Score:   1
Docket Number:   D-UT  2:18-cr-00141
Case Name:   USA v. Perez-Rivas et al
  Press Releases:
SALT LAKE CITY – Two defendants, who were involved in “jackpotting” a number of ATMs in Utah and elsewhere from Feb. 23, 2018, to March 7, 2018, have resolved their federal cases in Salt Lake City and been sentenced.  Three others have entered guilty pleas and will be sentenced in May. Cases are pending for two other defendants charged in the scheme.

Josshua Perez Rivas, age 39, a Venezuelan national, was sentenced to 42 months in federal prison in late February after pleading guilty to conspiracy to commit bank theft in December.  According to a sentencing memorandum filed by federal prosecutors, Perez Rivas played a significant role in organizing what was a sophisticated international conspiracy to steal from banks in the United States.  “The plot is remarkable for its technological sophistication and for the number of participants recruited to help ensure its success. It is a plot that requires significant planning and expertise,” they told the court.

The defendants in the case used software and equipment to reprogram ATM computers to enable them to direct the ATMs to dispense cash until emptied – an activity sometimes called jackpotting.  Perez Rivas compromised the ATM computers and installed the software in almost every instance. Perez Rivas appears to have been the point person for communications between the team on the ground and their coconspirators who developed the malware.

The defendants possessed false identifications and stolen credit card numbers to allow them to rent hotel rooms and vehicles to be used in facilitation of their conspiracy without leaving a record of their identities.  Computer files with approximately 600 credit card numbers that appear to have been stolen were found on data storage devices in the suitcases of one of the defendants.  Using the false identifications assured the defendants that their names were not left at the hotel or associated with the license plate on the vehicle should it be caught on camera, federal prosecutors said.  

Before their capture, Perez Rivas and his codefendants had successfully jackpotted five ATMs in Washington and one in Sandy, Utah.  They also attempted to jackpot two additional ATMs in Salt Lake City before being arrested during the Sandy crime.

According to information included in plea agreements reached in the case, the following amounts were stolen from ATMs through the unauthorized access:

Dec. 13, 2017             Sound Credit Union ATM -  Bothell, Washington                        $88,000

Dec. 15, 2017             iQ Credit Union - Vancouver, Washington                                    $8,000

Dec. 16, 2017             Umpqua Bank ATM - Vancouver, Washington                             $16,000

Dec. 16, 2017             Columbia Credit Union ATM - Vancouver, Washington             $91,000

Dec. 17, 2017             Heritage Bank ATM -  Vernon, Washington                                  $64,400

Feb. 25, 2018             Deseret First Credit Union ATM -  Sandy, Utah                          $38,800

The two ATMS in the attempted jackpotting events in Salt Lake City contained $75,000 and $33,200.  It appears these attempts were thwarted by an alarm that sounded at one ATM and the arrival of a bank customer at the other.    

Starlin Garcia Caraballo, age 40, pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit bank theft charged in the Washington indictment and conspiracy to commit computer fraud and abuse from the Utah indictment.  He has been sentenced to one year in federal prison.   

Joao Silva Robertson, age 29, and Pedro Rivero Velazquez, age 39, have pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit bank theft charged in a superseding indictment returned in the Western District of Washington and one count of conspiracy to commit computer fraud and abuse charged in the Utah indictment.  Sentencing for Velazquez will be May 13.  Robertson will be sentenced May 20, 2018.  Both plea agreements include a stipulated 30-month sentence, subject to the approval of the court.

Jean Carlos Dumont Gonzales pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit computer fraud and abuse in early March and is scheduled to be sentenced May 21, 2019.  His plea agreement includes a stipulation to a sentencing range of 12 to 30 months, subject to the approval of the court.

A change of plea hearing has been set for June 4, 2019, for Carlos Eduardo Goncalves Duran, age 33.

A federal arrest warrant is pending for Luis Mendez Mata, age. 43, who is alleged to have been part of the conspiracy to install malicious software that would allow them to direct the ATMs to dispense cash from the financial institutions.

Perez Rivas still faces charges in Washington.

Defendants convicted in the case will be jointly responsible for paying $306,200 in restitution to victim banks.

All seven defendants in the case are Venezuelan nationals.

The U.S. Attorney’s Office in Salt Lake City is prosecuting the case.  FBI Special agents are investigating the case.

Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1O7cmnrHC5s6Fnnm5ByYEWKroNa5TdFInd9g97XhSRQ8
  Last Updated: 2025-03-08 10:06:57 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: Case type associated with a magistrate case if the current case was merged from a magistrate case
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The docket number originally given to a case assigned to a magistrate judge and subsequently merged into a criminal case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a magistrate case
Format: A3

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the second highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE2
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE2
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the third highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE3
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE3
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
Magistrate Docket Number:   D-UT  2:18-mj-00133
Case Name:   USA v. Perez-Rivas et al
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: Case type associated with a magistrate case if the current case was merged from a magistrate case
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The docket number originally given to a case assigned to a magistrate judge and subsequently merged into a criminal case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a magistrate case
Format: A3

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the second highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE2
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE2
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the third highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE3
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE3
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
F U C K I N G P E D O S R E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E