treasury.

          “Individuals with disabilities, including those who are blind, should not be excluded from activities or services on the basis of stereotypes or false assumptions,” said United States Attorney Nick Hanna. “My office will continue to enforce the law to ensure equal treatment for people with disabilities.”

          Assistant United States Attorney Acrivi Coromelas of the Civil Division’s Civil Rights Section handled this matter.

          For more information on the ADA or this settlement agreement, please call the toll-free ADA Information Line at (800) 514-0301 or (800) 514-0383 (TDD), or access the ADA website at http://www.ada.gov.

Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   CD-CA  2:20-cr-00299
Case Name:   USA v. Sadleir
  Press Releases:
         LOS ANGELES – The recently ousted head of Aviron Pictures was arrested this morning on federal fraud charges that allege he applied for $1.7 million in loans under the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP), falsely certified that the money would be used to finance the operations of other Aviron entities, and then used some of the relief funds for his personal expenses.

         William Sadleir, 66, of Beverly Hills, was taken into custody without incident by special agents with the FBI, the Small Business Administration’s Office of Inspector General (SBA OIG), and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Office of Inspector General (FDIC OIG). Sadleir is expected to make his initial court appearance this afternoon in United States District Court in downtown Los Angeles.

         Sadleir was arrested pursuant to a criminal complaint that accuses him of fraudulently filing bank loan applications that sought more than $1.7 million dollars in forgivable PPP loans guaranteed by the Small Business Administration (SBA) under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act. Sadleir allegedly obtained the forgivable loans by falsely representing that the funds would be used to support payroll expenses, when, in fact, Sadleir intended to use and did use a significant portion of the funds for personal and non-business-related expenses

         The complaint, which was filed Thursday and unsealed after his arrest today, charges Sadleir with wire fraud, bank fraud, making false statements to a financial institution, and making false statements to the Small Business Administration.

         According to the affidavit in support of the complaint, Sadleir last month caused applications for PPP loans to be submitted to JPMorgan Chase on behalf of Aviron Group, LLC; Aviron Licensing, LLC; and Aviron Releasing, LLC dba Regatta. The bank approved the loans, and Sadleir received more than $1.7 million. “[I]mmediately upon receiving the funds a significant amount was diverted to Sadleir’s personal accounts and used for personal expenses,” the complaint alleges.

         Sadleir was terminated from Aviron Pictures in late 2019, and people associated with the film production company told investigators that Sadleir currently had no role in Aviron Pictures or the related entities, according to the affidavit, which notes that Aviron Group, Aviron Licensing and Aviron Releasing are not engaged in any ongoing operations.

         “This film producer allegedly made a series of misrepresentations to a bank and the Small Business Administration to illegally secure taxpayer money that he then used to fund his nearly empty personal bank account,” said United States Attorney Nick Hanna. “The Paycheck Protection Program was implemented to help small businesses stay afloat during the financial crisis, and we will act swiftly against those who abuse the program for their own personal gain.”

         “This defendant allegedly used Paycheck Protection Program loans to pay off his personal credit card debts and other personal expenses, rather than using the funds for legitimate business needs,” said Assistant Attorney General Brian A. Benczkowski of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division. “As the department has made clear, those who defraud the PPP to line their own pockets at the expense of the American people will be brought to justice.”

         “These funds were designed to be a lifeline to businesses struggling to stay afloat during the current crisis,” said Paul Delacourt, the Assistant Director in Charge of the FBI’s Los Angeles Field Office. “The FBI is committed to maintaining the integrity of the PPP and will hold accountable those who cheat the system at the expense of American taxpayers.”

         Authorities have linked Sadleir to the three PPP loan applications made on behalf of the three Aviron entities. All three applications claimed each company had 33 employees and monthly payroll expenses of well over $200,000. On April 30, JPMorgan Chase approved the loan applications, and the next day money was wired to nearly empty JPMorgan Chase bank accounts associated with the three entities.

         Within days, nearly $1 million of the PPP loan money was transferred into Sadleir’s personal account at JPMorgan Chase, the affidavit alleges. Investigators have determined that some of this money was used to pay personal expenses, including payments to Sadleir’s and his wife’s American Express cards. One payment allegedly made with PPP loan proceeds – a $40,000 payment on Sadleir’s car loan – was reversed and JPChase Morgan froze the accounts associated with the alleged scheme.

         The CARES Act, which was enacted on March 29, was designed to provide emergency financial assistance to the millions of Americans who are suffering the economic effects caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. One source of relief provided by the CARES Act was the authorization of up to $349 billion in forgivable loans to small businesses for job retention and certain other expenses, through the PPP. Last month, Congress authorized over $300 billion in additional PPP funding.

         The PPP allows qualifying small businesses and other organizations to receive loans with a maturity of two years and an interest rate of 1 percent. PPP loan proceeds must be used by businesses on payroll costs, interest on mortgages, rent, and utilities.  The PPP allows the interest and principal to be forgiven if businesses spend the proceeds on these expenses within eight weeks of receipt and use at least 75 percent of the forgiven amount for payroll.

         “SBA OIG applauds due diligence by SBA’s lending partners to maintain the integrity of the lending programs,” said Special Agent in Charge Weston King of the SBA OIG Western Region. “Providing false statements to gain access to SBA’s programs will be aggressively investigated by our office in partnership with our law enforcement counterparts. I want to thank the U.S. Attorney’s Office and our law enforcement partners for their dedication and pursuit of justice.”

         “Today’s charges hold the defendant responsible for his alleged actions to swindle money out of a federal program intended to help those in need during a pandemic crisis,” said FDIC OIG Special Agent in Charge Wade V. Walters. “When an individual cheats the Paycheck Protection Program out of money, it deprives hard-working Americans and deserving small businesses. The FDIC OIG is committed to working with our law enforcement partners to investigate financial crimes in order to preserve the integrity of the nation’s banking sector.”

         A complaint contains allegations that a defendant has committed a crime. Every defendant is presumed innocent until and unless proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

         The four charges alleged in the criminal complaint collectively carry a maximum statutory penalty of 82 years in federal prison.

         The case against Sadleir is being investigated by the FBI, the SBA’s Office of Inspector General, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Office of Inspector General.

         This case is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Alex Wyman of the Major Frauds Section and Justice Department Trial Attorney Amanda R. Vaughn of the Criminal Division’s Fraud Section.

         Sadleir’s arrest this morning was also pursuant to a separate criminal complaint filed by federal prosecutors in New York. That complaint charges Sadleir with engaging in multiple fraudulent schemes relating to investments in Aviron Pictures and its affiliated entities. The United States Securities and Exchange Commission today announced a civil lawsuit related to the New York criminal case.

         Anyone with information about allegations of fraud related to COVID-19 can report it by calling the Department of Justice’s National Center for Disaster Fraud Hotline at 866-720-5721 or via the NCDF Web Complaint Form at: https://www.justice.gov/disaster-fraud/ncdf-disaster-complaint-form.

Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1QettJxpLwXDmkWckW6PToOHI9VwkY1mUPlH6t_7YPpE
  Last Updated: 2025-03-26 02:59:46 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: Case type associated with a magistrate case if the current case was merged from a magistrate case
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The docket number originally given to a case assigned to a magistrate judge and subsequently merged into a criminal case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a magistrate case
Format: A3

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the second highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE2
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE2
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the third highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE3
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE3
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the fourth highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE4
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE4
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
Magistrate Docket Number:   CD-CA  2:20-mj-02326
Case Name:   USA v. Sadleir
Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1FBX8QQ3IUUU9nLfdzrVZR4UQ7Kz7YMLvj_T1xFwXEmc
  Last Updated: 2025-03-26 02:42:35 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: Case type associated with a magistrate case if the current case was merged from a magistrate case
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The docket number originally given to a case assigned to a magistrate judge and subsequently merged into a criminal case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a magistrate case
Format: A3

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the second highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE2
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE2
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the third highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE3
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE3
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the fourth highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE4
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE4
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanVzdGljZS5nb3YvdXNhby1jZGNhL3ByL2NhbGlmb3JuaWFzLWZvdXItdXMtYXR0b3JuZXlzLWFncmVlLWl0LXMtdGltZS1wZXJtYW5lbnQtYmFuLWZlbnRhbnlsLWFuYWxvZ3Vlcw
  Press Releases:
          The following statement was issued by the four U.S. Attorneys who serve California: Nicola T. Hanna (Central District of California), David L. Anderson (Northern District of California), Robert S. Brewer (Southern District of California) and McGregor W. Scott (Eastern District of California)

          In 2017, almost 50,000 Americans died from opioid overdoses. In California alone, there were 2,428 fatal opioid overdoses in 2018. And it’s getting worse. In San Francisco and Los Angeles counties, for instance, opioid fatalities have increased by 54% and 41%, respectively, since 2016. San Diego County and the Central Valley are also experiencing unprecedented levels of fatal opioid overdoses. This is a crisis, and illicitly produced fentanyl is largely responsible.

          To fight this epidemic, law enforcement must have all the necessary tools at their disposal. One such tool is the Drug Enforcement Administration’s (DEA) 2018 order making all fentanyl-related drugs illegal in the United States. Unfortunately, that order was temporary and will expire in less than two weeks. The Senate recently passed bipartisan legislation approving a 15-month extension of the temporary order. While this is a step in the right direction, and the House should pass the Senate’s bill, a longer term solution is needed. We need a permanent ban on all fentanyl-like drugs.

          Illicit fentanyl is manufactured in labs in China and Mexico and smuggled into the United States. It is 50 times more powerful than heroin and 100 times more powerful than morphine. So powerful, in fact, that only a couple milligrams – the size of a few grains of salt – can kill the average person.

          Fentanyl, however, is unique. Because it is made in labs using chemicals, its structure is easily manipulated. And the drug cartels that manufacture and traffic this synthetic poison into our neighborhoods understand American laws and know how to exploit them. They know that by changing a single molecule in the chemical structure of fentanyl, they have essentially created a new drug. One that, unlike fentanyl, is not illegal in the United States. These drugs, known as “fentanyl analogues,” do as fentanyl does: create more addicts and kill more Americans. The analogues – which can be up to 100 times more potent than fentanyl and 10,000 times more potent than morphine – will become legal if Congress fails to act.

          The DEA’s 2018 decision to temporarily schedule – that is, to make illegal – all fentanyl-related substances was a response to the extraordinary legal loophole exploited by drug traffickers. In April 2019, China also outlawed all fentanyl-related substances. This is extraordinary progress, with one caveat. Unlike China’s law, the United States’ has an expiration date.

          On Feb. 6, 2020, the DEA’s temporary order expires, and all drugs seized by U.S. investigators over the past two years that have tested positive as fentanyl analogues will no longer be illegal. If Congress fails to pass the legislation it will have a dramatic impact not just on the prosecutors and law enforcement officers who spend their lives investigating and prosecuting drug dealers, but on communities already hard hit by the opioid epidemic, many of which are right here in California.

          Despite the tireless efforts of law enforcement, California continues to be a main thoroughfare for fentanyl and fentanyl-like drugs arriving from China and Mexico. In 2019, federal law enforcement agents seized approximately three-quarters of a ton of fentanyl at the six ports of entry we share with Mexico and in all places in between. That’s 20 percent more than in 2018. And our federal resources are not infinite; we need all the help we can get. Passing this legislation would provide invaluable support to us as prosecutors and the entire law enforcement community as we continue to combat the opioid crisis in California and throughout America.

          A number of organizations have voiced opposition to the proposed legislation, arguing that the bill does not “embrace public health approaches to the overdose crisis.” We agree that a comprehensive approach to the crisis is needed, and a permanent fentanyl analogue ban should be viewed as part of a holistic effort. But time is running out. There is no doubt that drug traffickers are eagerly awaiting the temporary order’s expiration to start flooding our communities with these dangerous drugs. The passage of this legislation is quite literally a matter of life and death.

          There should be nothing partisan about declaring fentanyl analogues illegal. There is certainly nothing partisan about saving lives and bringing justice to those who profit from addiction and death. For the safety of our communities, we urge Congress to pass legislation making permanent the DEA’s temporary scheduling of all fentanyl-related drugs.

Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanVzdGljZS5nb3YvdXNhby1lZG5jL3ByL2x1bWJlcnRvbi1iYXNlZC1iZWhhdmlvcmFsLWhlYWx0aC1wcm92aWRlci1hZ3JlZXMtcGF5LW92ZXItMjUtbWlsbGlvbi1zZXR0bGUtbWVkaWNhaWQ
  Press Releases:
RALEIGH, N.C. – United States Attorney Michael F. Easley, Jr. announced today that Southeastern Behavioral Healthcare Services, LLC (“Southeastern”), a behavioral health business in Lumberton and Maxton, and its owners Bertha Hutchinson and Virgil Hutchinson (“the Hutchinsons”), have agreed to pay $2,505,000.00 to settle civil allegations that they falsely billed North Carolina Medicaid for services that were not rendered.  Southeastern has also agreed to enter an Integrity Agreement with the Office of Inspector General - United States Department of Health and Human Services as part of the settlement.Specifically, the United States and the State of North Carolina allege that Southeastern and the Hutchinsons improperly submitted claims to North Carolina Medicaid for services that were not in fact rendered, evidenced by recipient interviews establishing that services were not necessary at all, were systematically not rendered as billed, that services were billed for patients who were incarcerated or deceased on the billed date of services, and by a pervasive lack of medical records supporting either the provision of or necessity for the billed services, during the period from March 1, 2016, through July 14, 2020.  The Governments allege that Southeastern’s and the Hutchinsons’ conduct violated the Federal and North Carolina False Claims Acts.“This is yet another example of the U.S. Attorney’s Office and the North Carolina Attorney General’s Office working together to proactively pursue fraud in our publicly-funded healthcare programs,” said U.S. Attorney Michael F. Easley, Jr.  “Billing taxpayer-funded healthcare programs for services that are not rendered will not be tolerated.  Our office will continue to work with the North Carolina Attorney General’s Office to root out healthcare fraud within our public healthcare programs and hold providers accountable for engaging in fraud, waste, and abuse.”“Medical providers are required to strictly adhere to the law when billing Medicaid for services,” said Special Agent in Charge Kelly Blackmon of the Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General (HHS-OIG). “HHS-OIG, in collaboration with our law enforcement partners, remains committed to investigating improper billings submitted to federally funded health care programs.”“Medicaid dollars are taxpayer dollars, and health care providers need to be responsible stewards of this money,” said Attorney General Josh Stein. “I’m grateful for U.S. Attorney Easley’s partnership to protect the Medicaid program and fight health care fraud.”The Federal and North Carolina False Claims Acts authorize the Governments to recover triple the money falsely obtained, plus substantial civil penalties for each false claim submitted. It should be noted that the civil claims resolved by settlement here are allegations only, that there has been no judicial determination or admission of liability.This matter was investigated by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of North Carolina, the Office of Inspector General – United States Department of Health and Human Services (OIG-HHS), and the Medicaid Investigations Division of the North Carolina Attorney General’s Office (MID).  Special Deputy Attorney General Matthew R. Petracca, who also serves as a Special Assistant United States Attorney, represented the Government and the State of North Carolina.The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of North Carolina, in partnership with law enforcement agencies and state entities, investigates and prosecutes healthcare providers that defraud government programs, including Medicare and Medicaid, and abuse their patients.  The Medicaid Investigations Division investigates and prosecutes healthcare providers that defraud the Medicaid program, patient abuse of Medicaid recipients, patient abuse of any patient in facilities that receive Medicaid funding, and misappropriation of any patients’ private funds in nursing homes that receive Medicaid funding.  To report Medicare fraud or patient abuse in North Carolina, please visit the United States Department of Health and Human Services’ website at https://oig.hhs.gov/fraud/.  To report Medicaid fraud or patient abuse in North Carolina, please call the MID at 919-881-2320.
Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanVzdGljZS5nb3YvdXNhby1kYy9wci9mbG9yaWRhLXByb3VkLWJveS1wbGVhZHMtZ3VpbHR5LWZlbG9ueS1hbmQtbWlzZGVtZWFub3ItY2hhcmdlcy1hY3Rpb25zLWR1cmluZy1qYW4tNg
  Press Releases:
            WASHINGTON – A Florida man and member of the “Proud Boys” organization pleaded guilty today to felony and misdemeanor charges stemming from his conduct during the Jan. 6, 2021, breach of the U.S. Capitol. His actions and the actions of others disrupted a joint session of the U.S. Congress convened to ascertain and count the electoral votes related to the 2020 presidential election.

            Nathaniel Tuck, 32, of Apopka, Florida, pleaded guilty to a felony charge of obstruction of law enforcement during a civil disorder and a misdemeanor charge of entering and remaining in a restricted area. U.S. District Judge Timothy J. Kelly will sentence Tuck on Jan. 8, 2025.

            According to court documents, on Jan. 6, 2021, Nathan Tuck, who, at the time of the events of January 6th, was a member of the “Space Coast” chapter of the Proud Boys organization based in central Florida, traveled from his home to Washington, D.C., accompanied by his father, Kevin Tuck, and other members of the Proud Boys organization including Arthur Jackman and Joe Biggs.

            The men stayed together in a rental unit the night before and, on Jan. 6, 2021, gathered near the Washington Monument with approximately 100 other Proud Boys members. Following instructions, Nathan Tuck refrained from wearing Proud Boys colors and joined the group dressed in dark attire.

            At around 10:00 a.m., Ethan Nordean and Joe Biggs led the group away from a rally and towards the Capitol. During the march, Nordean addressed the group through a megaphone, expressing grievances against the police and government. As they passed Capitol Police officers, Biggs taunted them, and the group hurled accusations of "treason."

            By noon, the group arrived at the west side of the Capitol. After a brief stop near food trucks, the group, including the Tucks and Jackman, marched to the Peace Circle. Once there, Biggs led the crowd in chants such as “USA!” and “Whose Capitol? Our Capitol!” At 12:53 p.m., the crowd surged forward, overwhelming police barricades and advancing onto Capitol grounds. Nathan Tuck, aware he was not permitted to be there, entered the restricted area.

            Over the next hour, the group continued to press forward. At approximately 1:45 p.m., a push initiated by a Proud Boy member led to the crowd overwhelming officers and advancing towards the Capitol. Tuck, along with his group, moved to the east side, encountering and breaching a line of police officers. There, they proceeded to the Capitol building, where Tuck pushed past officers and entered the building at approximately 2:18 p.m., making physical contact with at least one officer.

            Once inside, Tuck joined other rioters in taunting police officers. At one point, he made statements referencing the lack of stimulus checks. He remained inside the Capitol for approximately 54 minutes before exiting at 3:12 p.m. After leaving, he reunited with other Proud Boys for a celebratory photograph on Capitol grounds. Later that day, in a text conversation with family, Tuck stated that he had, “Fought the police.”

            The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia and the Department of Justice National Security Division’s Counterterrorism Section are prosecuting this case. The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Middle District of Florida.

            This case was investigated by the FBI’s Tampa and Washington Field Offices. Valuable assistance was provided by the U.S. Capitol Police and Metropolitan Police Department.

            In the 43 months since Jan. 6, 2021, more than 1,488 individuals have been charged in nearly all 50 states for crimes related to the breach of the U.S. Capitol, including nearly 550 individuals charged with assaulting or impeding law enforcement, a felony. The investigation remains ongoing.

            Anyone with tips can call 1-800-CALL-FBI (800-225-5324) or visit tips.fbi.gov.

Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanVzdGljZS5nb3YvdXNhby1lZG5jL3ByL3NtaXRoZmllbGQtbWFuLWNvbnZpY3RlZC1kaXN0cmlidXRpbmctZmVudGFueWwtYW5hbG9ndWUtbGVkLWRlYXRoLWZhY2VzLW1pbmltdW0tMjA
  Press Releases:
ELIZABETH CITY, N.C. – A Smithfield man was convicted by a jury today for distributing a mixture and substance containing cyclopropyl fentanyl where death resulted. Shamel Nesbitt, 32, faces a minimum of 20 years in prison for this crime, and could receive a life sentence. Nesbitt’s sentencing is scheduled for November.

“The drug dealers and criminal networks lacing fentanyl into their supply are on notice.  We will bring charges and prosecute you to the fullest extent of the law.  When your criminal activity leads to death, you can face up to life in prison,” said U.S. Attorney Michael Easley.

According to court documents and other information presented in court, Nesbitt was investigated in November 2017 by the Johnston County Sheriff’s Office for the distribution of cyclopropyl fentanyl, a fentanyl analogue, where death resulted.  The investigation began on November 19, 2017, after Lucas Urbina, 20, was rushed to the hospital by several friends after using a controlled substance and overdosing.  A second friend of Urbina’s also suffered an overdose from using the same substance.  At that time, hospital staff were able to resuscitate both Urbina and his friend.  Urbina’s friend regained consciousness and became stable after a short period of time.  He left the hospital and was approached by law enforcement when he was attempting to get into a vehicle.  He was searched and law enforcement discovered he had a bag of suspected narcotics along with two syringes.

While Urbina was revived, he never regained consciousness.  Urbina died on November 22, 2017. 

Sample of Urbina’s blood taken upon admission to the hospital were sent to the toxicology section of the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner to see what substances were present.  Test results showed a lethal level of cyclopropyl fentanyl.  Urbina also had low levels of morphine and clonazepam in his blood.  Urbina’s death was ruled an accidental overdose. 

The bag of suspected narcotics that was found on Urbina’s friend immediately following the overdose was tested at the DEA Lab.  It was found to contain a mixture of heroin, cyclopropyl fentanyl, benzoyl fentanyl and caffeine. 

Law enforcement immediately began investigating to determine who distributed the narcotics to Urbina and his friends.  Text messages and dialed phone numbers showed Urbina was reaching out to someone listed as “Mista” in his phone.  Officers were able to quickly link the number to Shamel Nesbitt who had given it to law enforcement as his number when he was cited for a traffic violation a few months earlier.  Law enforcement officers were able to access Urbina’s Facebook account and saw he was communicating with another Facebook user with a name of “Chris Nesbitt.”  In the Facebook messages between Urbina and Nesbitt, it was clear Urbina was attempting to buy drugs from Nesbitt.  Officers got a search warrant for Nesbitt’s Facebook page.  They noticed pictures posted by “Chris Nesbitt” were of Shamel Nesbitt.  Multiple messages on Nesbitt’s Facebook page reference him by the nickname “Mista.” Law enforcement received a search warrant for Nesbitt’s home and found heroin packaging material, nitrile gloves and marijuana. 

Nesbitt made statements to law enforcement that he saw Urbina that day but didn’t sell him any narcotics.    

Michael Easley, U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of North Carolina made the announcement after the trial was concluded.  U.S. District Judge Terrence W. Boyle presided over the trial.  The Smithfield Police Department and the Johnston County Sheriff’s Office investigated the case and Assistant U.S. Attorney Charity Wilson and Brandon Boykin prosecuted the case.

Related court documents and information can be found on the website of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina or on PACER by searching for Case No. 5:19-cr-00226-BO.

Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanVzdGljZS5nb3YvdXNhby1lZG5jL3ByL2FybWVkLWRydWctdHJhZmZpY2tlci1yZWNlaXZlcy0xMjAtbW9udGgtc2VudGVuY2UtYWZ0ZXItdHJhZmZpYy1zdG9wLXdpbG1pbmd0b24
  Press Releases:
WILMINGTON, N.C. – A Lumberton man was sentenced today to 120 months in federal prison for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon and possession of a firearm in the furtherance of a drug trafficking offense. On September 26, 2023, Elhodge Malik Kirby, age 48, pled guilty to the charges.

According to court documents and other information presented in court, on August 17, 2021, officers with the Wilmington Police Department and New Hanover County Sheriff’s Office Mobile Field Force conducted a traffic stop on a vehicle in which Mr. Kirby was the front seat passenger. A narcotics K9 responded to the scene and detected the odor of narcotics coming from the vehicle and officers conducted a search. In a plastic bag on the front passenger’s floorboard, officers located approximately 24 grams of a heroin and fentanyl mixture, approximately 11 grams of crack cocaine, a digital scale with white powdery residue, and a Narcan box containing 157 empty and unused wax bindles used to package narcotics. Under the front passenger’s seat, officers located a .22 caliber pistol. Subsequent laboratory testing revealed the presence of Kirby’s DNA on the pistol.

The investigation revealed that Mr. Kirby came to Wilmington from Lumberton to distribute narcotics due to the high demand. The investigation also revealed that between July 2021 and August of 2021, Mr. Kirby was responsible for the possession and/or distribution of over 450 grams of crack cocaine, 24 grams of fentanyl, and possessing two firearms in connection with his drug trafficking activities.

Mr. Kirby has a substantial criminal history dating back to 1992. His prior convictions include, but are not limited to, Possession with Intent to Sell or Deliver Cocaine, Assault on a Government Official, Felony Breaking or Entering, Robbery with a Dangerous Weapon, and Possession of a Firearm by a Convicted Felon.

Michael F. Easley, Jr. U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of North Carolina made the announcement after sentencing by U.S. District Judge Terrence W. Boyle.  The FBI’s Coastal Carolina Task Force, The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF), the Mobile Field Force Task Force, New Hanover County Sheriff’s Office, the Wilmington Police Department’s Gun Crime Task Force, and the Wilmington Police Department investigated the case and Special Assistant United States Attorney William Van Trigt prosecuted the case.  Mr. Van Trigt is a prosecutor with the New Hanover County District Attorney’s Office.  District Attorney Ben David has assigned him to the United States Attorney’s Office to prosecute federal violent crimes and other criminal matters.  This has been made possible by a grant funded by New Hanover County.

Related court documents and information can be found on the website of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina or on PACER by searching for Case No. 7:23-cr-00013BO-001.

Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanVzdGljZS5nb3YvdXNhby1lZG5jL3ByL2hpZ2gtcmFua2luZy1nYW5nLW1lbWJlci1yZWNlaXZlcy0yMy15ZWFycy1mZWRlcmFsLXByaXNvbi1hbmQtYXJtZWQtZ2FuZy1tZW1iZXI
  Press Releases:
WILMINGTON – United States Attorney Robert J. Higdon, Jr. announced that United States District Judge James C. Dever III sentenced GARRY “RATCHET” HINES, age 25, of New Hanover County to 276 months imprisonment, followed by 3 years of supervised release.   He also sentenced SAVON HARDAWAY, 23, of New Hanover County to 151 months imprisonment followed by 3 years of supervised release.

On November 14, 2018, HINES pled guilty to three counts of distribution of a quantity of heroin.  On August 5, 2019, HARDAWAY pled guilty to three counts of distribution of heroin and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation’s Safe Streets Task Force, which is made up of FBI Special Agents, Wilmington Police Department investigators and New Hanover County Sheriff's Office detectives began this investigation in March 2018.  The task force uncovered an enormous amount of evidence that HINES and HARDAWAY were part of the Nine Trey sect of the United Blood Nation responsible not only for the sale of narcotics in Wilmington, but also multiple violent acts. 

Between March 29 and July 21, 2018, the task force made several controlled purchases of heroin and/or a heroin/fentanyl mixture from HINES or someone sent by HINES from several locations in Wilmington, North Carolina.

On August 21, 2018, law enforcement developed information, which led them to believe that HINES and others were gathering up guns in order to take part in a retaliatory shooting of another group.  After receiving this information, law enforcement conducted surveillance on the residence on North 5th Street.  They observed HARDAWAY and another male exit the residence and get into a car.  A traffic stop was conducted.  HARDAWAY fled and attempted to hide a stolen .380 handgun and a .45 caliber handgun.  Law enforcement recovered both handguns.   Ballistics showed the .45 caliber handgun had previously been used in prior shootings.  The other person had a stolen 9mm handgun on his person.  This person has a pending federal indictment on another firearms charge.

On August 31, 2019, a federal search warrant was served on North 5th Street in Wilmington.  HINES and Antwine “Big World” Lucas were arrested.  Law enforcement found a handgun underneath the couch where HINES was seated when the search warrant was served.  HINES was also in possession of baggies that contained a mixture of fentanyl and methamphetamine.  Previously, Lucas was sentenced in federal court for his criminal conduct in this organization and received a sentence of 188 months in federal prison.

Mr. Higdon commented:  “Our effort to Take Back North Carolina was born out of the violence and drug trafficking issues in Wilmington and across our District.  And this case is just an example of why we are committed to the defeat of criminal gang activity.  Those who terrorize our communities and who fill them with illegal drugs can expect the same treatment as these defendants.  We will take our communities back.”

"The FBI has a message for gang members involved in violent criminal activities; we will use every lawful tool available to hold you accountable for your crimes.  No matter how powerful you believe you are, you cannot win when the FBI and our law enforcement partners join forces to fight crime in North Carolina," said John Strong, FBI Special Agent in Charge. 

This case is part of an FBI lead OCDETF operation “DodgeBall”.  This is part of an extensive investigation by the Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Force (OCDETF).  This investigation focused on members of the Nine Trey sect of the United Blood Nation in Wilmington who were involved in the distribution of heroin, possession of firearm and associated violence.

This case is a classic example of the combining of an OCDETF operation with our Take Back North Carolina Initiative.  Wilmington Police Task Force Officers were able to identify members and associates of this violent drug gang and then partner with the FBI and the United States Attorney’s Office to develop a strategy to dismantle this organization.  After being armed with this local intelligence, law enforcement was able to utilize the substantial resources and tools of the federal government to help break the back of this group which had been terrorizing Wilmington.  The success of this case would not have been possible without these partnerships.

The Take Back North Carolina Initiative of the United States Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of North Carolina emphasizes a regional assignment of federal prosecutors to work with law enforcement and District Attorney’s Offices on a sustained basis in those communities to reduce the violent crime rate, drug trafficking, and crimes against law enforcement.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation Safe Street Task Force, the Wilmington Police Department and the New Hanover County Sheriff’s Office conducted the investigation of this case.  Assistant United States Attorney Timothy Severo prosecuted the case on behalf of the government.

F U C K I N G P E D O S R E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E