Score:   1
Docket Number:   D-CT  3:19-cr-00276
Case Name:   USA v. Sosa-Ortiz et al
  Press Releases:
John H. Durham, United States Attorney for the District of Connecticut, Brian D. Boyle, Special Agent in Charge of the Drug Enforcement Administration for New England, and Waterbury Police Chief Fernando C. Spagnolo today announced that 15 individuals have been charged with federal narcotics offenses related to the distribution of heroin and fentanyl in and around Waterbury.

As alleged in court documents and statements made in court, the arrests stem a joint investigation headed by the DEA New Haven Task Force and the Waterbury Police Department.  The investigation, which has included the use of court-authorized wiretaps, physical surveillance and controlled purchases of narcotics, revealed that Nestor Sosa-Ortiz has operated a Waterbury-based drug trafficking organization that received large quantities of heroin and fentanyl from suppliers in Connecticut and New York and distributed the narcotics throughout New Haven County.  After Nestor Sosa-Ortiz was arrested in New York City on a separate federal heroin and fentanyl trafficking charge in May 2019, he continued to control his drug network while incarcerated by using smuggled cell phones to communicate with various co-conspirators, including his sisters, Isamelis Sosa-Ortiz and Imirici Sosa-Ortiz, in Waterbury.

The following individuals have been charged by federal criminal complaint with conspiracy to distribute, and to possess with intent to distribute, heroin and fentanyl:

NESTOR SOSA-ORTIZ, 35, of WaterburyISAMELIS MARIAN SOSA-ORTIZ, a.k.a. “Marian,” 29, of WaterburyIMIRICI SOSA-ORTIZ, a.k.a. “Mimi,” 31, of WaterburyELIAS SANCHEZ-MARTINEZ, 27, of WaterburyFRANCIS AYBAR-PEGUERO, a.k.a. “Grena,” 27, of WaterburyERICA ORAMA, a.k.a. “Wifey,” 39, of WaterburyRONEY SOSA, 23, of WaterburyIVANNY ANTONIO FRANCISCO-ESTRELLA, 34, of WaterburyBRAYAN GONZALEZ, 35, of WaterburyJEFFREY TAVAREZ, 21, of WaterburyORLANDO MARTINEZ, a.k.a. “Bolo,” 51, of WatertownJUAN CARLOS CASTELLANO, 41, of BridgeportERIK RAFAEL POLANCO, a.k.a. “Chino,” 23, of WaterburyDARRY JOSE GUERRERO, a.k.a. “Domi,” 27, of WaterburyJEISSON AMARANTE-PEREZ, a.k.a. “Smart Yeii,” 25, of Waterbury

Thirteen defendants were arrested today, and one defendant, Jeisson Amarante-Perez, is currently being sought.  Nestor Sosa-Ortiz has been detained in federal custody since May 18, 2019.

In association with today’s arrests, law enforcement officers executed five search warrants at locations in Waterbury, including an apartment at 330 Bishop Street and the Corner Mini Market at 52 East Farm Street, and seized approximately six kilograms of suspected heroin/fentanyl, approximately 100,000 bags of suspected heroin/fentanyl packaged for street distribution, approximately 1,000 fentanyl pills disguised as Percocet pills, one firearm and approximately $50,000 in cash.

“Heroin and fentanyl continue to destroy too many lives in our state, and we are committed to using federal law enforcement resources to prosecute those responsible for distributing these deadly drugs,” said U.S. Attorney Durham.  “This investigation has closed the door on one drug trafficking network, but we know our work is not done, in Waterbury and throughout Connecticut.  We thank the members of the DEA Task Force and the Waterbury Police Department for their great work.  Every time a heroin dealer is arrested, we believe that lives are saved.”

“DEA is committed to investigating and dismantling large scale Drug Trafficking Organizations like this one operating in the greater Waterbury area,” said DEA Special Agent in Charge Boyle.  “DEA and Waterbury Police will continue to aggressively pursue those responsible for distributing lethal drugs like fentanyl and heroin to the citizens of Connecticut and hold them accountable for their actions.”

“In recent years, the flow of opioids in Waterbury has had a devastating impact on our community as a whole,” said Chief Spagnolo.  “We are grateful for the support from the U.S. Attorney’s Office and for our partnership with the DEA.  We will continue to work side by side with these agencies to combat the opioid trade in Waterbury.”

The 13 individuals who were arrested today appeared before U.S. Magistrate Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam in New Haven.

U.S. Attorney Durham stressed that a complaint is only a charge and is not evidence of guilt.  Charges are only allegations, and each defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

This investigation is being conducted by the Drug Enforcement Administration New Haven Task Force and the Waterbury Police Department.  The DEA New Haven Task Force includes participants from the U.S. Marshals Service, Internal Revenue Service – Criminal Investigation Division, and the New Haven, Hamden, West Haven, North Haven, Branford, Ansonia, Meriden, Derby, Middletown, Naugatuck and Waterbury Police Departments.

The case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Jocelyn Courtney Kaoutzanis, Lauren C. Clark, H. Gordon Hall, Peter D. Markle and Anthony E. Kaplan.

Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1twZvEVV0zpPbTKLthECHUiwxV_r1oLqKaL3kp3qyLG8
  Last Updated: 2026-04-26 08:49:02 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: Case type associated with a magistrate case if the current case was merged from a magistrate case
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The docket number originally given to a case assigned to a magistrate judge and subsequently merged into a criminal case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a magistrate case
Format: A3

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the second highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE2
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE2
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the third highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE3
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE3
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
Magistrate Docket Number:   D-CT  3:19-mj-01533
Case Name:   USA v. Sosa-Ortiz
  Press Releases:
John H. Durham, United States Attorney for the District of Connecticut, Brian D. Boyle, Special Agent in Charge of the Drug Enforcement Administration for New England, and Waterbury Police Chief Fernando C. Spagnolo today announced that 15 individuals have been charged with federal narcotics offenses related to the distribution of heroin and fentanyl in and around Waterbury.

As alleged in court documents and statements made in court, the arrests stem a joint investigation headed by the DEA New Haven Task Force and the Waterbury Police Department.  The investigation, which has included the use of court-authorized wiretaps, physical surveillance and controlled purchases of narcotics, revealed that Nestor Sosa-Ortiz has operated a Waterbury-based drug trafficking organization that received large quantities of heroin and fentanyl from suppliers in Connecticut and New York and distributed the narcotics throughout New Haven County.  After Nestor Sosa-Ortiz was arrested in New York City on a separate federal heroin and fentanyl trafficking charge in May 2019, he continued to control his drug network while incarcerated by using smuggled cell phones to communicate with various co-conspirators, including his sisters, Isamelis Sosa-Ortiz and Imirici Sosa-Ortiz, in Waterbury.

The following individuals have been charged by federal criminal complaint with conspiracy to distribute, and to possess with intent to distribute, heroin and fentanyl:

NESTOR SOSA-ORTIZ, 35, of WaterburyISAMELIS MARIAN SOSA-ORTIZ, a.k.a. “Marian,” 29, of WaterburyIMIRICI SOSA-ORTIZ, a.k.a. “Mimi,” 31, of WaterburyELIAS SANCHEZ-MARTINEZ, 27, of WaterburyFRANCIS AYBAR-PEGUERO, a.k.a. “Grena,” 27, of WaterburyERICA ORAMA, a.k.a. “Wifey,” 39, of WaterburyRONEY SOSA, 23, of WaterburyIVANNY ANTONIO FRANCISCO-ESTRELLA, 34, of WaterburyBRAYAN GONZALEZ, 35, of WaterburyJEFFREY TAVAREZ, 21, of WaterburyORLANDO MARTINEZ, a.k.a. “Bolo,” 51, of WatertownJUAN CARLOS CASTELLANO, 41, of BridgeportERIK RAFAEL POLANCO, a.k.a. “Chino,” 23, of WaterburyDARRY JOSE GUERRERO, a.k.a. “Domi,” 27, of WaterburyJEISSON AMARANTE-PEREZ, a.k.a. “Smart Yeii,” 25, of Waterbury

Thirteen defendants were arrested today, and one defendant, Jeisson Amarante-Perez, is currently being sought.  Nestor Sosa-Ortiz has been detained in federal custody since May 18, 2019.

In association with today’s arrests, law enforcement officers executed five search warrants at locations in Waterbury, including an apartment at 330 Bishop Street and the Corner Mini Market at 52 East Farm Street, and seized approximately six kilograms of suspected heroin/fentanyl, approximately 100,000 bags of suspected heroin/fentanyl packaged for street distribution, approximately 1,000 fentanyl pills disguised as Percocet pills, one firearm and approximately $50,000 in cash.

“Heroin and fentanyl continue to destroy too many lives in our state, and we are committed to using federal law enforcement resources to prosecute those responsible for distributing these deadly drugs,” said U.S. Attorney Durham.  “This investigation has closed the door on one drug trafficking network, but we know our work is not done, in Waterbury and throughout Connecticut.  We thank the members of the DEA Task Force and the Waterbury Police Department for their great work.  Every time a heroin dealer is arrested, we believe that lives are saved.”

“DEA is committed to investigating and dismantling large scale Drug Trafficking Organizations like this one operating in the greater Waterbury area,” said DEA Special Agent in Charge Boyle.  “DEA and Waterbury Police will continue to aggressively pursue those responsible for distributing lethal drugs like fentanyl and heroin to the citizens of Connecticut and hold them accountable for their actions.”

“In recent years, the flow of opioids in Waterbury has had a devastating impact on our community as a whole,” said Chief Spagnolo.  “We are grateful for the support from the U.S. Attorney’s Office and for our partnership with the DEA.  We will continue to work side by side with these agencies to combat the opioid trade in Waterbury.”

The 13 individuals who were arrested today appeared before U.S. Magistrate Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam in New Haven.

U.S. Attorney Durham stressed that a complaint is only a charge and is not evidence of guilt.  Charges are only allegations, and each defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

This investigation is being conducted by the Drug Enforcement Administration New Haven Task Force and the Waterbury Police Department.  The DEA New Haven Task Force includes participants from the U.S. Marshals Service, Internal Revenue Service – Criminal Investigation Division, and the New Haven, Hamden, West Haven, North Haven, Branford, Ansonia, Meriden, Derby, Middletown, Naugatuck and Waterbury Police Departments.

The case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Jocelyn Courtney Kaoutzanis, Lauren C. Clark, H. Gordon Hall, Peter D. Markle and Anthony E. Kaplan.

Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1K5faLl-RLVPnbDVPochFIF2zhvbtHAmyFcu7YtVJncA
  Last Updated: 2025-03-16 10:59:05 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: Case type associated with a magistrate case if the current case was merged from a magistrate case
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The docket number originally given to a case assigned to a magistrate judge and subsequently merged into a criminal case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a magistrate case
Format: A3

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the second highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE2
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE2
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
F U C K I N G P E D O S R E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E