Score:   0.9687
Docket Number:   SD-FL  1:19-cr-20374
Case Name:   USA v. Rodriguez
  Press Releases:
     Wifredo A. Ferrer, United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, Kelly R. Jackson, Special Agent in Charge, Internal Revenue Service, Criminal Investigation (IRS-CI), Miami Field Office, George L. Piro, Special Agent in Charge, Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Miami Field Office, Miami Field Office Juan P. Perez, Director, Miami Dade Police Department (MDPD), Timothy Camus, Deputy Inspector General for Investigations, Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA), Rafiq Ahmad, Special Agent in Charge, United States Department of Labor, Office of Inspector General, Miami Field Office (DOL-OIG), Mark Selby, Special Agent in Charge, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s Homeland Security Investigations (ICE-HSI), Brian Swain, Special Agent in Charge, U.S. Secret Service (USSS), Miami Field Office, Antonio J. Gomez, Inspector in Charge, U.S. Postal Inspection Service (USPIS), Miami Division, and Margaret Moore-Jackson, Special Agent in Charge, Social Security Administration, Office of Inspector General (SSA-OIG) announce the filing of federal charges against more than 100 defendants in 81 separate cases, dealing with over 30,000 stolen identities and the intended theft of over $60 million dollars from individuals, businesses and government agencies through fraudulent schemes.

     In August 2012, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida, with the collaboration of our federal, state and local law enforcement partners, established the South Florida Identity Theft Refund Fraud Strike Force (Strike Force) to combat an increase in stolen identity tax refund scams. The collective efforts of the Strike Force resulted in the successful prosecution of countless stolen identity tax refund cases. However, while the wave of these pernicious offenses subsided, evolving fraud schemes have spread across South Florida. No longer limited to stolen identity tax refund fraud, the Strike Force, now Stolen Identity Fraud (SIF) Strike Force is investigating and prosecuting a variety of cases stemming from stolen personal identifying information (PII). These cases include intrusion into proprietary government databases; theft of customer account information; takeovers by identity thieves of accounts as diverse as U.S. Social Security and unemployment benefits, retail credit card accounts, and bank accounts; and the use of skimmers to steal valuable PII. These cases demonstrate that law enforcement in general and the Strike Force in particular continue to adapt to meet this insidious identity theft threat.

Since the inception of the Strike Force in 2012, the U.S. Attorney’s Office has charged more than 600 defendants, who were responsible for over $400 million in intended losses.

“Law enforcement will not stand by as criminals attempt to disrupt our lives, steal our savings, ravage our credit, and compromise our government benefit programs through calculated and pervasive fraud schemes,” stated U.S. Attorney Wifredo A. Ferrer. “Today’s announcement demonstrates that the collective response by our federal, state, and local law enforcement partners has had a profound impact on protecting the community from identity theft.”

“I urge everyone to take steps to protect their personally identifiable information (PII) from criminals who seek illicit profits through stolen identity fraud,” said George L. Piro, Special Agent in Charge, FBI Miami. “Learn how you can protect your PII at FBI.GOV or FTC.GOV. The FBI and our partners continue to actively target these fraudsters who victimize hard-working taxpayers.”

     Kelly R. Jackson, Special Agent in Charge, Internal Revenue Service, Criminal Investigation (IRS-CI), stated, “Today’s announcement reinforces law enforcement’s continued commitment to combat identity theft in South Florida. As an agency, the IRS has made remarkable progress in its efforts to protect taxpayers, and we are focused on strengthening our systems and processes even more for this 2017 tax season. I urge taxpayers to protect their personal information and remain vigilant when choosing a return preparer. Beware of return preparers who claim they can get you a ‘higher’ refund then another preparer and those that set their fee based on a percentage of your refund. Ultimately, the taxpayer is responsible for what is filed with the IRS, so choose wisely. IRS-CI will continue to investigate significant Stolen Identity Refund Fraud (SIRF) schemes and egregious tax return preparers, and will collaborate with other federal agencies and IRS civil divisions to stop these thieves in their tracks.”

“The DOL-OIG is committed to working with our Identity Theft Strike Force partners to combat identity theft in the Southern District of Florida and safeguard the Nation's Unemployment Insurance program for those who seek relief from the financial impact of being unemployed,” stated Rafiq Ahmad, Special Agent in Charge, Atlanta Region, U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Inspector General.

"The impersonation of IRS employees continues to represent a serious threat to taxpayers and to the integrity of tax administration,” said Timothy P. Camus, Deputy Inspector General for the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA). “We are extremely grateful to the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Miami and their counterparts around the country for their excellent teamwork, collaboration, and support of our efforts on such cases. As these cases show, TIGTA agents continue to relentlessly pursue investigations of individuals who engage in this fraudulent activity and aggressively refer them for criminal prosecution.”

“These arrests are a reflection of the success that comes when federal, state and local law enforcement agencies work together to target criminal organizations and individuals in South Florida,” said Mark Selby, Special Agent in Charge of HSI Miami. “At HSI we will continue to aggressively investigate fraudulent financial schemes that put in jeopardy the integrity of our financial system and are often a gateway to further criminal activity.”

Antonio J. Gomez, Postal Inspector in Charge of the Miami Division stated, “The arrests of these individuals should serve as reassurance to our customers that the U.S. Postal Service remains one of the safest and securest ways of conducting both personal and private business and the U.S. Postal Inspection Service will stop at nothing to bring these criminals to account. Postal Inspectors will continue to partner with our federal and local law enforcement partners to aggressively investigate these types of crimes.”

Today’s Strike Force announcement reaffirms the collective joint federal, state and local commitment to the prosecution of perpetrators who steal, sell and use personal identification information to commit identity theft fraud schemes. The cases brought under the Strike Force operation, from October 2016 to the present day, include:

IRS IMPERSONATORS

United States v. Abhijeetsinh Jadeja and Rachel Jean Roragen, Case No. 17-CR-20085-Martinez

On January 27, 2017, Abhijeetsinh Jadeja, 29, of Miami, and, Rachel Jean Roragen, 41, of Miami Beach, were charged in a twelve-count indictment with conspiracy to commit wire fraud, possessing fifteen or more unauthorized access devices and aggravated identity theft.

to allegations contained in the indictment, between January 2014 and March 2016, Jadeja and Roragen’s co-conspirators impersonated officials from the IRS and other agencies during telephone calls in which they falsely represented to individual victims that they owed money to the IRS or fees on loans or grants. To satisfy their alleged debts, victims were fraudulently induced to send payments to bank accounts and debit cards under the control of Jadeja, Roragen and their conspirators.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the TIGTA, ICE-HSI, IRS-CI, and the Miami Beach Police Department. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Daya Nathan.

United States v. Andre Oakley Wellington, Case No. 17-CR-60027-Dimitrouleas

On January 27, 2017, Andre Oakley Wellington, 37, of Coral Springs, was charged in a two-count indictment for participating in a conspiracy to commit mail fraud and mail fraud.

According to the allegations contained in the criminal complaint and indictment, beginning in July of 2016 and ending in January 2017, Wellington’s conspirators impersonated IRS employees during telephone calls in which they falsely represented to an individual victim that he/she owed money to the IRS. Wellington’s conspirators fraudulently induced the victim to send payments via private and commercial mail carriers to addresses located throughout the United States, in order to satisfy the alleged IRS debt. In addition, Wellington’s co-conspirators demanded that the victim send a package containing $25,000 to Wellington’s address in Coral Springs. The conspirators provided Wellington with the FedEx tracking number, which the defendant used to track the package’s arrival. The package was delivered to Wellington’s residence, and was then recovered by TIGTA Special Agents. In total, Wellington and his co-conspirators fraudulently obtained over $550,000 from the victim.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of TIGTA and IRS-CI. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Daniel J. Marcet.

TAX REFUND FRAUD

United States v. Silvio Galvez, Case No. 16-CR-20016-Middlebrooks

On January 20, 2017, Silvio Galvez, 30, of Miami, was arrested on a criminal complaint and is charged by indictment for his alleged involvement in a $50 million stolen identity refund fraud scheme involving the cashing of fraudulently obtained large-dollar tax refund checks. Galvez was charged with conspiracy to commit theft of government money, conspiracy to commit bank fraud, theft of government money, and aggravated identity theft.

to allegations in the criminal complaint, Galvez was a leader in a conspiracy involving the filing of over $50 million in large tax refund claims — each claim ranging from approximately $130,000 to $170,000 — in 2013 and 2014. These fraudulent refund requests were submitted to the IRS for payment using stolen identity information. The tax refunds contained the same set of repeated addresses, including the defendant’s address. The IRS paid out at least $4.3 million via U.S. Treasury checks mailed to the addresses listed on the returns. Galvez directed individuals to deposit these fraudulently obtained tax refunds and other fraudulently obtained checks at a bank in Miami. Galvez separately directed a bank employee to open up accounts using stolen identity information so that fraudulently obtained tax refund checks could be deposited. Finally, Galvez directed the bank employee to obtain account information for accounts with substantial funds, in order to conduct account takeovers.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of IRS-CI, FBI and ICE-HSI. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Michael N. Berger.

United States v. Evelina Sophia Reid, Case No. 17-CR-20057-Williams

On January 26, 2017, Evelina Sophia Reid, 35, of Miami Gardens, was charged in a fourteen-count indictment with conspiracy to commit access device fraud, possessing fifteen or more unauthorized access devices, aggravated identity theft, and computer fraud.

According to the indictment and publicly available documents, Reid was an employee of Jackson Health System when she accessed Jackson’s computer databases to steal patient PII, including social security numbers, of over approximately 24,000 individuals during a five-year period. Using the stolen information, Reid’s co-conspirators filed fraudulent tax returns in the names of Jackson Hospital patients.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of SSA-OIG, IRS-CI, USSS, DOL-OIG, MDPD Professional Compliance Bureau and Public Corruption Section, and the Miami-Dade County Office of the Inspector General. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Daya Nathan.

United States v. Douglas McArthur Bentley, Jr., et al,

Case No. 17-CR-20033-Altonaga

On January 19, 2017, Douglas Mcarthur Bentley, Jr., 41, Yvonne Lynn Bentley, 40, and Willie Ellis Hayden, 25, all of Homestead, were charged in a thirteen-count indictment for participating in a conspiracy to defraud the government with respect to claims, theft of government funds and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, starting on or about January 29, 2010, and continuing to on or about April 16, 2013, the defendants and their co-conspirators obtained stolen PII from various individuals without their consent and used the PII to file false and fraudulent tax returns with the IRS. The defendants and their co-conspirators also directed the IRS to electronically transfer tax refunds from the false and fraudulent tax returns to personal and corporate bank accounts they controlled at several banks located in Miami-Dade County, Florida. Once the tax refunds were deposited in bank accounts the defendants controlled, the illicitly obtained refunds were used for their personal gain and profit. According to allegations made in court, the intended loss amount for the fraud scheme was approximately $472,393.07 and the actual loss was $414,838.07.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of IRS-CI and the Homestead Police Department. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Maurice A. Johnson.

United States v. Blain, et al., Case No. 16-CR-14076-Middlebrooks

On December 1, 2016, five people were charged in a three-count indictment for their participation in conspiracy to commit stolen identity tax refund fraud.

Charlton Tierry Blain, 30, Clifford Raoul Blain, 28, Stephane Randolph Blain, 25, all of Pembroke Pines, and Dorsey Sims, Jr., 31, and Luis Roberto Rodriguez, 38, both of Sebring, were charged with conspiracy to defraud the government with respect to claims; conspiracy to commit access device fraud; and unlawful transfer, possession or use of means of identification.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, between January of 2012 and December of 2013, the defendants conspired to unjustly enriched themselves by using unlawfully obtained personally identifiable information to file false and fraudulent income tax returns. The fraudulently obtained tax refunds were deposited into fraudulent bank accounts controlled by the defendants, and the illicit proceeds were then withdrawn from those accounts. In total, 679 fraudulent tax returns were filed, claiming $986,978.00 in total refunds.

Mr. Ferrer commends the efforts of IRS-CI. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Daniel E. Funk and Adam C. McMichael.

United States v. Teri Onick and Philip White,

Case No. 17-CR-20011-Williams

On January 6, 2017, Teri Onick, 44, of Miami, and Phillip White, 45, of Salt Lake City, UT, of Miami, were charged in a thirteen-count indictment for their participation in a conspiracy to defraud the U.S. government.

According to the allegations in the indictment, on various dates between February and October 2012, Onick and White unlawfully obtained and deposited the fraudulently obtained tax refund checks belonging to other persons, without their permission or authority, into Onick and White’s bank accounts for their personal use and benefit. The estimated fraud loss is over $150,000.00.

Mr. Ferrer commends the efforts of IRS-CI. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Cary Aronovitz.

United States v. Gregory Clermont, Case No. 17-mj-2128-Torres

On January 30, 2017, Gregory Clermont, 25, of Miami, was charged by criminal complaint with possession of fifteen or more unauthorized access devices, that is, social security numbers issued to other persons.

to the allegations contained in the criminal complaint, on May 7, 2013, Clermont was in possession of official tax documents and handwritten lists of names, dates of birth, and social security numbers belonging to other individuals, as well as other handwritten notes appearing to relate to the filing of tax returns. Clermont was also in possession of a composition book containing what appeared to be the names, dates of birth, and social security numbers of approximately 140 individuals, three H&R Block debit cards in other people’s names, and a laptop that contained user identification numbers associated with the filing and attempted filing of tax returns through TurboTax online. More than fifteen of the social security numbers in the composition book belonged to other individuals.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of IRS-CI. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney John P. Gonsoulin.

United States v. Johnathan Jameel Ford, Case No. 17-CR-20079-Williams

On January 27, 2017, Johnathan Jameel Ford a/k/a “Johnatan Jameel Ford”, 41, of Broward, was charged in a fourteen-count indictment for the theft of government money and aggravated identity theft.

According to the indictment, between September 2013 and July 2015, Ford received stolen tax refunds or deposited altered U.S. Treasury checks, totaling over $45,000, knowing that the tax refunds or U.S. Treasury checks had been stolen.

Mr. Ferrer commends the efforts of IRS-CI, TIGTA and USSS. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Daya Nathan.

United States v. Crystal Jesha Griffin, Case No. 17-CR-20076-Williams

On January 27, 2017, Crystal Jesha Griffin, 25, of Miramar, was charged in a nine-count indictment for theft of government money.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, Griffin did knowingly and willfully receive United States Department of Treasury tax refunds, knowing the tax refunds to have been stolen. Specifically, Griffin is accused of receiving nine different tax refunds, from nine different victims, totaling $8,074.00.

Mr. Ferrer commended the investigative efforts of the FBI and IRS-CI. The case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Jonathan Stratton.

United States v. Ronald Esperant, Case No. 17-mj-2122-O’Sullivan

On January 27, 2017, Ronald Esperant, 31, of Miami, was charged by criminal complaint with the theft of government money for his participation in a tax scheme that defrauded the U.S. government.

According to the allegations contained in the complaint, in April 2013 multiple tax refunds issued to other persons, without their permission or authority, were deposited into Esperant’s bank account for an actual loss amount of $5,885.00.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of IRS-CI. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Matthew J. Langley.

United States v. Ricardo Innocent, Case No. 17-mj-2123-O’Sullivan

On January 27, 2017, Ricardo Innocent, 34, of Miami, was charged by criminal complaint with the theft of government money for his participation in a tax scheme that defrauded the U.S. government.

According to the allegations contained in the complaint, Innocent, filed fraudulent tax returns from January 2011 through February 2014 and had those fraudulently obtained tax refunds deposited into his bank account for an actual loss amount of $77,381.18.

Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of IRS-CI. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Matthew J. Langley.

United States v. Michelin Petit-Maitre, Case No. 17-mj-2124-O’Sullivan

On January 27, 2017, Michelin Petit-Maitre, 36, of Miami, was charged by criminal complaint with the theft of government money for his participation in a tax scheme that defrauded the U.S. government.

According to the allegations contained in the complaint, Petit-Maitre filed fraudulent tax returns from June 2013 through in or around February 2014 in the names of other persons and had those fraudulently obtained tax refunds deposited into his bank for an actual loss amount of $41,840.00.

Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of IRS-CI. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Matthew J. Langley.

United States v. Martha Somayra Gomez, Case No. 17-CR-20061-King

On January 26, 2017, Martha Somayra Gomez, 28, of Miami, was charged in a nine-count indictment for the theft of government money.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, between August 20, 2012 and June 5, 2013, nine tax refunds issued to other persons were deposited into Gomez’s bank accounts for an actual loss amount of $24,922.00.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the FBI and IRS-CI. The case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney J. Mackenzie Duane.

United States v. Youri P. Baptiste, Case No. 17-CR-20048-Altonaga

On January 24, 2017, Youri P. Baptiste, 23, of Miami, was charged in a six-count indictment for the theft of government money.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, between September 5, 2012 and September 24, 2013, six tax refunds issued to other persons were deposited into Baptiste’s bank accounts for an actual loss amount of $22,048.00.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the FBI and IRS-CI. The case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney J. Mackenzie Duane.

United States v. Altagrace Shaina Descollines, Case No. 17-CR-20047-Scola

On January 24, 2017, Altagrace Shaina Descollines, 25, of Hollywood, was charged in a three-count indictment for the theft of government money.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, between December 5, 2012 and April 24, 2013, three tax refunds issued to other persons were deposited into Descollines’ bank account for an actual loss amount of $13,169.00.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the FBI and IRS-CI. The case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney J. Mackenzie Duane.

United States v. Quincy Thomas Cook, Case No. 17-CR-20059-Williams

On January 26, 2017, Quincy Thomas Cook, 24, of Miramar, was charged in a four-count indictment for the theft of government money.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, between April 2012 and April 2013, four tax refunds issued to other persons were deposited into Cook’s bank account for an actual loss amount of $5,896.00.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the FBI, IRS-CI and USPIS. The case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Jonathan Stratton.

United States v. Willie Lee Parker, III, Case No. 17-CR-20058-Middlebrooks

On January 26, 2017, Willie Lee Parker III, 23, of Opa-Locka, was charged in an eleven-count indictment for the theft of government money.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, between February 2013 and April 2013, eleven tax refunds issued to other persons were deposited into Parker III’s bank account for an actual loss amount of $6,610.00.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the FBI and IRS-CI. The case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Jonathan Stratton.

United States v. Damon Donnell Rhodes, Case No. 17-CR-20062-Lenard

On January 26, 2017, Damon Donnell Rhodes, 23, of Hialeah, was charged in a seven-count indictment for the theft of government money.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, between November 2012 and December 2012, seven tax refunds issued to other persons were deposited into Rhodes’ bank account for an actual loss amount of $5,495.00.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the FBI, USPIS and IRS-CI. The case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Jonathan Stratton.

United States v. Rashaundra Javanni Lewis, Case No. 17-CR-20060-Scola

On January 26, 2017, Rashaundra Javanni Lewis, 26, of Miami, was charged in a five-count indictment for the theft of government money.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, between September 19, 2012 and September 26, 2012, five tax refunds issued to other persons were deposited into Lewis’ bank account for an actual loss amount of $3,953.00.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the FBI and IRS-CI. The case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney J. Mackenzie Duane.

THEFT OF PUBLIC BENEFIT FUNDS

United States v. Phyllistone Termine, Case No. 17-mj-2098-O’Sullivan

On January 26, 2017, Phyllistone Termine, 19, of Miami, was charged by criminal complaint for access device fraud, possession of fifteen or more unauthorized access devices, possession of device making equipment, and aggravated identity theft related to his alleged participation in a fraudulent unemployment compensation scheme.

According to the court record, including allegations contained in the criminal complaint, an IP address connected to Termine’s residence was used to access and file fraudulent unemployment benefit claims for more than 800 individuals on the Florida Department of Employment and Opportunity’s online database between March 23, 2015, and March 7, 2016.

the course of the investigation law enforcement executed a search warrant at Termine’s residence and allegedly discovered the defendant in his bedroom, writing on a small notepad. The first line on the notepad read “Summer 2016th” and stated “Buy 3 Phones, 1 clean 2 dirty’s” and “Buy online – Merrick BNK & CCVs.” CCVs are numeric fraud-prevention codes on credit cards that are used to help verify possession of your credit card. They can also be purchased from internet sources, in order for people to obtain stolen credit card data. On the bed next to Termine were three cellular phones and a laptop computer. Hidden between the defendant’s mattress and box spring was a black case containing several debit and credit cards belonging to individuals who did not reside at Termine’s residence. Inside the black case were several white blank plastic cards with magnetic stripes that are used to make debit and credit cards. On the floor next to Termine’s bed was hardware used to encode the magnetic stripe on credit/debit cards. Several victims whose credit or debit cards were found during the search also had their identities used to file for unemployment benefits using the IP Address at Termine’s home. These victims had not filed unemployment claims within the last 5 years, did not authorize anyone else to, and did not know Termine.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of DOL-OIG and SSA-OIG. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Anne P. McNamara.

United States v. Kicksonley Azema and Abdul Pierrelus,

Case No. 17-CR-20081-Moore

On January 27, 2017, Kicksonley Azema, 26, and Abdul Pierrelus, 29, both of North Miami, were charged in a five-count indictment with conspiracy to commit access device fraud, using unauthorized access devices to fraudulently obtain something valued at $1,000 or more and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, beginning on or about January 26, 2015, and continuing through the date of the indictment, Azema and Pierrelus unlawfully used social security numbers of Michigan residents to fraudulently file unemployment benefit claims with the state of Michigan, and directed those fraudulently obtained funds to debit card accounts fraudulently established using the social security numbers belonging to other persons.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of DOL-OIG, ICE-HSI and the State of Michigan Unemployment Insurance Agency. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Brian J. Shack.

United States v. James Kelly Morency, Frantzy Morency, and Jakeem Amal Stevens, Case No. 17-CR-20075-Huck

On January 27, 2017, James Kelly Morency, 21, of Hallandale Beach, Frantzy Morency, 26, of Lehigh Acres, and Jakeem Amal Stevens, 28, of Hollywood, were charged in a thirteen-count indictment with conspiracy to commit access device fraud, aggravated identity theft, possession of 15 or more unauthorized access devices, access device fraud, and computer fraud.

According to the indictment, between May 2011 and February 2015, the defendants possessed, transferred and used the social security numbers of other persons to obtain Social Security Administration (SSA) benefits by creating online accounts with the SSA with the stolen social security numbers belonging to other persons and having the SSA benefits redirected to accounts that the defendants controlled.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the FBI, SSA-OIG, and IRS-CI. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Daya Nathan.

United States v. Sammie Nathaniel Williams, Jr., a/k/a “Old School,” Case No. 16-CR-20921-Scola

On December 9, 2016, Sammie Nathaniel Williams, Jr., a/k/a “Old School,” 58, of Miami, was charged in a six-count indictment for mail theft by a postal employee and theft of government money. On January 19, 2017, Williams pleaded guilty to theft of government money.

According to the court record, on November 29, 2016, Williams, a United States Postal Service employee, stole three U.S. Treasury checks from the mail.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of USPIS, TIGTA and IRS-CI. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Jonathan Stratton.

BANK ACCOUNT TAKEOVERS

United States v. Jonathan Phanor, Case No. 16-CR-60349-Dimitrouleas

On December 13, 2016, Jonathan Phanor, 33, of Margate, was charged in a four-count indictment for his participation in a conspiracy to commit bank fraud and identity theft scheme.

According to court documents, from May 18, 2013 through August 13, 2013, Phanor accessed Wells Fargo customers’ bank accounts to obtain their name, date of birth, social security number and bank account numbers and provided the information to his co-conspirator. A co-conspirator would then open joint bank accounts using Wells Fargo customer’s name, date of birth, social security number and bank account numbers and move Wells Fargo customers’ money to the joint account. Once the money was in the joint account, the co-conspirator would then transfer the money belonging to the Wells Fargo customers’ from the joint account to bank accounts controlled by the co-conspirators. The defendant and his co-conspirators used the customers’ identities without their permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the FBI. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Miesha Shonta Darrough.

United States v. Mike Edwing Brizard, Case No. 16-CR-20931-Altonaga

On December 13, 2016, Mike Edwing Brizard, 28, of Miramar, was charged in a seven-count indictment for his participation in a conspiracy to commit bank fraud and identity theft scheme. On January 20, 2017, Brizard pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit bank fraud and bank fraud. Brizard is scheduled to be sentenced by Judge Altonaga on April 3, 2017.

According to the court record, from August 20, 2012 through February 26, 2013, Brizard accessed Wells Fargo customers’ bank accounts to obtain their name, date of birth, social security number and bank account numbers and provided the information to his co-conspirator. A co-conspirator would then open joint bank accounts using Wells Fargo customers’ name, date of birth, social security number and bank account numbers and move Wells Fargo customers’ money to the joint account. Once the money was in the joint account, a co-conspirator would then transfer the money belonging to the Wells Fargo customers from the joint account to bank accounts controlled by the co-conspirators. The defendant and his co-conspirators used the customers’ identities without their permission or authority and were responsible for a loss totaling approximately $164,755.91.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the FBI. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Miesha Shonta Darrough.

ACCOUNT TAKEOVERS (INCLUDING CREDIT CARD FRAUD)

United States v. Yulier Blanco Perez, et al., Case No. 17-CR-20073-Altonaga

On January 27, 2017, Yulier Blanco Perez, 34, David Machado Frometa, 34, and Silvio Lopez Cuellar, 30, of Miami, were charged in an eleven-count indictment with conspiracy to commit access device fraud, access device fraud, aggravated identity theft, and possession of fifteen or more unauthorized access devices.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, from July 28, 2016 through October 27, 2016, Perez, Frometa and Cuellar conspired to use credit card account numbers issued to other persons to unlawfully obtain items with an aggregate value of at least $1,000.00. The defendants used the fraudulent credit card account numbers to purchase stone tile from various tile retailers in South Florida. Over four days, during the three-month conspiracy, the defendants fraudulently purchased over $96,000.00 worth of stone tile from three retailers.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the MDPD and USSS. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Jessica Kahn Obenauf.

United States v. Geraldine Hughes, Case No. 17-CR-20065-Gayles

On January 26, 2017, Geraldine Hughes, 30, of Pompano Beach, was charged in a four-count indictment for access device fraud and aggravated identity theft.

to the allegations contained in the indictment and other public records, in August of 2016, Hughes conspired with another person to create a Care Credit account in another person’s name to which Hughes was later fraudulently added on as an authorized user and able to charge dental procedures onto the Care Credit account. Hughes made several visits to dental offices in North Miami and Aventura. Approximately $7,000 worth of dental work was charged to the individual’s account, without his/her permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the Aventura Police Department and IRS-CI. The case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Breezye Telfair.

United States v. Fernando Garcia Cala, Case No. 17-CR-20072-Moore

On January 26, 2017, Fernandeo Garcia Cala, 32, of Miami, was charged in a nine-count indictment for access device fraud, possession of device-making equipment and aggravated identity theft.

According to the court record, including allegations contained in the indictment, Garcia operated a Ford F-350 diesel truck that was illegally outfitted with “bladders,” which are containers attached to the fuel line that allow the vehicle to hold more than 300 gallons of diesel fuel. Garcia used gift cards, fraudulently re-encoded with bank account numbers belonging to other individuals, to obtain hundreds of gallons of fuel from several different fuel stations. A search warrant executed at Garcia’s home revealed skimming devices that can be used to capture debit/credit card account number and pin numbers as they are inputted at the fuel pump, an encoding device that is used to place the skimmed numbers onto the magnetic stripes (such as those found on gift cards and hotel room keys), and more than 196 counterfeit access devices that were encoded with account numbers belonging to other individuals.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the USSS and MDPD. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Breezye Telfair.

United States v. Bamby Pierre, Case No. 16-CR-20945-Williams

On December 15, 2016, Bamby Pierre, 26, of Miami, was charged in an eight-count indictment for attempted use of unauthorized access devices, access device fraud and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, between November 2015 and April 2016, Pierre attempted to use and used the debit card numbers issued to other persons to make over $500,000 in withdrawals from ATMs. Bamby also unlawfully possessed and used the names and debit card numbers of other persons, without their permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the USPIS and Broward County Sheriff’s Office. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Jonathan Stratton.

United States v. Marcus Lee Grant, Case No. 17-CR-20077-Moreno

January 27, 2017, defendant Marcus Lee Grant, 26, of Miramar, was charged in a five-count indictment for his participation in a scheme to steal credit cards by directing and intercepting mail containing credit cards and other credit card account information. The indictment charges the defendant with conspiracy to commit access device fraud, access device fraud and aggravated identity theft. The indictment further charges that Grant and his co-conspirators changed the mailing addresses of other individuals, without their permission or authority, in order to intercept the mail and facilitate the fraudulent scheme.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the United States Postal Inspection Service (USPIS). The case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Cary Aronovitz.

United States v. Michel Gonzalez Suarez, et al., Case No. 16-CR-10053-King

On December 20, 2016, Michel Gonzalez Suarez, 38, and Beatriz Morales Saladriga, 20, both of Hialeah, were charged in a five-count indictment for their participation in a conspiracy to commit access device fraud, access device fraud, and aggravated identity theft in the Florida Keys.

to the allegations contained in the indictment, on October 5, 2016, Suarez and Saladriga conspired with each other and others to commit access device fraud. As part of the conspiracy, the defendants used counterfeit credit cards encoded with account numbers issued to other people to conduct a series of fraudulent transactions at several stores located in Monroe County. The defendants are also alleged to have unlawfully possessed fifteen or more counterfeit credit and debit cards encoded with unauthorized account numbers, and to have used one or more counterfeit credit cards encoded with account numbers issued to other persons.

Mr. Ferrer commends the efforts of ICE-HSI and the Monroe County Sheriff’s Office. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Anne P. McNamara.

United States v. Brandon Bair, et al., Case No. 17-CR-60005-Zloch

On January 10, 2017, Brandon Bair, 23, of Cutler Bay, Aimee Chin-Sang, 22, of Homestead, and Kevin Lawson Mitchell, 21, of Davie, were charged in a seven-count indictment for access fraud and aggravated identity theft indictment relating to trafficking in and using unauthorized AT&T merchant account numbers and credit card account numbers to commit more than $80,000 of fraud.

According to allegations contained in the indictment, on various dates in February, April and May of 2016, Bair and Chin-Sang used credit cards to conduct multiple fraudulent transactions at Home Depot stores located in Sunrise and Davie. Mitchell, an employee at the Davie Home Depot, helped Bair and Chin-Sang conduct several of these transactions. As part of the fraudulent scheme, Bair and Chin-Sang also presented counterfeit licenses and used unauthorized AT&T merchant account numbers to conduct fraudulent transactions involving thousands of dollars of Apple products at an AT&T store located in Fort Lauderdale. All three defendants are charged with conspiring to commit access device fraud. Bair and Chin-Sang are also charged with multiple counts of use of unauthorized access devices and aggravated identity theft.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the USSS, Fort Lauderdale Police Department, and Davie Police Department. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Anne P. McNamara.

United States v. Angela Maria Villegas, 17-CR-20086-Ungaro

On January 27, 2017, Angela Maria Villegas, 41, of Miami Beach, was charged in a five-count indictment for aggravated identity theft and use of unauthorized access devices.

According to the court record, including allegations contained in the indictment, from January 20, 2015, through April 12, 2016, Villegas, a high-end retail employee, made over $20,000 worth of unauthorized purchases using the credit card account numbers belonging to her high-end specialty customers, without their permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the efforts of the MDPD and USSS. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Matthew J. Langley.

United States v. Ahlaniee Maheei Chinn, 17-CR-20031-Middlebrooks

On January 7, 2017, Ahlaniee Maheei Chinn, 23, of Miami, was charged in a two-count indictment for access device fraud and aggravated identity theft.

to the court record, including allegations contained in the indictment, on March 4, 2016, Chinn, purchased more than two-thousand dollars’ worth of goods with a counterfeit credit card. The counterfeit card had the true account holders’ information shaved off and Chinn’s name was fraudulently embossed onto the credit card.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of IRS-CI and Aventura Police Department. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Breezye Telfair.

United States v. Suzelie Cheremond, Case No. 17-CR-60025-Bloom

On January 26, 2017, Suzelie Cheremond, 25, of Miami, was charged in a five-count indictment for access device fraud and aggravated identity theft.

According to the court record, including allegations contained in the indictment, in December of 2015, Cheremond, a Sam’s Club employee in Miramar, unlawfully obtained and used credit cards belonging to other persons to make purchases at Sam’s Club for $4,110.11.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of IRS-CI, the Aventura Police Department and Miramar Police Department. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Breezye Telfair.

United States v. Quienece Shedina Saintvil and Larod James Robinson,

Case No. 17-CR-20064-Ungaro

On January 26, 2017, Quienece Shedina Saintvil, 30, and Larod James Robinson, 34, both of Miami, were charged in a three-count indictment for their participation in a conspiracy to commit access device fraud and aggravated identity theft.

According to the court record, including allegations contained in the indictment, in August of 2016, Saintvil and Robinson entered the Bloomingdale’s Department store and unlawfully used a credit card account belonging to another person to make purchases. Saintvil and Robinson picked out merchandise and then Saintvil provided a Bloomingdale customer’s social security number in order to access the customer’s Bloomingdale’s credit account. Saintvil and Robinson made a total of three transactions, totaling $3,416.77, without the permission or authority of the true credit card account holder.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of IRS-CI and Aventura Police Department. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Breezye Telfair.

United States v. Shanisa Bell, Case No. 17-CR-60029-Bloom

On January 27, 2017, Shanisa Bell, 25, of Coconut Creek, was charged in a three-count indictment for using unauthorized access devices to fraudulently obtain something valued at $1,000 or more and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, between July 2015 and June 2016, Bell unlawfully used debit card account numbers issued in the names of other persons without their permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of DOL-OIG, ICE-HSI and the State of Michigan Unemployment Insurance Agency. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Brian J. Shack.

United States v. Edrey Acosta, Case No. 17-CR-20071-Martinez

On January 26, 2017, Edrey Acosta, 27, of Miami, was charged in a three-count indictment for access device fraud and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, on November 8, 2016, Acosta used counterfeit encoded with credit card account numbers issued to other persons.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the USSS and MDPD. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Breezye Telfair.

United States v. Crystal Henderson, Case No. 17-CR-20066-Gayles

On January 26, 2017, Crystal Henderson, 34, of Homestead, was charged in a four-count indictment for access device fraud and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, on various dates throughout September of 2016, Henderson unlawfully used a credit card account belonging to another person to make purchases over $1,000.00.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of IRS-CI, Stamford Connecticut Police Department, and Aventura Police Department. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Breezye Telfair.

United States v. Shante Marie Wesby, Case No. 17-CR-20032-Scola

On January 7, 2017, Shante Marie Wesby, 37, of Fort Lauderdale, was charged in a three-count indictment for access device fraud and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, on various dates throughout January and February of 2016, Wesby unlawfully used a social security number and a credit card account number belonging to another person, without his/her permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of IRS-CI and Aventura Police Department. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Breezye Telfair.

United States v. Kevin Martinez Morazan, Case No. 17-CR-60016-Bloom

On January 24, 2017, Kevin Martinez Morazan, 24, of Broward County, was charged in a five-count indictment with possessing fifteen or more unauthorized access devices and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, on May 7, 2015, Martinez unlawfully possessed names and social security numbers of other persons, without their permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the efforts of the Fort Lauderdale Police Department, USSS and IRS-CI. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Daya Nathan.

United States v. Tymonzo Ward, Case No. 16-CR-60306-Cohn

On October 28, 2016, Tymonzo Ward, 37, of Wilton Manors, was charged in a six-count indictment for access device fraud and aggravated identity theft.

According to allegations contained in the indictment, on May 21, 2015, Ward unlawfully possessed fifteen or more credit card account numbers and social security numbers belonging to other persons. Ward also unlawfully possessed and used the names, date of births, and driver licenses of other persons without their permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of IRS-CI, the USSS, and Fort Lauderdale Police Department. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Anne P. McNamara

United States v. Rayden Garcia Ramos, Case No. 16-CR-20808-Lenard

On October 21, 2016, Rayden Garcia Ramos, 46, of Hialeah, was charged in a six-count indictment for access device fraud, possession of fifteen or more unauthorized access devices and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, from September 8, 2015 through December 5, 2015, Ramos trafficked in and used one or more credit card account numbers issued to other persons in order to obtain something of value worth $1,000 or more. Additionally, on October 21, 2015, Ramos possessed unlawfully possessed fifteen or more counterfeit credit card account numbers belonging to other persons.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the USSS. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Anne P. McNamara.

United States v. Terry Tyrone Clowers, Case No. 17-CR-60004-Dimitrouleas

On January 10, 2017, Terry Tyrone Clowers, 30, of Fort Lauderdale, was charged in a two-count indictment for attempted use of unauthorized access devices and aggravated identity theft.

According to the court record, including allegations contained in the indictment, on January 2, 2017, Clowers used the name and social security number of another person in an attempt to purchase an All-Terrain Vehicle worth thousands of dollars from a Broward Motor Sports store in Fort Lauderdale.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the USSS and Fort Lauderdale Police Department. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Anne P. McNamara.

United States v. Halima Ouedraogo, Case No. 17-CR-60015-Moreno

On January 24, 2017, Halima Ouedraogo, 35, of Kirkland, Washington, was charged in a twelve-count indictment for access device fraud, possession of fifteen or more unauthorized access devices and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, from August 4, 2015 through August 25, 2015, in Broward County, Ouedraogo used credit cards issued to other persons to fraudulently obtain things valued at $1,000 or more. The indictment also alleges that on August 25, 2015, Ouedraogo possessed fifteen or more credit card account numbers and social security numbers belonging to other persons.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of IRS-CI, USSS, and the Fort Lauderdale Police Department. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Anne P. McNamara.

United States v. Terrell Tyrone Rivers and Preston Elijah Parrish, Case No. 17-CR-60024-Dimitrouleas

On January 26, 2017, Terrell Tyrone Rivers, 27, of Orlando, and Preston Elijah Parrish, 25, of Lauderhill, were charged in a ten-count indictment with conspiracy to commit access device fraud, possession of fifteen or more unauthorized access devices, and aggravated identity theft.

According to allegations contained in the indictment, from February 10, 2016 through February 24, 2016, Rivers and Parrish conspired to possess fifteen or more unauthorized access devices, that is, social security numbers issued to other persons. On February 24, 2016, Rivers drove from Orlando to Lauderhill, Florida, to meet Parrish. According to court documents, on February 24, 2016, Rivers and Parrish were pulled over in Lauderhill, Florida. Upon a search of Rivers, several driver licenses with other persons’ information and Rivers’ photograph were recovered, along with personalized checks in other persons’ names. In the vehicle, a black suitcase, printer, tablets, and multiple blank business checks were recovered. A search of Rivers’ electronics revealed the PII of more than fifteen other persons. A search of Parrish’s electronics also revealed the PII of more than fifteen other persons.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the USSS and the Lauderhill Police Department. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney J. Mackenzie Duane.

United States v. Jessie Aguilar, Case No. 16-CR-20944-Gayles

On December 15, 2016, Jesse Aguilar, 28, of Hallandale Beach, was charged in a five-count indictment for conspiring to commit access device fraud, access device fraud, and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, on or about November 2, 2014, through on or about September 15, 2015, Aguilar conspired with others to commit access device fraud. As part of the conspiracy, they used counterfeit credit cards encoded with account numbers issued to other people to conduct a series of fraudulent transactions at the Apple Store in Miami Beach, Florida. The loss amount was approximately $308,830.86.

Mr. Ferrer commends the efforts of ICE-HSI and the MDPD. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Miesha Shonta Darrough.

United States v. Dave Benggie Alin, Case No. 16-CR-20815-Williams

On October 25, 2016, Dave Benggie Alin, 21, of Miami, was charged in a three-count indictment with fraudulent use of a counterfeit credit card. aggravated identity theft, and possession of a firearm and ammunition by a convicted felon. On January 18, 2017, Alin pleaded guilty to all charges. He is currently set for sentencing on April 7, 2017.

According to the court record, on October 12, 2016, Alin was found by law enforcement to be in possession of a counterfeit credit card and a firearm. Alin used the credit card to check into a hotel in Miami, and then he continued to use the credit card to make purchases at the hotel.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the MDPD and IRS-CI. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Daniel Cervantes.

United States v. Luis Miniert, Case No. 16-CR-20941-Scola

On December 15, 2016, Luis Miniert, 26, of Miami, was charged in a five-count indictment for conspiring to commit access device fraud, access device fraud, and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, from November 2, 2014 through September 15, 2015, Miniert conspired with others to commit access device fraud. As part of the conspiracy, they used counterfeit credit cards encoded with account numbers issued to other people to conduct a series of fraudulent transactions at the Apple Store in Miami Beach, Florida. The loss amount was approximately $119,210.73.

Mr. Ferrer commends the efforts of ICE-HSI and the MDPD. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Miesha Shonta Darrough.

United States v. Anthony Leon, Case No. 17-CR-20068-Lenard

On January 26, 2017, Anthony Leon, 31, of Hialeah, was charged in a five-count indictment for conspiring to commit access device fraud, access device fraud, and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, March 20, 2014 through July 18, 2015, Leon conspired with others to commit access device fraud. As part of the conspiracy, they used counterfeit credit cards encoded with account numbers issued to other people to conduct a series of fraudulent transactions at the Apple Store in Miami Beach, Florida. The loss amount was approximately $158,690.37.

Mr. Ferrer commends the efforts of ICE-HSI and the MDPD. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Miesha Shonta Darrough.

United States v. Diana Leon a/k/a “Diana Montoya”, Case No.17-CR-20069-Altonaga

On January 26, 2017, Diana Leon a/k/a “Diana Montoya,” 22, of Hialeah, was charged in a five-count indictment for conspiring to commit access device fraud, access device fraud, and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, from September 20, 2014 through August 31, 2015, the defendant conspired with others to commit access device fraud. As part of the conspiracy, they used counterfeit credit cards encoded with account numbers issued to other people to conduct a series of fraudulent transactions at the Apple Store in Miami Beach, Florida. The loss amount was approximately $141,503.01.

Mr. Ferrer commends the efforts of ICE-HSI and the MDPD. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Miesha Shonta Darrough.

United States v. Stephanie Vargas, Case No. 17-CR-20070-Moreno

On January 26, 2017, Stephanie Vargas, 26, of Hialeah, was charged in a five-count indictment for conspiring to commit access device fraud, access device fraud, and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, from December 20, 2014 through July 17, 2015, Vargas conspired with others to commit access device fraud. As part of the conspiracy, they used counterfeit credit cards encoded with account numbers issued to other people to conduct a series of fraudulent transactions at the Apple Store in Miami Beach, Florida. The loss amount was approximately $174,152.60.

Mr. Ferrer commends the efforts of ICE-HSI and the MDPD. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Miesha Shonta Darrough.

UNLAWFULLY POSSESSING PII

United States v. Alvin Celius Andre, Case No. 17-CR-60014-Zloch

On January 20, 2017, Alvin Celius Andre, 26, of Miramar, was charged in a four-count indictment with access device fraud and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, on March 26, 2016, Andre possessed fifteen or more social security numbers issued to other persons. Andre also unlawfully possessed and used the names and date of births of other persons, without their permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of Miramar Police Department and ICE-HSI. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Matthew J. Langley.

United States v. Frantz Felix, Jr, Case No. 17-CR-20038-Williams

On January 20, 2017, Frantz Felix, Jr, 23, of Miramar, was charged in a six-count indictment with access device fraud and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, on March 26, 2016, Felix possessed fifteen or more social security numbers issued to other persons and used a credit card account number issued to another person. Felix, Jr. also unlawfully possessed and used the names and date of births of other persons, without their permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the Miramar Police Department and ICE-HSI. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Matthew J. Langley.

United States v. Marcus Allen Griffin, Case No. 17-CR-60011-Dimitrouleas

On January 13, 2017, Marcus Allen Griffin, 22, of Miramar, was charged in a six-count indictment with access device fraud and aggravated identity theft.

to the allegations contained in the indictment, on September 1, 2016, Griffin possessed fifteen or more social security numbers and credit card account numbers issued to other persons. Griffin also unlawfully possessed and used the names and date of births of other persons, without their permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the Miramar Police Department and ICE-HSI. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Matthew J. Langley.

United States v. Marc Antoine Riviere, Case No. 17-CR-20024-Moore

On January 13, 2017, Marc Antoine Riviere, 29, of Miami, was charged in a four-count indictment for identity theft in connection with his possession of at least fifteen social security numbers belonging to other individuals.

According to the allegations in the indictment, on July 17, 2014, Riviere was found in possession of fifteen or more social security numbers issued to other persons, without their permission or authority. Riviere also unlawfully possessed and used the names and date of births of other persons, without their permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of FBI, IRS-CI, and Miami-Dade County Schools Police Department. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Miesha Shonta Darrough.

United States v. Jacqueloi Trishauna Moreau, Case No. 17-CR-60003-Bloom

On January 10, 2017, Jacqueloi Trishauna Moreau, 28, of Lauderdale Lakes, was charged in a four-count indictment for identity theft in connection with her possession of at least fifteen social security numbers belonging to other individuals.

According to the allegations in the indictment, on July 18, 2016, Moreau was found in possession of fifteen or more names, dates and social security numbers issued to other persons. Moreau also unlawfully possessed and used the names and date of births of other persons, without their permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the efforts of USPIS, IRS-CI and Margate Police Department. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Miesha Shonta Darrough.

United States v. Elena Caridad Amaya, Case No. 17-CR-20067-Ungaro

On January 26, 2017, Elena Caridad Amaya, 42, of Lauderdale Lakes, was charged in a four-count indictment for identity theft in connection with her possession of at least fifteen social security numbers belonging to other individuals.

According to the allegations in the indictment, in April 2016, Amaya was found in possession of fifteen or more counterfeit card encoded with account numbers and social security numbers issued to other persons. Amaya used a credit card account number issued to another person, without his/her permission or authority, to make purchases totaling $20,681.64.

Mr. Ferrer commends the efforts of IRS-CI and MDPD. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Miesha Shonta Darrough.

United States v. Robert Jamorris Jackson, Case No. 16-CR-60337-Bloom

On December 2, 2016, Robert Jamorris Jackson, 33, of Broward County, was charged in a six count indictment with possession of fifteen or more unauthorized access devices and aggravated identity theft.

The indictment alleges that on February 18, 2016, in Broward County, Jackson possessed personal identifying information of more than fifteen people.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the USSS. This case was indicted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Daniel Cervantes and is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Jonathan Stratton.

United States v. Aamir Khan, Case No. 16-CR-20839-Lenard

On November 1, 2016, Aamir Khan, 20, of Miami, was charged in a six-count indictment with possession of fifteen or more unauthorized access devices and aggravated identity theft. On January 3, 2017, Khan pleaded guilty to possession of fifteen or more unauthorized access devices and one count of aggravated identity theft. Khan is scheduled to be sentenced on March 15, 2017.

According to the court record, on or about June 10, 2014, Khan was arrested for driving without a license. A search incident to arrest revealed that Khan had a USB drive in his pocket. A consensual search of the USB drive revealed PII for approximately 3,680 individuals, including their names, addresses, dates of birth, and social security numbers.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of IRS-CI and NMBPD. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Daniel Cervantes.

United States v. Victor Joseph, Case No. 16-CR-60335-Zloch

On November 29, 2016, Victor Joseph, 26, of Orlando, was charged in a seven-count indictment with using one or more unauthorized access devices, possessing fifteen or more unauthorized access devices and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations in the indictment, between January and March 2015, Joseph possessed and used social security numbers of other persons, without their permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the efforts of IRS-CI and USSS. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Daya Nathan.

United States v. Dave Pierre, Case No. 17-CR-60023-Moreno

On January 26, 2017, Dave Pierre, 28, of Miami, was charged in a five-count indictment with access device fraud and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, on November 7, 2016, Pierre unlawfully possessed fifteen or more names, dates of birth and social security numbers belonging to other persons. Pierre unlawfully possessed and used the names and date of births of other persons, without their permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of IRS-CI and the Broward County Sheriff’s Office. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Anne P. McNamara.

United States v. Ricky Cearc, Case No. 17-CR-20083-Moreno

On January 27, 2017, Ricky Cearc, 27, of Miami, was charged in a three-count indictment for access device fraud and aggravated identity theft.

According to allegations contained in the indictment, on August 29, 2013, Ricky Cearc unlawfully possessed fifteen or more social security numbers belonging to other persons. Ricky Cearc unlawfully possessed and used the date of births and social security numbers of other persons, without their permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of ICE-HSI and MDPD. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Jonathan D. Stratton.

United States v. Lyns Cearc, Case No. 17-CR-20084-Gayles

On January 27, 2017, Lyns Cearc, 34, of Miami, was charged in a three-count indictment for access device fraud and aggravated identity theft.

to allegations contained in the indictment, on August 29, 2013, Lyns Cearc unlawfully possessed fifteen or more social security numbers belonging to other persons. Lyns Cearc unlawfully possessed and used the date of births and social security numbers of other persons, without their permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of ICE-his and MDPD. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Jonathan D. Stratton.

United States v. Edouard Bastien, Case No. 16-CR-20953-Gayles

On December 19, 2016, a criminal information was filed, charging Edouard Bastien, 27, of North Miami Beach, with possession of fifteen or more unauthorized access devices and aggravated identity theft.

to the allegations contained in the information, on June 20, 2014, Bastien unlawfully possessed fifteen or more social security numbers belonging to other persons. Bastien also unlawfully possessed and used the names and social security numbers of other persons without their permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of ICE-HSI, DOL-OIG, IRS-CI and North Miami Beach Police Department (NMBPD). This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Joshua S. Rothstein.

United States v. D’Andre Nathaniel Watson. Case No. 16-CR-20958-Lenard

On December 20, 2016, D’Andre Nathaniel Watson, 19, of North Miami Beach, was charged in a six-count indictment for possession of fifteen or more unauthorized access devices and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, on February 25, 2016 and again on March 16, 2016, Watson unlawfully possessed fifteen or more social security numbers belonging to other persons. Watson also unlawfully possessed and used the names and the date of births of other persons, without their permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of ICE-HSI, DOL-OIG, and NMBPD. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Joshua S. Rothstein.

United States v. Brian Anthony Joseph, Case No. 17-CR-20004-Moore

On January 5, 2017, Brian Anthony Joseph, 21, of Miami, was charged in a four-count indictment for possession of fifteen or more unauthorized access devices and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, on November 9, 2015, Joseph unlawfully possessed fifteen or more social security numbers belonging to other persons. Watson also unlawfully possessed and used the names and the date of births of other persons, without their permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts ICE-HSI, DOL-OIG, NMBPD and the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Joshua S. Rothstein.

United States v. Richard Wayne Brown, Case No. 17-CR-60010-Cohn

On January 13, 2017, Richard Wayne Brown, 29, of Miramar, was charged in a seven-count indictment for possession of fifteen or more unauthorized access devices and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, on December 28, 2016 and January 6, 2017, Brown unlawfully possessed fifteen or more social security numbers belonging to other persons. Brown also unlawfully possessed and used the names and the date of births of other persons, without their permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of U.S. Department of Agriculture, Office of the Inspector General (USDA-OIG), FBI, USSS, and Fort Lauderdale Police Department. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Joshua S. Rothstein.

United States v. Peterson Joseph, Case No. 16-CR-20830-Moore

On October 28, 2016, Peterson Joseph, 24, of Miami, Florida, was charged in a four-count indictment with aggravated identity theft, possession of fifteen or more unauthorized access devices, and using unauthorized access devices to fraudulently obtain something valued at $1,000 or more.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, from June 17, 2014 through May 19, 2015, Joseph unlawfully possessed and used fifteen or more social security numbers belonging to other persons.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of DOL-OIG. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Brian J. Shack.

United States v. Jason Douglas, Case No. 16-CR-60308-Bloom

On October 28, 2016, Jason Douglas, 26, of New York, was charged in a three-count indictment with possessing fifteen or more unauthorized and counterfeit access devices and aggravated identity theft.

to the allegations contained in the indictment, on or about April 16, 2016, Douglas unlawfully possessed fifteen or more social security numbers issued to other persons and debit cards encoded with account numbers issued to other persons. Douglas also unlawfully possessed and used the names, date of births and social security numbers of other persons, without their permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of IRS-CI and the Broward County Sherriff’s Office. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Brian J. Shack.

United States v. Jerry Jean Baptiste and Stanley Auguste, Case No. 16-CR-20934-Cooke

On December 15, 2016, Jerry Jean Baptiste, 22, of Miami, and Stanley Auguste, 25, of Miami Gardens, were charged in a nine-count indictment with conspiracy to possess fifteen or more unauthorized access devices, possession of fifteen or more unauthorized access devices, and aggravated identity theft.

to the allegations contained in the indictment, from April 24, 2015 through August 5, 2015, Baptiste and Auguste conspired to possess unlawfully fifteen or more social security numbers issued to other persons. On or about April 30, 2015, Baptiste possessed and sold electronic files containing lists of PII of various individuals, including social security numbers issued to fifteen or more individuals. On or about May 6, 2015, and again on August 5, 2015, Baptiste and Auguste possessed and sold electronic files containing lists of PII, including fifteen or more social security numbers. Baptiste and Auguste possessed and used the names, social security numbers, and dates of birth of real individuals, without permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of ICE-HSI. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney John P. Gonsoulin.

ACCESS DEVICE FRAUD

United States v. Alexey Abreu Chapotin, et al., Case No. 17-CR-20043-Lenard

January 24, 2017, Alexey Abreu Chapotin, 22, Yankiel Blanco, 34, and Yuliesky Cespedes Perez, 26, all of Miami, were charged in a two-count indictment for conspiracy to commit access device fraud and possession of device making equipment.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, on August 16, 2016, Chapotin, Blanco and Perez possessed credit card “skimming” devices, drills, and other equipment which was used to modify the skimmers so that they could be surreptitiously installed onto credit card readers at gas pumps. The indictment further alleges that on August 16, 2016, the defendants installed one of these card “skimming” devices at a pump at the gas station, in order to capture customer credit card account information.

Mr. Ferrer commends ICE-HSI and the Aventura Police Department. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Anne P. McNamara.

United States v. Omar Pulido Sanchez, et al., Case No. 17-mj-2112-JJO

On January 27, 2017, Omar Pulido Sanchez, 38, Uriel Pulido Sanchez, 42, and Maria Castillo Sarmiento, all of Colombia, were charged by criminal complaint with conspiracy to possess fifteen or more access devices and conspiracy to possess access device making equipment.

According to the allegations contained in the complaint, in June of 2016, the defendants installed credit card skimming devices onto bank ATMs throughout South Florida. In total, the defendants stole the bank account information of at least three hundred victims, and of those three hundred victims, over sixty reported fraudulent withdrawals from their accounts.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the MDPD. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Daniel J. Marcet.

United States v. Rene Hernandez, Case No. 17-mj-2111-O’Sullivan

On January 27, 2017, Rene Hernandez, 57, of Miami, was charged by criminal complaint for possession of access device making equipment.

According to the allegations contained in the complaint, on April 5, 2016, Hernandez was found by law enforcement to be in possession of a magnetic stripe encoding device, multiple fuel pump credit card skimming devices, and several counterfeit credit cards in his own name.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the MDPD. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Daniel J. Marcet.

United States v. Cesar Castillo Vargas, Case No. 17-mj-6040-O’Sullivan

On January 27, 2017, Cesar Castillo Vargas, 37, of Colombia, was charged by criminal complaint with possession of access device making equipment.

According to the allegations contained in the complaint, on August 1, 2016, law enforcement found Castillo Vargas in possession of a magnetic strip encoder device, a fraudulent Colombian driver license, a fraudulent Mexican passport, and several blank credit or debit cards.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the MDPD. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Daniel J. Marcet.

United States v. Oberto Jean, Case No. 17-CR-20082-Scola

On January 27, 2017, Oberto Jean, 35, of Miami, Florida, was charged in a five-count indictment with possession of fifteen or more unauthorized access devices, possession of access device-making equipment, aggravated identity theft, and being a felon in possession of firearms and ammunition.

to the allegations contained in the indictment, on or about February 11, 2015, Jean unlawfully possessed access device-making equipment and fifteen or more social security numbers belonging to other persons. Jean unlawfully possessed and used the date of births and social security numbers of other persons, without their permission or authority. Jean, a convicted felon, also possessed two firearms and ammunition.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of IRS-CI, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) and the Miami Police Department (MPD). This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Brian J. Shack.

United States v. Anthony Reid, Case No. 16-CR-60307-Dimitrouleas

On October 28, 2016, Anthony Reid, 22, of Miami, was charged in a four-count indictment with possessing access device-making equipment, fifteen or more unauthorized and counterfeit access devices, and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, on April 16, 2016, Reid unlawfully possessed access device-making equipment, social security numbers issued to other persons, and counterfeit credit cards and debit cards encoded with account numbers issued to other persons.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of IRS-CI and the Broward County Sherriff’s Office. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Brian J. Shack.

United States v. Luis Perez Luis and Jose Luis Perez, Case No. 17-CR-20087-Altonaga

On January 27, 2017, Luis Perez Luis, 57, and Jose Luis Perez, 33, both of Miami, were charged in an eight-count indictment with aggravated identity theft, conspiracy to possess fifteen or more access devices, possession of fifteen or more unauthorized access devices, and possession of device making equipment

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, on August 31, 2016, Luis and Perez conspired to possess and possessed fifteen or more counterfeit credit cards and credit card account numbers issued to other persons, as well as access device making equipment.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the MDPD and USSS. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Matthew J. Langley.

United States v. Patrick Gaston Sebastian, Case No. 17-CR-20030-Williams

On January 20, 2017, Patrick Gaston Sebastian, 21, of Miami, Florida, was charged in a four-count indictment with aggravated identity theft, possession of fifteen or more unauthorized access devices and possession of device making equipment.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, on July 1, 2016, Sebastian possessed fifteen or more social security numbers and credit card account numbers issued to other persons as well as a credit card embosser and credit card skimmer. Sebastian also unlawfully possessed and used the names and the date of births of other persons, without their permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of MDPD and USSS. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Matthew J. Langley.

United States v. Luis Fernando Casallas Guzman, Case No. 17-CR-20022-Scola

On January 13, 2017, Luis Fernando Casallas Guzman, 61, of Colombia, was charged in a two-count indictment with possession of fifteen or more unauthorized access devices and possession of device making equipment.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, on March 12, 2015, Guzman possessed fifteen or more counterfeit credit cards and credit card account numbers of other individuals as well as a credit card skimmer and magnetic stripe encoder.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of ICE-HSI. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Matthew J. Langley.

     If convicted of the charged conduct, the defendants face a possible maximum statutory sentence of 10 years in prison for possession of fifteen or more unauthorized access devices; 10 years in prison for trafficking in or using one or more unauthorized access devices during a one-year period and by such conduct obtaining anything of value over $1,000; 5 years in prison for theft of mail; 10 years in prison for theft of government money; 5 in prison for conspiracy to commit theft of government money; 5 years in prison for conspiracy to defraud the United States; 15 years in prison for possession of access device making equipment; 20 years in prison for participating in a wire fraud conspiracy; 5 years in prison for conspiracy to pass Treasury checks bearing forged endorsements; and 2 years in prison consecutive to any other term for aggravated identity theft.

     Mr. Ferrer commends ATF, the Aventura Police Department, Broward County Sheriff’s Office, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), Davie Police Department, DOL-OIG, FBI , Florida Department of Economic Opportunity, Homestead Police Department, ICE-HSI, IRS-CI, Lauderhill Police Department, Margate Police Department, Miami Beach Police Department, MDPD Professional Compliance Bureau and Public Corruption Section, Miami-Dade County Office of the Inspector General, Miami-Dade Public Schools Police Department, Miramar Police Department, Monroe County Sheriff’s Office, MPD, NMBPD, Stamford Connecticut Police Department, State of Michigan Unemployment Insurance Agency, SSA-OIG, TIGTA, USDA-OIG, USPIS, USSS, for the investigative support they provide the Strike Force to combat fraud schemes throughout the Southern District of Florida.

     A criminal complaint or an indictment is an accusatory instrument that contains formal charges against a defendant. All persons charged in a criminal complaint or indictment are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Related court documents and information may be found on the website of the District Court for the Southern District of Florida at www.flsd.uscourts.gov or on http://pacer.flsd.uscourts.gov.

Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1DXz-xPk62WKDdz6obJMWKBqsDSLA6v5pOYK_jTOib88
  Last Updated: 2025-06-07 11:50:45 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the second highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE2
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE2
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the third highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE3
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE3
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
Score:   0.9687
Docket Number:   SD-FL  1:19-cr-20796
Case Name:   USA v. Perez et al
  Press Releases:
     Wifredo A. Ferrer, United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, Kelly R. Jackson, Special Agent in Charge, Internal Revenue Service, Criminal Investigation (IRS-CI), Miami Field Office, George L. Piro, Special Agent in Charge, Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Miami Field Office, Miami Field Office Juan P. Perez, Director, Miami Dade Police Department (MDPD), Timothy Camus, Deputy Inspector General for Investigations, Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA), Rafiq Ahmad, Special Agent in Charge, United States Department of Labor, Office of Inspector General, Miami Field Office (DOL-OIG), Mark Selby, Special Agent in Charge, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s Homeland Security Investigations (ICE-HSI), Brian Swain, Special Agent in Charge, U.S. Secret Service (USSS), Miami Field Office, Antonio J. Gomez, Inspector in Charge, U.S. Postal Inspection Service (USPIS), Miami Division, and Margaret Moore-Jackson, Special Agent in Charge, Social Security Administration, Office of Inspector General (SSA-OIG) announce the filing of federal charges against more than 100 defendants in 81 separate cases, dealing with over 30,000 stolen identities and the intended theft of over $60 million dollars from individuals, businesses and government agencies through fraudulent schemes.

     In August 2012, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida, with the collaboration of our federal, state and local law enforcement partners, established the South Florida Identity Theft Refund Fraud Strike Force (Strike Force) to combat an increase in stolen identity tax refund scams. The collective efforts of the Strike Force resulted in the successful prosecution of countless stolen identity tax refund cases. However, while the wave of these pernicious offenses subsided, evolving fraud schemes have spread across South Florida. No longer limited to stolen identity tax refund fraud, the Strike Force, now Stolen Identity Fraud (SIF) Strike Force is investigating and prosecuting a variety of cases stemming from stolen personal identifying information (PII). These cases include intrusion into proprietary government databases; theft of customer account information; takeovers by identity thieves of accounts as diverse as U.S. Social Security and unemployment benefits, retail credit card accounts, and bank accounts; and the use of skimmers to steal valuable PII. These cases demonstrate that law enforcement in general and the Strike Force in particular continue to adapt to meet this insidious identity theft threat.

Since the inception of the Strike Force in 2012, the U.S. Attorney’s Office has charged more than 600 defendants, who were responsible for over $400 million in intended losses.

“Law enforcement will not stand by as criminals attempt to disrupt our lives, steal our savings, ravage our credit, and compromise our government benefit programs through calculated and pervasive fraud schemes,” stated U.S. Attorney Wifredo A. Ferrer. “Today’s announcement demonstrates that the collective response by our federal, state, and local law enforcement partners has had a profound impact on protecting the community from identity theft.”

“I urge everyone to take steps to protect their personally identifiable information (PII) from criminals who seek illicit profits through stolen identity fraud,” said George L. Piro, Special Agent in Charge, FBI Miami. “Learn how you can protect your PII at FBI.GOV or FTC.GOV. The FBI and our partners continue to actively target these fraudsters who victimize hard-working taxpayers.”

     Kelly R. Jackson, Special Agent in Charge, Internal Revenue Service, Criminal Investigation (IRS-CI), stated, “Today’s announcement reinforces law enforcement’s continued commitment to combat identity theft in South Florida. As an agency, the IRS has made remarkable progress in its efforts to protect taxpayers, and we are focused on strengthening our systems and processes even more for this 2017 tax season. I urge taxpayers to protect their personal information and remain vigilant when choosing a return preparer. Beware of return preparers who claim they can get you a ‘higher’ refund then another preparer and those that set their fee based on a percentage of your refund. Ultimately, the taxpayer is responsible for what is filed with the IRS, so choose wisely. IRS-CI will continue to investigate significant Stolen Identity Refund Fraud (SIRF) schemes and egregious tax return preparers, and will collaborate with other federal agencies and IRS civil divisions to stop these thieves in their tracks.”

“The DOL-OIG is committed to working with our Identity Theft Strike Force partners to combat identity theft in the Southern District of Florida and safeguard the Nation's Unemployment Insurance program for those who seek relief from the financial impact of being unemployed,” stated Rafiq Ahmad, Special Agent in Charge, Atlanta Region, U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Inspector General.

"The impersonation of IRS employees continues to represent a serious threat to taxpayers and to the integrity of tax administration,” said Timothy P. Camus, Deputy Inspector General for the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA). “We are extremely grateful to the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Miami and their counterparts around the country for their excellent teamwork, collaboration, and support of our efforts on such cases. As these cases show, TIGTA agents continue to relentlessly pursue investigations of individuals who engage in this fraudulent activity and aggressively refer them for criminal prosecution.”

“These arrests are a reflection of the success that comes when federal, state and local law enforcement agencies work together to target criminal organizations and individuals in South Florida,” said Mark Selby, Special Agent in Charge of HSI Miami. “At HSI we will continue to aggressively investigate fraudulent financial schemes that put in jeopardy the integrity of our financial system and are often a gateway to further criminal activity.”

Antonio J. Gomez, Postal Inspector in Charge of the Miami Division stated, “The arrests of these individuals should serve as reassurance to our customers that the U.S. Postal Service remains one of the safest and securest ways of conducting both personal and private business and the U.S. Postal Inspection Service will stop at nothing to bring these criminals to account. Postal Inspectors will continue to partner with our federal and local law enforcement partners to aggressively investigate these types of crimes.”

Today’s Strike Force announcement reaffirms the collective joint federal, state and local commitment to the prosecution of perpetrators who steal, sell and use personal identification information to commit identity theft fraud schemes. The cases brought under the Strike Force operation, from October 2016 to the present day, include:

IRS IMPERSONATORS

United States v. Abhijeetsinh Jadeja and Rachel Jean Roragen, Case No. 17-CR-20085-Martinez

On January 27, 2017, Abhijeetsinh Jadeja, 29, of Miami, and, Rachel Jean Roragen, 41, of Miami Beach, were charged in a twelve-count indictment with conspiracy to commit wire fraud, possessing fifteen or more unauthorized access devices and aggravated identity theft.

to allegations contained in the indictment, between January 2014 and March 2016, Jadeja and Roragen’s co-conspirators impersonated officials from the IRS and other agencies during telephone calls in which they falsely represented to individual victims that they owed money to the IRS or fees on loans or grants. To satisfy their alleged debts, victims were fraudulently induced to send payments to bank accounts and debit cards under the control of Jadeja, Roragen and their conspirators.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the TIGTA, ICE-HSI, IRS-CI, and the Miami Beach Police Department. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Daya Nathan.

United States v. Andre Oakley Wellington, Case No. 17-CR-60027-Dimitrouleas

On January 27, 2017, Andre Oakley Wellington, 37, of Coral Springs, was charged in a two-count indictment for participating in a conspiracy to commit mail fraud and mail fraud.

According to the allegations contained in the criminal complaint and indictment, beginning in July of 2016 and ending in January 2017, Wellington’s conspirators impersonated IRS employees during telephone calls in which they falsely represented to an individual victim that he/she owed money to the IRS. Wellington’s conspirators fraudulently induced the victim to send payments via private and commercial mail carriers to addresses located throughout the United States, in order to satisfy the alleged IRS debt. In addition, Wellington’s co-conspirators demanded that the victim send a package containing $25,000 to Wellington’s address in Coral Springs. The conspirators provided Wellington with the FedEx tracking number, which the defendant used to track the package’s arrival. The package was delivered to Wellington’s residence, and was then recovered by TIGTA Special Agents. In total, Wellington and his co-conspirators fraudulently obtained over $550,000 from the victim.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of TIGTA and IRS-CI. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Daniel J. Marcet.

TAX REFUND FRAUD

United States v. Silvio Galvez, Case No. 16-CR-20016-Middlebrooks

On January 20, 2017, Silvio Galvez, 30, of Miami, was arrested on a criminal complaint and is charged by indictment for his alleged involvement in a $50 million stolen identity refund fraud scheme involving the cashing of fraudulently obtained large-dollar tax refund checks. Galvez was charged with conspiracy to commit theft of government money, conspiracy to commit bank fraud, theft of government money, and aggravated identity theft.

to allegations in the criminal complaint, Galvez was a leader in a conspiracy involving the filing of over $50 million in large tax refund claims — each claim ranging from approximately $130,000 to $170,000 — in 2013 and 2014. These fraudulent refund requests were submitted to the IRS for payment using stolen identity information. The tax refunds contained the same set of repeated addresses, including the defendant’s address. The IRS paid out at least $4.3 million via U.S. Treasury checks mailed to the addresses listed on the returns. Galvez directed individuals to deposit these fraudulently obtained tax refunds and other fraudulently obtained checks at a bank in Miami. Galvez separately directed a bank employee to open up accounts using stolen identity information so that fraudulently obtained tax refund checks could be deposited. Finally, Galvez directed the bank employee to obtain account information for accounts with substantial funds, in order to conduct account takeovers.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of IRS-CI, FBI and ICE-HSI. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Michael N. Berger.

United States v. Evelina Sophia Reid, Case No. 17-CR-20057-Williams

On January 26, 2017, Evelina Sophia Reid, 35, of Miami Gardens, was charged in a fourteen-count indictment with conspiracy to commit access device fraud, possessing fifteen or more unauthorized access devices, aggravated identity theft, and computer fraud.

According to the indictment and publicly available documents, Reid was an employee of Jackson Health System when she accessed Jackson’s computer databases to steal patient PII, including social security numbers, of over approximately 24,000 individuals during a five-year period. Using the stolen information, Reid’s co-conspirators filed fraudulent tax returns in the names of Jackson Hospital patients.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of SSA-OIG, IRS-CI, USSS, DOL-OIG, MDPD Professional Compliance Bureau and Public Corruption Section, and the Miami-Dade County Office of the Inspector General. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Daya Nathan.

United States v. Douglas McArthur Bentley, Jr., et al,

Case No. 17-CR-20033-Altonaga

On January 19, 2017, Douglas Mcarthur Bentley, Jr., 41, Yvonne Lynn Bentley, 40, and Willie Ellis Hayden, 25, all of Homestead, were charged in a thirteen-count indictment for participating in a conspiracy to defraud the government with respect to claims, theft of government funds and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, starting on or about January 29, 2010, and continuing to on or about April 16, 2013, the defendants and their co-conspirators obtained stolen PII from various individuals without their consent and used the PII to file false and fraudulent tax returns with the IRS. The defendants and their co-conspirators also directed the IRS to electronically transfer tax refunds from the false and fraudulent tax returns to personal and corporate bank accounts they controlled at several banks located in Miami-Dade County, Florida. Once the tax refunds were deposited in bank accounts the defendants controlled, the illicitly obtained refunds were used for their personal gain and profit. According to allegations made in court, the intended loss amount for the fraud scheme was approximately $472,393.07 and the actual loss was $414,838.07.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of IRS-CI and the Homestead Police Department. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Maurice A. Johnson.

United States v. Blain, et al., Case No. 16-CR-14076-Middlebrooks

On December 1, 2016, five people were charged in a three-count indictment for their participation in conspiracy to commit stolen identity tax refund fraud.

Charlton Tierry Blain, 30, Clifford Raoul Blain, 28, Stephane Randolph Blain, 25, all of Pembroke Pines, and Dorsey Sims, Jr., 31, and Luis Roberto Rodriguez, 38, both of Sebring, were charged with conspiracy to defraud the government with respect to claims; conspiracy to commit access device fraud; and unlawful transfer, possession or use of means of identification.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, between January of 2012 and December of 2013, the defendants conspired to unjustly enriched themselves by using unlawfully obtained personally identifiable information to file false and fraudulent income tax returns. The fraudulently obtained tax refunds were deposited into fraudulent bank accounts controlled by the defendants, and the illicit proceeds were then withdrawn from those accounts. In total, 679 fraudulent tax returns were filed, claiming $986,978.00 in total refunds.

Mr. Ferrer commends the efforts of IRS-CI. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Daniel E. Funk and Adam C. McMichael.

United States v. Teri Onick and Philip White,

Case No. 17-CR-20011-Williams

On January 6, 2017, Teri Onick, 44, of Miami, and Phillip White, 45, of Salt Lake City, UT, of Miami, were charged in a thirteen-count indictment for their participation in a conspiracy to defraud the U.S. government.

According to the allegations in the indictment, on various dates between February and October 2012, Onick and White unlawfully obtained and deposited the fraudulently obtained tax refund checks belonging to other persons, without their permission or authority, into Onick and White’s bank accounts for their personal use and benefit. The estimated fraud loss is over $150,000.00.

Mr. Ferrer commends the efforts of IRS-CI. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Cary Aronovitz.

United States v. Gregory Clermont, Case No. 17-mj-2128-Torres

On January 30, 2017, Gregory Clermont, 25, of Miami, was charged by criminal complaint with possession of fifteen or more unauthorized access devices, that is, social security numbers issued to other persons.

to the allegations contained in the criminal complaint, on May 7, 2013, Clermont was in possession of official tax documents and handwritten lists of names, dates of birth, and social security numbers belonging to other individuals, as well as other handwritten notes appearing to relate to the filing of tax returns. Clermont was also in possession of a composition book containing what appeared to be the names, dates of birth, and social security numbers of approximately 140 individuals, three H&R Block debit cards in other people’s names, and a laptop that contained user identification numbers associated with the filing and attempted filing of tax returns through TurboTax online. More than fifteen of the social security numbers in the composition book belonged to other individuals.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of IRS-CI. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney John P. Gonsoulin.

United States v. Johnathan Jameel Ford, Case No. 17-CR-20079-Williams

On January 27, 2017, Johnathan Jameel Ford a/k/a “Johnatan Jameel Ford”, 41, of Broward, was charged in a fourteen-count indictment for the theft of government money and aggravated identity theft.

According to the indictment, between September 2013 and July 2015, Ford received stolen tax refunds or deposited altered U.S. Treasury checks, totaling over $45,000, knowing that the tax refunds or U.S. Treasury checks had been stolen.

Mr. Ferrer commends the efforts of IRS-CI, TIGTA and USSS. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Daya Nathan.

United States v. Crystal Jesha Griffin, Case No. 17-CR-20076-Williams

On January 27, 2017, Crystal Jesha Griffin, 25, of Miramar, was charged in a nine-count indictment for theft of government money.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, Griffin did knowingly and willfully receive United States Department of Treasury tax refunds, knowing the tax refunds to have been stolen. Specifically, Griffin is accused of receiving nine different tax refunds, from nine different victims, totaling $8,074.00.

Mr. Ferrer commended the investigative efforts of the FBI and IRS-CI. The case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Jonathan Stratton.

United States v. Ronald Esperant, Case No. 17-mj-2122-O’Sullivan

On January 27, 2017, Ronald Esperant, 31, of Miami, was charged by criminal complaint with the theft of government money for his participation in a tax scheme that defrauded the U.S. government.

According to the allegations contained in the complaint, in April 2013 multiple tax refunds issued to other persons, without their permission or authority, were deposited into Esperant’s bank account for an actual loss amount of $5,885.00.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of IRS-CI. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Matthew J. Langley.

United States v. Ricardo Innocent, Case No. 17-mj-2123-O’Sullivan

On January 27, 2017, Ricardo Innocent, 34, of Miami, was charged by criminal complaint with the theft of government money for his participation in a tax scheme that defrauded the U.S. government.

According to the allegations contained in the complaint, Innocent, filed fraudulent tax returns from January 2011 through February 2014 and had those fraudulently obtained tax refunds deposited into his bank account for an actual loss amount of $77,381.18.

Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of IRS-CI. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Matthew J. Langley.

United States v. Michelin Petit-Maitre, Case No. 17-mj-2124-O’Sullivan

On January 27, 2017, Michelin Petit-Maitre, 36, of Miami, was charged by criminal complaint with the theft of government money for his participation in a tax scheme that defrauded the U.S. government.

According to the allegations contained in the complaint, Petit-Maitre filed fraudulent tax returns from June 2013 through in or around February 2014 in the names of other persons and had those fraudulently obtained tax refunds deposited into his bank for an actual loss amount of $41,840.00.

Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of IRS-CI. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Matthew J. Langley.

United States v. Martha Somayra Gomez, Case No. 17-CR-20061-King

On January 26, 2017, Martha Somayra Gomez, 28, of Miami, was charged in a nine-count indictment for the theft of government money.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, between August 20, 2012 and June 5, 2013, nine tax refunds issued to other persons were deposited into Gomez’s bank accounts for an actual loss amount of $24,922.00.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the FBI and IRS-CI. The case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney J. Mackenzie Duane.

United States v. Youri P. Baptiste, Case No. 17-CR-20048-Altonaga

On January 24, 2017, Youri P. Baptiste, 23, of Miami, was charged in a six-count indictment for the theft of government money.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, between September 5, 2012 and September 24, 2013, six tax refunds issued to other persons were deposited into Baptiste’s bank accounts for an actual loss amount of $22,048.00.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the FBI and IRS-CI. The case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney J. Mackenzie Duane.

United States v. Altagrace Shaina Descollines, Case No. 17-CR-20047-Scola

On January 24, 2017, Altagrace Shaina Descollines, 25, of Hollywood, was charged in a three-count indictment for the theft of government money.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, between December 5, 2012 and April 24, 2013, three tax refunds issued to other persons were deposited into Descollines’ bank account for an actual loss amount of $13,169.00.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the FBI and IRS-CI. The case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney J. Mackenzie Duane.

United States v. Quincy Thomas Cook, Case No. 17-CR-20059-Williams

On January 26, 2017, Quincy Thomas Cook, 24, of Miramar, was charged in a four-count indictment for the theft of government money.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, between April 2012 and April 2013, four tax refunds issued to other persons were deposited into Cook’s bank account for an actual loss amount of $5,896.00.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the FBI, IRS-CI and USPIS. The case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Jonathan Stratton.

United States v. Willie Lee Parker, III, Case No. 17-CR-20058-Middlebrooks

On January 26, 2017, Willie Lee Parker III, 23, of Opa-Locka, was charged in an eleven-count indictment for the theft of government money.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, between February 2013 and April 2013, eleven tax refunds issued to other persons were deposited into Parker III’s bank account for an actual loss amount of $6,610.00.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the FBI and IRS-CI. The case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Jonathan Stratton.

United States v. Damon Donnell Rhodes, Case No. 17-CR-20062-Lenard

On January 26, 2017, Damon Donnell Rhodes, 23, of Hialeah, was charged in a seven-count indictment for the theft of government money.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, between November 2012 and December 2012, seven tax refunds issued to other persons were deposited into Rhodes’ bank account for an actual loss amount of $5,495.00.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the FBI, USPIS and IRS-CI. The case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Jonathan Stratton.

United States v. Rashaundra Javanni Lewis, Case No. 17-CR-20060-Scola

On January 26, 2017, Rashaundra Javanni Lewis, 26, of Miami, was charged in a five-count indictment for the theft of government money.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, between September 19, 2012 and September 26, 2012, five tax refunds issued to other persons were deposited into Lewis’ bank account for an actual loss amount of $3,953.00.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the FBI and IRS-CI. The case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney J. Mackenzie Duane.

THEFT OF PUBLIC BENEFIT FUNDS

United States v. Phyllistone Termine, Case No. 17-mj-2098-O’Sullivan

On January 26, 2017, Phyllistone Termine, 19, of Miami, was charged by criminal complaint for access device fraud, possession of fifteen or more unauthorized access devices, possession of device making equipment, and aggravated identity theft related to his alleged participation in a fraudulent unemployment compensation scheme.

According to the court record, including allegations contained in the criminal complaint, an IP address connected to Termine’s residence was used to access and file fraudulent unemployment benefit claims for more than 800 individuals on the Florida Department of Employment and Opportunity’s online database between March 23, 2015, and March 7, 2016.

the course of the investigation law enforcement executed a search warrant at Termine’s residence and allegedly discovered the defendant in his bedroom, writing on a small notepad. The first line on the notepad read “Summer 2016th” and stated “Buy 3 Phones, 1 clean 2 dirty’s” and “Buy online – Merrick BNK & CCVs.” CCVs are numeric fraud-prevention codes on credit cards that are used to help verify possession of your credit card. They can also be purchased from internet sources, in order for people to obtain stolen credit card data. On the bed next to Termine were three cellular phones and a laptop computer. Hidden between the defendant’s mattress and box spring was a black case containing several debit and credit cards belonging to individuals who did not reside at Termine’s residence. Inside the black case were several white blank plastic cards with magnetic stripes that are used to make debit and credit cards. On the floor next to Termine’s bed was hardware used to encode the magnetic stripe on credit/debit cards. Several victims whose credit or debit cards were found during the search also had their identities used to file for unemployment benefits using the IP Address at Termine’s home. These victims had not filed unemployment claims within the last 5 years, did not authorize anyone else to, and did not know Termine.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of DOL-OIG and SSA-OIG. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Anne P. McNamara.

United States v. Kicksonley Azema and Abdul Pierrelus,

Case No. 17-CR-20081-Moore

On January 27, 2017, Kicksonley Azema, 26, and Abdul Pierrelus, 29, both of North Miami, were charged in a five-count indictment with conspiracy to commit access device fraud, using unauthorized access devices to fraudulently obtain something valued at $1,000 or more and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, beginning on or about January 26, 2015, and continuing through the date of the indictment, Azema and Pierrelus unlawfully used social security numbers of Michigan residents to fraudulently file unemployment benefit claims with the state of Michigan, and directed those fraudulently obtained funds to debit card accounts fraudulently established using the social security numbers belonging to other persons.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of DOL-OIG, ICE-HSI and the State of Michigan Unemployment Insurance Agency. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Brian J. Shack.

United States v. James Kelly Morency, Frantzy Morency, and Jakeem Amal Stevens, Case No. 17-CR-20075-Huck

On January 27, 2017, James Kelly Morency, 21, of Hallandale Beach, Frantzy Morency, 26, of Lehigh Acres, and Jakeem Amal Stevens, 28, of Hollywood, were charged in a thirteen-count indictment with conspiracy to commit access device fraud, aggravated identity theft, possession of 15 or more unauthorized access devices, access device fraud, and computer fraud.

According to the indictment, between May 2011 and February 2015, the defendants possessed, transferred and used the social security numbers of other persons to obtain Social Security Administration (SSA) benefits by creating online accounts with the SSA with the stolen social security numbers belonging to other persons and having the SSA benefits redirected to accounts that the defendants controlled.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the FBI, SSA-OIG, and IRS-CI. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Daya Nathan.

United States v. Sammie Nathaniel Williams, Jr., a/k/a “Old School,” Case No. 16-CR-20921-Scola

On December 9, 2016, Sammie Nathaniel Williams, Jr., a/k/a “Old School,” 58, of Miami, was charged in a six-count indictment for mail theft by a postal employee and theft of government money. On January 19, 2017, Williams pleaded guilty to theft of government money.

According to the court record, on November 29, 2016, Williams, a United States Postal Service employee, stole three U.S. Treasury checks from the mail.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of USPIS, TIGTA and IRS-CI. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Jonathan Stratton.

BANK ACCOUNT TAKEOVERS

United States v. Jonathan Phanor, Case No. 16-CR-60349-Dimitrouleas

On December 13, 2016, Jonathan Phanor, 33, of Margate, was charged in a four-count indictment for his participation in a conspiracy to commit bank fraud and identity theft scheme.

According to court documents, from May 18, 2013 through August 13, 2013, Phanor accessed Wells Fargo customers’ bank accounts to obtain their name, date of birth, social security number and bank account numbers and provided the information to his co-conspirator. A co-conspirator would then open joint bank accounts using Wells Fargo customer’s name, date of birth, social security number and bank account numbers and move Wells Fargo customers’ money to the joint account. Once the money was in the joint account, the co-conspirator would then transfer the money belonging to the Wells Fargo customers’ from the joint account to bank accounts controlled by the co-conspirators. The defendant and his co-conspirators used the customers’ identities without their permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the FBI. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Miesha Shonta Darrough.

United States v. Mike Edwing Brizard, Case No. 16-CR-20931-Altonaga

On December 13, 2016, Mike Edwing Brizard, 28, of Miramar, was charged in a seven-count indictment for his participation in a conspiracy to commit bank fraud and identity theft scheme. On January 20, 2017, Brizard pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit bank fraud and bank fraud. Brizard is scheduled to be sentenced by Judge Altonaga on April 3, 2017.

According to the court record, from August 20, 2012 through February 26, 2013, Brizard accessed Wells Fargo customers’ bank accounts to obtain their name, date of birth, social security number and bank account numbers and provided the information to his co-conspirator. A co-conspirator would then open joint bank accounts using Wells Fargo customers’ name, date of birth, social security number and bank account numbers and move Wells Fargo customers’ money to the joint account. Once the money was in the joint account, a co-conspirator would then transfer the money belonging to the Wells Fargo customers from the joint account to bank accounts controlled by the co-conspirators. The defendant and his co-conspirators used the customers’ identities without their permission or authority and were responsible for a loss totaling approximately $164,755.91.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the FBI. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Miesha Shonta Darrough.

ACCOUNT TAKEOVERS (INCLUDING CREDIT CARD FRAUD)

United States v. Yulier Blanco Perez, et al., Case No. 17-CR-20073-Altonaga

On January 27, 2017, Yulier Blanco Perez, 34, David Machado Frometa, 34, and Silvio Lopez Cuellar, 30, of Miami, were charged in an eleven-count indictment with conspiracy to commit access device fraud, access device fraud, aggravated identity theft, and possession of fifteen or more unauthorized access devices.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, from July 28, 2016 through October 27, 2016, Perez, Frometa and Cuellar conspired to use credit card account numbers issued to other persons to unlawfully obtain items with an aggregate value of at least $1,000.00. The defendants used the fraudulent credit card account numbers to purchase stone tile from various tile retailers in South Florida. Over four days, during the three-month conspiracy, the defendants fraudulently purchased over $96,000.00 worth of stone tile from three retailers.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the MDPD and USSS. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Jessica Kahn Obenauf.

United States v. Geraldine Hughes, Case No. 17-CR-20065-Gayles

On January 26, 2017, Geraldine Hughes, 30, of Pompano Beach, was charged in a four-count indictment for access device fraud and aggravated identity theft.

to the allegations contained in the indictment and other public records, in August of 2016, Hughes conspired with another person to create a Care Credit account in another person’s name to which Hughes was later fraudulently added on as an authorized user and able to charge dental procedures onto the Care Credit account. Hughes made several visits to dental offices in North Miami and Aventura. Approximately $7,000 worth of dental work was charged to the individual’s account, without his/her permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the Aventura Police Department and IRS-CI. The case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Breezye Telfair.

United States v. Fernando Garcia Cala, Case No. 17-CR-20072-Moore

On January 26, 2017, Fernandeo Garcia Cala, 32, of Miami, was charged in a nine-count indictment for access device fraud, possession of device-making equipment and aggravated identity theft.

According to the court record, including allegations contained in the indictment, Garcia operated a Ford F-350 diesel truck that was illegally outfitted with “bladders,” which are containers attached to the fuel line that allow the vehicle to hold more than 300 gallons of diesel fuel. Garcia used gift cards, fraudulently re-encoded with bank account numbers belonging to other individuals, to obtain hundreds of gallons of fuel from several different fuel stations. A search warrant executed at Garcia’s home revealed skimming devices that can be used to capture debit/credit card account number and pin numbers as they are inputted at the fuel pump, an encoding device that is used to place the skimmed numbers onto the magnetic stripes (such as those found on gift cards and hotel room keys), and more than 196 counterfeit access devices that were encoded with account numbers belonging to other individuals.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the USSS and MDPD. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Breezye Telfair.

United States v. Bamby Pierre, Case No. 16-CR-20945-Williams

On December 15, 2016, Bamby Pierre, 26, of Miami, was charged in an eight-count indictment for attempted use of unauthorized access devices, access device fraud and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, between November 2015 and April 2016, Pierre attempted to use and used the debit card numbers issued to other persons to make over $500,000 in withdrawals from ATMs. Bamby also unlawfully possessed and used the names and debit card numbers of other persons, without their permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the USPIS and Broward County Sheriff’s Office. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Jonathan Stratton.

United States v. Marcus Lee Grant, Case No. 17-CR-20077-Moreno

January 27, 2017, defendant Marcus Lee Grant, 26, of Miramar, was charged in a five-count indictment for his participation in a scheme to steal credit cards by directing and intercepting mail containing credit cards and other credit card account information. The indictment charges the defendant with conspiracy to commit access device fraud, access device fraud and aggravated identity theft. The indictment further charges that Grant and his co-conspirators changed the mailing addresses of other individuals, without their permission or authority, in order to intercept the mail and facilitate the fraudulent scheme.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the United States Postal Inspection Service (USPIS). The case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Cary Aronovitz.

United States v. Michel Gonzalez Suarez, et al., Case No. 16-CR-10053-King

On December 20, 2016, Michel Gonzalez Suarez, 38, and Beatriz Morales Saladriga, 20, both of Hialeah, were charged in a five-count indictment for their participation in a conspiracy to commit access device fraud, access device fraud, and aggravated identity theft in the Florida Keys.

to the allegations contained in the indictment, on October 5, 2016, Suarez and Saladriga conspired with each other and others to commit access device fraud. As part of the conspiracy, the defendants used counterfeit credit cards encoded with account numbers issued to other people to conduct a series of fraudulent transactions at several stores located in Monroe County. The defendants are also alleged to have unlawfully possessed fifteen or more counterfeit credit and debit cards encoded with unauthorized account numbers, and to have used one or more counterfeit credit cards encoded with account numbers issued to other persons.

Mr. Ferrer commends the efforts of ICE-HSI and the Monroe County Sheriff’s Office. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Anne P. McNamara.

United States v. Brandon Bair, et al., Case No. 17-CR-60005-Zloch

On January 10, 2017, Brandon Bair, 23, of Cutler Bay, Aimee Chin-Sang, 22, of Homestead, and Kevin Lawson Mitchell, 21, of Davie, were charged in a seven-count indictment for access fraud and aggravated identity theft indictment relating to trafficking in and using unauthorized AT&T merchant account numbers and credit card account numbers to commit more than $80,000 of fraud.

According to allegations contained in the indictment, on various dates in February, April and May of 2016, Bair and Chin-Sang used credit cards to conduct multiple fraudulent transactions at Home Depot stores located in Sunrise and Davie. Mitchell, an employee at the Davie Home Depot, helped Bair and Chin-Sang conduct several of these transactions. As part of the fraudulent scheme, Bair and Chin-Sang also presented counterfeit licenses and used unauthorized AT&T merchant account numbers to conduct fraudulent transactions involving thousands of dollars of Apple products at an AT&T store located in Fort Lauderdale. All three defendants are charged with conspiring to commit access device fraud. Bair and Chin-Sang are also charged with multiple counts of use of unauthorized access devices and aggravated identity theft.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the USSS, Fort Lauderdale Police Department, and Davie Police Department. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Anne P. McNamara.

United States v. Angela Maria Villegas, 17-CR-20086-Ungaro

On January 27, 2017, Angela Maria Villegas, 41, of Miami Beach, was charged in a five-count indictment for aggravated identity theft and use of unauthorized access devices.

According to the court record, including allegations contained in the indictment, from January 20, 2015, through April 12, 2016, Villegas, a high-end retail employee, made over $20,000 worth of unauthorized purchases using the credit card account numbers belonging to her high-end specialty customers, without their permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the efforts of the MDPD and USSS. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Matthew J. Langley.

United States v. Ahlaniee Maheei Chinn, 17-CR-20031-Middlebrooks

On January 7, 2017, Ahlaniee Maheei Chinn, 23, of Miami, was charged in a two-count indictment for access device fraud and aggravated identity theft.

to the court record, including allegations contained in the indictment, on March 4, 2016, Chinn, purchased more than two-thousand dollars’ worth of goods with a counterfeit credit card. The counterfeit card had the true account holders’ information shaved off and Chinn’s name was fraudulently embossed onto the credit card.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of IRS-CI and Aventura Police Department. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Breezye Telfair.

United States v. Suzelie Cheremond, Case No. 17-CR-60025-Bloom

On January 26, 2017, Suzelie Cheremond, 25, of Miami, was charged in a five-count indictment for access device fraud and aggravated identity theft.

According to the court record, including allegations contained in the indictment, in December of 2015, Cheremond, a Sam’s Club employee in Miramar, unlawfully obtained and used credit cards belonging to other persons to make purchases at Sam’s Club for $4,110.11.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of IRS-CI, the Aventura Police Department and Miramar Police Department. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Breezye Telfair.

United States v. Quienece Shedina Saintvil and Larod James Robinson,

Case No. 17-CR-20064-Ungaro

On January 26, 2017, Quienece Shedina Saintvil, 30, and Larod James Robinson, 34, both of Miami, were charged in a three-count indictment for their participation in a conspiracy to commit access device fraud and aggravated identity theft.

According to the court record, including allegations contained in the indictment, in August of 2016, Saintvil and Robinson entered the Bloomingdale’s Department store and unlawfully used a credit card account belonging to another person to make purchases. Saintvil and Robinson picked out merchandise and then Saintvil provided a Bloomingdale customer’s social security number in order to access the customer’s Bloomingdale’s credit account. Saintvil and Robinson made a total of three transactions, totaling $3,416.77, without the permission or authority of the true credit card account holder.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of IRS-CI and Aventura Police Department. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Breezye Telfair.

United States v. Shanisa Bell, Case No. 17-CR-60029-Bloom

On January 27, 2017, Shanisa Bell, 25, of Coconut Creek, was charged in a three-count indictment for using unauthorized access devices to fraudulently obtain something valued at $1,000 or more and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, between July 2015 and June 2016, Bell unlawfully used debit card account numbers issued in the names of other persons without their permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of DOL-OIG, ICE-HSI and the State of Michigan Unemployment Insurance Agency. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Brian J. Shack.

United States v. Edrey Acosta, Case No. 17-CR-20071-Martinez

On January 26, 2017, Edrey Acosta, 27, of Miami, was charged in a three-count indictment for access device fraud and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, on November 8, 2016, Acosta used counterfeit encoded with credit card account numbers issued to other persons.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the USSS and MDPD. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Breezye Telfair.

United States v. Crystal Henderson, Case No. 17-CR-20066-Gayles

On January 26, 2017, Crystal Henderson, 34, of Homestead, was charged in a four-count indictment for access device fraud and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, on various dates throughout September of 2016, Henderson unlawfully used a credit card account belonging to another person to make purchases over $1,000.00.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of IRS-CI, Stamford Connecticut Police Department, and Aventura Police Department. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Breezye Telfair.

United States v. Shante Marie Wesby, Case No. 17-CR-20032-Scola

On January 7, 2017, Shante Marie Wesby, 37, of Fort Lauderdale, was charged in a three-count indictment for access device fraud and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, on various dates throughout January and February of 2016, Wesby unlawfully used a social security number and a credit card account number belonging to another person, without his/her permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of IRS-CI and Aventura Police Department. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Breezye Telfair.

United States v. Kevin Martinez Morazan, Case No. 17-CR-60016-Bloom

On January 24, 2017, Kevin Martinez Morazan, 24, of Broward County, was charged in a five-count indictment with possessing fifteen or more unauthorized access devices and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, on May 7, 2015, Martinez unlawfully possessed names and social security numbers of other persons, without their permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the efforts of the Fort Lauderdale Police Department, USSS and IRS-CI. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Daya Nathan.

United States v. Tymonzo Ward, Case No. 16-CR-60306-Cohn

On October 28, 2016, Tymonzo Ward, 37, of Wilton Manors, was charged in a six-count indictment for access device fraud and aggravated identity theft.

According to allegations contained in the indictment, on May 21, 2015, Ward unlawfully possessed fifteen or more credit card account numbers and social security numbers belonging to other persons. Ward also unlawfully possessed and used the names, date of births, and driver licenses of other persons without their permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of IRS-CI, the USSS, and Fort Lauderdale Police Department. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Anne P. McNamara

United States v. Rayden Garcia Ramos, Case No. 16-CR-20808-Lenard

On October 21, 2016, Rayden Garcia Ramos, 46, of Hialeah, was charged in a six-count indictment for access device fraud, possession of fifteen or more unauthorized access devices and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, from September 8, 2015 through December 5, 2015, Ramos trafficked in and used one or more credit card account numbers issued to other persons in order to obtain something of value worth $1,000 or more. Additionally, on October 21, 2015, Ramos possessed unlawfully possessed fifteen or more counterfeit credit card account numbers belonging to other persons.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the USSS. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Anne P. McNamara.

United States v. Terry Tyrone Clowers, Case No. 17-CR-60004-Dimitrouleas

On January 10, 2017, Terry Tyrone Clowers, 30, of Fort Lauderdale, was charged in a two-count indictment for attempted use of unauthorized access devices and aggravated identity theft.

According to the court record, including allegations contained in the indictment, on January 2, 2017, Clowers used the name and social security number of another person in an attempt to purchase an All-Terrain Vehicle worth thousands of dollars from a Broward Motor Sports store in Fort Lauderdale.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the USSS and Fort Lauderdale Police Department. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Anne P. McNamara.

United States v. Halima Ouedraogo, Case No. 17-CR-60015-Moreno

On January 24, 2017, Halima Ouedraogo, 35, of Kirkland, Washington, was charged in a twelve-count indictment for access device fraud, possession of fifteen or more unauthorized access devices and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, from August 4, 2015 through August 25, 2015, in Broward County, Ouedraogo used credit cards issued to other persons to fraudulently obtain things valued at $1,000 or more. The indictment also alleges that on August 25, 2015, Ouedraogo possessed fifteen or more credit card account numbers and social security numbers belonging to other persons.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of IRS-CI, USSS, and the Fort Lauderdale Police Department. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Anne P. McNamara.

United States v. Terrell Tyrone Rivers and Preston Elijah Parrish, Case No. 17-CR-60024-Dimitrouleas

On January 26, 2017, Terrell Tyrone Rivers, 27, of Orlando, and Preston Elijah Parrish, 25, of Lauderhill, were charged in a ten-count indictment with conspiracy to commit access device fraud, possession of fifteen or more unauthorized access devices, and aggravated identity theft.

According to allegations contained in the indictment, from February 10, 2016 through February 24, 2016, Rivers and Parrish conspired to possess fifteen or more unauthorized access devices, that is, social security numbers issued to other persons. On February 24, 2016, Rivers drove from Orlando to Lauderhill, Florida, to meet Parrish. According to court documents, on February 24, 2016, Rivers and Parrish were pulled over in Lauderhill, Florida. Upon a search of Rivers, several driver licenses with other persons’ information and Rivers’ photograph were recovered, along with personalized checks in other persons’ names. In the vehicle, a black suitcase, printer, tablets, and multiple blank business checks were recovered. A search of Rivers’ electronics revealed the PII of more than fifteen other persons. A search of Parrish’s electronics also revealed the PII of more than fifteen other persons.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the USSS and the Lauderhill Police Department. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney J. Mackenzie Duane.

United States v. Jessie Aguilar, Case No. 16-CR-20944-Gayles

On December 15, 2016, Jesse Aguilar, 28, of Hallandale Beach, was charged in a five-count indictment for conspiring to commit access device fraud, access device fraud, and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, on or about November 2, 2014, through on or about September 15, 2015, Aguilar conspired with others to commit access device fraud. As part of the conspiracy, they used counterfeit credit cards encoded with account numbers issued to other people to conduct a series of fraudulent transactions at the Apple Store in Miami Beach, Florida. The loss amount was approximately $308,830.86.

Mr. Ferrer commends the efforts of ICE-HSI and the MDPD. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Miesha Shonta Darrough.

United States v. Dave Benggie Alin, Case No. 16-CR-20815-Williams

On October 25, 2016, Dave Benggie Alin, 21, of Miami, was charged in a three-count indictment with fraudulent use of a counterfeit credit card. aggravated identity theft, and possession of a firearm and ammunition by a convicted felon. On January 18, 2017, Alin pleaded guilty to all charges. He is currently set for sentencing on April 7, 2017.

According to the court record, on October 12, 2016, Alin was found by law enforcement to be in possession of a counterfeit credit card and a firearm. Alin used the credit card to check into a hotel in Miami, and then he continued to use the credit card to make purchases at the hotel.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the MDPD and IRS-CI. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Daniel Cervantes.

United States v. Luis Miniert, Case No. 16-CR-20941-Scola

On December 15, 2016, Luis Miniert, 26, of Miami, was charged in a five-count indictment for conspiring to commit access device fraud, access device fraud, and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, from November 2, 2014 through September 15, 2015, Miniert conspired with others to commit access device fraud. As part of the conspiracy, they used counterfeit credit cards encoded with account numbers issued to other people to conduct a series of fraudulent transactions at the Apple Store in Miami Beach, Florida. The loss amount was approximately $119,210.73.

Mr. Ferrer commends the efforts of ICE-HSI and the MDPD. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Miesha Shonta Darrough.

United States v. Anthony Leon, Case No. 17-CR-20068-Lenard

On January 26, 2017, Anthony Leon, 31, of Hialeah, was charged in a five-count indictment for conspiring to commit access device fraud, access device fraud, and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, March 20, 2014 through July 18, 2015, Leon conspired with others to commit access device fraud. As part of the conspiracy, they used counterfeit credit cards encoded with account numbers issued to other people to conduct a series of fraudulent transactions at the Apple Store in Miami Beach, Florida. The loss amount was approximately $158,690.37.

Mr. Ferrer commends the efforts of ICE-HSI and the MDPD. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Miesha Shonta Darrough.

United States v. Diana Leon a/k/a “Diana Montoya”, Case No.17-CR-20069-Altonaga

On January 26, 2017, Diana Leon a/k/a “Diana Montoya,” 22, of Hialeah, was charged in a five-count indictment for conspiring to commit access device fraud, access device fraud, and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, from September 20, 2014 through August 31, 2015, the defendant conspired with others to commit access device fraud. As part of the conspiracy, they used counterfeit credit cards encoded with account numbers issued to other people to conduct a series of fraudulent transactions at the Apple Store in Miami Beach, Florida. The loss amount was approximately $141,503.01.

Mr. Ferrer commends the efforts of ICE-HSI and the MDPD. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Miesha Shonta Darrough.

United States v. Stephanie Vargas, Case No. 17-CR-20070-Moreno

On January 26, 2017, Stephanie Vargas, 26, of Hialeah, was charged in a five-count indictment for conspiring to commit access device fraud, access device fraud, and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, from December 20, 2014 through July 17, 2015, Vargas conspired with others to commit access device fraud. As part of the conspiracy, they used counterfeit credit cards encoded with account numbers issued to other people to conduct a series of fraudulent transactions at the Apple Store in Miami Beach, Florida. The loss amount was approximately $174,152.60.

Mr. Ferrer commends the efforts of ICE-HSI and the MDPD. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Miesha Shonta Darrough.

UNLAWFULLY POSSESSING PII

United States v. Alvin Celius Andre, Case No. 17-CR-60014-Zloch

On January 20, 2017, Alvin Celius Andre, 26, of Miramar, was charged in a four-count indictment with access device fraud and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, on March 26, 2016, Andre possessed fifteen or more social security numbers issued to other persons. Andre also unlawfully possessed and used the names and date of births of other persons, without their permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of Miramar Police Department and ICE-HSI. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Matthew J. Langley.

United States v. Frantz Felix, Jr, Case No. 17-CR-20038-Williams

On January 20, 2017, Frantz Felix, Jr, 23, of Miramar, was charged in a six-count indictment with access device fraud and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, on March 26, 2016, Felix possessed fifteen or more social security numbers issued to other persons and used a credit card account number issued to another person. Felix, Jr. also unlawfully possessed and used the names and date of births of other persons, without their permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the Miramar Police Department and ICE-HSI. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Matthew J. Langley.

United States v. Marcus Allen Griffin, Case No. 17-CR-60011-Dimitrouleas

On January 13, 2017, Marcus Allen Griffin, 22, of Miramar, was charged in a six-count indictment with access device fraud and aggravated identity theft.

to the allegations contained in the indictment, on September 1, 2016, Griffin possessed fifteen or more social security numbers and credit card account numbers issued to other persons. Griffin also unlawfully possessed and used the names and date of births of other persons, without their permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the Miramar Police Department and ICE-HSI. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Matthew J. Langley.

United States v. Marc Antoine Riviere, Case No. 17-CR-20024-Moore

On January 13, 2017, Marc Antoine Riviere, 29, of Miami, was charged in a four-count indictment for identity theft in connection with his possession of at least fifteen social security numbers belonging to other individuals.

According to the allegations in the indictment, on July 17, 2014, Riviere was found in possession of fifteen or more social security numbers issued to other persons, without their permission or authority. Riviere also unlawfully possessed and used the names and date of births of other persons, without their permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of FBI, IRS-CI, and Miami-Dade County Schools Police Department. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Miesha Shonta Darrough.

United States v. Jacqueloi Trishauna Moreau, Case No. 17-CR-60003-Bloom

On January 10, 2017, Jacqueloi Trishauna Moreau, 28, of Lauderdale Lakes, was charged in a four-count indictment for identity theft in connection with her possession of at least fifteen social security numbers belonging to other individuals.

According to the allegations in the indictment, on July 18, 2016, Moreau was found in possession of fifteen or more names, dates and social security numbers issued to other persons. Moreau also unlawfully possessed and used the names and date of births of other persons, without their permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the efforts of USPIS, IRS-CI and Margate Police Department. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Miesha Shonta Darrough.

United States v. Elena Caridad Amaya, Case No. 17-CR-20067-Ungaro

On January 26, 2017, Elena Caridad Amaya, 42, of Lauderdale Lakes, was charged in a four-count indictment for identity theft in connection with her possession of at least fifteen social security numbers belonging to other individuals.

According to the allegations in the indictment, in April 2016, Amaya was found in possession of fifteen or more counterfeit card encoded with account numbers and social security numbers issued to other persons. Amaya used a credit card account number issued to another person, without his/her permission or authority, to make purchases totaling $20,681.64.

Mr. Ferrer commends the efforts of IRS-CI and MDPD. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Miesha Shonta Darrough.

United States v. Robert Jamorris Jackson, Case No. 16-CR-60337-Bloom

On December 2, 2016, Robert Jamorris Jackson, 33, of Broward County, was charged in a six count indictment with possession of fifteen or more unauthorized access devices and aggravated identity theft.

The indictment alleges that on February 18, 2016, in Broward County, Jackson possessed personal identifying information of more than fifteen people.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the USSS. This case was indicted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Daniel Cervantes and is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Jonathan Stratton.

United States v. Aamir Khan, Case No. 16-CR-20839-Lenard

On November 1, 2016, Aamir Khan, 20, of Miami, was charged in a six-count indictment with possession of fifteen or more unauthorized access devices and aggravated identity theft. On January 3, 2017, Khan pleaded guilty to possession of fifteen or more unauthorized access devices and one count of aggravated identity theft. Khan is scheduled to be sentenced on March 15, 2017.

According to the court record, on or about June 10, 2014, Khan was arrested for driving without a license. A search incident to arrest revealed that Khan had a USB drive in his pocket. A consensual search of the USB drive revealed PII for approximately 3,680 individuals, including their names, addresses, dates of birth, and social security numbers.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of IRS-CI and NMBPD. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Daniel Cervantes.

United States v. Victor Joseph, Case No. 16-CR-60335-Zloch

On November 29, 2016, Victor Joseph, 26, of Orlando, was charged in a seven-count indictment with using one or more unauthorized access devices, possessing fifteen or more unauthorized access devices and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations in the indictment, between January and March 2015, Joseph possessed and used social security numbers of other persons, without their permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the efforts of IRS-CI and USSS. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Daya Nathan.

United States v. Dave Pierre, Case No. 17-CR-60023-Moreno

On January 26, 2017, Dave Pierre, 28, of Miami, was charged in a five-count indictment with access device fraud and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, on November 7, 2016, Pierre unlawfully possessed fifteen or more names, dates of birth and social security numbers belonging to other persons. Pierre unlawfully possessed and used the names and date of births of other persons, without their permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of IRS-CI and the Broward County Sheriff’s Office. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Anne P. McNamara.

United States v. Ricky Cearc, Case No. 17-CR-20083-Moreno

On January 27, 2017, Ricky Cearc, 27, of Miami, was charged in a three-count indictment for access device fraud and aggravated identity theft.

According to allegations contained in the indictment, on August 29, 2013, Ricky Cearc unlawfully possessed fifteen or more social security numbers belonging to other persons. Ricky Cearc unlawfully possessed and used the date of births and social security numbers of other persons, without their permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of ICE-HSI and MDPD. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Jonathan D. Stratton.

United States v. Lyns Cearc, Case No. 17-CR-20084-Gayles

On January 27, 2017, Lyns Cearc, 34, of Miami, was charged in a three-count indictment for access device fraud and aggravated identity theft.

to allegations contained in the indictment, on August 29, 2013, Lyns Cearc unlawfully possessed fifteen or more social security numbers belonging to other persons. Lyns Cearc unlawfully possessed and used the date of births and social security numbers of other persons, without their permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of ICE-his and MDPD. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Jonathan D. Stratton.

United States v. Edouard Bastien, Case No. 16-CR-20953-Gayles

On December 19, 2016, a criminal information was filed, charging Edouard Bastien, 27, of North Miami Beach, with possession of fifteen or more unauthorized access devices and aggravated identity theft.

to the allegations contained in the information, on June 20, 2014, Bastien unlawfully possessed fifteen or more social security numbers belonging to other persons. Bastien also unlawfully possessed and used the names and social security numbers of other persons without their permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of ICE-HSI, DOL-OIG, IRS-CI and North Miami Beach Police Department (NMBPD). This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Joshua S. Rothstein.

United States v. D’Andre Nathaniel Watson. Case No. 16-CR-20958-Lenard

On December 20, 2016, D’Andre Nathaniel Watson, 19, of North Miami Beach, was charged in a six-count indictment for possession of fifteen or more unauthorized access devices and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, on February 25, 2016 and again on March 16, 2016, Watson unlawfully possessed fifteen or more social security numbers belonging to other persons. Watson also unlawfully possessed and used the names and the date of births of other persons, without their permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of ICE-HSI, DOL-OIG, and NMBPD. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Joshua S. Rothstein.

United States v. Brian Anthony Joseph, Case No. 17-CR-20004-Moore

On January 5, 2017, Brian Anthony Joseph, 21, of Miami, was charged in a four-count indictment for possession of fifteen or more unauthorized access devices and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, on November 9, 2015, Joseph unlawfully possessed fifteen or more social security numbers belonging to other persons. Watson also unlawfully possessed and used the names and the date of births of other persons, without their permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts ICE-HSI, DOL-OIG, NMBPD and the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Joshua S. Rothstein.

United States v. Richard Wayne Brown, Case No. 17-CR-60010-Cohn

On January 13, 2017, Richard Wayne Brown, 29, of Miramar, was charged in a seven-count indictment for possession of fifteen or more unauthorized access devices and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, on December 28, 2016 and January 6, 2017, Brown unlawfully possessed fifteen or more social security numbers belonging to other persons. Brown also unlawfully possessed and used the names and the date of births of other persons, without their permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of U.S. Department of Agriculture, Office of the Inspector General (USDA-OIG), FBI, USSS, and Fort Lauderdale Police Department. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Joshua S. Rothstein.

United States v. Peterson Joseph, Case No. 16-CR-20830-Moore

On October 28, 2016, Peterson Joseph, 24, of Miami, Florida, was charged in a four-count indictment with aggravated identity theft, possession of fifteen or more unauthorized access devices, and using unauthorized access devices to fraudulently obtain something valued at $1,000 or more.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, from June 17, 2014 through May 19, 2015, Joseph unlawfully possessed and used fifteen or more social security numbers belonging to other persons.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of DOL-OIG. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Brian J. Shack.

United States v. Jason Douglas, Case No. 16-CR-60308-Bloom

On October 28, 2016, Jason Douglas, 26, of New York, was charged in a three-count indictment with possessing fifteen or more unauthorized and counterfeit access devices and aggravated identity theft.

to the allegations contained in the indictment, on or about April 16, 2016, Douglas unlawfully possessed fifteen or more social security numbers issued to other persons and debit cards encoded with account numbers issued to other persons. Douglas also unlawfully possessed and used the names, date of births and social security numbers of other persons, without their permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of IRS-CI and the Broward County Sherriff’s Office. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Brian J. Shack.

United States v. Jerry Jean Baptiste and Stanley Auguste, Case No. 16-CR-20934-Cooke

On December 15, 2016, Jerry Jean Baptiste, 22, of Miami, and Stanley Auguste, 25, of Miami Gardens, were charged in a nine-count indictment with conspiracy to possess fifteen or more unauthorized access devices, possession of fifteen or more unauthorized access devices, and aggravated identity theft.

to the allegations contained in the indictment, from April 24, 2015 through August 5, 2015, Baptiste and Auguste conspired to possess unlawfully fifteen or more social security numbers issued to other persons. On or about April 30, 2015, Baptiste possessed and sold electronic files containing lists of PII of various individuals, including social security numbers issued to fifteen or more individuals. On or about May 6, 2015, and again on August 5, 2015, Baptiste and Auguste possessed and sold electronic files containing lists of PII, including fifteen or more social security numbers. Baptiste and Auguste possessed and used the names, social security numbers, and dates of birth of real individuals, without permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of ICE-HSI. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney John P. Gonsoulin.

ACCESS DEVICE FRAUD

United States v. Alexey Abreu Chapotin, et al., Case No. 17-CR-20043-Lenard

January 24, 2017, Alexey Abreu Chapotin, 22, Yankiel Blanco, 34, and Yuliesky Cespedes Perez, 26, all of Miami, were charged in a two-count indictment for conspiracy to commit access device fraud and possession of device making equipment.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, on August 16, 2016, Chapotin, Blanco and Perez possessed credit card “skimming” devices, drills, and other equipment which was used to modify the skimmers so that they could be surreptitiously installed onto credit card readers at gas pumps. The indictment further alleges that on August 16, 2016, the defendants installed one of these card “skimming” devices at a pump at the gas station, in order to capture customer credit card account information.

Mr. Ferrer commends ICE-HSI and the Aventura Police Department. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Anne P. McNamara.

United States v. Omar Pulido Sanchez, et al., Case No. 17-mj-2112-JJO

On January 27, 2017, Omar Pulido Sanchez, 38, Uriel Pulido Sanchez, 42, and Maria Castillo Sarmiento, all of Colombia, were charged by criminal complaint with conspiracy to possess fifteen or more access devices and conspiracy to possess access device making equipment.

According to the allegations contained in the complaint, in June of 2016, the defendants installed credit card skimming devices onto bank ATMs throughout South Florida. In total, the defendants stole the bank account information of at least three hundred victims, and of those three hundred victims, over sixty reported fraudulent withdrawals from their accounts.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the MDPD. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Daniel J. Marcet.

United States v. Rene Hernandez, Case No. 17-mj-2111-O’Sullivan

On January 27, 2017, Rene Hernandez, 57, of Miami, was charged by criminal complaint for possession of access device making equipment.

According to the allegations contained in the complaint, on April 5, 2016, Hernandez was found by law enforcement to be in possession of a magnetic stripe encoding device, multiple fuel pump credit card skimming devices, and several counterfeit credit cards in his own name.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the MDPD. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Daniel J. Marcet.

United States v. Cesar Castillo Vargas, Case No. 17-mj-6040-O’Sullivan

On January 27, 2017, Cesar Castillo Vargas, 37, of Colombia, was charged by criminal complaint with possession of access device making equipment.

According to the allegations contained in the complaint, on August 1, 2016, law enforcement found Castillo Vargas in possession of a magnetic strip encoder device, a fraudulent Colombian driver license, a fraudulent Mexican passport, and several blank credit or debit cards.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the MDPD. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Daniel J. Marcet.

United States v. Oberto Jean, Case No. 17-CR-20082-Scola

On January 27, 2017, Oberto Jean, 35, of Miami, Florida, was charged in a five-count indictment with possession of fifteen or more unauthorized access devices, possession of access device-making equipment, aggravated identity theft, and being a felon in possession of firearms and ammunition.

to the allegations contained in the indictment, on or about February 11, 2015, Jean unlawfully possessed access device-making equipment and fifteen or more social security numbers belonging to other persons. Jean unlawfully possessed and used the date of births and social security numbers of other persons, without their permission or authority. Jean, a convicted felon, also possessed two firearms and ammunition.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of IRS-CI, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) and the Miami Police Department (MPD). This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Brian J. Shack.

United States v. Anthony Reid, Case No. 16-CR-60307-Dimitrouleas

On October 28, 2016, Anthony Reid, 22, of Miami, was charged in a four-count indictment with possessing access device-making equipment, fifteen or more unauthorized and counterfeit access devices, and aggravated identity theft.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, on April 16, 2016, Reid unlawfully possessed access device-making equipment, social security numbers issued to other persons, and counterfeit credit cards and debit cards encoded with account numbers issued to other persons.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of IRS-CI and the Broward County Sherriff’s Office. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Brian J. Shack.

United States v. Luis Perez Luis and Jose Luis Perez, Case No. 17-CR-20087-Altonaga

On January 27, 2017, Luis Perez Luis, 57, and Jose Luis Perez, 33, both of Miami, were charged in an eight-count indictment with aggravated identity theft, conspiracy to possess fifteen or more access devices, possession of fifteen or more unauthorized access devices, and possession of device making equipment

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, on August 31, 2016, Luis and Perez conspired to possess and possessed fifteen or more counterfeit credit cards and credit card account numbers issued to other persons, as well as access device making equipment.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the MDPD and USSS. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Matthew J. Langley.

United States v. Patrick Gaston Sebastian, Case No. 17-CR-20030-Williams

On January 20, 2017, Patrick Gaston Sebastian, 21, of Miami, Florida, was charged in a four-count indictment with aggravated identity theft, possession of fifteen or more unauthorized access devices and possession of device making equipment.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, on July 1, 2016, Sebastian possessed fifteen or more social security numbers and credit card account numbers issued to other persons as well as a credit card embosser and credit card skimmer. Sebastian also unlawfully possessed and used the names and the date of births of other persons, without their permission or authority.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of MDPD and USSS. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Matthew J. Langley.

United States v. Luis Fernando Casallas Guzman, Case No. 17-CR-20022-Scola

On January 13, 2017, Luis Fernando Casallas Guzman, 61, of Colombia, was charged in a two-count indictment with possession of fifteen or more unauthorized access devices and possession of device making equipment.

According to the allegations contained in the indictment, on March 12, 2015, Guzman possessed fifteen or more counterfeit credit cards and credit card account numbers of other individuals as well as a credit card skimmer and magnetic stripe encoder.

Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of ICE-HSI. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Matthew J. Langley.

     If convicted of the charged conduct, the defendants face a possible maximum statutory sentence of 10 years in prison for possession of fifteen or more unauthorized access devices; 10 years in prison for trafficking in or using one or more unauthorized access devices during a one-year period and by such conduct obtaining anything of value over $1,000; 5 years in prison for theft of mail; 10 years in prison for theft of government money; 5 in prison for conspiracy to commit theft of government money; 5 years in prison for conspiracy to defraud the United States; 15 years in prison for possession of access device making equipment; 20 years in prison for participating in a wire fraud conspiracy; 5 years in prison for conspiracy to pass Treasury checks bearing forged endorsements; and 2 years in prison consecutive to any other term for aggravated identity theft.

     Mr. Ferrer commends ATF, the Aventura Police Department, Broward County Sheriff’s Office, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), Davie Police Department, DOL-OIG, FBI , Florida Department of Economic Opportunity, Homestead Police Department, ICE-HSI, IRS-CI, Lauderhill Police Department, Margate Police Department, Miami Beach Police Department, MDPD Professional Compliance Bureau and Public Corruption Section, Miami-Dade County Office of the Inspector General, Miami-Dade Public Schools Police Department, Miramar Police Department, Monroe County Sheriff’s Office, MPD, NMBPD, Stamford Connecticut Police Department, State of Michigan Unemployment Insurance Agency, SSA-OIG, TIGTA, USDA-OIG, USPIS, USSS, for the investigative support they provide the Strike Force to combat fraud schemes throughout the Southern District of Florida.

     A criminal complaint or an indictment is an accusatory instrument that contains formal charges against a defendant. All persons charged in a criminal complaint or indictment are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Related court documents and information may be found on the website of the District Court for the Southern District of Florida at www.flsd.uscourts.gov or on http://pacer.flsd.uscourts.gov.

Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1YmDCP-bctu0LUXADRLu4DOmA-k7HpskPYVhBghXSyEU
  Last Updated: 2026-03-08 00:22:47 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: Case type associated with a magistrate case if the current case was merged from a magistrate case
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The docket number originally given to a case assigned to a magistrate judge and subsequently merged into a criminal case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a magistrate case
Format: A3

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the second highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE2
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE2
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the third highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE3
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE3
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the fourth highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE4
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE4
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the fifth highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE5
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE5
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE5
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE5
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
Magistrate Docket Number:   SD-FL  1:19-mj-03798
Case Name:   USA v. Perez
Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ehXP686NTtiDo4C0rW_6Aity8ODhRkZlSLAaEZtP2GU
  Last Updated: 2025-03-21 10:25:11 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: Case type associated with a magistrate case if the current case was merged from a magistrate case
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The docket number originally given to a case assigned to a magistrate judge and subsequently merged into a criminal case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a magistrate case
Format: A3

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the second highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE2
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE2
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the third highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE3
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE3
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the fourth highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE4
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE4
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the fifth highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE5
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE5
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE5
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE5
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
Magistrate Docket Number:   SD-FL  1:19-mj-03817
Case Name:   USA v. Arguelles et al
Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1DzRGIo-6cfAby5EC47VNeAoz8CbTSI6LJMps6gJxfD4
  Last Updated: 2025-03-21 10:26:43 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: Case type associated with a magistrate case if the current case was merged from a magistrate case
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The docket number originally given to a case assigned to a magistrate judge and subsequently merged into a criminal case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a magistrate case
Format: A3

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the second highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE2
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE2
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the third highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE3
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE3
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the fourth highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE4
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE4
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the fifth highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE5
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE5
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE5
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE5
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
Magistrate Docket Number:   SD-FL  1:19-mj-03842
Case Name:   USA v. Verdura
Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1zC5L_dexfiNRI-xBghsiOckO5x5TelfHDzIBk3PxuQg
  Last Updated: 2025-03-21 10:28:49 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: Case type associated with a magistrate case if the current case was merged from a magistrate case
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The docket number originally given to a case assigned to a magistrate judge and subsequently merged into a criminal case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a magistrate case
Format: A3

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the second highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE2
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE2
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the third highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE3
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE3
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the fourth highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE4
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE4
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the fifth highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE5
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE5
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE5
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE5
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
Score:   0.9687
Docket Number:   aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanVzdGljZS5nb3YvdXNhby1tZGZsL3ByL2FwcGVhbHMtY291cnQtdXBob2xkcy1zY2llbnRpc3RzLWZyYXVkLWNvbnZpY3Rpb25z
  Press Releases:
Tampa, Florida – United States Attorney Maria Chapa Lopez announces that the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit has affirmed the convictions for two Belleair Beach scientists, Mahmoud Aldissi (a/k/a Matt) and his wife Anastassia Bogomolova (a/k/a Anastasia), for conspiracy to commit wire fraud, wire fraud, aggravated identity theft, and falsification of records. The Court’s opinion describes how Aldissi and Bogomolova lied about their facilities, equipment, and employees, fabricated price quotes, and forged endorsements from respected scientists to obtain $10.5 million in small-business research funding from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and other government agencies. When government officials began investigating, the defendants submitted falsified business records for their companies, Fractal Systems, Inc. and Smart Polymers Research Corp., to cover up the fraud.

The Eleventh Circuit explained that had Congress established the programs that Aldissi and Bogomolova defrauded in order to provide qualified small businesses with research-and-development support to turn research into actual commercial products and services. In a highly competitive process, researchers submit detailed proposals outlining their research, a panel of experts selects winners, and the winning proposals become contracts between the researchers and the government for the research.

On appeal, the defendants had admitted that their proposals were faked and that, “under the terms of the bid contracts, they were not eligible for any of the contracts or grants for which they applied.” They nonetheless claimed that their convictions should be overturned because they had performed research and published the results in scientific journals. However, after hearing oral argument, the Court of Appeals rejected all of their arguments, stating, “These are not job programs for unemployed scientists and do not fund research merely for the sake of research.” Because the defendants’ “lies, forgeries, and fabricated price quotes” related to key ingredients for commercialization, their frauds deprived the government of what it actually was paying for and of the money that should have been awarded to other researchers.

The Court also affirmed the defendants’ sentences, which were based in part on the $24.5 million that they sought from their fraudulent proposals. Aldissi is serving 15 years in prison, and Bogomolova is serving 13 years in prison. And both have been ordered to repay as restitution the $10.5 million that they obtained from the government.

“The Defense Criminal Investigative Service investigation into these fraud crimes uncovered and documented clear evidence of egregious violations of the law, leading to the conviction of these defendants,” said Special Agent in Charge John F. Khin, Southeast Field Office. “That these convictions were upheld on appeal is a testament to the compelling results of the thorough and detailed investigation pursued by DCIS and our partners.”

“We concur and appreciate today's affirmation of sentence from the 11th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals,” said the Director of the U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Command’s Major Procurement Fraud Unit, Frank Robey. “Regardless of the extraordinary plots that people create to attempt to corrupt the system and satisfy their own greed, we will root them out and sooner or later unravel their criminal schemes. Along with the DOJ and our other law enforcement partners, we will continue to tirelessly work shoulder-to-shoulder to protect the integrity of the DOD contracting system,” Robey said.  

“In affirming the district court, the Eleventh Circuit has recognized that defendants thwarted the important purpose behind the SBIR and STTR programs, to promote the progress of science by increasing opportunities for small businesses to commercialize cutting-edge scientific research,” said Allison Lerner, Inspector General for the National Science Foundation. “This decision is an important step in protecting the integrity of this program. The NSF Office of Inspector General is committed to vigorously pursuing oversight of these taxpayer funds and I commend the U.S. Attorney’s Office and our investigative partners for their strong support in this effort.”

The appeal was handled by Assistant United States Attorney Roberta J. Bodnar, and the underlying criminal case—including an 18-day trial—was prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Thomas N. Palermo. It was investigated by the Defense Criminal Investigative Service, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s Office of the Inspector General, the Major Procurement Fraud Unit of the United States Army Criminal Investigation Division, the National Science Foundation’s Office of the Inspector General, the Environmental Protection Agency’s Office of the Inspector General, the Department of Energy’s Office of the Inspector General, and the Department of Homeland Security’s Office of the Inspector General.

Score:   0.9687
Docket Number:   aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanVzdGljZS5nb3YvdXNhby1uZGNhL3ByL2ZvdXItZGVmZW5kYW50cy1wbGVhZC1ndWlsdHktcmFja2V0ZWVyaW5nLWNvbnNwaXJhY3ktbmF0aW9ud2lkZS1wcmVzY3JpcHRpb24tZHJ1Zw
  Press Releases:
SAN FRANCISCO – Mihran Stepanyan, Artur Stepanyan, Yan German, and Khachig Geuydjian pleaded guilty today to crimes stemming from their respective roles in a wide-ranging racketeering conspiracy involving diversion of prescription drugs, money laundering, bank fraud, identity theft, and additional crimes, announced United States Attorney David L. Anderson; Federal Bureau of Investigation Special Agent in Charge John F. Bennett; and Internal Revenue Service, Criminal Investigation, Special Agent in Charge Kareem Carter.  The pleas were accepted by the Hon. Charles R. Breyer, United States District Judge, and leaves one remaining defendant to stand trial for allegations made in a Second Superseding Indictment filed in February of 2016 against 38 defendants. 

“Patients needing prescription drugs shouldn’t have to worry that their medications came out of a back alley,” said U.S. Attorney Anderson.  “The defendants and their co-conspirators were able to make massive profits by diverting street drugs back into mainstream channels while creating false paperwork to conceal their true source.  Thanks to the FBI, IRS, and federal prosecutors in San Francisco, the defendants now face the prospect of lengthy prison sentences for their criminal conduct.”

“The American public was victimized twice by this scheme,” said FBI San Francisco Special Agent in Charge John F. Bennett. “The majority of the profits were subsidized both by American taxpayers and by those paying private insurance premiums.” “Additionally, patients were put at risk by the movement of these black market drugs, as the defendants disregarded general safety protocols and guidelines, to include expiration dates and pharmaceutical lot numbers.”

“Today’s guilty pleas bring us one step closer to closing the chapter on this criminal enterprise,” said Kareem Carter, Special Agent in Charge IRS Criminal Investigation. “The crimes committed by these defendants ranged from picking up drugs at a pizza shop to a half-million-dollar tax check fraud scheme.  In total, more than $199 million in diverted prescription drug proceeds were laundered through bank accounts established with false identities and shell companies.  IRS-CI is committed to following the money so we can financially disrupt and dismantle criminal organizations like these.”

All four defendants pleading guilty today—Mihran Stepanyan (M. Stepanyan), his cousin Artur Stepanyan (A. Stepanyan), German, and Geuydjian—have acknowledged that they were members of a nationwide conspiracy referred to in court documents as the Karapedyan-Stepanyan Enterprise (Enterprise).  One key aspect of the criminal activity was a multi-million dollar prescription drug diversion scheme.  According to the plea agreements filed today, members and associates of the Enterprise procured prescription drugs from unlicensed sources, usually street dealers, and resold the drugs to unknowing customers.  The Stepanyans also admitted that they are not licensed to sell drugs, that they procured millions of dollars of drugs through street suppliers and other unlicensed sources, and that the drugs they procured eventually were resold as legitimate products.

The Stepanyans’ plea agreements include an overview of the complexity and sophistication of the Enterprise’s operations.  Members of the Enterprise conducted the affairs of the organization through a pattern of racketeering and committed crimes throughout California as well as in Minnesota, Ohio, and Puerto Rico.  Further, the Stepanyans’ plea agreements describe how members and associates of the Enterprise procured and distributed a wide variety of drugs from unlicensed sources for distribution throughout the country.  The drugs included medications used to treat HIV infection, Type-2 diabetes, dementia, and high blood pressure, among other conditions.  Members and associates of the Enterprise also created false and fraudulent paperwork, referred to as pedigrees, to make it appear that those drugs had been purchased from legitimate sources.  In addition, they created sham companies and used multiple bank accounts to receive and distribute the proceeds from their fraudulent transactions.  The plea agreements also describe how the Stepanyans, along with other members and associates of the Enterprise, intentionally used the identities of real people to carry out their unlawful objectives.  The plea agreements of Geuydjian and German provide further details of the Enterprise’s operations.  Specifically, Geuydjian’s plea agreement describes how he negotiated fraudulent personal and tax checks for the benefit of the Enterprise, and German’s plea agreement describes how he supplied drugs for distribution by the Enterprise and managed aspects of the Enterprise’s money laundering operations. 

According to M. Stepanyan’s plea agreement, he became a member of the Enterprise as early as January 2010.  He admitted that he agreed with his co-conspirators to commit multiple criminal acts involving money laundering, mail fraud, wire fraud, bank fraud, identity theft, and multiple acts involving the distribution of drugs from unlicensed sources to conduct the affairs of the Enterprise.  In his plea agreement, M. Stepanyan admitted that he controlled several entities, including Red Rock Capital Group, Inc.; Trans Atlantic Capital Group, Inc.; GC National Wholesale, Inc.; and Sky Atlantic Group, Inc., in addition to numerous bank accounts through which approximately $199 million of pharmaceutical money flowed between 2010 and 2014.  M. Stepanyan also admitted purchasing approximately $56 million in gold using the illicit proceeds from the unlawful sale of prescription drugs.  As a further example of his participation in the Enterprise, M. Stepanyan used an entity called Niva Pharmaceuticals to facilitate transactions related to the criminal conspiracy.  Specifically, M. Stepanyan admitted that in January of 2014, he purchased Niva from a co-conspirator who had set up the company.  Although Niva was licensed to engage in drug wholesaling in California, it was not and did not engage in wholesale drug distribution.  Instead, M. Stepanyan acknowledged, Niva was nothing more than a shell company with offices that generally were empty except for a desk, a computer, and tables for drugs that the Enterprise procured.  The plea agreement describes how Enterprise members stored boxes of drugs in Niva’s offices and shipped them throughout the country using fraudulent labels that suggested the drugs were being shipped by or to authentic companies, including a legitimate drug company operating in Puerto Rico. 

A. Stepanyan also admitted in his plea agreement that he was a member of the Enterprise beginning in at least January of 2010.  Between 2010 and 2015, he directed and participated in a prescription drug diversion scheme whereby he procured drugs from various unlicensed sources and sold them to a co-defendant who, in turn, sold the drugs to pharmacies throughout the United States.  Further, A. Stepanyan admitted that the gross receipts for the sale of those diverted prescription drugs was at least $199 million.  According to the plea agreement, A. Stepanyan and his cousin, M. Stepanyan, laundered those proceeds through various bank accounts established in false identities, which M. Stepanyan controlled. 

German admitted in his plea agreement that he was a member of the Enterprise between 2013 and 2015.  He acknowledged that he was responsible for establishing a network of unlicensed street suppliers to provide drugs for the distribution scheme.  As described in his plea agreement, German had multiple sources of drugs.  Between 2013 and 2014, he obtained boxes full of prescription drugs from one of his co-conspirators in Los Angeles, California.  For example, he would pick up drugs from one of his sources at a pizza shop with the help of one of his associates, load the boxes into the trunk of a car, and drive them to a nearby mall or another pre-arranged location where he would deliver them to the Stepanyans.  German also admitted that in his role managing money-laundering operations for the Enterprise, he assisted with wire fraud, bank fraud, identity theft, and illegal check cashing schemes.  In the plea agreement, German admits that he used his birth name, Henrik Hartyunyan, during some of the underlying illegal conduct he performed on behalf of the Enterprise.

Geuydjian admitted that he was a member of the Enterprise from at least 2012 through approximately 2014.  In his plea agreement, he describes himself as a “money launderer for the Enterprise.”  Geuydjian acknowledged that he and others in the Enterprise created sham companies and used multiple bank accounts to receive and distribute the proceeds from the fraudulent transactions.  Geuydjian liquidated tax fraud and drug diversion proceeds by making deposits to a number of sham corporate entities that he created and allowed other members and associates of the Enterprise to use his businesses to send illicit funds and other merchandise.  Furthermore, Geuydjian used the identities of real people to carry out many of the Enterprise’s unlawful objectives.  For example, the plea agreement describes how Geuydjian’s co-conspirators acquired and possessed stolen identifying information for dozens of individuals in order to file fraudulent tax returns online.  The Enterprise obtained checks issued by the federal government and mailed from the United States Treasury based on fraudulent tax returns.  From approximately August 2012 through August 2013, Geuydjian fraudulently liquidated approximately 51 checks totaling more than $538,295 though accounts he held in the names of three companies he controlled.  Geuydjian also used photocopies of driver’s licenses, social security cards, or other personal identifying with the identities of real people to open bank accounts or gain access to the victims’ bank accounts, to negotiate checks made out in the victims’ names.  Furthermore, Geudjian and his co-conspirators perpetrated a tax check fraud scheme.  For example, in March 2014, Geudjian deposited two tax refund checks into fraudulent Wells Fargo bank accounts—one in the amount of $117,887 and another in the amount of $131,205.  These checks, which were from legitimate tax return filings, were stolen out of the mail by “runners” employed by members of the conspiracy.  Geudjian also liquidated approximately $71,806 that his co-conspirators stole from a victim’s Fidelity 401K retirement account.

On February 11, 2016, a federal grand jury handed down the Second Superseding Indictment charging the four defendants—as well as 34 additional individuals—with various crimes in connection with the activities of the Enterprise.  All four defendants pleading guilty today are released on bond pending sentencing.  A majority of the defendants in this case have pleaded guilty to various charges, including the following:



Defendant





Charges To Which Defendant Pleaded Guilty





Status of Sentencing





MIHRAN STEPANYAN, 34, Glendale, Calif.

 





Pleaded guilty today to racketeering conspiracy, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d). 





Sentencing scheduled for September 21, 2020

(statutory maximum of 20 years in prison and $250,000 fine)





ARTUR STEPANYAN, 43, Glendale, Calif.

 





Pleaded guilty today to racketeering conspiracy, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d). 





Sentencing scheduled for September 21, 2020

(statutory maximum of 20 years in prison and $250,000 fine)





KHACHIG GEUYDJIAN, 79, Chatsworth, Calif.

 





Pleaded guilty today to racketeering conspiracy, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d). 





Sentencing scheduled for September 21, 2020

(statutory maximum of 20 years in prison and $250,000 fine)





YAN GERMAN

a/k/a Henrik Hartyunyan, 40, Encino, Calif.





Pleaded guilty today to racketeering conspiracy, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d). 





Sentencing scheduled for September 21, 2020

(statutory maximum of 20 years in prison and $250,000 fine)





GEVORK TER-MKRTCHYAN, 58, Encino, Calif.





Pleaded guilty on August 23, 2017, racketeering conspiracy, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d). 





Sentenced on January 30, 2018, to 21 months in prison





ARMAN PETROSYAN, 37, Northridge, Calif.

 





Pleaded guilty on August 28, 2019, this defendant pled guilty pursuant to racketeering conspiracy, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d). 





Sentencing is scheduled for September 21, 2020

(statutory maximum of 20 years in prison and $250,000 fine)





LANNA KARAPEDYAN, 30, Los Angeles, Calif.

 





Pleaded guilty on October 22, 2019, to a Superseding Information charging her with aiding and abetting receiving, retaining, and concealing stolen or forged Treasury checks, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 510(b) and 2. 





Sentencing is scheduled for September 21, 2020 (statutory maximum of 10 years in prison and $250,000 fine)





MAXWELL STARSKY, 41, Studio City, Calif.

 





Pleaded guilty on August 29, 2017, racketeering conspiracy, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d).





Sentenced on March 9, 2018, to 18 months in prison.





SEVAK GHARGHANI, 48, Burbank, Calif.

 





Pleaded guilty on August 28, 2019, to racketeering conspiracy, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d).





Sentencing is scheduled for September 21, 2020 (statutory maximum of 20 years in prison and $250,000 fine)





JEAN DUKMAJIAN, 66, Los Angeles, Calif.

 





Pleaded guilty on October 22, 2019, to racketeering conspiracy, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d).





Sentencing is scheduled for September 21, 2020 (statutory maximum of 20 years in prison and $250,000 fine)





KARINE DUKMAJIAN, 38, Reseda, Calif.





Pleaded guilty on October 22, 2019, to one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1343 and 1349.





Sentencing is scheduled for September 21, 2020 (maximum of 20 years in prison and $1,000,000, per count)





ANGELA DUKMAJIAN, 30, Los Angeles, Calif.





Pleaded guilty on October 22, 2019, to one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1343 and 1349.





Sentencing is scheduled for September 21, 2020 (maximum of 20 years in prison and $1,000,000)





ARMAN DANIELIAN, 44, Burbank, Calif.





Pleaded guilty on October 22, 2019, to one count of conspiracy to engage in unlicensed wholesale distribution of prescription drugs, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 331(t), 333(b)(1)(D), and 353(e)(2)(A).





Sentencing is scheduled for September 21, 2020 (maximum of 10 years in prison and $250,000, per count)





ASATOUR MAGZANYAN, 58, Los Angeles, Calif.





Pleaded guilty on March 15, 2019, to racketeering conspiracy, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d).





Sentencing is scheduled for September 21, 2020 (statutory maximum of 20 years in prison and $250,000 fine)





TIGRAN SARKISYAN, 45, Toluca Lake, Calif.





Pleaded guilty on May 10, 2017, to racketeering conspiracy, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d).





Sentenced on August 1, 2018, to 15 months in prison. 





HRIPSIME KHACHTRYAN, 45, Toluca Lake, Calif.





Pleaded guilty on May 10, 2017, to racketeering conspiracy, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d).





Sentenced on August 1, 2018, to 12 months and one day in prison. 





LOUI ARTIN, 58, North Hollywood, Calif.





Pleaded guilty on November 15, 2017, to racketeering conspiracy, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d).





Sentencing is scheduled for September 21, 2020 (statutory maximum of 20 years in prison and $250,000 fine)





ARMAN ZARGARYAN, 37, Granada Hills, Calif.





Pleaded guilty on November 20, 2019, to racketeering conspiracy, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d).





Sentencing is scheduled for September 21, 2020 (statutory maximum of 20 years in prison and $250,000 fine)





DMITRIY KUSTOV, 50, Los Angeles, Calif.





Pleaded guilty on May 10, 2017, to racketeering conspiracy, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d).





Sentenced on August 29, 2018 to a term of probation.





MICHAEL INMAN, 58, Los Angeles, Calif.





Pleaded guilty on February 8, 2017, to one count of conspiracy to commit bank fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1349.





Sentenced on June 7, 2017, to 34 months in prison.





ARAXIA NAZARYIAN, 29, Van Nuys, Calif.





Pleaded guilty on December 18, 2019, to a Superseding Information charging her with misdemeanor introduction or delivery for introduction of adulterated or misbranded drugs, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 331(a) and 333(a)(1)). 





Sentencing is scheduled for September 21, 2020 (maximum statutory sentence is one year in prison and a $1,000 fine)





CHERYL BARNDT, 46, Spicewood, Texas





Pleaded guilty on August 21, 2019, to a Superseding Information charging her with misdemeanor introduction or delivery for introduction of adulterated or misbranded drugs, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 331(a) and 333(a)(1)).





Sentencing is scheduled for September 21, 2020 (maximum statutory sentence is one year in prison and a $1,000 fine)





ERIC FIGUEROA, 35, Los Angeles, Calif.





Pleaded guilty on June 13, 2018, to one count of conspiracy to engage in the unlicensed wholesale distribution of drugs, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 331(t), 333(b)(1)(D), 353(e)(2)(A), and 18 U.S.C. § 371.





Sentenced on February 22, 2019, to three years’ probation, six months of home detention, and 200 hours of community service.





MARC ASHEGHIAN, 59, Sherman Oaks, Calif.





Pleaded guilty on December 11, 2019 to a Superseding Information charging him with aiding and abetting the unlicensed wholesale distribution of drugs, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 331(t), 333(b)(1)(D), 353(e)(2)(A), and 18 U.S.C. § 2.





Sentencing is scheduled for September 21, 2020 (maximum statutory sentence is 10 years in prison and a $250,000 fine)





MICHAEL ASHEGHIAN, 71, Vernon, Calif.





Pleaded guilty on December 11, 2019 to a Superseding Information charging him with aiding and abetting the unlicensed wholesale distribution of drugs, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 331(t), 333(b)(1)(D), 353(e)(2)(A), and 18 U.S.C. § 2. 





Sentencing is scheduled for September 21, 2020 (maximum statutory sentence is 10 years in prison and a $250,000 fine)





ARARAT YESAYAN, 39, Glendale, Calif.





Pleaded guilty on February 6, 2017, to one count of conspiracy to commit identity theft, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1028(f).





Sentenced on June 9, 2017 to a term of five years of probation. 





ILIA NALBANS, 57, Montbello, Calif.





Pleaded guilty on March 15, 2019 to two counts of forging endorsements on Treasury checks and aiding and abetting the same, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 510 and 2. 





Sentenced on June 19, 2019, to restitution of $17,215 and a term of two years of supervised release.



For those defendants who have not yet been sentenced, in addition to a term of imprisonment and fine, the court also may order additional periods of supervised release, restitution, and special assessments.  However, any sentence following conviction would be imposed by the court only after consideration of the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and the federal statute governing the imposition of a sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3553.

A separate investigation resulted in another indictment filed on May 6, 2015 in the Southern District of Ohio charging M. Stepanyan, A. Stepanyan, and others with various crimes arising from their sale of millions of dollars of illicitly-procured drugs.  That matter was transferred to the Northern District of California and consolidated with the instant case.

Assistant United States Attorneys Claudia A. Quiroz, Andrew Dawson, and Chris Kaltsas are prosecuting the case with the assistance of Adrienne DelaPena and Kevin Costello.  The prosecution is the result of an investigation by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the IRS.  

Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanVzdGljZS5nb3YvdXNhby1zZHR4L3ByL2h1bWJsZS1tYW4tc2VudGVuY2VkLXJlbGF0aW9uLXNjaGVtZS1pbGxlZ2FsbHktc2hpcC1maXJlYXJtcy1pcmFx
  Press Releases:
HOUSTON – A 53-year-old local resident has been sentenced to federal prison for providing false information on federally mandated firearms records, announced U.S. Attorney Nicholas J. Ganjei.Yashab Idnan Sandhu, Humble, pleaded guilty July 24, 2023.U.S. District Judge Andrew Hanen has now ordered Sandhu to serve 42 months in federal prison to be immediately followed by three years of supervised release.“The Southern District of Texas is pleased to have worked with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) to have intercepted this shipment of guns before they reached Iraq, and used for whatever unknown purpose,” said Ganjei.“Being a responsible gun dealer is not just a matter of business; it’s a fundamental duty to safeguard public safety and uphold the trust placed in our agency by the American people,” said ATF Special Agent in Charge Michael Weddel. “ATF puts great trust in Federal Firearms Licensees (FFLs), to include ‘responsible persons,’ as they carry significant responsibility. When that trust is violated, it undermines the confidence the public has in the system. ATF Houston is committed to maintaining public safety, which includes holding these FFLs and their associated employees responsible when the laws and regulations are not followed."The investigation began March 13, 2020, when authorities discovered a cache of handguns concealed in a shipping crate addressed to Iraq at a Port of Houston warehouse. They recovered approximately 473 handguns, 38 of which were pistols with obliterated serial numbers.Law enforcement ultimately traced 38 pistols with obliterated serial numbers to R’s Golf & Guns, an FFL for whom Sandhu was a “responsible person.”A responsible person is someone who has the authority and power to direct firearm compliance decisions and operations for an FFL.The investigation revealed Sandhu had sold these firearms to a suspected firearms smuggler. As part of his plea, Sandhu admitted he went back to previously completed forms and added the firearms, falsely reporting they had been sold to other innocent persons. Sandhu was permitted to remain on bond and voluntarily surrender to a U.S. Bureau of Prisons facility to be determined in the near future.ATF conducted the investigation with the assistance of the FBI and Bureau of Industry and Security. Assistant U.S. Attorneys Steven Schammel and Heather Winter prosecuted the case.
Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanVzdGljZS5nb3YvdXNhby1zZHR4L3ByL3JpbmdsZWFkZXItc2VudGVuY2VkLWlsbGVnYWwtcHVyY2hhc2VzLWZpcmVhcm1zLXRyYWZmaWNrZWQtbWV4aWNv
  Press Releases:
HOUSTON – A 34-year-old Houston resident and felon has been ordered to federal prison for illegal purchase and trafficking of firearms, announced U.S. Attorney Alamdar S. Hamdani.

A federal jury convicted Jose Abraham Nicanor May 11 on all 13 counts as charged following a three-day trial. He was also convicted for possessing a firearm after a previous felony for armed robbery.

U.S. District Judge Kenneth M. Hoyt has now ordered Nicanor to serve 60 months in federal prison. At the hearing, the court heard evidence that showed Nicanor aggregated the firearms shipment to Mexico. In handing down the sentence, the court noted Nicanor’s conduct amounted to more than mistakes, but to a pattern of choices to violate the law.



“Stemming the illegal river of firearms into Mexico, a river stained blood red, deprives Mexican cartels of their tools of violence,” said Hamdani. “Cartels and other transnational criminal organizations are a national security threat, and my office, with its fearless prosecutors, will always be committed to aggressively pursuing those who exploit American gun laws so that weapons of war don’t reach violent criminals in Mexico and beyond.”



“Firearms trafficking and straw purchasing are not victimless crimes,” said acting Special Agent in Charge Noel Rangel of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF). “These acts are illegal and puts firearms in the hands of violent criminals. By focusing on firearms trafficking and straw purchasing, ATF keeps guns out of the hands of criminal trigger pullers, thereby reducing violent crime.”

At trial, the jury heard that Nicanor recruited two straw purchasers to buy high-caliber rifles that drug trafficking organizations regularly seek.

Testimony and evidence showed that a total of 94 firearms were attributable to Nicanor’s straw purchasing group. Mexican authorities later recovered some of the firearms in the possession of drug trafficking organizations.

The jury also heard that Nicanor rented a machine gun at a local gun range and posted a video of himself with the firearm to his social media. As a convicted felon, he is prohibited from possessing firearms or ammunition per federal law.

Nicanor was permitted to remain on bond and voluntarily surrender to a U.S. Bureau of Prisons facility to be determined in the near future.

The straw purchasers – James Paxton Jefferson, 34, Alejandro Garcia, 33, both of Houston – previously pleaded guilty and have been sentenced.

ATF conducted the investigation. Mexican authorities also provided assistance. Assistant U.S. Attorneys Lisa Collins and Stuart Tallichet prosecuted the case.

Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanVzdGljZS5nb3YvdXNhby1zZHR4L3ByL3RleGFuLWNvbnZpY3RlZC1tdWx0aW1pbGxpb24tZG9sbGFyLWNvdmlkLTE5LXJlbGllZi1mcmF1ZA
  Press Releases:
HOUSTON – A federal jury convicted a Texas man today for his role in a scheme to fraudulently obtain and launder millions of dollars in forgivable Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loans the Small Business Administration (SBA) guarantees under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security (CARES) Act, announced U.S. Attorney Alamdar S. Hamdani.

According to court documents and evidence presented at trial, Abdul Fatani, 57, Richmond, conspired with others to submit fraudulent PPP loan applications by falsifying the number of employees and the average monthly payroll expenses of the applicant businesses. In total, the co-conspirators sought over $35 million through more than 80 fraudulent PPP loans. Fatani distributed over $500,000 in fraudulent loan proceeds to his co-conspirators and himself using bogus payroll checks and laundered a portion of the proceeds by transferring the funds from one of his bank accounts to another bank account he controlled.

“Fatani’s pilfering of the PPP fund defrauded the government of funds that were supposed to help people with real businesses, suffering real losses and facing real struggles,” said Hamdani. “This man, instead, had no business and no employees. Just a scheme to defraud. Today’s jury’s verdict shows that his fraudulent actions are not acceptable and will not be tolerated in this district.”  

Fatani was convicted of one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud, one count of wire fraud and one count of unlawful monetary transactions (money laundering). He is scheduled to be sentenced May 8 and faces a maximum penalty of 20 years in prison for conspiracy and wire fraud and 10 years in prison for money laundering.

In addition, 15 other individuals have pleaded guilty to their involvement in the loan fraud scheme.

Hamdani made the announcement along with Assistant Attorney General Kenneth A. Polite Jr. of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division; Inspector General Hannibal “Mike” Ware of the SBA Office of Inspector General (OIG); Special Agent in Charge Catherine Huber of the Federal Housing Finance Agency OIG (FHFA-OIG); Special Agent in Charge Mark B. Dawson of Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) Houston Field Office; Acting Inspector General Tyler Smith of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation – OIG (FDIC-OIG); and Inspector General J. Russell George of the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA).

Assistant U.S. Attorney (AUSA) Rodolfo Ramirez for the Southern District of Texas prosecuted the case along with Trial Attorneys Kate McCarthy, Spencer Ryan, Della Sentilles and Louis Manzo of the Criminal Division’s Fraud Section. AUSA Kristine Rollinson for the Southern District of Texas handled asset forfeiture.

The Fraud Section leads the Criminal Division’s prosecution of fraud schemes that exploit the PPP. Since the inception of the CARES Act, the Fraud Section has prosecuted over 200 defendants in more than 130 criminal cases and has seized over $78 million in cash proceeds derived from fraudulently obtained PPP funds, as well as numerous real estate properties and luxury items purchased with such proceeds. More information can be found at https://www.justice.gov/criminal-fraud/ppp-fraud.

In May 2021, the Attorney General established the COVID-19 Fraud Enforcement Task Force to marshal the resources of the Department of Justice in partnership with agencies across government to enhance efforts to combat and prevent pandemic-related fraud. The Task Force bolsters efforts to investigate and prosecute the most culpable domestic and international criminal actors and assists agencies tasked with administering relief programs to prevent fraud by augmenting and incorporating existing coordination mechanisms, identifying resources and techniques to uncover fraudulent actors and their schemes, and sharing and harnessing information and insights gained from prior enforcement efforts. For more information on the department’s response to the pandemic, please visit https://www.justice.gov/coronavirus.

Anyone with information about allegations of attempted fraud involving COVID-19 can report it by calling the Department of Justice’s National Center for Disaster Fraud (NCDF) Hotline via the NCDF Web Complaint Form at https://www.justice.gov/disaster-fraud/ncdf-disaster-complaint-form.

Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanVzdGljZS5nb3YvdXNhby1zZHR4L3ByL2hvdXN0b24taXNkLW9mZmljaWFsLWFuZC1jb250cmFjdG9yLWd1aWx0eS1uaW5lLXllYXItbXVsdGltaWxsaW9uLWRvbGxhci1mcmF1ZC1zY2hlbWU
  Press Releases:
HOUSTON – A Houston federal jury has returned guilty verdicts against the former chief operating officer of the Houston Independent School District (HISD) and an HISD contractor, announced U.S. Attorney Nicholas J. Ganjei for the Southern District of Texas (SDTX).The jury deliberated for only six hours before convicting Brian Busby and Anthony Hutchison following a four-week trial. Both were convicted of conspiracy, bribery, filing false tax returns and witness tampering. Hutchison was also convicted of seven counts of wire fraud.Over the course of the trial, the jury heard testimony from over 50 witnesses regarding the 33 charged counts involving bribery, false invoicing schemes, witness tampering and tax violations. Five former HISD officials testified, all of whom received bribe payments - Rhonda Skillern-Jones, former HISD Board of Education president; Derrick Sanders, officer of construction services; Alfred Hoskins, general manager of facilities, maintenance and operations; Gerron Hall, area manager for maintenance – south; and Luis Tovar, area manager for maintenance - north. They described the pressure Busby put on them to provide Hutchison’s companies more work with HISD as well as larger projects following Hurricane Harvey. They recounted how they received tens of thousands of dollars over the course of 2017 and 2018 or longer. Skillern-Jones testified Busby told her she should use Hutchison’s company on school projects with the funds remaining from the school bond passed in 2012. They agreed that if the contract was given to Hutchison, then they could make some money off the projects. Following completion of the Holland Middle School and Pleasantville Elementary School projects, Busby met with Skillern-Jones outside of a Walmart parking lot to give her $12,000 in cash from Hutchison as the bribery payment for allocating her district’s portion of bond funds for projects Hutchison performed.Sanders, who also socialized with Busby and Hutchison, described taking trips to Las Vegas with them where he would be paid bribes and recounted their lavish purchases. On one occasion when Hutchison paid him, he exclaimed “next,” signaling Busby to come into the room for his payment. Hoskins testified his maintenance team did not want to use Just Construction because it was often more expensive than other vendors, but Busby pressured him to give Hutchison’s company more work. Testimony further revealed they would bypass the rotation or bid process in selecting vendors and just provide work directly to Hutchison’s companies.The jury also saw a handwritten ledger seized from Hutchison’s residence which contained detailed notes of all HISD projects awarded to Just Construction. It included entries for bribe payments and locations where they were made.Detailed evidence also revealed the extensive invoicing fraud scheme Hutchison perpetrated through his company Southwest Wholesale. Since 2015, Southwest Wholesale had been the exclusive mowing and landscape contractor for HISD. The jury heard testimony demonstrating how Hutchison continuously overbilled for years for the approximately 150 schools he was contracted to mow. He also similarly charged HISD over twice the cost of what he paid for the supplies and marked that inflated charge up 20%. He consistently overbilled HISD over the course of years for a loss in excess of $6 million.Busby also made excessive cash deposits to over 18 bank accounts which was far more than his legitimate income. He attempted to explain it based on other sources of income, but the jury was not convinced it accounted for the close to $3 million cash deposits made over the course of five years that were not declared in his income tax returns for 2015-2019. Hutchison similarly filed false tax returns in 2017 and 2018 wherein he deducted improper business expenses. Specifically, Hutchison obtained cash he used to pay bribes to HISD officials by writing company checks to vendors, who cashed the checks and provided the cash to him. He falsely stated on the memo line that they were in payment for work performed on HISD properties. He then caused the checks to be improperly deducted on corporate tax returns as business expenses. In reality, they were cashed to pay extensive gambling debts and cash bribe payments.Hoskins also testified about the steps Busby and Hutchison took to interfere with the investigation. Specifically, Busby called Hoskins and told him to tell investigators Busby had nothing to do with the award of the maintenance contract to Hutchison and his company. Hoskins also described how Hutchison advised him that police had a handwritten ledger with numbers on it and that Hoskins should say it was for gambling. “HISD is the largest school district in the state, and the people of Houston trusted that district officials would spend their tax dollars wisely and carefully. Instead, Busby and Hutchinson defrauded the school district and the taxpayers of millions of dollars, doing so to line their own pockets,” said Ganjei. “People need to have faith in their public institutions, and they can become understandably cynical when they hear of public servants stealing from school kids by taking bribes and over-billing. SDTX aimed to restore that public trust by bringing this multi-year investigation to trial, which lasted over four weeks and involved over 50 witnesses. I’m proud of the trial team for delivering justice here, and I thank our incredible law enforcement partners.  Most of all, I’d like to thank the jury for devoting their precious time and attention over the past month. This case demonstrates that theft from schools won’t be tolerated and that the public can have confidence in their institutions.”“For years, Busby and Hutchison defrauded the largest public school system in Texas out of millions of dollars - money that was intended to benefit the students of HISD,” said Special Agent in Charge Douglas Williams of the FBI Houston Field Office. “In turn, Busby and Hutchison also defrauded the taxpayers whose hard-earned dollars were fraudulently diverted for their greed and personal gain. Public corruption cases like this one are challenging to investigate and prove and erode the trust we place on our public servants. At the end of the day, we want to make sure corrupt individuals like Busby and Hutchison are brought to justice. Today’s guilty verdict is a step towards that justice. I’m proud of FBI Houston’s public corruption squad for the results of its years-long investigation and thank them, and the U.S. Attorney’s Office, for their commitment to this case and to its thousands of victims.”U.S. District Judge Andrew Hanen presided over the trial and has set sentencing for July 28. At that time, Busby and Hutchison face up to five, 10 and 20 years, respectively, for the conspiracy, bribery and witness tampering charges. Hutchison also faces up to 20 years for each count of wire fraud. All charges also carry a $250,000 maximum possible fine.Skillern-Jones, 39, Houston; Sanders, 50, Hoskins, 58, Hall, 48, all of Missouri City; and Tovar, 39, Huffman have pleaded guilty to the conspiracy charges. They face up to five years in prison.Busby and Hutchison were permitted to remain on bond pending sentencing.The FBI and IRS - Criminal Investigation conducted the investigation. Assistant U.S. Attorneys Robert S. Johnson and Heather R. Winter are prosecuting the case. 
Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanVzdGljZS5nb3YvdXNhby1zZHR4L3ByL2NsaW5pYy1vd25lci1zZW50LXByaXNvbi1vcmNoZXN0cmF0aW5nLTE1bS1tZWRpY2FyZS1mcmF1ZC1hbmQta2lja2JhY2stc2NoZW1l
  Press Releases:
HOUSTON – The owner of a Houston-area mental health clinic has been sentenced for conspiracy to commit healthcare fraud, announced U.S. Attorney Alamdar S. Hamdani.

Gwendolyn Gibbs, 72, pleaded guilty Dec. 3, 2021.

U.S. District Judge Charles R. Eskridge has now ordered Gibbs to serve 84 months in federal prison to be immediately followed by three years of supervised release. At the hearing, the court heard additional evidence Gibbs fraudulently billed Medicare for services provided to vulnerable adults with intellectual disabilities who did not require mental health services. In addition, Gibbs was ordered to pay $8,680,380.42 in restitution to Medicare. In handing down the sentence, the court noted Gibbs’ role as leader, the length of the fraud scheme and her long history in the medical field as evidence she knew what she was doing was wrong.



“Gwendolyn Gibbs exploited vulnerable adults with intellectual disabilities and residents of group homes in order to defraud Medicare of millions of dollars,” said Hamdani. “Public resources for mental health services should go to the patients that actually need them, not to enrich criminal actors like Gibbs.”



Gibbs was the owner of Daybreak Rehabilitation Center. From 2007 until 2016, she submitted fraudulent claims for partial hospitalization program (PHP) services to Medicare that were not provided or not medically necessary. A PHP is a form of intensive outpatient treatment for severe mental illness. Daybreak patients, including individuals with intellectual disabilities, did not need PHP services. Gibbs admitted to falsifying medical records to make it appear that patients were sicker than they actually were.

Gibbs also paid kickbacks to owners of group homes and patient recruiters in exchange for referring Medicare beneficiaries to Daybreak. The owners of the group homes required their residents to attend Daybreak and, in exchange, Gibbs and her co-conspirators provided transportation, supervision and meals to the group home residents.

Charles Guidry Jr., 70, Houston, a manager at Daybreak and Gibbs’ ex-husband, was previously sentenced to 70 months imprisonment followed by three years of supervised release.

Gibbs will remain in custody pending transfer to a U.S. Bureau of Prisons facility to be determined in the near future.

FBI, Department of Health and Human Services - Office of the Inspector General, Texas Attorney General’s Medicaid Fraud Control Unit and the Railroad Retirement Board-OIG conducted the investigation. Assistant U.S. Attorneys Kathryn Olson and Michael Day prosecuted the case.

Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanVzdGljZS5nb3YvdXNhby1zZHR4L3ByL3Nhbi1iZW5pdG8tbWFuLWhlYWRzLXByaXNvbi1wb3NpbmctbGljZW5zZWQtdm9jYXRpb25hbC1udXJzZQ
  Press Releases:
McALLEN, Texas ‐ A San Benito man has been ordered to federal prison following his conviction of aggravated identity theft, announced U.S. Attorney Kenneth Magidson. Juan Manuel Perez, 36, pleaded guilty Nov. 3, 2016.

 

Today, U.S. District Judge Micaela Alvarez handed Perez a mandatory 24-month sentence imprisonment in connection with his misappropriation of the identity of a Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) of the same name. In handing down the sentence, Alvarez noted that Perez’s misappropriation of the LVN’s identity had denied patients the right to receive health care from a licensed professional.

 

In December 2014, Perez obtained employment with Cleveland Health Care LLC in McAllen, claiming to be an LVN. The license number presented by Perez, however, belonged to another individual of the same name. Perez is not licensed by the Texas Board of Nursing and is not an LVN.

 

Perez, posing as the LVN, conducted patient home visits and provided medical services from December 2015 through July 2016 while employed with Cleveland Health Care.

 

Previously released on bond, Perez was permitted to remain on bond and voluntarily surrender to a U.S. Bureau of Prisons facility to be determined in the near future.

 

The Department of Health and Human Services‐Office of Inspector General, FBI and the Health and Human Services Commission conducted the investigation. Assistant U.S. Attorneys Andrew Swartz and Michael Day are prosecuting the case.

Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanVzdGljZS5nb3YvdXNhby1hei9wci9qdXN0aWNlLWRlcGFydG1lbnQtYXdhcmRzLTg0LW1pbGxpb24tc3VwcG9ydC1uYXRpdmUtYW1lcmljYW4tY3JpbWUtdmljdGltcy10ZW4tc3RhdGVz
  Press Releases:
     PHOENIX – This week, the Office of Justice Programs’ Office for Victims of Crime (OVC) awarded more than $8.4 million to support crime victims in Native American communities in 10 states: Alaska, Arizona, California, Idaho, Michigan, New Mexico, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Utah and Washington. The group of 17 awards is the fifth in a series of grants being made by OVC to American Indian and Alaska Native communities. OVC has now awarded more than $34 million of nearly $100 million to support tribal victim service programs.

     The awards - 63 in total so far - will fund critical crime victim services, such as counseling, transitional housing, emergency services and transportation. The grants are supported by the Crime Victims Fund, a repository of federal criminal fines, fees and special assessments. The fund includes zero tax dollars. 

     “American Indian and Alaska Native communities face extensive public safety challenges, but through creative approaches that combine traditional methods with innovative solutions, they are demonstrating their determination to meet the needs of victims in their communities,” said OJP’s Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Matt M. Dummermuth. “These grants, part of historic levels of funding awarded by the Department of Justice to American Indian and Alaska Native communities, will provide significant resources to bring critical services to those who suffer the effects of crime and violence.”

     “We congratulate Pascua Yaqui Tribe, Salt River Pima Maricopa Indian Community, and San Carlos Apache Tribe on being selected for these awards from DOJ’s Office for Victims of Crime,” stated Elizabeth A. Strange, First Assistant United States Attorney for the District of Arizona.  “The $1.5 million in OVC funding will help these communities to expand their services for crime victims and help to prevent victims from suffering further harm.”  

     According to OJP’s Bureau of Justice Statistics, American Indians and Alaska Natives experience violent crime at rates far greater than the general population.

     The following tribes (or tribal organizations) are the 17 receiving grant awards this week. More than 150 tribes are expected to receive funding this spring to help their communities support crime victims over the next three years:

The Pascua Yaqui Tribe (Arizona) received $491,450 to enhance existing services to victims by providing crisis intervention and response, resources, referrals, accompaniment to forensic interviews and hospitals, and court advocacy. Funding will support a victim advocate, staff training, transportation for victims, program and office supplies, and emergency assistance.

 

The Salt River Pima Maricopa Indian Community (Arizona) received $336,031 to enhance its existing victim services program by creating a multi-disciplinary team, which will expand services to victims of violent crimes. Funding will support a victim services liaison, staff training, program and office supplies, staff training and emergency assistance.

 

The San Carlos Apache Tribe (Arizona) received $716,117 to expand its existing victim services programs by supporting a victim advocate, case manager, program manager, staff training, transportation for victims, program and office supplies, a consultant to serve as a forensic interviewer, and a consultant to provide training on a trauma-informed approach to victim services.

 

The Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe (South Dakota) received $315,000 to provide victim services on and around the Flandreau reservation. Funding will expand victim assistance and establish new services for unemployed battered women and their children in remote rural areas on and off the reservation.

 

The Akiak Native Community (Alaska) received $450,932 to develop a comprehensive victim services program to assist all victims in the community. Funding will support staff training, program and office supplies, travel to Anchorage for victims to access counseling and other services not available in the community, and emergency assistance.

 

The Seneca Cayuga Nation (Oklahoma) received $720,000 to enhance and expand its existing victim services program by funding long-term support and other victim services that are not currently available. Funding will support staff training, program and office supplies, transportation and emergency assistance.

 

The Taos Pueblo Administration (New Mexico) received $694,002 to enhance existing victim services and build program capacity, with a focus on victims of elder abuse and domestic violence. Funding will support the establishment of a case management system, a financial counselor to assist elder victims of financial fraud and abuse, and emergency assistance.

 

The New Stuyahok Village (Alaska) received $382,750 to conduct a community needs assessment and prepare a strategic plan to develop a victim services program, with a focus on shelters, advocacy, crisis counseling and other services to victims of sexual assault, domestic violence, stalking and other violent crimes. 

 

The Coeur d’Alene Tribe (Idaho) received $478,504 to expand victim-centered services through a tribal healing and recovery program. Funding will support staff training, program and office supplies, transportation for victims, outreach and emergency assistance.

 

The Tolowa Dee-ni’ Nation (California) received $40,000 to enhance local transportation for victims within the tribe’s five-county service area.

 

The Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians of Washington (Washington) received $381,933 to expand and enhance the existing victim assistance program by increasing services to children and elders who are victims of crime. Funding will support the hiring of a social worker, staff training, program and office supplies, and transportation for victims.

The Suquamish Tribe (Washington) received $356,621 to enhance existing services by conducting a needs assessment and developing a comprehensive strategic plan for coordinating and integrating the delivery of services to crime victims. Funding will support travel for victims to access specialized services not available locally, program and office supplies, a forensic interviewer, a strategic planning consultant, and trauma response training for staff.

 

The Shoshone-Bannock Tribes (Idaho) received $649,244 to address four critical needs in existing programming, including shelter renovations to ensure safety and accessibility, trauma-informed case management, satellite victim service offices and expansion of services to vulnerable adults. Funding will support a case manager, domestic violence shelter and office space, program and office supplies, and emergency assistance.

 

The Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma (Oklahoma) received $541,872 to expand its existing victim services program by identifying victims in need of additional services and developing resources to meet those needs. Funding will support a senior victim advocate, staff training, program and office supplies, transportation for victims and emergency assistance.

 

The Chugachmiut, Inc. (Alaska) received $625,094 to develop the Aprun Aswigmen: Pathway Toward Healing program that will expand and enhance its domestic violence and sexual assault program to serve a broader population of victims. Funding will support a tribal victim services coordinator, forensic medical examination equipment, program and office supplies, and training for staff on serving victims of traumatic brain injury as a result of their victimization.

  

The Pokagon Band of Potawtomi Indians (Michigan) received $602,470 to expand its existing victim services program to include services for all victims of crime. Funding will support a project coordinator, adult protective services worker, staff training, outreach materials, legal assistance to victims, staff to conduct a needs assessment and develop a strategic plan, and emergency assistance.

 

The Paiute Indian Tribe of Utah (Utah) received $699,000 to expand its existing victim services program by creating a crime victim services program that is more accessible to tribal members. Funding will support a family services manager; staff training; transport for victims; program and office supplies; and subcontracts with the Family Support Center of Southwestern Utah, Family Support Center of Washington County, Canyon Creek Services, Dove Center and New Horizons. The grant will provide shelter and advocacy services for adult and child victims, and subcontracts with the Iron County Children’s Justice Center and Washington County Children’s Justice Center to provide forensic interviews and exams for child victims.

 

     “American Indian and Alaska Native crime victims continue to face challenges in accessing vital services and resources needed to help survivors address their trauma and navigate a complex system,” said OVC Director Darlene Hutchinson. “The Justice Department has made it a priority to partner with tribes to help victims and their families rebuild their lives in the aftermath of violence.”           

     The Office of Justice Programs, directed by Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Matt M. Dummermuth, provides federal leadership, grants and resources to improve the nation’s capacity to prevent and reduce crime, assist victims and enhance the rule of law by strengthening the criminal justice system. More information about OJP and its components can be found at www.ojp.gov.

 

###

 

 

 

RELEASE NUMBER:           2019­-051_Crime Victim Grants

 

# # #

For more information on the U.S. Attorney’s Office, District of Arizona, visit http://www.justice.gov/usao/az/

Follow the U.S. Attorney’s Office, District of Arizona, on Twitter @USAO_AZ for the latest news.

 

 

 

Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanVzdGljZS5nb3YvdXNhby1uZGlsL3ByL21hbi1wbGVhZHMtZ3VpbHR5LWZlZGVyYWwtY291cnQtdGhyZWUtY2FyamFja2luZ3MtY2hpY2Fnbw
  Press Releases:
CHICAGO — A man has pleaded guilty in federal court to carjacking three vehicles at gunpoint in Chicago and shooting one of the victims.JAMARI EDWARDS admitted in a plea agreement that he carjacked the vehicles in August 2022 in the West Englewood neighborhood of Chicago.  The first carjacking occurred in the drive-thru area of a coffee shop, while the other two occurred outside of a convenience store at a gas station.  In each of the carjackings, Edwards pointed a gun at the driver and demanded the keys to the car.  In the coffee shop carjacking, Edwards shot the driver in the leg after the driver had already given Edwards the key and exited the vehicle. Before shooting the driver, Edwards asked him words to the effect of, “Why are you not scared?”Edwards, 22, of Chicago, pleaded guilty on Thursday to federal carjacking and firearm charges.  The convictions are punishable by a mandatory minimum sentence of 17 years in federal prison and a maximum of life.  U.S. District Judge Lindsay C. Jenkins set sentencing for Aug. 12, 2025, at 10:00 a.m.The guilty plea was announced by Andrew S. Boutros, United States Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois, Douglas S. DePodesta, Special Agent-in-Charge of the Chicago Field Office of the FBI, and Larry Snelling, Superintendent of the Chicago Police Department.  The government is represented by Assistant U.S. Attorney Margaret Steindorf. 



edwards_plea_agreement.pdf





Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanVzdGljZS5nb3YvdXNhby1hei9wci9tZXNhLW1hbi1pbmRpY3RlZC10b3JjaGluZy10ZXNsYS1wcm9wZXJ0eQ
  Press Releases:
PHOENIX, Ariz. – On April 30, 2025, a federal grand jury in Phoenix returned a 5-count indictment against Ian William Moses, 35, of Mesa, Arizona for Maliciously Damaging Property and Vehicles in Interstate Commerce by Means of Fire.The charging documents filed in the case allege that Moses was at the Tesla dealership in Mesa shortly before 2 a.m. on Monday, April 28, 2025, wearing a dark hooded sweatshirt, tan ballcap, grey pants, black boots, and a black mask. He also carried a red plastic gas can and a black backpack. While in the Tesla parking lot, Moses was captured on video as he placed fire starter logs next to the dealership building. Moses then poured gasoline onto the starter logs, the building, and three Tesla vehicles. At around 1:38 a.m., Moses ignited the starter logs, causing a fire that destroyed a silver Tesla Cybertruck. Video shows Moses leaving the dealership on a dark colored bicycle shortly thereafter.Mesa police officers arrested Moses approximately a quarter mile from the Tesla dealership at around 3 a.m., still dressed in the same clothes as he was seen wearing at the scene. After his arrest, officers found a hand drawn map of the area in Moses’ pocket, which included a box with the letter “T” marking the dealership’s location.“If you engage in domestic terrorism, this Department of Justice will find you, follow the facts, and prosecute you to the fullest extent of the law,” said Attorney General Pamela Bondi. “No negotiating.”“ATF’s Special Agents and forensic investigators, working with the FBI and local partners, quickly recovered and analyzed critical evidence following this deliberate attack,” said ATF Acting Director Dan Driscoll. “This attack poses a serious threat to public safety and the ATF remains committed to aggressively pursuing anyone who endangers our communities through violence or destruction.”“There is nothing American about burning down someone else’s business because you disagree with them politically,” said U.S. Attorney Timothy Courchaine. “These ongoing attacks against Tesla are not protests, they are acts of violence that have no place in Arizona or anywhere else. If someone targets Tesla with violence, they will be found and confronted with the full force of the law.”“I would like to recognize the dedicated work of the Mesa Police and Mesa Fire Departments on this case,” stated ATF Special Agent in Charge Brendan Iber. “Cooperation with our law enforcement partners acts as a multiplier in our efforts to remove violent criminals from the streets and make our communities safer. The professionalism and extensive investigative knowledge of the police and fire investigators within our arson taskforce cannot be overstated.”“My office will be engaged in this investigation, and I’m pleased to be able to share our expertise,” said Maricopa County Attorney Rachel Mitchell. “We have a high level of success in prosecuting these types of crimes. My office stands ready to assist our federal law enforcement partners in the prosecution of this individual.”“I would like to recognize the outstanding efforts of the Superstition District Patrol officers who played a crucial role in this investigation. Their swift action in identifying and monitoring the suspicious van parked near the dealership was critical to the success of this operation. I am truly grateful for their diligent police work,” said Mesa Police Chief Ken Cost. “Special thanks also go to the Mesa Police specialty units and the partnering agencies involved. Your collaboration was instrumental in bringing this suspect to justice and enhancing the safety of our community.”Each count of conviction for Malicious Damage to Property in Interstate Commerce carries a minimum penalty of 5 years and up to a maximum of 20 years imprisonment and a fine of $250,000.An indictment is simply a method by which a person is charged with criminal activity and raises no inference of guilt. An individual is presumed innocent until evidence is presented to a jury that establishes guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.The investigation in this case is being conducted by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, the FBI, Mesa Police Department, and the Maricopa County Attorney’s Office. Assistant U.S. Attorney Raymond K. Woo, District of Arizona, Phoenix, is handling the prosecution.CASE NUMBER:           25-8272MJ RELEASE NUMBER:    2025-068_Moses

















































# # #For more information on the U.S. Attorney’s Office, District of Arizona, visit http://www.justice.gov/usao/az/ Follow the U.S. Attorney’s Office, District of Arizona, on Twitter @USAO_AZ for the latest news.
Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanVzdGljZS5nb3YvdXNhby13ZHR4L3ByL2hpZ2gtcmFua2luZy1zaW5hbG9hLWxlYWRlci1leHRyYWRpdGVkLWVsLXBhc28tZmFjZXMtbGlmZS1mZWRlcmFsLXByaXNvbg
  Press Releases:
EL PASO, Texas – A high-ranking member of the Sinaloa Cartel was extradited from Mexico to El Paso, indicted for criminal charges related to his alleged federal racketeering, narcotics, money laundering, firearms, and continuing criminal enterprise offenses.According to court documents, Daniel Franco Lopez aka “Micha” aka “Neon” aka “Fer,” 40, of Mexico, allegedly coordinated the shipments of hundreds of kilograms of cocaine and thousands of kilograms of marijuana into the United States, along with the pickup of drug proceeds, and kidnappings and murders.Lopez was indicted in April 2012 along with Joaquin Guzman Loera aka “Chapo,” Ismael Zambada Garcia “Mayo,” and over a dozen other codefendants. He was arrested Aug. 14, 2012, and remained in Mexican custody until his extradition. Lopez made his initial appearance in federal court Monday.“The extradition of this defendant is a of many significant pieces in a very large cartel case that spans more than a decade,” said Acting U.S. Attorney Margaret Leachman for the Western District of Texas. “Not only are we grateful for the enduring and successful efforts our federal law enforcement partners at the DEA, FBI and ATF, but I want to emphasize our goal to put an end to these organizations is shared by this U.S. Attorney’s Office, the Justice Department and our counterparts in Mexico.”“Daniel Franco Lopez was defendant #16 on DEA’s RICO indictment that included Joaquin ‘Chapo’ Guzman and Ismael ‘Mayo’ Zambada,” said Special Agent in Charge Towanda Thorne-James for the Drug Enforcement Administration’s El Paso Division. “This extradition demonstrates that the men and women of DEA will never tire of pursuing the most violent, drug traffickers responsible for thousands of deaths in our country. We thank our domestic and international partners for their assistance on this case.”“The extradition is one more step towards dismantling and ending violence perpetrated by criminal drug trafficking organizations such as the Sinaloa Cartel,” said Special Agent in Charge John Morales for FBI El Paso. “The FBI and our partners will endlessly pursue and prosecute cartel members and associates who attempt to control and intimidate their communities through violence.  This extradition starts the justice process to all of those who have suffered as a result of Franco Lopez’s criminal actions as a member of the Sinaloa Cartel.” “This case reads like a Hollywood movie script. You know the film…cartels, guns, drugs, money, feds,” said Special Agent in Charge Jeffrey C Boshek II for the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives Dallas Field Division. “Fortunately for the citizens of the United States, the good guys prevailed in this one. Mr. Lopez, an alleged underground criminal mastermind, left a path of destruction in his path. The American people are safer with this bandit in handcuffs and behind bars.”Lopez is charged with one count of RICO conspiracy; two counts related to conspiracy to possess and import over five kgs of cocaine and over 1,000 kgs of marijuana; one count of conspiracy to launder monetary instruments; one count of conspiracy to possess firearms in furtherance of drug trafficking crimes and aid and abet; and one count of engaging in a continuing criminal enterprise in furtherance of drug trafficking. If convicted, Lopez faces up to life in prison. A federal district court judge will determine any sentence after considering the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and other statutory factors.The DEA, FBI, and ATF are investigating the case.Assistant U.S. Attorneys Antonio Franco, Kyle Myers and Susanna Martinez are prosecuting the case for the Western District of Texas. The Justice Department’s Office of International Affairs worked with law enforcement partners in Mexico to secure the arrest and extradition of Lopez.An indictment is merely an allegation and all defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.### 
Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanVzdGljZS5nb3YvdXNhby1hei9wci9kZXBhcnRtZW50LWp1c3RpY2Utb2JzZXJ2ZXMtMTV0aC1hbm51YWwtd29ybGQtZWxkZXItYWJ1c2UtYXdhcmVuZXNzLWRheQ
  Press Releases:
PHOENIX, Ariz. – Today, United States Attorney Michael Bailey joined Attorney General William P. Barr and the entire Department of Justice in observing the 15th Annual World Elder Abuse Awareness Day. The Department echoes voices around the world condemning elder abuse, neglect and exploitation.

"The Department of Justice has made protecting America's seniors a top priority, and our office shares that commitment," said United States Attorney Michael Bailey. "Our seniors deserve to be treasured and treated with respect and care, not targeted by fraudulent schemes. We encourage you to call the hotline today if you suspect abuse. Let's work together to protect our seniors."

The COVID-19 pandemic has created unprecedented challenges for our country and the world, but among those most severely affected by the threat of the virus are our senior citizens. Bad actors have exploited this international tragedy to prey on the elderly, who are vulnerable and isolated from their families and loved ones by social distancing and quarantine restrictions, through a host of scams and fraud schemes. As the world takes this day to remember the elderly during these uncertain times, the Department of Justice remains relentlessly committed, through its department-wide Elder Justice Initiative, to prevent and prosecute fraud on America’s seniors.

The Department will aggressively prosecute fraudsters exploiting the COVID-19 pandemic and targeting seniors by offering them fake testing kits and fake help obtaining stimulus and Paycheck Protection Program Funds. Just last week, attorneys from the District of Arizona partnered with the FBI and AARP to give a telephonic town hall about current COVID-19 scams around the country. The town hall was attended by well over a thousand callers from the state who had the opportunity to ask questions and learn tips for avoiding scams.

On this day, World Elder Abuse Awareness Day, dedicated to recognizing our seniors who have been victims of scams and other forms of abuse, the Department of Justice sends a strong message that we will continue the fight to keep seniors safe. Earlier this year Attorney General Barr declared “Prevention and Disruption of Transnational Elder Fraud” to be an Agency Priority Goal, making it one of the Department’s four top priorities. In recognition of that goal, the United States Attorney's Office for the District of Arizona also collaborated with the Pima Council on Aging and the FBI in January to offer an informational talk on scams for older adults.

Major strides have already been made toward the goal of preventing and disrupting elder fraud:

National Elder Fraud Hotline: 833-FRAUD-11

Attorney General Barr recently launched a National Elder Fraud Hotline. Staffed by experienced case managers who provide personalized support to callers, the hotline serves to assist elders and caretakers who believe they have been a victim of fraud by reporting and providing appropriate services.

 

Transnational Elder Fraud Strike Force: Established in June 2019 to combat foreign elder fraud schemes, the Strike Force is composed of the Department’s Consumer Protection Branch and six U.S. Attorneys’ Offices along with FBI special agents, Postal Inspectors, and numerous other law enforcement personnel. Since its inception, prosecutors in Strike Force districts brought cases against more than 140 sweep defendants. 

 

Annual Elder Justice Sweep: In March of this year, the Attorney General announced the largest coordinated sweep of elder fraud cases in department history. The Department, together with every U.S. Attorney’s office, charged more than 400 defendants, causing over $1 billion in loss through fraud schemes that largely affected seniors, including 16 defendants charged in the District of Arizona.

 

Money Mule Initiative: Since October 2018, the Department and its law enforcement partners began a concentrated effort across the country and around the world to disrupt, investigate, and prosecute money mule activity used to facilitate fraud schemes, especially those victimizing senior citizens. In 2019 actions were taken to halt the conduct of more than 600 domestic money mules, exceeding a similar effort against approximately 400 mules in the previous year.

 

Holding foreign-based perpetrators and those that flee the United States accountable: Transnational criminal organizations are targeting our elder population in schemes including mass mailing fraud, grandparent scams, romance scams, lottery and sweepstakes scams, IRS and Social Security Administration imposter scams, and technical-support scams.

 

For more information on enforcement actions, training and resources, research, and victim services, please visit www.justice.gov/elderjustice.

RELEASE  NUMBER:  2020-058_Elder Abuse Awareness Day

# # #

For more information on the U.S. Attorney’s Office, District of Arizona, visit http://www.justice.gov/usao/az/Follow the U.S. Attorney’s Office, District of Arizona, on Twitter @USAO_AZ for the latest news.

 

Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanVzdGljZS5nb3Yvb3BhL3ByL2Zvcm1lci1taWNoaWdhbi1wb2xpY2Utb2ZmaWNlci1zZW50ZW5jZWQtY2l2aWwtcmlnaHRzLXZpb2xhdGlvbi12aW9sZW50bHktYXNzYXVsdGluZw
  Press Releases:
A former Warren, Michigan, police officer was sentenced today to one year and one day in prison for using excessive force against an arrestee while fingerprinting and photographing him at a local detention facility.

Matthew Rodriguez, 49, pleaded guilty in March to one count of deprivation of rights under color of law. According to court documents, on June 13, 2023, then-officer Rodriguez was fingerprinting and photographing an arrestee, J.S., who had recently been brought to the Warren Police Department’s jail for processing. During fingerprinting, Rodriguez and J.S. got into a verbal argument and began trading insults. In retaliation for one of J.S.’ remarks, Rodriguez struck J.S. multiple times and slammed J.S.’ head against the fingerprint room floor.

In connection with his plea, Rodriguez admitted to writing a report in which he made false statements about the incident and omitted material information in an attempt to cover up his crime.

“This defendant swore to protect and serve his community, but instead he abused his power by violently assaulting an arrestee,” said Assistant Attorney General Kristen Clarke of the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division. “This sentence should serve as a reminder to all law enforcement that a badge is not a license to answer verbal insults with physical violence and excessive force. The Justice Department will continue to protect the constitutional rights of all Americans and to hold law enforcement accountable when they violate federal civil rights law.”

“Police officers have a duty to protect the civil rights of everyone in our community, including individuals in their custody,” said U.S. Attorney Dawn N. Ison for the Eastern District of Michigan. “Physical abuse of detainees is completely unacceptable and undermines public confidence in the integrity of law enforcement. My office is committed to accountability for all public servants who abuse the public trust, and today’s sentence is a powerful reflection of that commitment.”

“When it comes to the public’s trust, law enforcement officers are held to the highest ethical standards,” said Special Agent in Charge Cheyvoryea Gibson of the FBI Detroit Field Office. “The sentencing of former police officer Matthew Rodriguez should serve as a stark reminder that the use of excessive force and deliberate false statements are not only criminal acts but also tarnishes the hard work and dedication of law enforcement officers who serve with integrity every day. This sentencing would not have been possible without the assistance of the Warren Police Department, the U.S. Attorney’s Office of Eastern Michigan and the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division.”

The FBI Detroit Field Office investigated the case, with assistance from the Warren Police Department’s Internal Affairs Unit.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Robert Moran for the Eastern District of Michigan and Trial Attorney Alec Ward of the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division prosecuted the case.

Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanVzdGljZS5nb3YvdXNhby1hei9wci93b21hbi1zZW50ZW5jZWQtdGhyZWUteWVhcnMtcHJpc29uLWRpc3RyaWJ1dGluZy1veHljb2RvbmU
  Press Releases:
     PHOENIX – This week, Ma de Lourdes Casas-Franco, 45, of Nogales, Sonora, Mexico, was sentenced to 36 months in prison by U.S. District Judge Steven P. Logan. Casas-Franco had previously pleaded guilty to conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute a controlled substance and money laundering conspiracy.

 

     According to the plea agreement, Casas-Franco worked at a Mexican pharmacy, Sonora's Desert Pharmacy, from June 2010 through July 2011. On numerous occasions, Casas-Franco arranged to have oxycodone pills, a Schedule II controlled substance, delivered from the pharmacy in Mexico to a customer in the United States. She also arranged to have the part of the purchase price deposited into a bank account in her name maintained in a bank in the United States and part of the purchase price to be deposited into another's bank account. On at least one occasion, the total value of the order was in excess of $10,000.

 

     The investigation in this case was conducted by agencies participating in the Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Force, which include, but are not limited to, the Mesa Police Department, Homeland Security Investigations, and the U. S. Postal Inspection Service. The lead agencies were the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration and Internal Revenue Service-Criminal Investigation. The prosecution was handled by Karen McDonald and Maria Gutierrez, Assistant U.S. Attorneys, District of Arizona, Phoenix.

 

CASE NUMBER: CR-16-00763-PHX-SPL

RELEASE NUMBER: 2017-034_ Casas-Franco

 

# # #

 

For more information on the U.S. Attorney’s Office, District of Arizona, visit http://www.justice.gov/usao/az/

Follow the U.S. Attorney’s Office, District of Arizona, on Twitter @USAO_AZ for the latest news.

 

Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanVzdGljZS5nb3YvdXNhby1pZC9wci90d28tZWFzdC1pZGFoby1tZW4tZWFjaC1zZW50ZW5jZWQtMTAteWVhcnMtZmVkZXJhbC1wcmlzb24tYXR0ZW1wdGVkLXNleC1jcmltZXMtYWdhaW5zdA
  Press Releases:
POCATELLO – U.S. Attorney Josh Hurwit announced the outcomes in two separate East Idaho cases in which the defendants were sentenced to 10 years in federal prison for attempted sex crimes against a minor child.

“These cases demonstrate that child predators will find no refuge in Idaho,” said U.S. Attorney Hurwit.  “Instead, they will find justice and a ticket to federal prison.  My office is fortunate to work with law enforcement across the state who spare no effort in tracking down these criminals.  And we will continue to prosecute these offenders to the fullest extent of the law.”

On February 2, 2024, Lawrence Osborn, 44, of Soda Springs, was sentenced to ten years in prison for attempted coercion and enticement of a minor.  According to court records, on February 24, 2023, agents with Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) in San Angelo, Texas, conducted an online undercover operation to identify adults engaged in sexually predatory behavior towards children.  During the operation, Osborn engaged in online chat communications with one of the undercover HSI agents who was posing as a mother with a 7-year-old daughter.  In those communications, Osborn proposed that the mother travel from Texas to Idaho so that Osborn could sexually abuse the 7-year-old child.  Osborn offered the mother money and travel accommodations to facilitate the sexual abuse of the 7-year-old.  On March 3, Osborn arrived at a grocery store in Soda Springs with the intention of meeting the mother and 7-year-old, and he was arrested.

“Fortunately, Osborn was talking to an undercover agent and not a real parent or child,” said Shohini Sinha of the Salt Lake City FBI.  “This case highlights the collective efforts of law enforcement to protect society’s most vulnerable and hold child predators accountable.”

“Internet crime knows no border or boundaries, and in this instance our joint law enforcement partnerships were able to stop this Idaho based child predator from finding victims wherever his disgusting impulses may have led him,” said Special Agent in Charge Robert Hammer, who oversees HSI operations in the Pacific Northwest.  “This sentence helps to keep our communities, both virtual and throughout Idaho, safe from those who would prey upon children.”

Senior U.S. District Judge B. Lynn Winmill also ordered that Osborn be placed on supervised release for ten years following his prison sentence.  Osborn pleaded guilty to the charge on September 14, 2023.

In a separate case, Nathan Mark Law, 49, of Idaho Falls was also sentenced to ten years in prison on February 5, 2024.  According to court records, between July and September 2022, the Idaho Internet Crimes Against Children (ICAC) Task Force found that Law had downloaded thousands of images of child pornography also known as, “child sexual abuse material” (CSAM) over the internet.  Investigators executed a search warrant of Law’s residence where they discovered CSAM on Law’s electronic devices.  Law admitted not only that he downloaded CSAM but also that he had hidden a camera in his camp trailer bathroom and captured images of a minor female using the shower.  Law also admitted to sharing CSAM including the images he produced with another Idaho Falls man, Che Miles.  Miles was sentenced to 136 months in federal prison in September.

“This is the level of evil that we fight against – a man who would seek to create pornographic images of children,” said Attorney General Raúl Labrador, who oversees the Internet Crimes Against Children (ICAC) Task Force for Idaho.  “We cannot pretend it doesn’t happen in our communities. This kind of exploitation must be stopped at every turn.  These cases are a cooperative effort and I’m grateful for everyone involved in these successful prosecutions.  The stakes could not be higher when it comes to putting those that prey on Idaho’s children behind bars.” 

Chief U.S. District Judge David C. Nye sentenced Law to 120 months in federal prison followed by ten years of supervised release.  Law pleaded guilty to attempted sexual exploitation of a minor child on June 26, 2023.

The Osborn case was investigated by HSI in Idaho Falls, in conjunction with HSI in Dallas and San Angelo, with assistance from the Idaho State Police, the United States Marshals Service, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the Soda Springs Police Department.  The Law and Miles cases were investigated by the Idaho ICAC Task Force, HSI in Idaho Falls, the Idaho Falls Police Department, and the Bonneville County Sheriff’s Office.  Assistant U.S. Attorney Justin Paskett prosecuted these cases.

These case were brought as part of Project Safe Childhood, a nationwide initiative to combat the growing epidemic of child sexual exploitation and abuse launched in May 2006 by the Department of Justice. As part of Project Safe Childhood, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Idaho and the Idaho Attorney General’s Office partner to marshal federal, state and local resources to better locate, apprehend and prosecute individuals who exploit children via the Internet, as well as to identify and rescue victims. For more information about Project Safe Childhood, please visit www.justice.gov/psc.

###

Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanVzdGljZS5nb3YvdXNhby1zZGNhL3ByL211bHRpLWFnZW5jeS1uYXJjb3RpY3Mtb3BlcmF0aW9uLW5ldHMtbGFyZ2UtcXVhbnRpdGllcy1tZXRoYW1waGV0YW1pbmUtY29jYWluZS1hbmQ
  Press Releases:
Assistant U.S. Attorney Joseph Smith (619) 546-8299

NEWS RELEASE SUMMARY – October 15, 2020

SAN DIEGO – U.S. Attorneys Robert S. Brewer Jr. of the Southern District of California and Nicola T. Hanna of the Central District of California announced today that through a coordinated operation conducted over the last three months, hundreds of kilograms of dangerous narcotics were taken off of the streets of Southern California.

State and federal law enforcement agencies worked together to plan and execute this operation, which culminated in a one week coordinated surge in mid-September which resulted in the seizures of approximately 778 kilograms of methamphetamine, 268 kilograms of cocaine, 30 kilograms of fentanyl, 31 kilograms of heroin,  and $281,000 in U.S. currency.

In addition to the substantial seizures, six individuals were arrested and charged with various federal drug trafficking charges in the Central District of California out of the International Narcotics, Money Laundering, and Racketeering Section, and numerous additional individuals were charged with federal drug trafficking offenses in the Southern District of California.

The operation focused on identifying narcotics entering the United States though numerous Southern California ports of entry and then being transported to various locations throughout Southern California  for further distribution around the country. Numerous High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area (HIDTA) teams from Southern California, comprised of both state and federal law enforcement officers and agents, worked throughout the operation to identify and arrest individuals involved in the illegal activity and to seize narcotics and narcotics proceeds.     

“Drug traffickers and their networks are not bound by city or county boundaries, and neither are we,” said U.S. Attorney Brewer. “With the combined resources of our federal, state and local law enforcement partners, our reach is far and wide. We are seizing the drugs and dismantling the networks that are injecting our neighborhoods with poison.” Brewer praised Assistant U.S. Attorney Joseph Smith and his team of prosecutors, as well as law enforcement partners, for their commendable work on this operation.

“This operation underscores our significant – and successful – efforts to disrupt the smuggling routes used by international drug cartels to deliver narcotics to the United States,” said U.S. Attorney Hanna. “This concerted effort allowed us to identify shipments coming in from Mexico and being delivered to stash houses across the region. As a result of the excellent work of law enforcement agents, we were able to make substantial seizures and arrest individuals who played important roles in the distribution chain.”

This effort is part of an ongoing Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Forces (OCDETF) operation jointly undertaken by law enforcement agencies and prosecutors in the Southern and Central Districts of California. OCDETF identifies, disrupts, and dismantles the highest-level transnational criminal organizations that threaten the United States using a prosecutor-led, intelligence driven, multi-agency approach to combat transnational organized crime.         

OCDETF Director Adam W. Cohen said, “We must salute the coordinated efforts led by dedicated OCDETF prosecutors from these two U.S. Attorney’s Offices to leverage our multi-agency strengths against these criminal networks.”

The three-month operation was coordinated by Assistant U.S. Attorney Joseph Smith, Chief of the OCDETF Section in San Diego, and Assistant U.S. Attorney Carol Alexis Chen, Chief of the International Narcotics, Money Laundering, and Racketeering Section in Los Angeles.

INVESTIGATING AGENCY

Homeland Security Investigations

Customs and Border Protection, Office of Field Operations

Drug Enforcement Administration

San Diego County Sheriff’s Department

LA IMPACT

SD-NET

Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanVzdGljZS5nb3YvdXNhby1zZGNhL3ByL3Nhbi1kaWVnby1sYWJvcmF0b3J5LWFkbWl0cy1mcmF1ZHVsZW50LXRyaWNhcmUtYmlsbGluZy1hZ3JlZXMtcGF5LTQ5LW1pbGxpb24
  Press Releases:
Assistant U. S. Attorneys Valerie Chu and Paul Starita (619) 546-6750/7701

NEWS RELEASE SUMMARY – July 23, 2020

SAN DIEGO - San Diego-based clinical laboratory Progenity, Inc. admitted today that it submitted fraudulent bills to TRICARE, the Department of Defense health care benefit program that covers military service members and their dependents, and to the Federal Health Care Employee Benefits Program (FEHBP), for clinical tests that it knew were not covered or properly payable by either program.

In addition, Progenity, formerly known as Ascendant MDx, Inc., and previously headquartered in Carlsbad, California, admitted that it offered improper incentives to patients and doctors to use its laboratory services.  To account for its fraud, Progenity has agreed to pay a total of $49 million in civil settlements in federal courts in the Southern District of California (SDCA) and the Southern District of New York (SDNY), as well as to multiple states.

Progenity offered noninvasive prenatal testing (“NIPT”) to pregnant women. NIPT refers to a category of genetic tests that screen for fetal chromosomal abnormalities, through analysis of fetal DNA present in a pregnant woman’s blood.  This form of genetic testing, however, did not have FDA approval and was considered by TRICARE as a “laboratory-developed test.”  As a result, TRICARE did not cover NIPT tests for its beneficiaries.  Therefore, in order to get reimbursed by TRICARE, between April 1, 2013 and April 30, 2016, Progenity falsely and fraudulently used a medical billing code that TRICARE covered, but that Progenity knew did not accurately reflect that the NIPT test. 

The U.S. Attorney’s Office for SDCA launched both a criminal probe into Progenity’s fraudulent billing practices and a civil investigation of the false claims Progenity had submitted to TRICARE and the FEHBP. Separately, SDNY initiated its own investigation into misconduct by Progenity relating to the improper incentives provided to patients and doctors to use its laboratory services.  SDNY also coordinated with multiple state Attorneys General to investigate Progenity’s miscoding of NIPT to Medicaid programs in New York and several other states.

Progenity’s settlement agreement requires the company to pay $16.4 million to settle the SDCA civil matter, $19,449,316 to settle the SDNY civil matter, and $13,150,684 to settle the state civil allegations. The civil settlements were based on an ability-to-pay, payment-over-time basis, following an analysis of financial condition submissions made by Progenity.  In light of Progenity’s remedial efforts, cooperation with the investigation, and payment of restitution to TRICARE and the FEHBP, the criminal investigation was resolved via a non-prosecution agreement, requiring that Progenity admit its misconduct and be subject to additional terms and conditions for up to a 24-month period.   

U.S. Attorney Robert Brewer said, “San Diego is known for cutting-edge research and innovation, particularly in the biomedical sciences, that advances fields and improves people’s lives.  But in the quest for advancement and profit, companies must still engage in honest and straightforward dealing, and provide the information that allows federal programs to determine whether to pay for new technologies.” Brewer commended the work of the attorneys from the criminal and civil divisions of the office and agents from the FBI and DCIS, who successfully conducted these parallel proceedings and brought to bear the full range of enforcement options to address Progenity’s misconduct.

“Fraudulent billing practices undermines the confidence in our healthcare system and in this case, cheated the TRICARE program serving the men, women and families of our military,” said Omer Meisel, Acting FBI Special Agent in Charge of the San Diego Field Office. “The FBI is committed to working with our partners and the public to stop fraud and ensure that healthcare dollars are used appropriately.”

“The settlement is a significant victory for the American public in that it returns ill-gotten proceeds to the U.S. Government and restores confidence in our healthcare system, including the U.S. military's TRICARE program,” said Bryan D. Denny, Special Agent in Charge of the Defense Criminal Investigative Service, Western Field Office.  “As in this case, any unprincipled actions by healthcare providers that tarnish and possibly corrupt the integrity of the TRICARE program will be reviewed and vigorously investigated by DCIS and its law enforcement partners.”

“Fraudulent billing is a theft from the FEHBP and the American taxpayer,” said Norbert E. Vint, Deputy Inspector General Performing the Duties of the Inspector General, Office of Personnel Management OIG. “I congratulate our investigators and law enforcement partners on this successful outcome. The OPM OIG will always work hard to investigate suspected fraud and abuse of the FEHBP.”

“Protecting and providing top quality health care to service members, veterans and their families is our primary mission at TRICARE,” said Lt. Gen. Ronald Place, USA, director, Defense Health Agency. “We thank the investigators who uncovered this fraudulent billing by a company trying to profit from taking advantage of our men and women on the front lines. We will continue to work with law enforcement and other state and federal agencies to ensure health care providers are held accountable for participating in any fraudulent practices.”

This case was handled by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Valerie Chu, Paul Starita, and Beth Clukey on behalf of the Southern District of California.

DEFENDANT                                                                      

Progenity, Inc.                                   

San Diego, CA

AGENCIES

Federal Bureau of Investigation

Defense Criminal Investigative Services

Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanVzdGljZS5nb3YvdXNhby1zZGNhL3ByL2ludGVybmF0aW9uYWwtd2hvbGVzYWxlLWN1cnJlbmN5LWRlYWxlci1wbGVhZHMtZ3VpbHR5LXVubGF3ZnVsbHktb3BlcmF0aW5nLXVuaXRlZA
  Press Releases:
Assistant U. S. Attorneys Michael A. Deshong, Daniel C. Silva, and Carl Brooker (619) 546-9290

NEWS RELEASE SUMMARY—July 29, 2021

SAN DIEGO—GPOMCT Grupo Empresarial S.A. de C.V., an international, Mexico-based wholesale currency dealer and currency exchange business, pleaded guilty in federal court today to unlawfully operating in the United States. Through its subsidiaries, GPOMCT controls more than 40 locations in Mexico that handle an average of over $1 million in U.S. currency daily.

Special Agents from Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) led the investigation into hundreds of transactions that involved GPOMCT importing large volumes of U.S. dollars into the United States between 2019 and 2021. Agents from Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Office of Inspector General assisted HSI in its investigation.

As admitted in the plea agreement entered today before U.S. Magistrate Judge Michael S. Berg, GPOMCT imported shipments of currency from Mexico into the United States for the purposes of selling Mexican pesos to a currency exchange located in San Ysidro, California, identified only as “MSB 1” in the plea agreement. Between September 2019 and September 2020, GPOMCT imported approximately 195 shipments of currency—each worth between $90,000 and $100,000 in U.S. dollars—and delivered them to MSB 1 in San Ysidro. GPOMCT used the services of an armored car company to collect currency from MSB 1 as payment and deliver it to a third-party intermediary in Miami, Florida.

By offering a variety of services as a wholesale currency dealer, GPOMCT admitted that it operated as an unlicensed money transmitting business in the United States and agreed to criminally forfeit $1.1 million as property involved in its unlawful operations. By failing to register as a money transmitting business, GPOMCT did not file currency and transactional reports with the Department of the Treasury, as required by the Bank Secrecy Act, nor did it subject itself to inspection by the Department of Treasury for compliance with these financial laws and regulations.

Acting U.S. Attorney Randy S. Grossman said, “Financial laws and regulations are not a suggestion. They are significant tools to combat international money laundering, tax evasion, and other crimes. Financial institutions that operate in the United States of America should learn from the crimes committed by GPOMCT. This office will continue to demand the highest level of compliance from financial institutions in the Southern District of California.” Grossman praised prosecutors Michael Deshong, Daniel Silva, and Carl Brooker as well as agents from Homeland Security Investigations and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation for their excellent work on this case.

During the course of the investigation, agents also learned that GPOMCT used the services of an armored car company—and the armored car company’s Mexican affiliate—to import U.S. dollars into the United States and deliver them to third parties around the United States on hundreds of occasions between January 2019 and February 2021. These third parties would convert the U.S. dollars to Mexican pesos and electronically transmit the funds back to GPOMCT in Mexico, thereby completing the wholesale currency cycle.

GPOMCT has since registered as a money services business, or MSB, and acknowledged that it is now expected to comply with all U.S. statutes and regulations, including anti-money laundering requirements.  

Cardell T. Morant, Special Agent in Charge for Homeland Security Investigations, San Diego, stated, “HSI is committed to protecting the integrity of the U.S. financial system by holding Money Service Businesses  accountable for the registration and reporting requirements necessary to ensure transparency. Companies or individuals that import, transport, or transfer large amounts of currency without complying with reporting requirements create opportunities for criminal organizations to introduce their profits into the financial system without scrutiny. This guilty plea should send a strong signal to MSBs to remain vigilant in their anti-money laundering duties.”

“This guilty plea holds GPOMCT responsible for failing to comply with requirements established under anti-money laundering laws,” said Special Agent in Charge Jeffrey D. Pittano of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Office of Inspector General (FDIC OIG). “The FDIC OIG is committed to working with our law enforcement partners to investigate those who fail to adhere to laws and regulations that are designed to detect and prevent financial crimes.”

Sentencing is scheduled to occur on October 15, 2021 before U.S. District Judge Janis L. Sammartino.

DEFENDANTS                                             Case Number 21cr2120-JLS                            

GPOMCT Grupo Empresarial S.A. de C.V.

SUMMARY OF CHARGES

Operating an Unlicensed Money Transmitting Business—Title 18, U.S.C., Section 1960

Criminal Forfeiture—Title 18, U.S.C., Section 982

Maximum penalty: $500,000 fine or twice the gross gain or loss from the offense, whichever is greater; criminal forfeiture

AGENCY

Homeland Security Investigations

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanVzdGljZS5nb3YvdXNhby1zZGNhL3ByL3Nhbi1kaWVnby1yZXNpZGVudC1zZW50ZW5jZWQtMTMteWVhcnMtcHJpc29uLWRpc3RyaWJ1dGluZy1mZW50YW55bC1yZXN1bHRlZC0xNS15ZWFy
  Press Releases:
For Further Information, Contact:

Assistant U. S. Attorney Adam Gordon (619) 546-6720

SAN DIEGO - Kaylar Junior Tawan Beltranlap, a 21-year-old San Diego resident, was sentenced in federal court today to 156 months in prison for distributing counterfeit oxycodone pills laced with fentanyl that resulted in the death of 15-year-old Coronado High School sophomore Clark Jackson Salveron on May 12, 2021.

Beltranlap pleaded guilty in July, admitting that he used his Instagram account to coordinate a drug transaction with Salveron. According to admissions in his plea agreement, Beltranlap warned Salveron to only take half the pill because it was “strong as hell.”

According to the government’s sentencing memo, on the morning of May 13, 2021, law enforcement officials and paramedics responded to a 911 call from a home in Coronado. Salveron was found deceased in his bedroom. The Medical Examiner’s Office later determined that the teen had died as the result of “acute fentanyl intoxication.”

During a search of Salveron’s room at that time, law enforcement observed a small desk in the corner next to his closet. On the desk was a laptop still open and running. Detectives were able to see the teen’s personal Instagram account which included a conversation with the user account “chefkaylar.” A subsequent database search showed that the username “chefkaylar” was registered to Beltranlap with an address in San Diego. The messages between the two showed that the night before the victim’s death, Salveron and Beltranlap discussed the purchase of “percs.” The next day, law enforcement located and arrested Beltranlap.

Per the plea agreement, Beltranlap and the government stipulated that the Sentencing Guidelines for distribution of a controlled substance resulting in death and/or serious bodily injury would apply.

During today’s hearing, U.S. District Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo noted that by dealing drugs, the defendant went for the “easy money” with “callous disregard for the poison he was putting into the community and into a very young victim.”

“A 15-year-old child tragically lost his life to fentanyl, leaving behind a devastated family and community.", said U.S. Attorney Randy Grossman. “Parents – the defendant in this case advertised these counterfeit blues on Instagram and Snapchat. I implore you to actively take steps to ensure that your children are not buying drugs online. We invite you to review the Fentanyl Toolkit which describes the various codes used by drug dealers in their online advertisements: https://www.sdpdatf.org/community-parent-fentanyl-toolkit.” Grossman thanked the prosecution team and the DEA Overdose Response Team for their excellent work on this case.

“Drug dealers are using social media to target kids,” said DEA Special Agent in Charge Shelly Howe. “Parents, be vigilant about checking your children’s social media, it may save their life. For additional information visit https://www.dea.gov/onepill for resources on fake pills and fentanyl.”

“One child’s death from fentanyl is far too many,” said Chad Plantz, special agent in charge, HSI San Diego. “HSI and our San Diego law enforcement partners will continue our efforts to identify and hold accountable those who sell poisonous drugs in our community.”

“A family lost a child and that is more than any family should have to experience,” said Coronado Police Chief Chuck Kaye. “We are grateful for all the work that went into today’s sentencing.”

In the government’s sentencing memorandum, the Salveron was described by his family as a fun-loving kid with braces, a leader and role model to his younger sister and twin brothers, and a volunteer who always lovingly assisted his disabled grandparents. He was a “kind, sweet, helpful young man who cared deeply about his family.”

In the memo, the boy’s parents described the devastating impact of their son’s death.

“I will never recover from my oldest son being poisoned and taken from me,” his mother said. “Clark had a full life to live and now it’s gone. I will never see my son, graduate high school, go to college, get married, and have grandchildren.”

In explaining how Clark’s death has affected him, the victim’s father wrote: “Everything I did was with (my son). I don’t really go out anymore. We hiked, biked, he was my partner through nature. I don’t feel very deserving…I miss him so much. I cry every day. I think of him all day. I still can’t believe it.”

This case is the result of ongoing efforts by the U.S. Attorney’s Office, Drug Enforcement Administration, Homeland Security Investigations, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the San Diego Police Department, the California Department of Health Care Services and the San Diego County District Attorney’s Office to investigate and prosecute the distribution of dangerous illegal drugs—fentanyl in particular—that result in overdose deaths. The DEA created the DEA Overdose Response Team (formerly Team 10) which investigates overdose deaths in San Diego County. Investigators from the Overdose Response Team, as well as the Coronado Police Department and NTF Team 3, contributed to the investigation into Salveron’s death.

 

DEFENDANT                                               Case Number 21-CR-3442 CAB                                        

Kaylar Junior Tawan Beltranlap                     Age: 21                       San Diego, CA

SUMMARY OF CHARGES

Distribute of Fentanyl– Title 21, United States Code, Sections 841(a)

Maximum penalty: Twenty years in prison

AGENCY

Drug Enforcement Administration

Homeland Security Investigations

Federal Bureau of Investigation

Coronado Police Department

San Diego Police Department

California Department of Health Care Services

Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanVzdGljZS5nb3YvdXNhby1zZGNhL3ByL2NyZWRpdC1jYXJkLWZyYXVkc3Rlci1zZW50ZW5jZWQtcHJpc29u
  Press Releases:
Assistant U.S. Attorney Nicholas W. Pilchak and Matthew J. Sutton (619) 546-9709 and (619) 546-8941

NEWS RELEASE SUMMARY – June 1, 2018

SAN DIEGO – The leader of a credit card fraud ring that stole account information from dozens of San Diego residents and used it to purchase over $70,000 of merchandise at area retailers was sentenced in federal court today to 51 months in prison.

U.S. District Judge John A. Houston sentenced the ringleader, Daniel Stephen Wray, following his January 18, 2018 guilty plea to conspiracy to use counterfeit access devices.  Wray was also ordered to pay $76,489.35 in restitution.

As detailed in the plea agreement, indictment, and other publicly-filed court documents, Wray recruited multiple co-conspirators to join his ring of credit card fraudsters in late 2016. Wray then provided these individuals with counterfeit access devices—credit cards bearing altered names, but encoded with real credit card numbers for the accounts of unwitting victims—and drove them to San Diego-area stores.

Investigators believe that many of the victims’ identities and credit card numbers were stolen after Wray and his co-conspirators installed a skimmer at a La Jolla, California gas station. A skimmer is a device capable of reading and recording account information, including customer names, account numbers, and personal identification numbers, from credit and debit cards. After creating the fraudulent credit cards with the stolen credit card numbers, Wray and his co-conspirators then used them to purchase tens of thousands of dollars of merchandise from multiple San Diego retailers, including Costco and Smart N Final.

Wray admitted his role as the leader of the fraudulent scheme, acknowledging that he obtained dozens of counterfeit and unauthorized access devices from multiple victims in San Diego County and then directed his associates to use these fraudulent credit cards to make tens of thousands of dollars in purchases, ranging from Apple iPads, luxury wristwatches, gold and silver, and significant quantities of liquor and energy drinks from large San Diego retailers. According to court filings, Wray rapidly resold or distributed the stolen property on the black market. 

Wray also admitted to being previously convicted of illegally possessing 269 counterfeit credit cards in 2014. In fact, according to court records, Wray was on supervised release for his prior credit card fraud conviction when he committed this crime, and even recruited his accomplices from the halfway house where he was serving his supervised release term. 

At sentencing this morning, Judge Houston noted Wray’s lengthy and serious prior criminal record, his aggravating role in the offense, and the effect of identity theft on the lives of ordinary citizens. The judge said Wray’s identity theft conduct “destroys lives.”

“Identity thieves cannot victimize citizens of our district with impunity,” said U.S. Attorney Adam L. Braverman. “To anyone who considers credit card fraud a quick and easy payday: this office will investigate and prosecute you, and you will face the consequences.” 

“Today’s sentencing is a reminder that financial crimes are not victimless crimes,” said United States Secret Service Special Agent in Charge Brian S. Christensen. “The defendant and his conspirators victimized the community of San Diego for their own personal gain by taking advantage of multiple local merchants. The U.S. Secret Service and its law enforcement partners will continue to investigate and pursue prosecution of those who engage in identity theft or financial fraud.”

The San Diego Regional Fraud Task Force (SDRFTF), conducted the investigation that led to the successful prosecution of this defendant. The SDRFTF was established as a collaborative, multi-agency effort to effectively combat financial crimes, including identity fraud, in San Diego County. Partnering in this effort are the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of California, the United States Secret Service, the San Diego Police Department, and the San Diego County District Attorney’s Office, along with other state and local partners. The case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Nicholas W. Pilchak and Matthew J. Sutton.

DEFENDANT                                                                   Case Number 17CR3856-JAH                  

Daniel Stephen Wray                                                        Age: 29                   San Diego, California                   

SUMMARY OF CHARGES

Conspiracy to Commit Access Device Fraud, in violation of Title 18 U.S.C. § 1029; Term of custody including 20 years in prison, $250,000 fine and 3 years supervised release and mandatory restitution.

AGENCIES

San Diego Regional Fraud Task Force:

- United States Secret Service

- San Diego Police Department

- San Diego District Attorney’s Office

 

Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanVzdGljZS5nb3YvdXNhby1zZGNhL3ByL3VzLWF0dG9ybmV5LWNvbnZlbmVzLW11bHRpLWFnZW5jeS1icmllZmluZy1pbmZvcm1pbmctbG9jYWwtY29tbXVuaXR5LWxlYWRlcnMtdGFyZ2V0ZWQ
  Press Releases:
SAN DIEGO – In response to recent violent shootings, online white supremacist rhetoric, and a significant increase in hate crimes, U.S. Attorney Randy Grossman today gathered key law enforcement and community leaders for a briefing that included a threat assessment, an overview of pre-attack indicators and the best ways to report and mitigate threats. 

Grossman was joined by DHS officials in Washington, D.C., Marcus Coleman, Director of the DHS Faith Based and Community Relations Program, and Dominic Cucciarre, Team Lead in the DHS Office of Intelligence and Analysis, Counterterrorism Mission Center, several local law enforcement leaders, including Curtis Jones, Deputy National Sector Chief, FBI - InfraGard Program, San Diego Police Department Chief Dave Nisleit, Assistant District Attorney Dwain Woodley, FBI Supervisory Special Agent Renee Green, and two Fusion Center Senior Intelligence Analysts, as well as more than a dozen stakeholders who work in  Southeast San Diego, including leaders of the San Diego Organizing Project, which requested the briefing.

“While the combination of hateful online rhetoric and access to firearms presents a chilling challenge, prevention through partnerships has saved lives, both nationally and here in San Diego,” said U.S. Attorney Randy Grossman. “Violent remarks by online extremists have resulted in public ‘tip’ reports to law enforcement, followed by a gun violence restraining order and successful federal prosecution. To ensure this prevention strategy is repeated, it is essential to arm our community leaders with information.”

“It’s important that the community members know they are not alone in this battle against radical extremism, hateful threats and targeted gun violence: federal, state and local law enforcement agencies are with you, ready to assist in every way possible,” Grossman added. “We want to work hand in hand with you to keep your loved ones and community safe.”

“Our faith and nonprofit leaders are often in the best position to notice and report suspicious behavior,” Marcus Coleman stated. “We need to ensure they are briefed on the latest intelligence so they can better identify pre-attack indicators and contact law enforcement.”

 

Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanVzdGljZS5nb3YvdXNhby1ubS9wci9wZXJhbHRhLW5ldy1tZXhpY28tcGhhcm1hY3ktYWdyZWVzLXNldHRsZW1lbnQtcmVsYXRpbmctdmlvbGF0aW9ucy1jb250cm9sbGVkLXN1YnN0YW5jZXM
  Press Releases:
ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. – Alexander M.M. Uballez, United States Attorney for the District of New Mexico, announced today that Joe’s Pharmacy of Peralta, New Mexico, has agreed to pay to the United States $50,000 representing civil penalties under Controlled Substances Act (CSA).

The agreement settles civil claims against Joe’s Pharmacy arising from Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) on-sight inspections on Aug. 7, 2018, and March 5, 2019, and the process by which Joe’s Pharmacy returned or reverse-distributed its controlled substances inventory following the March 5, 2019, inspection. Joe’s Pharmacy failed to account for 24,422 doses of controlled substances, a majority of which were opioid analgesics. The inspections also revealed 112 additional record-keeping violations and four dispensing violations. In the return process, Joe’s Pharmacy failed to account for 1,231 doses of controlled substances and 15 doses of listed chemicals.

“Pharmacies are on the front lines of preventing the abuse of opioids and other controlled substances in our communities,” said U.S. Attorney Uballez.  “Pharmacies are responsible for ensuring that controlled substances are only dispensed through a valid prescription for legitimate medical purposes. The failure of a pharmacy to account for opioids and other controlled substances exposes New Mexicans to the risk that these substances will be diverted and abused.”

“Pharmacies, and all registrants, must do their part to ensure that prescription medications are not misused and abused,” said Greg Millard, Special Agent in Charge of the Drug Enforcement Administration’s El Paso Division. “Because we want safe and healthy communities, DEA will continue to utilize its regulatory oversight to ensure these entities comply with the rules set forth in the Controlled Substance Act.”

Assistant United States Attorney Sean Cunniff and Auditor Julie Chappell represented the United States in this matter.

# # #

Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanVzdGljZS5nb3YvdXNhby1tZGZsL3ByL3plcGh5cmhpbGxzLXJlZ2lzdGVyZWQtc2V4LW9mZmVuZGVyLXNlbnQtYmFjay1mZWRlcmFsLXByaXNvbi0xNy15ZWFycy1yZWNlaXZpbmctY2hpbGQ
  Press Releases:
Tampa, Florida – U.S. District Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington has sentenced Aaron Bicknell (37, Zephyrhills) to 17 years in federal prison, followed by a lifetime term of supervised release, for receiving child sexual abuse material. The court also ordered Bicknell to pay $20,000 in restitution to the victims of the offense. Bicknell entered a guilty plea on April 22, 2024.

According to court documents, in 2011, Bicknell was sentenced to seven years in federal prison for receiving child sexual abuse material over the internet using a filesharing program. As part of his sentence, Bicknell was required to register as a sex offender. The Federal Bureau of Prisons released Bicknell in May 2021, and he began serving a lifetime term of supervised release. In August 2023, law enforcement downloaded files of child sexual abuse material from Bicknell. After executing a  search warrant at Bicknell’s home, investigators discovered more than100 images and 80 videos of child sexual abuse on Bicknell’s devices.

“The sentencing of this recidivist felon for collecting child sexual abuse material underscores HSI’s commitment to protecting our communities most vulnerable,” said Homeland Security Investigations Tampa Assistant Special Agent in Charge Micah C. McCombs. “Alongside our partners at the Pasco Sheriff’s Office, we will make sure these individuals are not able to hide their actions under a cloak of internet anonymity.”

This case was investigated by Homeland Security Investigations (Tampa), with substantial assistance from the Pasco Sheriff’s Office. It was prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Erin Claire Favorit.

This is another case brought as part of Project Safe Childhood, a nationwide initiative launched in May 2006 by the Department of Justice to combat the growing epidemic of child sexual exploitation and abuse. Led by the United States Attorneys’ Offices and the Criminal Division’s Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section, Project Safe Childhood marshals federal, state, and local resources to locate, apprehend, and prosecute individuals who sexually exploit children, and to identify and rescue victims. For more information about Project Safe Childhood, please visit www.justice.gov/psc.

Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanVzdGljZS5nb3YvdXNhby1tZGZsL3ByL2hvcGUtaG9zcGljZS1hZ3JlZXMtcGF5LTMyLW1pbGxpb24tc2V0dGxlLWZhbHNlLWNsYWltcy1hY3QtbGlhYmlsaXR5
  Press Releases:
Fort Myers, FL – United States Attorney Maria Chapa Lopez announces today that Hope Hospice has agreed to pay the United States $3.2 million to resolve allegations that it knowingly submitted false claims to Medicare, Medicaid, and TRICARE for hospice care provided to beneficiaries who did not qualify for the service. Founded in 1979, Hope Hospice is a subsidiary of Hope Healthcare. Hope Healthcare is a not-for-profit organization that provides a variety of programs for the elderly in Lee, Hendry, and Glades Counties, including hospice and palliative care services.

Hospice care is special end-of-life care for terminally ill patients intended to comfort the dying. Patients admitted to hospice care generally stop receiving coverage for traditional medical care intended to cure their illnesses and instead receive medical care focused on providing them with relief from the symptoms, pain, and stress of a terminal illness. Medicare patients are considered to be terminally ill and hospice eligible when they have a life expectancy of six months or less if their illness runs its normal course.

This settlement resolves allegations that Hope Hospice knowingly submitted false claims to Medicare for hospice services for patients who were not terminally ill.  According to the settlement agreement, the United States alleged that from July 1, 2012 to June 30, 2016, Hope Hospice billed Medicare for four or more years of hospice care for certain patients who were not terminally ill for at least a portion of their greater than four year hospice stay.

The settlement also resolves allegations that Hope Hospice knowingly submitted false claims to Medicare, Medicaid, and TRICARE for general inpatient (“GIP”) hospice care in circumstances where that higher level of care was not medically necessary. Medicare, Medicaid, and TRICARE reimburse for four different levels of hospice care: routine home care, continuous home care, inpatient respite care, and GIP. GIP is for pain control or symptom management that cannot be managed in other settings, such as a patient’s home. GIP is intended to be short-term and is reimbursed at a higher rate than routine home care or inpatient respite care. According to the settlement agreement, the United States alleged that Hope Hospice knowingly submitted false claims from January 1, 2011 to June 30, 2016, to Medicare, Medicaid and TRICARE for unnecessary GIP hospice care for certain patients for whom Hope Hospice billed for over two weeks of GIP care

As part of the settlement, Hope Hospice has agreed to enter into a Corporate Integrity Agreement (CIA) with HHS OIG. The CIA promotes compliance with the statutes, regulations, program requirements, and written directives of Medicare, Medicaid, and all other federal health care programs, specifically dealing with, among other things, the proper billing and submission of reimbursement claims by Hope Hospice.

“Our seniors rely on the hospice program to provide them with quality care, dignity and respect, when they are terminally ill and need end-of-life care,” said United States Attorney Maria Chapa Lopez. “This investigation and settlement demonstrates our continued commitment to combating health care fraud and protecting the financial solvency of this critical benefit.” 

Attorney General Ashley Moody said, “Hospice care has brought peace of mind and reduced suffering for so many Floridians and their families. It is vital that we ensure this compassionate health care service is not exploited and that Medicaid recipients nearing the end of their journey are able to access these end-of-life resources to help bring dignity and peace to those with terminal illnesses. I am proud to work with our federal partners to preserve the integrity of hospice care in Florida.”

“Hospice care is designed to provide quality end-of-life care and is only medically appropriate – and reimbursable by Medicare – for terminally ill patients,” said Special Agent in Charge Omar Pérez Aybar of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General (HHS OIG). “HHS OIG, in concert with our investigative and prosecutive partners, will continue to vigorously pursue and hold accountable providers who knowingly submit fraudulent claims to Medicare and Medicaid.” 

"This settlement is representative of quality, uncompromising work by DCIS, our investigative partners and the U.S. Attorney's Office to ensure the integrity of the Department of Defense’s Healthcare system, commented Cynthia A. Bruce, Special Agent in Charge, Southeast Field Office, Defense Criminal Investigative Service. We are committed to fully investigating allegations of fraud, waste and abuse, which jeopardize our military families’ precious healthcare resources."

The settlement concludes a lawsuit originally filed in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida by Margaret Peters who formerly worked at Hope Hospice as the Director of Hospice Care. Peters sued under the qui tam, or whistleblower, provisions of the False Claims Act permitting a private citizen to sue on behalf of the United States for false claims and to share in the recovery. The case is captioned U.S. and the State of Florida ex rel. Margaret Peters v. Hope Hospice and Community Services, et al, No. 2:16-cv-6-FtM-99MRM. The Act also allows the United States to intervene and prosecute the action. Peters will receive 19% of the proceeds from the settlement with Hope Hospice.

The investigation was handled by the Fort Myers Division of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Middle District of Florida and Trial Attorney Holly H. Snow from the Civil Division’s Commercial Litigation Branch, with assistance from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services – Office of Inspector General, Defense Criminal Investigative Service, and the State of Florida Medicaid Fraud Control Unit Civil Enforcement Bureau. The claims resolved by the settlement are allegations only, and there has been no determination of liability.

The government’s action in this matter illustrates the emphasis on combating health care fraud, and one of the most powerful tools in this effort is the False Claims Act. Tips from all sources about potential fraud, waste, abuse, and mismanagement can be reported to the Department of Health and Human Services, at 800-HHS-TIPS (800-447-8477).

Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanVzdGljZS5nb3YvdXNhby1tZGZsL3ByL3J1c3NpYW4tbmF0aW9uYWwtY2hhcmdlZC1jb25zcGlyaW5nLWhhdmUtdXMtY2l0aXplbnMtYWN0LWlsbGVnYWwtYWdlbnRzLXJ1c3NpYW4
  Press Releases:
WASHINGTON – An indictment was unsealed today in Tampa, Florida, charging a Russian national, working on behalf of the Russian government and in conjunction with the Russian Federal Security Service (FSB), with allegedly orchestrating a years-long foreign malign influence campaign that used various U.S. political groups to sow discord, spread pro-Russian propaganda, and interfere in elections within the United States.

As alleged in the indictment, from at least December 2014 until March 2022, Aleksandr Viktorovich Ionov, a resident of Moscow, together with at least three Russian officials, engaged in a years-long foreign malign influence campaign targeting the United States. Ionov is the founder and president of the Anti-Globalization Movement of Russia (AGMR), an organization headquartered in Moscow and funded by the Russian government. Ionov utilized AGMR to carry out Russia’s influence campaign.

“As court documents show, Ionov allegedly orchestrated a brazen influence campaign, turning U.S. political groups and U.S. citizens into instruments of the Russian government,” said Assistant Attorney General Matthew G. Olsen of the Justice Department’s National Security Division. “The Department of Justice will not allow Russia to unlawfully sow division and spread misinformation inside the United States.”

According to the indictment, Ionov — working under the supervision of the FSB and with the Russian government’s support — recruited political groups within the United States, including U.S. Political Group 1 in Florida, U.S. Political Group 2 in Georgia, and U.S. Political Group 3 in California, and exercised direction or control over them on behalf of the FSB. Specifically, Ionov provided financial support to these groups, directed them to publish pro-Russian propaganda, coordinated and funded direct action by these groups within the United States intended to further Russian interests, and coordinated coverage of this activity in Russian media outlets. Ionov also relayed detailed information about this influence campaign to three FSB officials.

“Secret foreign government efforts to influence American elections and political groups threaten our democracy by spreading misinformation, distrust and mayhem,” said Assistant Attorney General Kenneth A. Polite, Jr. of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division. “The department is committed to ensuring U.S. laws protecting transparency in the electoral process and the political system are not undermined through foreign malign influence.”

According to the indictment, Ionov allegedly targeted U.S. Political Group 1 based in St. Petersburg, Florida. In May 2015, Ionov funded an all-expense paid trip to Russia for the leader of U.S. Political Group 1 (Unindicted Co-Conspirator-1, UIC-1) in order to “communicate on future cooperation” between U.S. Political Group 1 and AGMR. Following that trip, and for at least the next seven years, Ionov exercised direction and control over senior members of U.S. Political Group 1.

“The prosecution of this criminal conduct is essential to protecting the American public when foreign governments seek to inject themselves into the American political process,” said U.S. Attorney Roger B. Handberg for the Middle District of Florida. “We will continue to work with our partners at the FBI to investigate these events, and we will continue to follow the evidence to ensure justice is done.”

Early in the conspiracy, senior members of U.S. Political Group 1, UIC-1, UIC-2, and UIC-3 exchanged emails about the fact that Ionov was working on behalf of the Russian Government. For example, in September 2015, Ionov paid for UIC-1 to attend an AGMR-sponsored “Dialogue of Nations” conference in Moscow. Upon his return to Florida, UIC-1 reported to the leadership of U.S. Political Group 1 that AGMR is “a solid institution of Russian politic,” and that it was “clear” that AGMR was “an instrument of [the] Russian government,” which, UIC-1 wrote, did not “disturb us.” The following week, in an email discussion, U.S. Political Group 1 leaders observed that it was “more than likely” that the Russian government was using AGMR “to utilize forces inside of the U.S. to sew [sic] division inside the United States.”

“The impact of Russian malign foreign influence cannot be overstated,” said Assistant Director Luis Quesada of the FBI’s Criminal Investigative Division. “The FBI will aggressively pursue any foreign government that attempts to divide American citizens and poison our democratic process.”

Ionov used his control over U.S. Political Group 1 leaders to foster discord within the United States, to spread pro-Russian propaganda under the guise of a domestic political organization, and to interfere in local elections. For example, in January 2016, Ionov guaranteed financing for — and ultimately funded — a four-city protest tour undertaken by U.S. Political Group 1 in support of a “Petition on Crime of Genocide against African People in the United States,” which it had previously submitted to the United Nations at Ionov’s direction. Later, in 2017 and 2019, Ionov monitored and supported the St. Petersburg, Florida, political campaigns of UIC-3 and UIC-4. In 2019, before the primary election, Ionov wrote to a Russian official that he had been “consulting every week” on the campaign. After UIC-4 advanced to the general election, FSB Officer 1 wrote to Ionov that “our election campaign is kind of unique,” and asked, “are we the first in history?” Ionov later sent FSB Officer 1 additional details about the election, referring to UIC-4 as the candidate “whom we supervise.”

According to the indictment, Ionov’s relationship with U.S. Political Group 1 continued until at least March 2022. Specifically, in the wake of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, U.S. Political Group 1 repeatedly hosted Ionov via video conference to discuss the war, during which Ionov falsely stated that anyone who supported Ukraine also supported Nazism and white supremacy. In a report to the FSB, Ionov explained that he had enlisted U.S. Political Group 1 to support Russia in the “information war unleashed” by the West.

Alongside his malign foreign influence efforts with U.S. Political Group 1, Ionov also exercised direction and control over U.S. Political Group 3, an organization based in California whose primary goal was to promote California’s secession from the United States. In January and February of 2018, Ionov supported U.S. Political Group 3’s efforts — led by the organization’s founder (UIC-6)—to orchestrate a protest demonstration at the California Capitol building in Sacramento. Ionov partially funded the efforts and attempted to direct UIC-6 to physically enter the governor’s office. Later, Ionov sent various media reports covering the demonstration and U.S. Political Group 3’s broader efforts to FSB Officer 1, writing that FSB Officer 1 had asked for “turmoil” and stating, “there you go.” 

According to the indictment, Ionov also directed the efforts of U.S. Political Group 2, based in Atlanta. For example, as recently as March 2022, Ionov paid for members of U.S. Political Group 2 — including its founder (UIC-5) — to travel from Atlanta to San Francisco to protest at the headquarters of a social media company that had placed content restrictions on posts supporting Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Ionov sent UIC-5 designs for signs used at the protest and funded cross-country travel for UIC-5 and other members of U.S. Political Group 2. After the protest, Ionov sent UIC-5 a picture of a Russian news website’s social media page, which displayed a Russian-language news story about the protest.   

Ionov is charged with conspiring to have U.S. citizens act as illegal agents of the Russian government. If convicted, he faces a maximum penalty of five years in prison. A federal district court judge will determine any sentence after considering the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and other statutory factors.

Assistant U.S. Attorneys Daniel J. Marcet and Risha Asokan, Trial Attorney Menno Goedman of the Justice Department’s Counterintelligence and Export Control Section, and Trial Attorney Demetrius Sumner of the Justice Department’s Public Integrity Section are prosecuting the case.

The FBI Tampa Field Office is investigating the case.

An indictment is merely an allegation. All defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.

Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanVzdGljZS5nb3YvdXNhby1tZGZsL3ByL29yYW5nZS1jaXR5LW1hbi13aG8tc2V4dG9ydGVkLW11bHRpcGxlLW1pbm9ycy1zZW50ZW5jZWQtNjAteWVhcnM
  Press Releases:
Orlando, Florida – U.S. District Judge Carlos E. Mendoza today sentenced Justin Richard Testani (30, Orange City) to 60 years in federal prison for child sexual exploitation. Testani had pleaded guilty on February 6, 2020.

According to court documents and evidence presented during the sentencing hearing, for more than a year, Testani contacted multiple young girls (usually between the ages of 10 and 13) through Instagram and Snapchat. Testani frequently posed as a young, teenage girl who modeled for a prominent teen lingerie brand. Using that disguise, Testani convinced numerous victims to send him revealing photographs of themselves. After the victims sent such photographs, Testani often threatened to disseminate the photos or publicly humiliate the victims. At other times, Testani threatened to kidnap, rape, and/or kill the victims and their family members. He issued these threats to coerce victims into creating and sending him more images and videos of themselves engaged in sexually explicit conduct. 

Testani also used threats to coerce certain victims into giving him the passwords to their social media accounts. After gaining those passwords, Testani often took over the accounts and used those platforms to contact and exploit the victims’ friends. The investigation revealed that Testani reached out to hundreds of young girls across the United States between December 2017 and January 2019.

"This case is a prime example of how a child can be victimized even in the safety of their own home," said Michael McPherson, Special Agent in Charge of the FBI Tampa Division. "Parents, please talk to your children about the dangers of the internet and social media and make it clear to them they are not to blame if they fall victim to a predator. The FBI, along with our law enforcement partners are dedicated to ensuring children are protected from online predators. The 60-year sentence in this case is proof of that commitment."

This case was investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Sanford Police Department, and the Trussville (Alabama) Police Department.  It was prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Emily C. L. Chang.

This case was brought as part of Project Safe Childhood, a nationwide initiative launched in May 2006 by the Department of Justice to combat the growing epidemic of child sexual exploitation and abuse. Led by United States Attorneys’ Offices and the Criminal Division’s Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section (CEOS), Project Safe Childhood marshals federal, state, and local resources to locate, apprehend, and prosecute individuals who sexually exploit children, and to identify and rescue victims. For more information about Project Safe Childhood, please visit www.justice.gov/psc.

Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanVzdGljZS5nb3YvdXNhby13ZHdhL3ByL3NlY29uZC1jb21tYW5kLWRydWctZGlzdHJpYnV0aW9uLW9yZ2FuaXphdGlvbi10aWVkLWFyeWFuLXByaXNvbi1nYW5nLXNlbnRlbmNlZC0xMg
  Press Releases:
Tacoma – A 61-year-old Auburn, Washington, man was sentenced today in U.S. District Court in Tacoma to twelve years in prison for his leadership role in a multi-state drug distribution ring announced U.S. Attorney Tessa M. Gorman. Thomas Carver has a lengthy criminal history that includes multiple prior convictions related to drug trafficking. He served as the second-in-command to drug ringleader Jesse Bailey, a high-ranking member of the Aryan Family prison gang. The two were documented in multiple wiretapped phone calls discussing their distribution of hundreds of pounds of methamphetamine and hundreds of thousands of fentanyl pills.  At the sentencing hearing Chief U.S. District Judge David G. Estudillo told Carver, “You are not a local dealer. You are someone who helped sell and distribute across the region… What is alarming are the references to these different flavored or colored pills now that are out there potentially in our streets. I do think their intent is to bring in new users…. as in younger individuals who can be easily swayed by these things.”“The leaders of this drug ring spread so much misery throughout our area,” said U.S. Attorney Gorman. “Mr. Carver knows first-hand the nightmare of methamphetamine addiction, and yet he routinely brought 50 pounds of the drug to our community to distribute. He also delt in large amounts of fentanyl laced pills, a drug that has brought unprecedented numbers of overdose deaths to our community.”According to records filed in the case, over a two-year investigation of the drug trafficking ring, agents seized an estimated 223 pounds of methamphetamine, an estimated 830,000 fentanyl pills, multiple-pound quantities of fentanyl powder, cocaine, heroin, and marijuana, $338,000 of suspected drug proceeds, and 48 firearms from members of the conspiracy. In addition, during the coordinated arrests of the DTO members in March 2023, law enforcement seized approximately 22 pounds of methamphetamine, 26 pounds of fentanyl in pill and powder form, six pounds of heroin, more than $330,000 of suspected drug proceeds, and 177 additional firearms. Four of those firearms were seized from the Auburn residence where Carver was arrested. Law enforcement found more than $43,000 in cash in the room where Carver slept.On July 9,2024, Carver pleaded guilty to conspiracy to distribute controlled substances. He has been in custody at the Federal Detention Center at SeaTac since his arrest in March 2023.Carver is the seventh member of the drug ring to be sentenced. Some defendants have received prison sentences of as much at 13 years in prison. Less culpable defendants have been sentenced to 20-50 months in prison. Drug ringleader Jesse James Bailey pleaded guilty last month and is scheduled for sentencing on February 28, 2025.This case is part of an Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Forces (OCDETF) investigation. OCDETF identifies, disrupts, and dismantles the highest-level drug traffickers, money launderers, gangs, and transnational criminal organizations that threaten the United States by using a prosecutor-led, intelligence-driven, multi-agency approach that leverages the strengths of federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies against criminal networks.This investigation was led by the FBI with critical investigative teamwork from the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), Homeland Security Investigations (HSI), the Washington State Department of Corrections and significant local assistance from the Tacoma Police Department, Pierce County Sheriff’s Office, and the Thurston County Narcotics Task Force, led by the Thurston County Sheriff’s Office. Throughout this investigation the following agencies assisted the primary investigators: Washington State Patrol, Customs and Border Protection Air and Marine, Lewis County Sheriff’s Office, Lakewood Police Department, and U.S. Postal Inspection Service (USPIS).The case is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorneys Max Shiner and Zach Dillon.
Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanVzdGljZS5nb3YvdXNhby13ZHdhL3ByL3VzLWF0dG9ybmV5LXMtb2ZmaWNlLXJlY29nbml6ZXMtbmF0aW9uYWwtY3JpbWUtdmljdGltcy1yaWdodHMtd2Vlaw
  Press Releases:
 

Seattle - U.S. Attorney Brian T. Moran today recognized the important role of victims and victim advocates in the criminal justice system, as part of National Crime Victims’ Rights Week.  The first victims’ rights week was declared in Philadelphia in 1975 and became a nationally recognized week with a declaration by President Ronald Reagan in 1981.  This year April 19-25 is National Crime Victims’ Rights Week.

“The evolution of the rights of crime victims in the criminal justice system is a relatively recent development, and one that is critically important,” said U.S. Attorney Moran.  “This week allows us to highlight important messages: Victims will be informed, heard, consulted and respected at all phases of criminal prosecutions.  We encourage reporting crimes to law enforcement so that we can provide services and protect victims’ rights.”

In the Western District of Washington, a dedicated team of victim advocates makes sure crime victims are consulted, connected to resources, are notified of each hearing, and are able to participate as much as they want in the criminal process.  Whether it is a crime of fraud or a crime of violence, victims can suffer major life disruptions and ongoing trauma.  Some fear they will not be believed or may even be blamed for falling victim to a crime. 

For victims of financial fraud, such as those who fell prey to Keenan Gracey, being a crime victim was a new experience.  “I had never been a victim of a crime.  It was scary, I felt violated…  But I felt (the victim witness specialist) was going to fight for me.  I felt like I knew what to expect,” Laurie said. 

Laurie’s son Jason adds, “I got a lot out of it, learning what was happening with the case.  I felt like I was actually part of it….  I was able to have my voice heard and I was able to positively contribute to the justice system…  By showing up and voicing my opinion it allowed the judge to see the true impact of this crime on the community.”

Both say that by being involved in the justice system and speaking up, they gained closure.  “It can happen to you and if it does, speak up and fight back to help the next person who could be victimized by the scheme,” Laurie said.  Jason adds “You will feel supported and you will reclaim your strength.  It allows you to heal and do so safely.”

The focus on victims’ rights began in the late 1970’s, and the protections were codified federally in the Victim and Witness Protection Act of 1982.  Over the years, there have been other important milestones such as the establishment of DOJ’s Office of Victims of Crime (OVC) in 1983, passage of the Violence Against Women Act in 1994, the creation of the FBI’s internet crime site Ic3 in 2000, DOJ’s StopFraud.gov in 2010.  As recently as 2019, victim rights were key considerations in the establishment of the Presidential Task Force on Missing and Murdered Native Americans and Alaska Natives, and the Debbie Smith DNA Backlog Grant Program.

The Office for Victims of Crime, part of the Justice Department’s Office of Justice Programs, supports more than 7,000 local victim assistance programs and victim compensation programs in every state and U.S. territory.  Funds for these programs come from the Crime Victims Fund, which is made up of federal criminal fines, penalties, and bond forfeitures.

During National Crime Victims’ Rights Week, victim advocacy organizations, community groups and state, local, and tribal agencies traditionally host rallies, candlelight vigils, and other events to raise awareness of victims’ rights and services.  This year, due to COVID-19, many communities are organizing virtual gatherings and online public awareness campaigns.

To learn about victims’ rights and options call 855–4–VICTIM or visit VictimConnect.org.

Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanVzdGljZS5nb3YvdXNhby13ZHdhL3ByL2RldmVsb3Blci1zZW50ZW5jZWQtNC15ZWFycy1wcmlzb24tZGVmcmF1ZGluZy1pbnZlc3RvcnMtc2Vla2luZy1wZXJtYW5lbnQtcmVzaWRlbmN5
  Press Releases:
          A Bellevue developer who fraudulently obtained over $235 million dollars during his real estate investment scheme, including over $140 million from immigrant investors, was sentenced today in U.S. District Court in Seattle to four years in prison, announced U.S. Attorney Annette L. Hayes. LOBSANG DARGEY, 43, entered guilty pleas in January 2017 to two federal felonies, admitting that he defrauded immigrant investors, federal regulators, and institutional investors. DARGEY promised to use the immigrant investors’ investment funds in compliance with a federal immigration program designed to stimulate growth and create jobs. Instead, he secretly diverted tens of millions of dollars of investor funds to unauthorized uses and used falsified financial records in an attempt to obtain additional funding to make up the shortfall. At the sentencing hearing, U. S. District Judge Robert S. Lasnik said DARGEY engaged in “reckless behavior . . . putting these people in jeopardy of never achieving their immigration dreams.”

          “This defendant stole not just money but something that he knew from personal experience was much more valuable – the right to come to the United States and live the American dream,” said U. S. Attorney Annette L. Hayes. “Many of the investors that the defendant defrauded sold everything they had in China in reliance on his promises. They now live in limbo – with their money tied up in litigation and no idea of whether their dream to live in this country will come true.”

 

          According to records filed in the case, between 2012 and 2015, DARGEY recruited overseas investors, primarily in China, to fund two development projects – one in Everett, Washington known as the “Path American Farmer’s Market” and one in Seattle’s Belltown neighborhood known as the “Potala Tower.” DARGEY promoted the projects under the federal “EB-5” program, which allows immigrant investors to qualify for permanent residency if they create American jobs by investing $500,000 in a qualifying American business project. DARGEY represented to the immigrant investors and to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security that he was investing all of investors’ funds in the Everett and Seattle projects in compliance with program requirements.

          Contrary to his promises, DARGEY used tens of millions of investor dollars for uses not allowed under the federal program and not disclosed to investors. This included approximately $11.5 million of investor funds that DARGEY secretly used to pay unauthorized sales expenses, including sales commissions to Asian brokers. The money also went for lavish meals, expensive gifts, and cash withdrawals at casinos, and the purchase of a $1.4 million Bellevue home for a DARGEY business associate. DARGEY withdrew over $10 million in investor funds from the project as developer fees to fund his lavish lifestyle, including his purchase of a $2.5 million home in Bellevue.

          In addition, DARGEY told investors and the United States government that DARGEY would contribute $32.5 million of his own money toward the projects. In fact, DARGEY admitted that he did not contribute any funds to the projects. DARGEY’s fraud resulted in tens of millions of dollars in funding shortfalls for the EB-5 approved projects. DARGEY attempted to fill these shortfalls by using a falsified bank statement to obtain a $25 million construction loan, and by using altered financial statements to obtain $60 million in additional funding from a private institutional investor.

          Of the 281 foreign investors defrauded by DARGEY, none has received permanent resident status in the United States. A majority of the investors have had their applications denied because of DARGEY’s fraud, and are appealing the denials. Some wrote to the court explaining the damage DARGEY’s conduct caused:



Investor Y.Y. wrote: In order to provide our children with better lives and study environments, we sold our one and only real estate so as to accumulate money for the American EB-5 investment immigration [program]…. Lobsang’s illegal behavior has destroyed our immigration dream.





Investor Y.W. wrote: Many younger investors like me had to dramatically alter their life path. Some adults were forced to return to China without finishing their college degree.





Investor Z.C. wrote: “…because of defendant’s illegal behavior, it led us to live in fear and suffer huge mental damage because our lives can be cancelled at any moment…. My wife is so afraid that she dares not pick up the mail for fear of receiving a deportation notification.”



          “Mr. Dargey’s selfish greed twice robbed his investors as he seized both their funds and jeopardized their dreams for a future life in the United States,” said Acting Director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services James McCament. “We are grateful to our many law enforcement partners who helped to deliver justice in this case and uphold the integrity of the EB-5 Program.”

 

          U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services administers the EB-5 Program. Under this program, entrepreneurs (and their spouses and unmarried children under 21) are eligible to apply for permanent residence if they make the required investment in a commercial enterprise in the United States and plan to create or preserve 10 permanent full-time jobs for qualified U.S. workers.

  

          DARGEY’s fraudulent conduct came to an end in August 2015, when the Securities and Exchange Commission filed a civil suit and won a court order freezing his assets. The FBI simultaneously executed search warrants at DARGEY’s offices in Bellevue and Everett.

 

          As part of his plea agreement in this case, DARGEY agreed to provide restitution of more than $24 million to the investors.

 

          The case was investigated by the FBI and is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorneys Justin Arnold and Seth Wilkinson. The Department of Justice appreciates the assistance of the Securities and Exchange Commission and U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services in connection with this matter.

Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanVzdGljZS5nb3YvdXNhby1jZGNhL3ByL2hlcm1vc2EtYmVhY2gtY291cGxlLXdoby1maWxlZC1mcmF1ZHVsZW50LXRheC1yZXR1cm5zLWFuZC1wYXNzZWQtYm9ndXMtZmluYW5jaWFs
  Press Releases:
          LOS ANGELES – A Hermosa Beach man was sentenced this afternoon to six years in federal prison for filing fraudulent tax returns with the Internal Revenue Service that sought millions of dollars in refunds and using bogus financial instruments in an attempt to pay off debt. His wife was also sentenced today to two years in federal prison.

          Sean David Morton, 59, was sentenced by United States District Judge Stephen V. Wilson, who further ordered Morton to pay $480,322 in restitution to the IRS.

          Sean Morton’s sentencing follows a four-day trial in April in which he was found guilty by a federal jury of one count of conspiracy to defraud the United States, two counts of filing false claims against the United States, and 26 counts of passing false or fictitious financial instruments. Sean Morton was originally scheduled to be sentenced in June, but he failed to appear for that hearing and was a fugitive for over two months.

          Melissa Ann Morton, 51, also of Hermosa Beach, who was convicted of conspiracy, two counts filing false claims and 25 counts of passing false or fictitious financial instruments, was also ordered to pay $480,322 in restitution to the IRS.

          The Mortons operated a “redemption” scheme, which is the most common scheme used across the nation by tax defiers and “sovereign citizens.” Proponents of this scheme falsely claim that the United States government controls bank accounts – often referred to as “U.S. Treasury Direct Accounts” – for U.S. citizens that can be accessed by submitting paperwork with state and federal authorities. Individuals promoting this scam frequently cite bogus legal theories and may refer to the scheme as “Redemption” or “Strawman.” This scheme, which repeatedly has been rejected by courts, predominately uses fraudulent financial documents that appear to be legitimate.

          “This is a case where the defendants clearly engaged in a systematic effort to impede the tax system, undermine the efforts of prosecutors, and, in the case of Sean Morton, avoid sentencing after being convicted by a jury of his peers,” said Acting United States Attorney Sandra R. Brown. “This case sends a clear message that we will spare no effort to preserve the integrity of this nation’s institutions. The lengthy sentences also demonstrate that illegal efforts to use bogus legal theories in an effort to defraud fellow taxpayers will not be tolerated.”

          “The Mortons’ blatant disrespect for the law will now cost them years of valuable freedom,” stated IRS Criminal Investigation Special Agent in Charge R. Damon Rowe. “Today’s sentencing shows how seriously the courts take those individuals who attempt to lead others down a perilous financial and legal path, in addition to devising illegal tax schemes to obtain refunds to which they are not entitled.”

          The evidence presented at trial showed that the Mortons filed income tax returns with the IRS that falsely claimed they had income from various banking institutions reported on Forms 1099-OID. As part of the scheme, the Mortons falsely reported large withholdings and claimed they were owed refunds from the IRS.

          As a result of the scheme, the IRS erroneously issued a refund of $480,322.55 to Sean Morton for a 2008 income tax return. On the same day the refund was deposited into the Mortons’ joint bank account, the couple took immediate steps to conceal the money, which included opening two new accounts, transferring over $360,000 to the two new accounts, and withdrawing $70,000 in cash.

          When the IRS took steps to collect the erroneous refund, the Mortons began a campaign to thwart the government’s collection efforts. Specifically, when the IRS placed a levy on the couple’s joint bank account, the couple repeatedly sent letters to the IRS that falsely claimed it was Melissa Morton’s sole and separate account.

          When the IRS attempted to collect the erroneous refund from the Mortons, the Mortons presented to the IRS various “coupons” and “bonds” that purported to pay off their debt with the IRS. The Mortons created and submitted these bogus documents to the IRS, instructing the agency to draw upon funds with the United States Treasury to satisfy their debt.

          The Mortons also sold the bond scheme to others who were in debt to governmental organizations, such as the IRS and the State of California, and private bank institutions for mortgage or credit card debt. The Mortons charged their clients thousands of dollars to prepare and file useless UCC-1 documents declaring their clients’ “strawman” status, and to prepare and send false bonds to the government or banks which purported to pay off the clients’ debt. “The total amounts of the check/bonds [the Mortons] made and passed are astronomical – the principal amounts of said instruments range from $50,000 to $10 million,” according to court documents.

          In sentencing briefs filed with the court, prosecutors said Sean Morton “touted he was a ‘paper terrorist’ when giving seminars regarding his schemes,” and he harassed and burdened the “courts with mountains of frivolous paperwork…in an effort to degrade the court system over time and make it more difficult to efficiently resolve cases, especially tax cases.”

          While sentencing Sean Morton today, Judge Wilson said his conduct “caused a serious disruption” to the tax system and “caused others to engage in fraudulent conduct.”

          “The scheme, while outrageous, was also calculated,” Judge Wilson said.

          Sean Morton was originally scheduled to be sentenced on June 19, but he failed to appear in court and was a fugitive for 61 days. During that time, Sean Morton “flagrantly flouted the law, appeared on social media, his radio program, and YouTube to brag about his status as a fugitive,” according to court papers filed by prosecutors. Soon after her husband fled, Melissa Morton was ordered not to have any contact with her husband.

          The Mortons were arrested on August 21 while observing the solar eclipse poolside at a hotel in Desert Hot Springs. The following day, a United States Magistrate Judge found that they had violated the terms of their release on bond and ordered them detained.

          The investigation of the Mortons was conducted by IRS Criminal Investigation.

          This case is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorneys Valerie Makarewicz and James C. Hughes of the Tax Division.

Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanVzdGljZS5nb3YvdXNhby1jZGNhL3ByL2p1c3RpY2UtZGVwdC1zZWl6ZXMtb3Zlci0xMTJtLWZ1bmRzLWxpbmtlZC1jcnlwdG9jdXJyZW5jeS1pbnZlc3RtZW50LXNjaGVtZXMtb3Zlci1oYWxm
  Press Releases:
LOS ANGELES – The Department of Justice announced today that it has seized virtual currency worth an estimated $112 million linked to cryptocurrency investment scams commonly called “pig butchering.”

Seizure warrants for six virtual currency accounts were authorized by judges in Los Angeles, the District of Arizona, and the District of Idaho. In the Los Angeles matter, a United States magistrate judge authorized the seizure of an account containing approximately $66.4 million in various cryptocurrencies after finding probable cause that the funds were derived from wire fraud schemes.

According to court documents, the six virtual currency accounts were used to launder proceeds of various cryptocurrency confidence scams. In these schemes, fraudsters cultivated long-term, online relationships with victims, eventually enticing them to make investments in fraudulent cryptocurrency trading platforms. In reality, the funds sent by victims for these purported investments were instead funneled to cryptocurrency addresses and accounts controlled by scammers and their co-conspirators.

“The victims in Pig Butchering schemes are referred to as ‘pigs’ by the scammers because the scammers will use elaborate storylines to ‘fatten up’ victims into believing they are in a romantic or otherwise close personal relationship,” according to the affidavit in support of the Los Angeles seizure warrant. “Once the victim places enough trust in the scammer, the scammer brings the victim into a cryptocurrency investment scheme.”

The scammer attempts to create the appearance of legitimacy by fabricating websites or mobile apps to display a bogus investment portfolio with large returns, the affidavit states. In relation to the Los Angeles-based account seizure, the FBI has identified at least 10 victims who were unable to withdraw funds they had invested, with the seized account containing some funds from all 10 victims.

Authorities executed the Los Angeles seizure warrant in December and received the last transfer of cryptocurrency on March 21.

“Using the methods of traditional con artists, high-tech fraudsters have taken advantage of the publicity and hype surrounding cryptocurrency to encourage an untold number of Americans to invest in get-rich-quick schemes,” said United States Attorney Martin Estrada. “We all know that investment scams are not new, but the use of digital currency to commit fraud presents new challenges to victims and to law enforcement trying to recover lost funds – which likely total billions of dollars in the so-called ‘pig butchering’ schemes. The major seizures announced today show that law enforcement is confronting the new challenges and taking strong measures to address this fraud, but the public should be extremely wary of investment scams that use cryptocurrency and promise unrealistic returns.”

The affidavit in the Los Angeles seizure warrant discussed a series of cryptocurrency investment scams, one of which targeted a professional woman who was contacted on LinkedIn by a man who used the name “Fei Kuang.” After learning that the victim already had a small cryptocurrency account, “Fei Kuang” offered to help the victim, eventually convincing her to invest more money and to move her funds to another, presumably fraudulent, trading exchange. When she tried to withdraw her funds, she was told she had to pay a 20% in “taxes.” When the trading platform continued to demand more money, the woman realized she was the victim of a scam which cost her approximately $2.5 million.

“Transnational criminal organizations are combining confidence scams with technological savvy to swindle Americans out of their hard-earned funds,” said Assistant Attorney General Kenneth A. Polite, Jr. of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division. “These particularly vicious frauds – where scammers carefully cultivate relationships with their victims over time – have devastated families and cost individuals their life savings. Now that we have seized this virtual currency, we will seek to swiftly return it to victims. In addition to our tireless efforts to disrupt these schemes, we must also work to raise public awareness and help inform potential victims: be wary of people you meet online; seriously question investment advice, especially about cryptocurrency, from people you have not met in person; and remember, investments that seem too good to be true, usually are.”

In 2022, investment fraud caused the highest losses of any scam reported by the public to the FBI’s Internet Crimes Complaint Center (IC3), totaling $3.31 billion. Frauds involving cryptocurrency, including pig butchering, represented most of these scams, increasing 183% from 2021 to $2.57 billion in reported losses last year.

According to the FBI, the highest number of reports came from victims between the ages of 30 and 49. In these schemes, often called “Sha Zhu Pan,” a Chinese phrase that loosely translates to “pig butchering,” scammers often target their victims through social networking and online communications platforms, dating websites, and phone calls and text messages that are meant to appear to have been misdialed. After gaining the trust of their victims – sometimes over a period of months – scammers eventually introduce the idea of trading in cryptocurrency. They then direct victims to cryptocurrency investment platforms or to co-conspirators posing as investment advisors or customer service representatives. Scammers control websites that are built to look like legitimate trading platforms, applications that victims download onto their phones, or malicious smart contracts accessed through cryptocurrency wallet software.

Once victims make an initial “investment,” the platforms purport to show substantial gains. Sometimes, victims are even allowed to withdraw some of these initial gains to further engender trust in the scheme. It is not until a large investment is made that victims find that they are unable to withdraw their funds.

Even when a victim is denied access to their funds, the fraud is often not yet over. Scammers request additional investments, taxes or fees, promising that these payments will allow victims access to their accounts. These scam operations often continue to steal from their victims and do not stop until they have deprived victims of any remaining savings.

“Depriving scam organizations of their ill-gotten gains is an important part of our strategy to combat these ruthless schemes,” said Director Eun Young Choi of the Criminal Division’s National Cryptocurrency Enforcement Team (NCET). “We will continue to use all tools at our disposal to disrupt and deter cryptocurrency confidence schemes, including by following the money on the blockchain and seizing cryptocurrency to return funds to victims, and by targeting and taking down online infrastructure used by the scammers. Today’s announcements also demonstrate the value of early notification by victims to law enforcement; we thank those victims who came forward to notify the FBI when they were targeted by this scheme.”

The FBI Phoenix Division is investigating the matter that resulted in seizures announced today.

Assistant United States Attorney Daniel Boyle of the Asset Forfeiture and Recovery Section is handling the Los Angeles case. The other cases are being handled by the District of Arizona and the District of Idaho. The NCET and the Criminal Division’s Fraud Section provided substantial assistance and coordination.

If you or someone you know is a victim, visit www.fbi.gov/cryptoguard, contact your local FBI field office (the Los Angeles Field Office can be reached at 310-477-6565), call 1-800-CALL-FBI, or report it to  IC3.gov. In your complaint, please reference, “Pig Butchering PSA.” Include as much information as possible in your complaint including names of investment platforms, cryptocurrency addresses and transaction hashes, bank account information, and names and contact information of suspected scammers. Maintain copies of all communications with scammers and records of financial transactions.

Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanVzdGljZS5nb3YvdXNhby1jZGNhL3ByL3ZpbmVsYW5kLWJveXMtc3RyZWV0LWdhbmctdGFyZ2V0ZWQtZmVkZXJhbC1yYWNrZXRlZXJpbmctaW5kaWN0bWVudC1hbGxlZ2VzLXZpb2xlbmNl
  Press Releases:
          LOS ANGELES – Law enforcement authorities this morning arrested 25 members and associates of the San Fernando Valley-based Vineland Boys street gang who are charged in five federal grand jury indictments that allege a wide range of criminal activity, including shootings and assaults that targeted rivals, extortion and methamphetamine trafficking.

          The five indictments charge a total of 45 defendants. The main indictment alleges that 31 Vineland Boys members and associates participated in a criminal enterprise and conspired to violate the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act. To consolidate control over their “territory” in Sun Valley, North Hollywood and Burbank, the gang shot and brutally assaulted rival gang members, controlled and conducted drug and firearms trafficking activity, and extorted money in the form of “taxes” from drug dealers, and trafficked narcotics, the indictment alleges.

          The RICO indictment details numerous violent incidents involving the gang, including an April 2016 incident where a rival gang member was shot on Lankershim Boulevard. The investigation revealed that the gang was heavily armed and often engaged in illegal firearm sales. One non-gang defendant allegedly manufactured “ghost guns” – AR-15-type weapons with no serial numbers, which makes them untraceable – that were sold to the gang to use in crimes because so many members were prohibited from legally purchasing firearms due their prior felony convictions.

          The RICO indictment unsealed today detail multiple narcotics transactions, including two that each involve approximately two pounds of methamphetamine.

          The other four indictments cumulatively charge 14 other defendants with supplying methamphetamine to the Vineland Boys, with some transactions taking place near an elementary school.

          Today’s arrests come 14 years after law enforcement severely disrupted the Vineland Boys with a series of federal indictments that came in the wake of the 2003 murder of Burbank Police Officer Matthew Pavelka and the attempted murder of his partner, Detective Greg Campbell. Those indictments resulted in more than four dozen convictions, and led to two defendants receiving sentences of life without parole in federal prison.

          “Our first attack on this street gang dealt a punishing blow to its operations and sent a message that law enforcement would not tolerate their violent acts and drug trafficking,” said United States Attorney Nick Hanna. “Unfortunately, a new generation of gangsters has come of age and tried to revive the organization’s control of drug trafficking through violence. This takedown will provide significant relief to the law-abiding residents of the east San Fernando Valley, and it sends a strong message to the gang that we will continue our efforts to crush their organization until they no longer pose any threat.”

          “The tools of the gang trade are intimidation, violent crime and extortion,” said Paul Delacourt, the Assistant Director in Charge of the FBI's Los Angeles Field Office. “By announcing these distinct operations with our law enforcement partners, we hope to show that these tactics – and these gangs – are not tolerated in Los Angeles.”

          “The Los Angeles Police Department is extremely grateful for the culmination of a collaborative task force with our federal partners that led to a well-planned, comprehensive and strategic operation,” said LAPD Assistant Chief Robert Arcos. “Today’s arrests focused on individuals who not only committed extremely violent crimes, but who also have been involved in violent attacks against innocent people in our communities. The Los Angeles Police Department stands committed, with our federal partners, to continue to reduce violent crime in Los Angeles, and to interrupt organizations and apprehend those responsible.”

          An indictment contains allegations that a defendant has committed a crime. Every defendant is presumed innocent until and unless proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

          The 25 defendants arrested today are scheduled to make their initial court appearances this afternoon in United States District Court.

          In addition to the today’s arrests, 11 defendants were already in custody. Authorities are continuing to search for nine fugitives, four of whom are believed to be currently in Mexico.

          The investigation targeting the Vineland Boys was conducted by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Los Angeles Police Department and IRS Criminal Investigation.

          The case is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Jennifer Chou of the Violent and Organized Crime Section.

Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanVzdGljZS5nb3YvdXNhby1jZGNhL3ByL3VzLWZpbGVzLW5ldy1jb21wbGFpbnQtYWxsZWdpbmctY2l0eS1sYS1yZWNlaXZlZC1taWxsaW9ucy1kb2xsYXJzLW1ha2luZy1mYWxzZS1wcm9taXNlcw
  Press Releases:
          LOS ANGELES – The United States late yesterday filed a complaint in intervention against the City of Los Angeles and the CRA/LA (formerly the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Los Angeles) alleging that together they fraudulently obtained millions of dollars in housing grants from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) by falsely certifying that the money was being spent in compliance with federal accessibility laws.

          The complaint in intervention – which replaces a complaint previously filed on behalf of the United States by a “whistleblower” – alleges the city and CRA/LA received federal money by falsely promising to create accessible housing for people with disabilities. Instead of creating accessible housing, they used the money to create inaccessible housing that deprived people with disabilities an equal opportunity to find housing of their choice.

          The city repeatedly certified its compliance with federal accessibility laws to obtain the federal funds without taking the required steps to ensure it complied, according to the complaint, which further alleges that many of the HUD-assisted apartment buildings failed to meet minimal accessibility requirements. The city allegedly approved the design and construction of inaccessible buildings, with, among other things:



slopes and ramps that are too steep for safe passage by persons with mobility disabilities;





door thresholds that are too tall for wheelchairs to roll over;





steps that prohibit access to common areas;





kitchen cabinets, shelves and surfaces that are outside of the accessible reach ranges of persons who use wheelchairs;





sinks, grab bars, mailboxes and circuit breakers mounted beyond the reach of wheelchair users;





pipes below sinks and lavatories that are not insulated, thereby posing a physical threat of burns to people who use wheelchairs; and





insufficient numbers of accessible parking spaces in garages and lots.



          “Despite the federal government investing hundreds of millions of dollars in Los Angeles to create housing for everyone, the City of Los Angeles instead created housing only for some,” said Acting United States Attorney Sandra R. Brown. “For 17 years, the city falsely certified that it had complied with federal law and covered up its repeated disregard of historic and important civil rights laws.”

          “The complaint filed yesterday underscores the Department’s commitment to ensure that people with disabilities are provided equal access to federally-funded public housing, as required by law,” said Acting Assistant Attorney General Chad A. Readler of the Justice Department’s Civil Division.

          The city and the CRA/LA allegedly violated Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act, as well as failed to fulfill their duty to affirmatively further fair housing. Congress passed these accessibility laws to ensure people with disabilities have an opportunity to live in an integrated society, achieve independent living, and have the same opportunities for economic and social self-sufficiency as other citizens.

          By law, the city and the CRA/LA are required to comply with the federal accessibility laws. They could not – neither directly, nor through contractual or other arrangements – deny people with disabilities the opportunity to benefit from housing services or subject them to discrimination based on disability.

          The accessibility laws require recipients of federal funds to operate their housing programs in a manner that is accessible to people with disabilities. Among other things, they must have a system in place to ensure compliance with the laws. They are required to develop non-discriminatory policies and practices, hire a coordinator knowledgeable about accessibility, and implement a grievance procedure that allows for just resolution of complaints. They also must maintain a publicly available list of accessible units and their accessibility features so that people who require those features are able to find housing.

          The federal accessibility laws also require that recipients of federal monies have a method in place to avoid giving accessible units needed by people with disabilities to people who do not need accessibility features. The laws also require that recipients of federal monies monitor apartment buildings to ensure they are designed, constructed and altered in compliance with the law so that, among other things, 5 percent of all units in certain multifamily housing will be accessible to people with mobility impairments, and an additional 2 percent will be accessible to people with visual and auditory impairments.

          The United States’ lawsuit alleges that the city and CRA/LA failed to meet these legal obligations.

          The lawsuit, United States ex rel. Ling, et al. v. City of Los Angeles, et al., CV11-974-PG, was originally filed in United States District Court by whistleblowers Mei Ling, a resident of Los Angeles who uses a wheelchair, and the Fair Housing Council of San Fernando Valley, a nonprofit civil rights advocacy group. The United States elected to intervene in the lawsuit and take over the litigation, which prompted the unsealing of the whistleblowers’ complaint in June. The case is pending before United States District Judge Philip S. Gutierrez.

          The lawsuit was filed under the qui tam – or whistleblower – provisions of the False Claims Act, which permit private parties to sue on behalf of the United States when they believe that a party has submitted false claims for government funds, and to receive a share of any recovery.

          This matter was investigated by Assistant United States Attorney Lisa A. Palombo of the Civil Fraud Section, the Commercial Litigation Branch of the Justice Department’s Civil Division, and the HUD Office of Inspector General.

          The claims asserted against the City of Los Angeles and the CRA/LA are allegations only; there has been no determination of liability.

Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanVzdGljZS5nb3YvdXNhby1jZGNhL3ByL2NhbGlmb3JuaWFzLWZvdXItdXMtYXR0b3JuZXlzLWFncmVlLWl0LXMtdGltZS1wZXJtYW5lbnQtYmFuLWZlbnRhbnlsLWFuYWxvZ3Vlcw
  Press Releases:
          The following statement was issued by the four U.S. Attorneys who serve California: Nicola T. Hanna (Central District of California), David L. Anderson (Northern District of California), Robert S. Brewer (Southern District of California) and McGregor W. Scott (Eastern District of California)

          In 2017, almost 50,000 Americans died from opioid overdoses. In California alone, there were 2,428 fatal opioid overdoses in 2018. And it’s getting worse. In San Francisco and Los Angeles counties, for instance, opioid fatalities have increased by 54% and 41%, respectively, since 2016. San Diego County and the Central Valley are also experiencing unprecedented levels of fatal opioid overdoses. This is a crisis, and illicitly produced fentanyl is largely responsible.

          To fight this epidemic, law enforcement must have all the necessary tools at their disposal. One such tool is the Drug Enforcement Administration’s (DEA) 2018 order making all fentanyl-related drugs illegal in the United States. Unfortunately, that order was temporary and will expire in less than two weeks. The Senate recently passed bipartisan legislation approving a 15-month extension of the temporary order. While this is a step in the right direction, and the House should pass the Senate’s bill, a longer term solution is needed. We need a permanent ban on all fentanyl-like drugs.

          Illicit fentanyl is manufactured in labs in China and Mexico and smuggled into the United States. It is 50 times more powerful than heroin and 100 times more powerful than morphine. So powerful, in fact, that only a couple milligrams – the size of a few grains of salt – can kill the average person.

          Fentanyl, however, is unique. Because it is made in labs using chemicals, its structure is easily manipulated. And the drug cartels that manufacture and traffic this synthetic poison into our neighborhoods understand American laws and know how to exploit them. They know that by changing a single molecule in the chemical structure of fentanyl, they have essentially created a new drug. One that, unlike fentanyl, is not illegal in the United States. These drugs, known as “fentanyl analogues,” do as fentanyl does: create more addicts and kill more Americans. The analogues – which can be up to 100 times more potent than fentanyl and 10,000 times more potent than morphine – will become legal if Congress fails to act.

          The DEA’s 2018 decision to temporarily schedule – that is, to make illegal – all fentanyl-related substances was a response to the extraordinary legal loophole exploited by drug traffickers. In April 2019, China also outlawed all fentanyl-related substances. This is extraordinary progress, with one caveat. Unlike China’s law, the United States’ has an expiration date.

          On Feb. 6, 2020, the DEA’s temporary order expires, and all drugs seized by U.S. investigators over the past two years that have tested positive as fentanyl analogues will no longer be illegal. If Congress fails to pass the legislation it will have a dramatic impact not just on the prosecutors and law enforcement officers who spend their lives investigating and prosecuting drug dealers, but on communities already hard hit by the opioid epidemic, many of which are right here in California.

          Despite the tireless efforts of law enforcement, California continues to be a main thoroughfare for fentanyl and fentanyl-like drugs arriving from China and Mexico. In 2019, federal law enforcement agents seized approximately three-quarters of a ton of fentanyl at the six ports of entry we share with Mexico and in all places in between. That’s 20 percent more than in 2018. And our federal resources are not infinite; we need all the help we can get. Passing this legislation would provide invaluable support to us as prosecutors and the entire law enforcement community as we continue to combat the opioid crisis in California and throughout America.

          A number of organizations have voiced opposition to the proposed legislation, arguing that the bill does not “embrace public health approaches to the overdose crisis.” We agree that a comprehensive approach to the crisis is needed, and a permanent fentanyl analogue ban should be viewed as part of a holistic effort. But time is running out. There is no doubt that drug traffickers are eagerly awaiting the temporary order’s expiration to start flooding our communities with these dangerous drugs. The passage of this legislation is quite literally a matter of life and death.

          There should be nothing partisan about declaring fentanyl analogues illegal. There is certainly nothing partisan about saving lives and bringing justice to those who profit from addiction and death. For the safety of our communities, we urge Congress to pass legislation making permanent the DEA’s temporary scheduling of all fentanyl-related drugs.

Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanVzdGljZS5nb3Yvb3BhL3ByL3NpeHRlZW4taGVsbHMtYW5nZWxzLXJlZC1kZXZpbHMtbW90b3JjeWNsZS1nYW5nLW1lbWJlcnMtZmFjZS1jaGFyZ2VzLXJlbGF0ZWQtdmlvbGVudA
  Press Releases:
An indictment was unsealed in the Eastern District of North Carolina charging 16 members of two outlaw motorcycle gangs — the Hells Angels Motorcycle Club (HAMC) and the Red Devils Motorcycle Club (RDMC) — for their alleged roles in a criminal enterprise engaging in violent criminal activity in and around Raleigh and Fayetteville, North Carolina. The RDMC is the main support club nationwide for the HAMC.Five of the defendants are charged with murder in aid of racketeering for allegedly killing a member of the Pagan’s Motorcycle Club (PMC), a rival gang, on Jan. 1, 2023, in Raleigh. Two additional defendants are charged with accessory after the fact for their alleged actions following that murder.Eight defendants are charged with attempted murder in aid of racketeering and assault with a dangerous weapon in aid of racketeering for their alleged roles in a July 22, 2023, violent assault of PMC members in the parking lot of a Dairy Queen restaurant in Wade, North Carolina.And one defendant is charged with obstruction for allegedly attempting to dissuade a witness from assisting the criminal investigation of this case.“According to the indictment, these defendants were leaders, organizers, and members of the Hell’s Angels Motorcycle Club and committed multiple crimes to advance their positions in this violent gang,” said Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Nicole M. Argentieri, head of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division. “The gang’s alleged violent acts included the murder of a rival gang member on a public street, and the assault and attempted murder of other rival gang members in a restaurant parking lot. This indictment demonstrates that, along with our local, state, and federal law enforcement partners, the Criminal Division is committed to holding accountable those responsible for acts of violence that terrorize local communities.”“Two years ago we launched a Violent Crime Action Plan to partner with local law enforcement to identify the individuals and groups driving violence in North Carolina, especially criminal enterprises that support and encourage violence by their members,” said U.S. Attorney Michael F. Easley Jr. for the Eastern District of North Carolina. “We’ll keep pursuing cases like this one, charging violent crimes in aid of racketeering, to expose patterns of violence and hold gang members and those who enable them accountable.”“Outlaw motorcycle gangs are notorious for lawless and violent behavior,” said Special Agent in Charge Bennie Mims of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco Firearms and Explosives (ATF) Charlotte Field Division. “These criminal organizations are allegedly responsible for a long list of illegal activities, including firearms trafficking, assault, and homicide, and operate with absolutely no regard for the safety of law enforcement or the community. ATF is proud to stand with our law enforcement partners and be part of an effort to disrupt and disband such a violent and dangerous network.”“I am proud to stand with my federal, state, and local partners in investigating and disrupting violent organizations which demonstrate a blatant disregard for life and will pursue any method to advance their criminal enterprise in our great city,” said Chief Estella Patterson of the Raleigh Police Department. “The Raleigh Police Department and our community will not tolerate destructive behavior and will work tirelessly with our law enforcement partners to identify those responsible to ensure they are held accountable. I am grateful to U.S. Attorney Michael Easley and his team for their continued dedication and steadfast commitment to public safety. I also thank the ATF, the Fayetteville Police Department, and the Cumberland County Sheriff’s Office for their strong partnership in these cases.”“Operation Broken Halo has been an ongoing investigation with the Fayetteville Police Department and the ATF into an alleged criminal enterprise connected to an outlaw motorcycle gang,” said Chief Kemberle Braden of the Fayetteville Police Department. “Through collaboration and partnership with the ATF and other supporting agencies, we were able to successfully bring charges against numerous members of this outlaw motorcycle gang and their supporting clubs. The Fayetteville Police Department remains committed to our partnership with federal, state, and local agencies to remove violent criminals from our community.”“I want to make it clear: violent activity is not tolerated in Cumberland County,” said Sheriff Ennis W. Wright of the Cumberland County Sherriff’s Office. “The Sheriff's Office is 100% committed to maintaining a safe and peaceful community. We thoroughly investigate all tips, and it’s vital for the community to continue to report what they see because we cannot do it alone. We are grateful for our partnerships with the community, the Justice Department, and federal and local law enforcement agencies. Together, we do and will continue to make a difference.”Most of the charges are being brought under the Violent Crimes in Aid of Racketeering Activity (VICAR) statute, which makes it illegal to commit certain violent crimes for the purpose of joining, maintaining one’s position with, or moving up in rank within the enterprise. The violent crimes included in this statute include murder, kidnapping, maiming, assault with a dangerous weapon, assault resulting in serious bodily injury, and threatening to commit a crime of violence.The indictment alleges that all 16 defendants are members or associates of the HAMC, a violent outlaw motorcycle group that allegedly uses violence, threats, and intimidation to carry out its perceived mission and enforce its rules. According to the indictment, RDMC members are subservient to the HAMC and provide support by acting as a source of recruitment for the HAMC and carrying out violent acts to further the HAMC’s interests.The indictment alleges that HAMC members are under a standing order to attack, injure, and kill members of the PMC. The indictment also alleges that HAMC members commonly commit physical assaults, including murder, threats to injure, and intimidation to keep witnesses to their criminal conduct silent.The indictment charges the following offenses:Vidaul Rashaad Reed, 31, also known as Hootie, of Columbus, Mississippi; Anthony Edward Cheever, 34, also known as Rowdy, of Garner, North Carolina; David William Stephens, 26, also known as 007, of Spring Lake, North Carolina; Martinus Jermaine Starks, 43, also known as Tee, of Fayetteville; and Tyler Scott Grissom, 31, also known as Snow, of Warrenton, North Carolina, are all allegedly members of the RDMC and are each charged with one count of murder in aid of racketeering and one count of discharge of a firearm in connection with a crime of violence and, in doing so, causing death related to the alleged murder of a member of the PMC on Jan. 1, 2023. Murder in aid of racketeering carries a mandatory life sentence, if convicted.Christopher Dylan Manor, 28, of Fayetteville; and Robert Scott Brown, 62, of Cumberland County, North Carolina; are both charged with accessory after the fact to the Jan. 1, 2023, murder. As alleged, Manor was a member of the RDMC at the time of the alleged offense and Brown is a member of the HAMC. Each faces a maximum penalty of 15 years in prison, if convicted.Jason Lee Hathaway, 47, of Michigan City, Indiana; Fred Joseph Prosperi, 42, also known as Freddy and Snow Boy, of Wheeling, West Virginia; William Scott Gardner, 33, also known as Big Will, of Garner, North Carolina; Terry Lewis Akins Jr., 51, of Palatka, Florida; J.R. Nevarez Darr, 31, of Raleigh; Darrell Dewayne Strickland Jr., 26, of Fayetteville; William Franklin Beasley, 64, of Nashville; and David Lee Woodall, 45, of Fayetteville are charged with attempted murder in aid of racketeering and assault with a deadly weapon in aid of racketeering related to the alleged attempted murder and assault with a dangerous weapon of members of the PMC on July 22, 2023, in the parking lot of a Dairy Queen restaurant in Wade, North Carolina. They were all allegedly members of the HAMC at the time of the offense. If convicted, each faces a maximum penalty 30 years in prison.Jonathan Michael Robarge, 40, of Orlando, is charged with tampering with a witness, victim or informant by harassment. Robarge allegedly has ties to both the HAMC and the RDMC. If convicted, he faces a maximum penalty three years in prison.A federal district court judge will determine any sentence after considering the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and other statutory factors.The ATF, Raleigh and Fayetteville Police Departments, and Cumberland County Sheriff’s Office are investigating the case.Trial Attorney Alyssa Levey-Weinstein and Deputy Chief Kelly Pearson of the Criminal Division’s Violent Crime and Racketeering Section and Assistant U.S. Attorneys Kelly L. Sandling and Robert Dodson for the Eastern District of North Carolina are prosecuting the case.This investigation was an Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Forces (OCDETF) investigation. OCDETF identifies, disrupts, and dismantles the highest-level drug traffickers, money launders, gangs, and transnational criminal organizations that threaten the United States by using a prosecutor-led, intelligence-driven, multi-agency approach that leverages the strengths of federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies against criminal networks.An indictment is merely an allegation. All defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.
Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanVzdGljZS5nb3YvdXNhby1lZG5jL3ByL2RlYS1hbm5vdW5jZXMtMTl0aC1uYXRpb25hbC1wcmVzY3JpcHRpb24tZHJ1Zy10YWtlLWJhY2stZGF5
  Press Releases:
WASHINGTON – DEA is holding its 19th National Prescription Drug Take Back Day on Saturday, Oct. 24 at locations across the country. The nationwide event aims to provide a safe, convenient, and responsible means of disposing of prescription drugs, while also educating the general public about the potential for abuse of medications.

Rates of prescription drug abuse in the United States are alarmingly high, as are the number of accidental poisonings and overdoses due to these drugs. Studies show that a majority of abused prescription drugs are obtained from family and friends, including from the home medicine cabinet.

Collection sites will adhere to local COVID-19 guidelines and regulations in order to maintain the safety of all participants and local law enforcement.

“The initiative – now in its tenth year – addresses a vital public safety and public health issue,” said DEA Acting Administrator Timothy Shea. “Medicines that languish in home cabinets are highly susceptible to diversion, misuse, and abuse. Together with our partners, we are not only holding National Prescription Drug Take Back Day, but offering other ways to dispose of unwanted, unused, and expired prescription medications.”

“Even in the midst of the pandemic, DEA’s nineteenth take-back event will allow Americans to safely and properly dispose of their unwanted/unused prescription medications,” said the Special Agent in Charge of the DEA Atlanta Field Division Robert J. Murphy. “Collection sites will adhere to local COVID-19 guidelines and regulations in order to maintain the safety of all participants and local law enforcement. DEA will work hand-in-hand with a number of law enforcement, Tribal and community partners, all in effort to stem the tide of prescription drug abuse.”

“Many people don’t know how to properly dispose of old medication.  So, it is either disposed of improperly, which can seriously damage the environment, or not discarded, which can cause medications to all too often end up in the wrong hands,” said United States Attorney for the Eastern District of North Carolina Robert J. Higdon, Jr.  “DEA is providing an important public service.  I encourage everyone to get rid of their old, unused and unneeded prescription medicine in the proper way.  DEA is making it easier for all of us and I thank them again for this twice a year effort.”

North Carolinians participating in the United States Drug Enforcement Administration’s (DEA’s) 18th National Prescription Drug Take-Back Day Initiative (NTBI) held on Saturday, October 26, turned in 38,541 pounds of unwanted or expired medications for safe and proper disposal at sites set up throughout the state.  This was the highest amount ever collected during the previous 17 Rx drug take back events. Given the ongoing COVID-19 public health emergency, DEA wants to ensure that the public is aware of other ways they can dispose of unwanted prescription drugs without having to leave their homes. Both the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency have tips on how to safely dispose of drugs at home.

In addition to DEA’s National Prescription Drug Take Back Day, prescription drugs can be disposed of at any of the 11,000 DEA authorized collectors at any time throughout the year. For more information, visit: https://apps2.deadiversion.usdoj.gov/pubdispsearch/spring/main?execution=e1s1. 

DEA also encourages the public to reach out to their local law enforcement to find out if they have any permanent drug disposal locations throughout their local community.

DEA and its partners will collect tablets, capsules, patches, and other solid forms. DEA will also accept vape pens or other e-cigarette devices from individual consumers, only after the batteries are removed from the devices. If the battery cannot be removed, individual consumers can check with large electronic chain stores who may accept the vape pen or e-cigarette devices for proper disposal. Liquids, including intravenous solutions, syringes and other sharps, and illegal drugs cannot be dropped off. This service is free and anonymous, no questions asked.

For more information on DEA’s National Prescription Drug Take Back Day, and to find a collection site near you, visit www.deatakeback.com.

Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanVzdGljZS5nb3YvdXNhby1lZG5jL3ByL3NtaXRoZmllbGQtbWFuLWNvbnZpY3RlZC1kaXN0cmlidXRpbmctZmVudGFueWwtYW5hbG9ndWUtbGVkLWRlYXRoLWZhY2VzLW1pbmltdW0tMjA
  Press Releases:
ELIZABETH CITY, N.C. – A Smithfield man was convicted by a jury today for distributing a mixture and substance containing cyclopropyl fentanyl where death resulted. Shamel Nesbitt, 32, faces a minimum of 20 years in prison for this crime, and could receive a life sentence. Nesbitt’s sentencing is scheduled for November.

“The drug dealers and criminal networks lacing fentanyl into their supply are on notice.  We will bring charges and prosecute you to the fullest extent of the law.  When your criminal activity leads to death, you can face up to life in prison,” said U.S. Attorney Michael Easley.

According to court documents and other information presented in court, Nesbitt was investigated in November 2017 by the Johnston County Sheriff’s Office for the distribution of cyclopropyl fentanyl, a fentanyl analogue, where death resulted.  The investigation began on November 19, 2017, after Lucas Urbina, 20, was rushed to the hospital by several friends after using a controlled substance and overdosing.  A second friend of Urbina’s also suffered an overdose from using the same substance.  At that time, hospital staff were able to resuscitate both Urbina and his friend.  Urbina’s friend regained consciousness and became stable after a short period of time.  He left the hospital and was approached by law enforcement when he was attempting to get into a vehicle.  He was searched and law enforcement discovered he had a bag of suspected narcotics along with two syringes.

While Urbina was revived, he never regained consciousness.  Urbina died on November 22, 2017. 

Sample of Urbina’s blood taken upon admission to the hospital were sent to the toxicology section of the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner to see what substances were present.  Test results showed a lethal level of cyclopropyl fentanyl.  Urbina also had low levels of morphine and clonazepam in his blood.  Urbina’s death was ruled an accidental overdose. 

The bag of suspected narcotics that was found on Urbina’s friend immediately following the overdose was tested at the DEA Lab.  It was found to contain a mixture of heroin, cyclopropyl fentanyl, benzoyl fentanyl and caffeine. 

Law enforcement immediately began investigating to determine who distributed the narcotics to Urbina and his friends.  Text messages and dialed phone numbers showed Urbina was reaching out to someone listed as “Mista” in his phone.  Officers were able to quickly link the number to Shamel Nesbitt who had given it to law enforcement as his number when he was cited for a traffic violation a few months earlier.  Law enforcement officers were able to access Urbina’s Facebook account and saw he was communicating with another Facebook user with a name of “Chris Nesbitt.”  In the Facebook messages between Urbina and Nesbitt, it was clear Urbina was attempting to buy drugs from Nesbitt.  Officers got a search warrant for Nesbitt’s Facebook page.  They noticed pictures posted by “Chris Nesbitt” were of Shamel Nesbitt.  Multiple messages on Nesbitt’s Facebook page reference him by the nickname “Mista.” Law enforcement received a search warrant for Nesbitt’s home and found heroin packaging material, nitrile gloves and marijuana. 

Nesbitt made statements to law enforcement that he saw Urbina that day but didn’t sell him any narcotics.    

Michael Easley, U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of North Carolina made the announcement after the trial was concluded.  U.S. District Judge Terrence W. Boyle presided over the trial.  The Smithfield Police Department and the Johnston County Sheriff’s Office investigated the case and Assistant U.S. Attorney Charity Wilson and Brandon Boykin prosecuted the case.

Related court documents and information can be found on the website of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina or on PACER by searching for Case No. 5:19-cr-00226-BO.

Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanVzdGljZS5nb3YvdXNhby1lZG5jL3ByL2Zvcm1lci1vcGVyYXRvci1pbGxlZ2FsLWJvb3Rlci1zZXJ2aWNlcy1wbGVhZHMtZ3VpbHR5LWNvbnNwaXJhY3ktY29tbWl0LWNvbXB1dGVyLWRhbWFnZQ
  Press Releases:
WASHINGTON  – An Orland Park, Illinois man pleaded guilty today to one count of conspiracy to cause damage to internet-connected computers for his role in owning, administering, and supporting illegal booter services that launched millions of illegal DDoS attacks against victim computer systems in the United States and elsewhere.  The illegal services included ExoStress.in, (“ExoStresser”), QuezStresser.com, Betabooter.com (“Betabooter”), Databooter.com, Instabooter.com, Polystress.com, and Zstress.net. 

Assistant Attorney General Brian A. Benczkowski of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division and U.S. Attorney Robert J. Higdon Jr. for the Eastern District of North Carolina, made the announcement. 

According to the criminal information, Sergiy P. Usatyuk, 20, combined with a co-conspirator to develop, control and operate a number of booter services and booter-related websites from around August 2015 through November 2017 that launched millions of DDoS attacks that disrupted the internet connections of targeted victim computers, rendered targeted websites slow or inaccessible, and interrupted normal business operations.  For instance, as of Sept. 12, 2017, ExoStresser advertised on its website (exostress.in) that its booter service alone had launched 1,367,610 DDoS attacks, and caused targeted victim computer systems to suffer 109,186.4 hours of network downtime.

“Booters” or “Stressers” are a class of publicly-available, web-based services that allow cybercriminals to launch distributed denial-of-service, or DDoS, attacks that overwhelm a target computer system with unrequested traffic and, in turn, “boot” or “drop” the victim from the internet for a relatively small fee or no fee at all.  To launch a DDoS attack using a booter, a cybercriminal often needs only a web browser and online payment tool to subscribe to a provider, provide instructions for attacking a victim computer system, and deliver payment.

The DDoS attacks launched by the booters also harmed computer systems that were not directly targeted.  For example, according to the criminal information, in November 2016, a Betabooter subscriber launched a series of DDoS attacks against a school district in the Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania area that not only disrupted the school district’s computer systems, but affected the computer systems of 17 organizations that shared the same computer infrastructure, including other school districts, the county government, the county’s career and technology centers, and a Catholic Diocese in the area.

During the period of the conspiracy, Usatyuk and a co-conspirator gained in excess of $550,000 from charging subscriber fees to paying customers of their booter services and selling advertising space to other booter operators.

“For over two years, Sergiy Usatyuk conspired to launch millions of DDoS attacks that paralyzed the computer systems of U.S. organizations for more than 100,000 hours,” said Assistant Attorney General Benczkowski.  “The Criminal Division and our law enforcement partners will remain vigilant in protecting the American public by prosecuting the cybercriminals responsible for these sophisticated and harmful schemes.”

“DDoS-for-hire services pose a malicious threat to the citizens of our district, as well as districts across the country, by impeding critical access to the internet and jeopardizing safety and security in the process,” said U.S. Attorney Higdon.  “The operation and use of these services to disrupt the operations of our businesses and other institutions cannot be tolerated.  Anyone who weaponizes web traffic in this manner will be vigorously pursued and prosecuted by my office.”

Over the past five years, booter and stresser services have grown as an increasingly prevalent class of DDoS attack tools.  Booter-based DDoS attack tools offer a low barrier to entry for users looking to engage in cybercrime.

For additional information on booter and stresser services and the harm that they cause, please visit: https://www.ic3.gov/media/2017/171017-2.aspx.

The investigation was conducted by special agents of the FBI Charlotte Field Office, Raleigh Resident Agency.  Additional assistance was provide by FBI’s Chicago and Miami Field Offices, as well as the Defense Criminal Investigative Service.

The case is being prosecuted by Trial Attorney Aarash Haghighat of the Criminal Division’s Computer Crime and Intellectual Property Section (CCIPS) and Assistant U.S. Attorney Adam Hulbig of the Eastern District of North Carolina.

Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   D-PR  3:19-cr-00806
Case Name:   USA v. Concepcion-Guerrero et al
  Press Releases:
SAN JUAN, Puerto Rico – U.S. Coast Guard intercepted a vessel with no indicia of nationality on December 5, 2019 attempting to smuggle more than 600 kilograms of cocaine, with an approximated street value of 14 million dollars south of La Romana, Dominican Republic. Coast Guard Cutter (CGC) RELIANCE responded for law enforcement action and three individuals were arrested. The Caribbean Corridor Strike Force is in charge of the investigation of the case.

U.S. Magistrate Judge Silvia Carreño-Coll authorized a complaint charging Jorge Luiz De La Cruz-Acevedo, Freddy Gerardo Fernández-Breth, and Simon Antonio Patino-Rivero with possession with intent to distribute a controlled substance on board a vessel subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, announced W. Stephen Muldrow, United States Attorney for the District of Puerto Rico.  

Custody of the defendants and the narcotics were transferred over to Special Agents of DEA for further investigation and prosecution. This case is part of the Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Force (OCDETF) program and the Caribbean Corridor Strike Force (CCSF). The CCSF is a multi-agency OCDETF strike force comprised of federal and state law enforcement agencies, including the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), Federal Bureau of Investigation, United States Coast Guard, U.S. Marshals Service, Internal Revenue Service, and the Puerto Rico Department of Public Safety.

In a different interdiction that occurred on December 10, 2019, the U.S. Customs and Border Protection/Border Patrol (CBP) surveillance unit spotted a suspected target of interest while conducting border security patrol along the western coast of Puerto Rico. CBP Unit continued surveillance of the vessel while contacting and relaying its position to the Puerto Rico Police Department (PRPD) Maritime Unit (FURA) to assist with the interdiction. Soon thereafter PRPD FURA “COBRA 54” unit located and stopped the vessel at one (1) nautical mile from Crash Boat Beach in Aguadilla, Puerto Rico. The five persons on board, Jesús Ramón Concepción-Guerrero, Miguel Ángel Pourie-Portalatín, Riky Laureano-Ruiz, Israel Herrera-Herrera, and José Manuel Ruiz-Mercedes, and the vessel were detained and towed to the PRPD FURA Unit in Añasco, PR.

After further inspection of the vessel a total of 161 bricks weighing 181.90 kilograms of cocaine were seized, with an approximated street value of four million twenty-five thousand dollars ($4,025,000). U.S. Magistrate Judge Silvia Carreño-Coll authorized a complaint charging the five individuals with conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute five (5) kilograms or more of cocaine and possession with intent to distribute five (5) kilograms or more of cocaine.

“During the past two weeks federal and local law enforcement worked together to intercept hundreds of kilograms of cocaine before they reached our shores,” said W. Stephen Muldrow, US Attorney for the District of Puerto Rico. “We cannot, and will not, halt our efforts to protect our borders from drug trafficking.”

Assistant U.S. Attorneys Vanessa Bonhomme and César Rivera-Giraud are in charge of the prosecution of the cases. If convicted the defendants face a minimum sentence of 10 years up to life in prison. 

Criminal complaints contain only charges and are not evidence of guilt. Defendants are presumed to be innocent until and unless proven guilty.

# # #

Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1GA4FU5GsDzYabIjQqUXK6coGDxdGehpXAITkqg6o2x0
  Last Updated: 2025-09-29 13:58:03 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: Case type associated with a magistrate case if the current case was merged from a magistrate case
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The docket number originally given to a case assigned to a magistrate judge and subsequently merged into a criminal case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a magistrate case
Format: A3

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the second highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE2
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE2
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
Magistrate Docket Number:   D-PR  3:19-mj-02381
Case Name:   DO NOT DOCKET IN MAGISTRATE CASE - CASE MERGED WITH CRIMINAL CASE 19-806 (PAD)
Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1tFr_wpAGW-BaItZqVk0LLkjpTFbursOBpuG4ga-l2pQ
  Last Updated: 2025-03-18 03:35:37 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: Case type associated with a magistrate case if the current case was merged from a magistrate case
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The docket number originally given to a case assigned to a magistrate judge and subsequently merged into a criminal case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a magistrate case
Format: A3

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the second highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE2
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE2
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   D-PR  3:19-cr-00807
Case Name:   USA v. De La Cruz-Acevedo et al
  Press Releases:
SAN JUAN, Puerto Rico – U.S. Coast Guard intercepted a vessel with no indicia of nationality on December 5, 2019 attempting to smuggle more than 600 kilograms of cocaine, with an approximated street value of 14 million dollars south of La Romana, Dominican Republic. Coast Guard Cutter (CGC) RELIANCE responded for law enforcement action and three individuals were arrested. The Caribbean Corridor Strike Force is in charge of the investigation of the case.

U.S. Magistrate Judge Silvia Carreño-Coll authorized a complaint charging Jorge Luiz De La Cruz-Acevedo, Freddy Gerardo Fernández-Breth, and Simon Antonio Patino-Rivero with possession with intent to distribute a controlled substance on board a vessel subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, announced W. Stephen Muldrow, United States Attorney for the District of Puerto Rico.  

Custody of the defendants and the narcotics were transferred over to Special Agents of DEA for further investigation and prosecution. This case is part of the Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Force (OCDETF) program and the Caribbean Corridor Strike Force (CCSF). The CCSF is a multi-agency OCDETF strike force comprised of federal and state law enforcement agencies, including the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), Federal Bureau of Investigation, United States Coast Guard, U.S. Marshals Service, Internal Revenue Service, and the Puerto Rico Department of Public Safety.

In a different interdiction that occurred on December 10, 2019, the U.S. Customs and Border Protection/Border Patrol (CBP) surveillance unit spotted a suspected target of interest while conducting border security patrol along the western coast of Puerto Rico. CBP Unit continued surveillance of the vessel while contacting and relaying its position to the Puerto Rico Police Department (PRPD) Maritime Unit (FURA) to assist with the interdiction. Soon thereafter PRPD FURA “COBRA 54” unit located and stopped the vessel at one (1) nautical mile from Crash Boat Beach in Aguadilla, Puerto Rico. The five persons on board, Jesús Ramón Concepción-Guerrero, Miguel Ángel Pourie-Portalatín, Riky Laureano-Ruiz, Israel Herrera-Herrera, and José Manuel Ruiz-Mercedes, and the vessel were detained and towed to the PRPD FURA Unit in Añasco, PR.

After further inspection of the vessel a total of 161 bricks weighing 181.90 kilograms of cocaine were seized, with an approximated street value of four million twenty-five thousand dollars ($4,025,000). U.S. Magistrate Judge Silvia Carreño-Coll authorized a complaint charging the five individuals with conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute five (5) kilograms or more of cocaine and possession with intent to distribute five (5) kilograms or more of cocaine.

“During the past two weeks federal and local law enforcement worked together to intercept hundreds of kilograms of cocaine before they reached our shores,” said W. Stephen Muldrow, US Attorney for the District of Puerto Rico. “We cannot, and will not, halt our efforts to protect our borders from drug trafficking.”

Assistant U.S. Attorneys Vanessa Bonhomme and César Rivera-Giraud are in charge of the prosecution of the cases. If convicted the defendants face a minimum sentence of 10 years up to life in prison. 

Criminal complaints contain only charges and are not evidence of guilt. Defendants are presumed to be innocent until and unless proven guilty.

# # #

Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1bPkwMqPxMS4t7fzm8c6r59TiD8urG-XUIVJDRmzd5GY
  Last Updated: 2025-03-18 03:35:06 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: Case type associated with a magistrate case if the current case was merged from a magistrate case
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The docket number originally given to a case assigned to a magistrate judge and subsequently merged into a criminal case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a magistrate case
Format: A3

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
Magistrate Docket Number:   D-PR  3:19-mj-02387
Case Name:   DO NOT DOCKET IN MAGISTRATE CASE - CASE MERGED WITH CRIMINAL CASE 19-807 (PAD)
Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1BBfxKQdLumf77YopMwOd6Y0S0FGcjnCCES2lpSkAP_Y
  Last Updated: 2025-03-18 03:36:01 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: Case type associated with a magistrate case if the current case was merged from a magistrate case
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The docket number originally given to a case assigned to a magistrate judge and subsequently merged into a criminal case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a magistrate case
Format: A3

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanVzdGljZS5nb3YvdXNhby1wci9wci90d28taW5kaXZpZHVhbHMtaW5kaWN0ZWQtY2FyamFja2luZw
  Press Releases:
SAN JUAN, P.R. – A federal grand jury returned a four-count indictment against Miguel Ángel Martines-Ramos and Michael Rosa-Rodríguez for carjacking resulting in serious bodily injury, announced United States Attorney Rosa Emilia Rodríguez-Vélez. The Federal Bureau of Investigation is in charge of the investigation.

The indictment alleges that on or about April 14, 2018, in the District of Puerto Rico, Miguel Ángel Martines-Ramos and Michael Rosa-Rodríguez, while carrying, brandishing and discharging a firearm, did take a motor vehicle, to wit: a black 2017 Hyundai Tucson, that had been transported, shipped and received in interstate or foreign commerce, from the presence of an adult male, by force, violence and intimidation, with the intent to cause death or serious bodily injury. During the incident, both defendants traveled with the male victim in his vehicle, shot him three times, and left him for dead.

Both defendants are also charged with possession of a machinegun, a black and grey Glock pistol, Model 23, .40 caliber, one 22-round capacity Glock magazine, and 11 rounds of .40 caliber ammunition. The pistol was modified to shoot automatically more than one shot, without manual reloading, by a single function of the trigger.

 “These defendants planned and carried out the carjacking and shooting of a defenseless victim,” said U.S. Attorney Rosa Emilia Rodríguez-Vélez. “Through the hard work of federal and state law enforcement, and our prosecutors, the defendants will be brought to justice.”  

The case is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Daynelle Álvarez-Lora. If convicted, the defendants face up to 25 years of imprisonment for the carjacking charge (Count One), and up to life imprisonment for the firearms charge (Count Two). Indictments contain only charges and are not evidence of guilt.  Defendants are presumed to be innocent until and unless proven guilty.

# # #

Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanVzdGljZS5nb3YvdXNhby1wci9wci90d28tYWdlbnRzLXB1ZXJ0by1yaWNvLXRyZWFzdXJ5LWRlcGFydG1lbnQtaGFjaWVuZGEtYXJyZXN0ZWQtYWNjZXB0aW5nLWJyaWJlcy1hbmQtMA
  Press Releases:
SAN JUAN, P.R. – On March 2, 2017, a Federal grand jury returned a two-count indictment against two agents from the Puerto Rico Treasury Department, (“Hacienda”) charging them with one count of extortion and one count of accepting bribes in their role as agents for the Puerto Rico Treasury Department, announced Rosa Emilia Rodríguez-Vélez, United States Attorney for the District of Puerto Rico. The investigation was led by the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

 

The indictment alleges that on June 10, 2015, the defendants Edwin Aponte-Hernández and Eduardo Collazo-Torres, did obstruct, delay, and affect commerce and the movement of articles and commodities in commerce by extortion in that the defendants obtained property not due them or Hacienda under the color of official right. The bribes received were related to the regulation and licensure of adult entertainment machines within several businesses located in San Juan.

 

The defendants are also charged with accepting bribes in excess of $5,000.00 during the period of January through December 2015, intending to be influenced and rewarded in connection with a series of transactions on behalf of Hacienda.  The defendants were arrested March 9, 2017.

 

“Abusing one’s position as a public servant for personal gain is a breach of trust and a violation of the oath that every government employee takes,” said United States Attorney, Rosa Emilia Rodríguez-Vélez. “We will continue working together with our law enforcement partners to ensure that those who engage in corrupt activities are brought to justice.”

 

 

“The honor of public service brings with it the duty to find and remove those public servants who abuse their power to serve their own selfish ends,” said Douglas Leff, FBI Special Agent in Charge. “From the moment he took office, Secretary Maldonado Gautier reaffirmed Hacienda's commitment to this effort, which led to today’s actions on behalf of the honest citizens of Puerto Rico”.

 

 

“We worked closely with the Federal authorities during the course of this investigation. We are not going to stop until we get rid of those who betray the public trust,” stated Lcdo. Raúl Maldonado Gautier, CPA, Director of the Puerto Rico Treasury Department. “Our commitment is to maintain transparency on our administration and to collaborate in every necessary way to preserve the integrity of the Department of the Treasury and to recover the credibility of the people of Puerto Rico.”

 

The case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Nicholas W. Cannon. The case was investigated by the FBI, with the collaboration of the PR Treasury Department.

If convicted the defendants face a sentence of 20 years of imprisonment. Criminal indictments are only charges and are not evidence of guilt. A defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.

Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanVzdGljZS5nb3YvdXNhby1wci9wci90aHJlZS1tb3JlLWluZGl2aWR1YWxzLWNoYXJnZWQtYXNjby1hcm1lZC1yb2JiZXJ5
  Press Releases:
SAN JUAN, P.R. – On March 14, 2018, a federal grand jury returned a superseding eight-count indictment against Benjamin Melendez-Rivera, Ralph Laboy-Santiago, Miguel Cruz-Kuilan, and Joel Laboy-Rosario for conspiracy to interfere with commerce by robbery, interference with commerce by robbery, and related firearms offenses, announced United States Attorney Rosa Emilia Rodríguez-Vélez. The FBI, the Aguadilla Violent Crimes Task Force of the FBI, and the Police of Puerto Rico’s Bank Robbery Unit are in charge of the investigation.

The superseding indictment alleges that on March 20, 2017, in the District of Puerto Rico, the co-conspirators traveled to a Banco Popular branch in Morovis, Puerto Rico to commit a robbery. The defendants brandished a firearm at an armed courier employed by Econo Supermarket outside of the Banco Popular, and robbed approximately $3,000 in U.S. currency.

On March 23, 2017, the defendants conducted surveillance on a Banco Popular branch in Añasco, in preparation for a robbery. Returning to Añasco on March 30, 2017, Melendez-Rivera took photographs of the Añasco branch. On that same day, two of the co-conspirators robbed and discharged their firearms at a Ranger American armed courier outside of the Banco Popular branch. During the robbery, the armed courier was wounded and two innocent bystanders were killed. The defendants robbed approximately $16,900 in U.S. currency.

The superseding indictment further charges that Melendez-Rivera was found to have taken photographs of another Banco Popular branch located in Puerto Nuevo on October 9, 2017, allegedly in preparation for another robbery.

“Thanks to the joint investigation conducted by the FBI, Aguadilla Task Force officers, and Puerto Rico Police’s Bank Robbery Unit, the members of this alleged armed robbery organization have been apprehended,” said Rosa Emilia Rodríguez-Vélez, U.S. Attorney for the District of Puerto Rico. “We thank our local law enforcement partners for their outstanding work. The U.S. Department of Justice is committed to working actively with local law enforcement to apprehend and bring armed robbery organizations like this one to justice.”

“Today’s arrests by the Puerto Rico Police Department (PRPD) Tactical Operations Unit and FBI SWAT were the result of outstanding detective work by the PRPD Bank Robbery Unit and the FBI Aguadilla and San Juan Offices, with critical assistance provided by the Puerto Rico Department of Housing. Furthermore, FBI Headquarters has advised the United States Attorney General of the essential role played by our PRDP Task Force Officers in solving this and many other dangerous crimes occurring in Puerto Rico,” said FBI Special Agent in Charge Douglas A. Leff. “We commend the Puerto Rico authorities for committing these dedicated officers to work alongside us, and together we will never stop investigating crimes of violence until justice is fully accomplished through the apprehension of all those responsible”

Benjamin Melendez-Rivera was charged with conspiracy to interfere with commerce by robbery; interference with commerce by robbery (two counts); possession, and discharge of a firearm in furtherance of a crime of violence (two counts); and as a felon-in-possession (two counts).

Ralph Laboy-Santiago was charged with conspiracy to interfere with commerce by robbery; interference with commerce by robbery (two counts); possession, and discharge of a firearm in furtherance of a crime of violence (two counts); and as a felon-in-possession (two counts). Laboy-Santiago

Miguel Cruz-Kuilan was charged with conspiracy to interfere with commerce by robbery; interference with commerce by robbery (two counts); possession, and discharge of a firearm in furtherance of a crime of violence (two counts); and as a felon-in-possession (three counts).

Joel Laboy-Rosario was charged with conspiracy to interfere with commerce by robbery; interference with commerce by robbery (two counts); and possession, and discharge of a firearm in furtherance of a crime of violence (two counts).

The previous five-count indictment in the case, returned on December 6, 2017, charged only Melendez-Rivera.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Alexander Alum is in charge of the prosecution of the case. If convicted, the defendants face a maximum sentence of life imprisonment. Indictments contain only charges and are not evidence of guilt. The defendants are presumed to be innocent until the charges are proven beyond a reasonable doubt.

Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanVzdGljZS5nb3YvdXNhby1wci9wci9zaXgtaW5kaXZpZHVhbHMtY2hhcmdlZC1kcnVnLXRyYWZmaWNraW5n
  Press Releases:
SAN JUAN, Puerto Rico – On April 29, 2021, a federal grand jury in the District of Puerto Rico returned a two-count indictment, which was unsealed today, charging six defendants charged with conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute controlled substances, announced W. Stephen Muldrow, United States Attorney for the District of Puerto Rico, Rafael Riviere-Vázquez, Special Agent in Charge of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, San Juan Field Office, and John F. Kanig, Acting Special Agent in Charge of the Drug Enforcement Administration, Caribbean Field Division. The FBI and DEA led the investigation.

The indictment alleges that since the year 2014, until in or about September 2019, the defendants distributed cocaine, within Puerto Rico and the Continental United States, all for financial gain and profit.

As part of the conspiracy, the members would mail kilograms of cocaine to the Continental United States concealed in U.S. Postal parcels.  Some members of the conspiracy would receive these parcels in the Continental United States for further distribution. Similarly, members of the conspiracy would mail bulk cash consisting of the proceeds of the sales of the narcotics from the Continental United States back to Puerto Rico.

The individuals indicted are:

Yavick Rodriguez-Santos, a/k/a “Yavo”

Lisandro Bermúdez-Negron, a/k/a “Gambo”

Gadiel Figueroa-Rodriguez

Luis Catala-Fuentes, a/k/a “Pinto/El Loco”

Luis Diaz-Ramos

Jose Rivera-Ortiz

Special Assistant U.S. Attorney R. Vance Eaton from the Gang Section is in charge of the prosecution of the case. If convicted the defendants face a minimum sentence of 10 years, and up to life in prison. Indictments contain only charges and are not evidence of guilt. Defendants are presumed to be innocent until and unless proven guilty.

# # #

Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanVzdGljZS5nb3YvdXNhby1wci9wci90d28taW5kaXZpZHVhbHMtYXJyZXN0ZWQtYW5kLWluZGljdGVkLWNhcmphY2tpbmc
  Press Releases:
SAN JUAN, P.R. – On May 4, 2017, a federal grand jury returned a three-count indictment against Nestor Morales-Cortijo, A.K.A. “Papum,” and José Vázquez-Millán for carjacking and using a firearm during a crime of violence, announced United States Attorney Rosa Emilia Rodríguez-Vélez. The Federal Bureau of Investigation is in charge of the investigation.

The indictment alleges that on or about April 27, 2017, in the District of Puerto Rico, Morales-Cortijo and Vázquez-Millán, while carrying and brandishing a firearm, did take a motor vehicle, to wit: a green, 2003 Mitsubishi Lancer, that had been transported, shipped or received in interstate or foreign commerce, from the presence of an adult female, by force, violence and intimidation, with the intent to cause death or serious bodily injury, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 2119(1) and 2.

Defendant José Vázquez-Millán is facing one count for being felon in possession of ammunitions, having been convicted in court of a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year. Vázquez Millán did knowingly and unlawfully possess thirty-two (32) rounds of 9mm ammunition, said ammunition having been shipped and transported in interstate or foreign commerce.

In a separate criminal complaint authorized by US Magistrate Judge Bruce McGiverin, Jonathan Fuentes-Millán was charged for possession of a firearm in relation to a crime of violence and carjacking. On or about April 27, 2017, a female victim arrived to her residence, located at Loiza, Puerto Rico and parked her blue Toyota Prius in the driveway. Also at the residence was her husband, and two children. Shortly after, the victims heard gunshots outside. They attempted to close the front door when a male individual, accompanied by two others, demanded the car keys to the Prius, which they turned over. The males used the keys to start the vehicle, but then fled the area on foot.

Officers arrived at the scene and noticed bullet casings on the ground and blood stains along the exterior wall of the residence. Officers followed the blood stains and walked toward the adjacent property which is under construction and has open access. Inside the property they found Fuentes-Millán holding a black rifle loaded with a magazine, and two additional magazines in his waist band.

“These defendants planned and carjacked defenseless victims,” said US Attorney Rosa Emilia Rodríguez-Vélez. “These defendants will be brought to justice through the hard work of federal and state law enforcement agents and our prosecutors.”

“As always, the public’s help is essential to apprehending these violent criminals, and citizens with information are asked to call the FBI San Juan Field Office at 787-754-6000, or to use the tip line available at our website, http://www.fbi.gov,” said Douglas A. Leff, Special Agent in Charge of the FBI, San Juan Field Office.

The cases are being prosecuted by Special Assistant United States Attorney Ana M. Santiago-Ramírez. If convicted, the defendants face up to 15 years of imprisonment for the carjacking charge (Count One), and up to life imprisonment for the firearms charge (Count Two). Indictments contain only charges and are not evidence of guilt. Defendants are presumed to be innocent until and unless proven guilty.

 

Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanVzdGljZS5nb3YvdXNhby1wci9wci9mdWdpdGl2ZS12bGFkaW1pci1uYXRlcmEtYWJyZXUtYXJyZXN0ZWQtZG9taW5pY2FuLXJlcHVibGlj
  Press Releases:
SAN JUAN, Puerto Rico – Today, Vladimir Natera-Abreu and Joset Rivera-Verdejo were arrested in a joint law enforcement operation by the FBI, the Dominican National Police, and the U.S. Marshals Service. The defendants were fugitives since February 2019, announced W. Stephen Muldrow, United States Attorney for the District of Puerto Rico.

Defendant Natera-Abreu was one of the main leaders in the drug trafficking organization known as “Las FARC,” (Las FuerzasArmadas Revolucionarias de Cantera). “Las FARC” operated out of the Barrio Obrero Ward, including, but not limited to El Guano sector, Playita sector, William Street, Eleven Street, Cantera sector, and the Public Housing Projects Villa Kennedy, Las Casas, El Mirador, and Las Margaritas, all located in Santurce, since in or about 2006. The goal of “Las FARC” was to maintain control of all the drug trafficking activities within the Santurce area by the use of force, threats, violence, and intimidation.

Natera-Abreu and Rivera-Verdejo had been previously charged in a seven-count indictment for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute narcotics, aiding and abetting in the possession and distribution of heroin, crack, cocaine, and marihuana, and possession of a firearm in furtherance of drug trafficking. The charged drug conspiracy included 75 defendants.

Assistant U.S. Attorneys Alberto López-Rocafort and Teresa S. Zapata-Valladares are in charge of the prosecution of the case. If convicted the defendant faces a mandatory minimum sentence of 15 years, and up to life in prison. Indictments contain only charges and are not evidence of guilt. Defendants are presumed to be innocent until and unless proven guilty.

 # # #

Score:   0.9375
Docket Number:   aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanVzdGljZS5nb3YvdXNhby1wci9wci80LWluZGl2aWR1YWxzLWluZGljdGVkLXRyYWZmaWNraW5nLW1ldGhhbXBoZXRhbWluZS1hbmQtbWFyaWh1YW5h
  Press Releases:
SAN JUAN, PR – On January 31, 2018, a federal grand jury in the District of Puerto Rico returned an indictment against four individuals as a result of an Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Force (OCDETF) investigation led by the U.S Postal Service, Office of Inspector General, DEA and the Puerto Rico Police Department, announced today United States Attorney Rosa Emilia Rodríguez-Vélez. The defendants are charged in a three-count indictment with conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute controlled substances, and the use of mail to distribute controlled substances.

The indictment alleges that beginning in the year 2015, the defendants conspired to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine in Puerto Rico for significant financial gain. U.S Postal Service, Office of Inspector General, DEA San Juan Tactical Division Squad, and PRPD, started an investigation into a Drug Trafficking Organization (DTO) responsible for shipping crystal meth (also known as “ice”) and marihuana from the state of California to Puerto Rico via the United States Postal Service (USPS) with the assistance of two postal employees.

The defendants are:

1.         José Chávez, a.k.a. “El Mejicano/El Ingeniero”- sent the drugs from California to Puerto Rico

2.         Pedro Rodríguez Valentin- USPS employee

3.         Julio Valenzuela Morel- facilitator

4.         Josué Torres Colón- USPS employee

According to the indictment, the defendants mailed the packaged methamphetamine and/or marihuana to Puerto Rico from United States Post Offices in California. They had the methamphetamine and/or marihuana laden boxes have specific existing addresses on the postal employee’s delivery route, so that he could take control of the package to deliver to co-conspirators. The defendants and co-conspirators held meetings in Puerto Rico or Florida to discuss the distribution of controlled substances and communicated via text or phone regarding the shipments of controlled substances to Puerto Rico and its distribution. They used Well Fargo and Banco Popular accounts to pay co-conspirators for the shipments of methamphetamine.

“The US Attorney’s Office will continue to vigorously pursue the criminal prosecution of U.S. Postal Service employees and others who would defraud the U.S. Postal Service or utilize its services in their criminal schemes,” said United States Attorney Rosa Emilia Rodríguez-Vélez. “We are committed to dismantling and removing the threat posed by these criminal organizations flooding our communities with dangerous narcotics.”

Eileen Neff, Special Agent in Charge, U.S. Postal Service, Office of Inspector General, Northeast Area Field Office stated: “The U.S Postal Service, Office of Inspector General will utilize every resource available, to include our strong law enforcement partnerships, to prevent USPS employees from abusing positions of public trust by assisting with the trafficking of methamphetamine, as alleged in this case. This type of destructive and dangerous scheme will not be tolerated. We greatly appreciate the support of the Drug Enforcement Administration, Puerto Rico Police Department, and the U.S. Attorney’s Office in this matter.” 

The case is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Laura Montes under the supervision of Julia Díaz-Rex, Deputy Chief for International Narcotics Unit. If convicted, the defendants could face a minimum penalty of 10 years up to life imprisonment and/or fines of up to $10,000,000. Indictments contain only charges and are not evidence of guilt. Defendants are presumed to be innocent unless and until proven guilty.

The case was investigated as part of the Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Force (OCDETF). This multi-agency task force investigates and dismantles major drug trafficking organizations responsible for the movement of multi-kilogram quantities of narcotics as well as the gang violence that accompanies drug trafficking.

###

F U C K I N G P E D O S R E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E