Score:   1
Docket Number:   D-PR  3:19-cr-00507
Case Name:   USA v. Tower & Son Exterminating Corp. et al
  Press Releases:
SAN JUAN, P.R. – On Thursday, August 16, 2019, a federal grand jury returned an eight-count indictment charging Tower & Son Exterminating, Corp. and its owner Wilson Javier Torres-Rivera for violations of FIFRA, announced Rosa Emilia Rodríguez-Vélez, United States Attorney for the District of Puerto Rico. The Puerto Rico Department of Agriculture and the Environmental Protection Agency are in charge of the investigation. 

Tower & Son Exterminating, Corp. is a Puerto Rico corporation that provided pest control services. According to the allegations in the indictment, Tower & Son Exterminating, Corp., and Wilson Javier Torres-Rivera, in the District of Puerto Rico and within the jurisdiction of this Court, acting as a commercial applicator, did knowingly apply the restricted-use pesticide Meth-O-Gas Q, containing methyl bromide, at the locations listed below, for the purpose of exterminating household pests, a use not in accordance with its registration and labeling:

1. August 19, 2014 at Cangrejos Yacht Club Carolina, PR

2. October 1, 2014 at Carr. 176 Km Camino Armando Marrero, PR

3. October 3, 2014 at Calle Estrella Del Mar, Dorado, PR

4. November 19, 2014 at Los Sueños Ciudad Jardín, Gurabo, PR

5. December 4, 2014 at Road 829 Km 6.2, Bayamón, PR

6. December 10, 2014 at Los Robles, Las Cumbres, San Juan, PR

7. January 12, 2015 at Los Robles, Las Cumbres, San Juan, PR

8. February 19, 2015 at Tejas Ward, Los Velázquez, Las Piedras, PR

All in violation of Title 7, United States Code, Sections 136j(a)(2)(G) and 136l(b)(1)(B).

Methyl bromide is acutely toxic and could be used only as a commodity fumigant for quarantine/regulatory use. According to its labeling, methyl bromide exposure could be fatal or cause acute illness or delayed lung or nervous system injury. Methyl bromide is odorless and nonirritating to skin and eyes during exposure. Early symptoms of overexposure are dizziness, headache, nausea, and vomiting. Lung edema may develop in 2 to 48 hours after exposure, accompanied by cardiac irregularities; these effects are the usual cause of death. Exposure to toxic levels of methyl bromide could occur without warning or detection.

“The highly dangerous actions of the defendant exposed both workers and the public to hazardous materials,” said U.S. Attorney Rosa Emilia Rodríguez-Vélez. “Today’s indictment underscores the importance of industry’s compliance with the law to ensure the protection of human health and the environment for the benefit of the people.”

The case is being prosecuted by Senior Litigation Counsel from the Environmental Crimes Section, Howard P. Stewart and Assistant United States Attorney Carmen M. Marquez. An indictment is only an accusation and not evidence of guilt. The defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty.

# # #

 

Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ThL--UXiaHxhqef7jkPfhi9lcVD21YHmVO-79Y4JuTo
  Last Updated: 2025-03-18 02:30:36 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
F U C K I N G P E D O S R E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E